Overstretching Expectations May Endanger the Success of the “Millennium Surgery”

In vivo load on knee, hip and spine during manual materials handling with two lifting techniques

It is generally accepted that the lifting technique strongly influences physical loads within the human body and, thus, the risk of musculoskeletal disorders. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding whether particular lifting techniques are effective in reducing loads. Hence, this retrospective study quantified (partly published) in vivo loads at joints within the human body during two typical lifting techniques, stoop lifting and squat lifting. Patients who had received instrumented implants underwent in vivo load measurements at either the knee (two patients), the hip (eight patients), or the upper lumbar spine (four patients) while lifting a 10 kg weight frontally with either straight (stoop) or bent (squat) knees. Contact forces and moments and the orientation of the contact force vector were determined and examined using the paired t test of Statistical Parametric Mapping. The two lifting techniques did not differ in terms of load magnitudes but did differ in terms of directions: (i) at the hip joint, the load vector varied significantly (p < 0.05) in the frontal and sagittal planes, (ii) at the knee joint, the load vector differed significantly (p < 0.05) in the sagittal plane (iii) while the load vector and magnitude did not differ at the upper lumbar spine (p > 0.05). Our findings indicate that the lifting technique causes changes in the orientation rather than the magnitude of lower extremity joint contact loads. Even though this quantification could only be performed in a small group of patients, the quantification of the relevance of such lifting technique recommendations will hopefully guide future recommendations towards a more scientific interpretation.

Loading of the Hip and Knee During Swimming: An in Vivo Load Study

BACKGROUND

Swimming is commonly recommended as postoperative rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). So far, in vivo hip and knee joint loads during swimming remain undescribed.

METHODS

In vivo hip and knee joint loads were measured in 6 patients who underwent THA and 5 patients who underwent TKA with instrumented joint implants. Joint loads, including the resultant joint contact force (F Res ), torsional moment around the femoral shaft axis or the tibial axis (M Tors ), bending moment at the middle of the femoral neck (M Bend ), torsional moment around the femoral neck axis (M Tne ), and medial force ratio (MFR) in the knee, were measured during breaststroke swimming at 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 m/s and the breaststroke and crawl kicks at 0.5 and 1.0 m/s.

RESULTS

The ranges of the median maximal F Res were 157% to 193% of body weight for the hip and 93% to 145% of body weight for the knee during breaststroke swimming. Greater maxima of F Res (hip and knee), M Tors (hip and knee), M Bend (hip), and M Tne (hip) were observed with higher breaststroke swimming velocities, but significance was only identified between 0.5 and 0.6 m/s in F Res (p = 0.028), M Tors (p = 0.028), and M Bend (p = 0.028) and between 0.5 and 0.7 m/s in F Res (p = 0.045) in hips. No difference was found in maximal MFR between different breaststroke swimming velocities. The maximal F Res was significantly positively correlated with the breaststroke swimming velocity (hip: r = 0.541; p < 0.05; and knee: r = 0.414; p < 0.001). The maximal F Res (hip and knee) and moments (hip) were higher in the crawl kick than in the breaststroke kick, and a significant difference was recognized in F Res Max for the hip: median, 179% versus 118% of body weight (p = 0.028) for 0.5 m/s and 166% versus 133% of body weight (p = 0.028) for 1.0 m/s.

CONCLUSIONS

Swimming is a safe and low-impact activity, particularly recommended for patients who undergo THA or TKA. Hip and knee joint loads are greater with higher swimming velocities and can be influenced by swimming styles. Nevertheless, concrete suggestions to patients who undergo arthroplasty on swimming should involve individual considerations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Activity Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Which Patients Are Active, and Is Being Active Safe?

BACKGROUND

Younger and physically active patients demand a return to sport after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, because of the risk of implant wear and loosening, high-impact activities are often not recommended. The current study evaluates predictive factors and revision rates in patients with higher activity levels.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 4152 hips in 3828 patients aged 45-75 that underwent primary THA for primary osteoarthritis between 2009 and 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Pain and Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) were assessed before and 2 years after surgery. Activity was classified as low (LEAS 1-6), moderate (LEAS 7-13), or high (LEAS 14-18).

RESULTS

Pain and LEAS improved from preoperative to 2-years postoperative (p < 0.001). The activity level was low in 6.2%, moderate in 52.9%, and high in 40.9% of the patients. Younger age, lower BMI, ASA, and CCI, male sex, and higher preoperative LEAS correlated with higher activity at 2 years (p < 0.001). The predicted revision-free survival rates between the activity groups were better for more highly active patients (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High physical activity 2 years following THA, with participating in sports like jogging several times a week, did not increase the risk of revision surgery. THA patients should not be prevented from a highly active lifestyle.