An Adjuvant-Free Mouse Model Using Skin Sensitization Without Tape-Stripping Followed by Oral Elicitation of Anaphylaxis: A Novel Pre-Clinical Tool for Testing Intrinsic Wheat Allergenicity

Chronic application of alcohol-soluble gluten extract over undamaged skin causes clinical sensitization for life-threatening anaphylaxis via activation of systemic Th2 immune responses in mice

Introduction

Gluten allergy is a major public health problem that is growing at an alarming rate. Specific mechanisms underlying sensitization to gluten remain incompletely understood. Currently, it is unclear whether chronic exposure to alcohol-soluble gluten extract via undamaged skin has the capacity to clinically sensitize mice for life-threatening anaphylaxis. Using an adjuvant-free mouse model, here we tested the hypothesis that chronic application of alcohol-soluble durum gluten (ASDG) extract will clinically sensitize mice for life-threatening anaphylaxis.

Methods

This study was conducted in a gluten-free Balb/c mouse colony that was established and maintained on a plant protein-free diet. Groups of adult female mice were exposed dermally to ASDG extract or vehicle once a week for 9-weeks. Specific (s) and total (t) IgE levels were quantified. Mice were challenged systemically with ASDG to measure symptoms of systemic anaphylaxis. Hypothermic shock response (HSR) and mucosal mast cell degranulation response (MMCR) were determined upon challenge. Spleen Th1, Th2, and other immune markers were quantified.

Results

We found that chronic exposure to ASDG elicited robust elevation of sIgE and tIgE. Systemic challenge with ASDG, but not vehicle, elicited life-threatening anaphylaxis associated with dramatic HSR and MMCR. Correlation analysis demonstrated direct positive inter-relationships among IgE, HSR, and MMCR. Anaphylaxis was associated with significant elevation of prototypic Th2 but not Th1 immune markers in the spleen.

Discussion/Conclusion

Our study collectively demonstrates that ASDG is intrinsically allergenic; and chronic exposure to ASDG via undamaged skin can clinically sensitize mice for life-threatening anaphylaxis via activating the systemic Th2 immune responses.

Clinical profiles of patients with wheat-induced anaphylaxis at various ages of onset

Background

Wheat-induced anaphylaxis (WIA) is a serious and potentially life-threatening wheat allergy, more common in adults than in children. Little is known about the differences in clinical profiles in WIA among patients of various ages in China.

Methods

We analyzed data retrospectively from an allergy department in a tertiary hospital that included 248 patients (208 adults and 40 children and adolescents) with a history of WIA.

Results

We found that alcohol was more frequent in patients aged ≥50 years [older adults] (19.0%, 4/21) than in those aged 12-17 years [adolescents] (0%, 0/33; p = 0.019). The frequency of NSAID use in older adults (42.9%, 9/21) was significantly higher than that in adolescents (0%, 0/33; p < 0.001), and patients aged 18-49 years [young adults] (2.8%, 5/178; p < 0.001). During WIA, cardiovascular symptoms in children were less frequent than those in other age groups (children, 28.6%; adolescents, 87.9%; young adults, 93.0%; older adults, 95.2%; p < 0.001). The consciousness loss rate in adults (both age groups; p < 0.001) and the hypotension rate in older adults (p = 0.006) were higher than those in other age groups. Compared with adults (young and older adults), children had a higher rate of allergic comorbidities (p = 0.004, 0.001, respectively) and a higher rate of other food allergies (p < 0.001, <0.001, respectively). Compared with the mild-to-moderate anaphylaxis group, the severe anaphylaxis group had a higher onset age (p = 0.001), higher cofactor prevalence (p = 0.004), lower allergic comorbidity rate (p = 0.014), and higher positive rate of specific IgE to omega-5 gliadin (ω-5 gliadin) (p = 0.023).

Conclusion

Clinical profiles of patients with WIA are different among various onset age/severity groups. An improved understanding of WIA symptoms in various age/severity groups could help accelerate diagnosis, suggest preventive measures, and contribute to improved patient care.

Intrinsic Allergenicity Potential of Salt-Soluble Protein Extracts from the Diploid, Tetraploid and Hexaploid Wheats: Validation Using an Adjuvant-Free Mouse Model

Wheat allergies are potentially life-threatening and, therefore, have become a major health concern at the global level. It is largely unknown at present whether genetic variation in allergenicity potential exists among hexaploid, tetraploid and diploid wheat species. Such information is critical in establishing a baseline allergenicity map to inform breeding efforts to identify hyper-, hypo- and non-allergenic varieties. We recently reported a novel mouse model of intrinsic allergenicity using the salt-soluble protein extract (SSPE) from durum, a tetraploid wheat (Triticum durum). Here, we validated the model for three other wheat species [hexaploid common wheat (Triticum aestivum), diploid einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum), and the ancient diploid wheat progenitor, Aegilops tauschii], and then tested the hypothesis that the SSPEs from wheat species will exhibit differences in relative allergenicities. Balb/c mice were repeatedly exposed to SSPEs via the skin. Allergic sensitization potential was assessed by specific (s) IgE antibody responses. Oral anaphylaxis was quantified by the hypothermic shock response (HSR). The mucosal mast cell response (MMCR) was determined by measuring mast cell protease in the blood. While T. monococcum elicited the least, but significant, sensitization, others were comparable. Whereas Ae. taushcii elicited the least HSR, the other three elicited much higher HSRs. Similarly, while Ae. tauschii elicited the least MMCR, the other wheats elicited much higher MMCR as well. In conclusion, this pre-clinical comparative mapping strategy may be used to identify potentially hyper-, hypo- and non-allergenic wheat varieties via crossbreeding and genetic engineering methods.

Diagnostic management of patients reporting symptoms after wheat ingestion

Many patients report symptoms after wheat ingestion experiencing a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Three possible diagnoses have been recognized: celiac disease (CD), wheat allergy (WA), and non-celiac (gluten) wheat sensitivity (NCGS/NCWS). CD is a chronic immune-mediated disease of the small bowel caused by exposure to dietary gluten in genetically predisposed individuals, with a prevalence of approximately 1%. It is characterized by mucosal inflammation and atrophy following exposure to gluten and improvement after gluten withdrawal. Food allergies are immunological responses to a food antigen. WA is the expression of an immunologically mediated process that can be immunoglobulin E (IgE) or non-IgE mediated; its many symptoms include urticaria/angioedema, asthma, rhinitis, and anaphylaxis. NCGS/NCWS is characterized by gastrointestinal and/or extra-intestinal symptoms after ingestion of gluten-containing food in subjects not affected by CD or WA. The aim of this review is to help physicians and nutritionists diagnose the cause of symptoms reported after wheat ingestion, thus avoiding patient frustration, inappropriate testing, and incorrect or missed diagnoses. An algorithm for the diagnostic approach in these patients is provided, to help to diagnose CD, WA, NCGS/NCWS or to identify possible functional disorders as the wheat-sensitive irritable bowel syndrome. A personalized approach, regular follow-up, and the help of a skilled healthcare professional are mandatory for patients with symptoms following wheat ingestion is provided. A gluten-free-diet is often recommended for patients with self-reported gluten/wheat-dependent symptoms; for patients with symptoms similar to those of functional diseases while there is evidence that a low-FODMAP diet could be the first option.