Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Effect of surgical devices on the biomechanical characteristics of multi-segment implants in anterior cervical discectomy and Fusion: A finite element study

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established surgical method for restoring neurological function and reconstructing cervical curvature. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the biomechanical changes after ACDF involving multiple surgical segments. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of surgical devices, number of surgical segments and motions on the strain and stress distribution of the implants. A validated finite element cervical spine model (C2-C7) was used to develop four postoperative models involving zero-profile (ZP) devices or cage and plate (CP) constructs across two- and three-segment ACDF. We analyzed postoperative range of motion (ROM) and implant strain-stress characteristics. ZP devices yielded higher ROM values on fused segments compared to CP devices. The ZP group exhibited higher maximum strain values and predicted effective strain area (Pesa) on bone graft surfaces compared to the CP group. Similarly, maximum and average stress values were greater in the ZP group, with minimal influence from the number of surgical segments on strain and stress distributions. Two-way ANOVA showed that the type of surgical device significantly affected stress values across multiple moment sizes during extension and flexion, while the number of surgical segments was significant only under specific conditions, such as extension at 1.0 Nm and 1.5 Nm and flexion at 1.5 Nm. Our study found that increasing the number of surgical segments had little impact on implant biomechanics. ZP devices significantly increased strain and stress values on bone grafts, with higher stress and larger Pesa area at the graft-endplate interface, promoting bone growth in fused segments. In contrast, CP devices showed lower stress and strain values, warranting caution in multi-segment surgeries.

Biomechanical comparison of multiple zero-profile systems in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with zero-profile (ZP) implant is commonly used for cervical degenerative diseases, but subsidence remains a concern, particularly in osteoporosis. The two-screw ZP (TSZP), four-screw ZP (FSZP), and ROI-C implants are frequently applied, yet the biomechanical performance across varying bone qualities remains unclear.

METHODS

A finite element (FE) model of the cervical spine (C3-C7) was constructed with TSZP, FSZP, and ROI-C implants at C4/C5 to simulate normal and osteoporotic conditions. A 73.6 N load and 1 Nm torque were applied at C3 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, followed by biomechanical analysis.

RESULTS

The FSZP implant exhibited the smallest ranges of motion, followed by ROI-C, with the largest in TSZP. ROI-C showed the lowest peak implant system stresses, while TSZP had the highest on the anchoring device and FSZP on the cage. The TSZP implant had the highest cortical endplate stresses, whereas FSZP had the lowest in normal and ROI-C in osteoporosis. No significant differences were observed in adjacent intervertebral disc pressures. All parameters increased in osteoporosis, except cortical endplate stresses.

CONCLUSION

The FSZP implant provided superior stability, while ROI-C exhibited a lower risk of implant-related complications. The TSZP implant was more prone to subsidence, which may be mitigated by optimizing stress distribution and enhancing damage prevention. Biomechanical performance was poorer under osteoporotic conditions, highlighting the need for careful surgical planning.

Biomechanical Effects of Zero-P Height on Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

OBJECTIVE

The principle of selecting a Zero-P implant of an appropriate height remains a topic of debate, particularly when similarly sized implants seem to appropriately fit the intervertebral space. Thus, this study compared the biomechanical performance of smaller and larger Zero-P implants within an appropriate height range with that of oversized Zero-P implants for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the C2-C7 cervical spine was constructed and validated. The implants were categorized as smaller (6 mm), larger (7 mm), and oversized (8 mm) according to the average intervertebral height and implant specifications. Thus, the following four FE models were constructed: the intact cervical spine model (M1), the 6 mm model (M2), the 7 mm model (M3), and the 8 mm (M4) Zero-P implant C5/6 segment ACDF surgical model. Then, a pure moment of 1.0 N·m combined with a follower load of 75 N was applied at C2 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

The results indicated that the maximum stress on the vertebral body, intervertebral disc, and facet joints under self-weight increased with increasing Zero-P height. Under six different loading conditions, the maximum stress on the vertebral body in the surgical segment of the M4 model was generally greater than that in the M2 and M3 models. Following an increase in the height of the implant from 6 mm to 8 mm, the maximum stress increased, and the intervertebral disc stress of both segments reached its peak in the M4 model. In the M4 model, the implant experienced the highest stress, whereas the M2 model exhibited the lowest stress on the implant under both self-weight and loading conditions. Furthermore, the stress on the posterior facet joints of the surgical segment increased with increasing Zero-P height. The range of maximum stress on the posterior facet joints for the M3 model was situated between that of the M2 and M4 models.

CONCLUSION

In summary, after determining the appropriate height range for the implant in accordance with the mean height of the intervertebral space, opting for a larger size appears to be more advantageous. This approach helps maintain the height of the intervertebral space and provides greater stress, promoting a tighter fit between the upper and lower endplates and the Zero-P. This tighter fit is crucial for maintaining spinal stability, enhancing the early bony fusion rate, and potentially leading to better postoperative outcomes.

Influence of Cervical Level Fused on Subsidence of Cage and Allograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the cervical levels fused and the degree of subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures.

BACKGROUND

Subsidence following ACDF may worsen clinical outcomes. Previous studies have linked lower cervical levels with higher rates of subsidence, but none have quantified the relative degree of subsidence between levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF from 2016 to 2021 at a tertiary medical center were included in this study. Lateral cervical radiographs from the immediate postoperative period and the final follow-ups were used to calculate subsidence. Analysis of variance was used to examine the association between cervical levels fused and subsidence. Multivariable linear regression analysis controlled for age, sex, smoking status, osteopenia/osteoporosis, number of fused levels, cage-to-body ratio, and cage type while examining the relationship between the cervical level fused and subsidence.

RESULTS

This study includes 122 patients who underwent 227 levels fused. There were 16 (7.0%) C3-C4 fusions, 55 (24.2%) C4-C5 fusions, 97 (42.7%) C5-C6 fusions, and 59 (26.0%) C6-C7 fusions. There was a significant difference in the degree of anterior subsidence between cervical levels fused ( P = 0.013) with a mean subsidence of 1.0 mm (SD: 1.6) for C3-C4, 1.1 mm (SD: 1.4) for C4-C5, 1.8 mm (SD: 1.5) for C5-C6, and 1.8 mm (SD: 1.6) for C6-C7 fusions. Relative to C6-C7 fusions, C4-C5 ( P = 0.016), and C3-C4 ( P = 0.014) fusions were associated with decreased anterior subsidence, whereas C5-C6 ( P = 0.756) fusions were found to have similar degrees of anterior subsidence in the multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

We found upper cervical levels experienced a smaller degree of anterior subsidence than lower levels, after controlling for demographic and implant characteristics. Surgeons can consider using larger cages at lower cervical levels to minimize these risks.

Biomechanical Changes in Kyphotic Cervical Spine After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Different Degrees of Correction

Cervical kyphosis is a debilitating disease, and its surgical treatment involves correction to restore sagittal alignment. Few studies have explored the appropriate degree of correction, and the biomechanical impact of correction on the cervical spine is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical changes in the cervical spine after different degrees of correction by two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of the intact cervical spine (C2-C7) with normal physiological lordosis and kyphosis were constructed. Based on the kyphotic model, three two-level ACDF in C4-6 surgical models were developed: (1) non-correction: only the intervertebral heights were restored; (2) partial correction: the cervical curvature was adjusted to straighten; (3) complete correction: the cervical curvature was adjusted to physiological lordosis. A pure moment of 1.0 Nm combined with a follower load of 73.6 N was applied to the C2 vertebra to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The stress of vertical bodies and facet joints, intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the overall ROMs of all models were computed. The peak von Mises stress on the upper (C4) and lower (C6) instrumented vertebral bodies in the kyphotic model was greater than that of the physiological lordosis model, with the exception of C6 under lateral bending. The maximum stress was observed in C4 during lateral bending after complete correction, which increased by 145% compared to preoperative von Mises stress. For the middle (C5) instrumented vertebral body, the peak von Mises stress increased after surgery. The maximum stress was observed in partial correction during flexion. Compared to physiological lordosis, the peak von Mises stress on the facet joints in kyphotic segments was lower; however, it was higher in the adjacent segments, except C4/5 in extension. The stress on the facet joints in kyphotic segments decreased, with the most significant decrease observed in partial correction. The IDPs in adjacent segments, except for C6/7 in flexion, showed no significant difference before and after surgery. Additionally, correction seemed to have little impact on IDPs in adjacent segments. In conclusion, for the treatment of cervical kyphosis with two-level ACDF, complete correction resulted in the highest peak von Mises stress on the upper instrumented vertebral body. Partial correction mitigated von Mises stress within the facet joints in kyphotic segments, albeit at the expense of high von Mises stress on the middle instrumented vertebral body.

How Does the Stress in the Fixation Device Change during Different Stages of Bone Healing in the Treatment of Fractures? A Finite Element Study of External Fixation for Tibial Fractures

BACKGROUND

Although the specific relationship between the stress changes in the external fixator during tibial fracture treatment and the bone healing process remains unclear, it is believed that stress variations in the external fixator scaffold can, to a certain extent, reflect the progress of tibial healing.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to propose a non-invasive method for assessing the degree of fracture healing by monitoring the changes in stress transmission, the locations of stress-sensitive points, and displacement in the external fixator-tibia system during the healing process of tibial fractures.

METHODS

In this study, finite element models of tibial fractures at various healing stages were developed. Physiological conditions, including axial, torsional, and bending loads on the tibia, were simulated to evaluate stress and strain within the external scaffold-tibia system under normal physiological loading conditions.

RESULTS

The results indicate variations in the stress distribution between the external fixator and the tibia during different stages of healing. In the early phase of fracture healing, the external fixator plays a crucial role as the primary load-bearing unit under all three loading conditions. As the fracture healing progresses, the stress on the tibia gradually increases, concentrating on the medial part of the tibia under axial and torsional loading, and at the upper and lower ends, as well as the central part of the anterior and posterior tibia during bending loading. The stress at the callus gradually increases, while micro-movements decrease. The stress within the external bracket gradually decreases, with a tendency for the connecting rod to transfer stress towards the screws. Throughout the fracture healing process, the location of maximum stress in the external fixator remains unchanged. Under axial and torsional loading, the maximum stress is located at the intersection of the lowest screw and the bone cortex, while under bending loading, it is at the intersection of the second screw and the connecting rod.

CONCLUSION

During the bone healing process, stress is transferred between the external fixation frame and the bone. As bone healing advances, the stress on the connecting rods and screws of the external fixation frame decreases, and the amplitude of stress changes diminishes. When complete and robust fusion is achieved, stress variations stabilize, and the location of maximum stress on the external fixation frame remains unchanged. The intersections of the lowest screw and the bone cortex, as well as the second screw and the connecting rod, can serve as sensitive points for monitoring the degree of bone healing.

A comparative study of the effect of facet tropism on the index-level kinematics and biomechanics after artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) with Prestige LP, Prodisc-C vivo, and Mobi-C: a finite element study

INTRODUCTION

Artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) is a widely accepted surgical procedure in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. However, some research suggests that ACDR may redistribute more load onto the facet joints, potentially leading to postoperative axial pain in certain patients. Earlier studies have indicated that facet tropism is prevalent in the lower cervical spine and can significantly increase facet joint pressure. The present study aims to investigate the changes in the biomechanical environment of the cervical spine after ACDR using different prosthese when facet tropism is present.

METHODS

A C2-C7 cervical spine finite element model was created. Symmetrical, moderate asymmetrical (7 degrees tropism), and severe asymmetrical (14 degrees tropism) models were created at the C5/C6 level by adjusting the left-side facet. C5/C6 ACDR with Prestige LP, Prodisc-C vivo, and Mobi-C were simulated in all models. A 75 N follower load and 1 N⋅m moment was applied to initiate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, and the range of motions (ROMs), facet contact forces(FCFs), and facet capsule stress were recorded.

RESULTS

In the presence of facet tropism, all ACDR models exhibited significantly higher FCFs and facet capsule stress compared to the intact model. In the asymmetric model, FCFs on the right side were significantly increased in neutral position, extension, left bending and right rotation, and on both sides in right bending and left rotation compared to the symmetric model. All ACDR model in the presence of facet tropism, exhibited significantly higher facet capsule stresses at all positions compared to the symmetric model. The stress distribution on the facet surface and the capsule ligament in the asymmetrical models was different from that in the symmetrical model.

CONCLUSIONS

The existence of facet tropism could considerably increase FCFs and facet capsule stress after ACDR with Prestige-LP, Prodisc-C Vivo, and Mobi-C. None of the three different designs of implants were able to effectively protect the facet joints in the presence of facet tropism. Research into designing new implants may be needed to improve this situation. Clinical trials are needed to validate the impact of facet tropism.

Does Screw Number of Zero-profile Implants in Fusion Segment Influence Intervertebral Stability?

OBJECTIVE

The unclear clinical outcomes of two different zero-profile implants with different number of screws in hybrid surgery restricts the choice of patient-specific implants. This study aims to compare two different implants on its postoperative subsidence, motion stabilization and clinical outcomes. It also provides references to the most reasonable implant choice in fusion surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. From February 2014 to March 2022, 173 patients who underwent hybrid surgery were included. Among them, 122 received surgery with a four screw implant, while 51 received a two screw implant. We analyzed the significance of patient-specific factors, radiographic factors and clinical outcomes. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, t tests/analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and stepwise multivariate logistic regression were adopted for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was observed between the two screw and four screw groups in terms of immediate, middle, and long-term stability and fusion rate (p > 0.05). However, the two screws group had higher FSU height subsidence at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and higher rates of significant subsidence at three and 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). Both groups showed significant clinical improvements at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Two screw and four screw implants provide comparable stability, fusion rates and clinical outcomes. However, the two screw implant was inferior to the four screw implant in subsidence prevention. Therefore, the two-screw implant is non-inferior to the four-screw implant in most patients. It can be used as the priority choice in the fusion segment by its easy manageability. However, the patients with a high risk of subsidence such as multilevel surgery, the elderly, lower BMD, bad cervical alignment should receive a four screw implant rather than a two screw implant.

Subject-specific trunk segmental masses prediction for musculoskeletal models using artificial neural networks

Accurate determination of body segment parameters is crucial for studying human movement and joint forces using musculoskeletal (MSK) models. However, existing methods for predicting segment mass have limited generalizability and sensitivity to body shapes. With recent advancements in machine learning, this study proposed a novel artificial neural network-based method for computing subject-specific trunk segment mass and center of mass (CoM) using only anthropometric measurements. We first developed, trained, and validated two artificial neural networks that used anthropometric measurements as input to predict body shape (ANN1) and tissue mass (ANN2). Then, we calculated trunk segmental mass for two volunteers using the predicted body shape and tissue mass. The body shape model (ANN1) was tested on 279 subjects, and maximum deviation between the predicted body shape and the original was 28 mm. The tissue mass model (ANN2) was evaluated on 223 subjects, which when compared to ground truth data, had a mean error of less than 0.51% in the head, trunk, legs, and arms. We also compared the two volunteer's trunk segment mass with experimental data and found similar trend and magnitude. Our findings suggested that the proposed method could serve as an effective and convenient tool for predicting trunk mass.

Biomechanical Effects on the Prostheses and Vertebrae of Three-Level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study

PURPOSE

Three-level hybrid surgery (HS) consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been partly used for the treatment of multi-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The complications related to the implants and the collapse of the surgical vertebral bodies had been reported in multi-level anterior cervical spine surgery. Thus, this study aimed to explore the biomechanical effects on the prostheses and vertebrae in three-level HS.

METHODS

A FE model of cervical spine (C0-T1) was constructed. Five surgical models were developed. They were FAF model (ACDF-CDA-ACDF), AFA model (CDA-ACDF-CDA), FFF model (three-level ACDF), SF model (single-level ACDF), and SA model (single-level CDA). A 75-N follower load and 1.0-N·m moment was applied to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact model, the range of motion (ROM) of total cervical spine in FAF model decreased by 34.54%, 54.48%, 31.76%, and 27.14%, respectively, in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, which were lower than those in FFF model and higher than those in AFA model. The ROMs of CDA segments in FAF and AFA models were similar to the intact model and SA model. Compared with the intact model, the ROMs at C3/4 segment in FFF model increased from 5.71% to 7.85%, and increased from 5.31% to 6.81% at C7/T1 segment, following by FAF model, then the FAF model. The maximum interface pressures of the Prestige-LP in FAF model were similar to SA model, however the corresponding values were increased in AFA model. The maximum interface pressures of the Zero-P were increased in FAF and AFA model compared with those in SF and FFF models. The stress was mainly distributed on the screws. In AFA model, the maximum pressures of the ball and trough articulation in superior and inferior Prestige-LP were all increased compared with those in SA and FAF model. In FFF model, the maximum pressures of the vertebrae were higher than those in other models. The stress was mainly distributed on the anterior area of the vertebral bodies.

CONCLUSIONS

HS seemed to be more suitable than ACDF for the surgical treatment of three-level CDDD in consideration of the biomechanical effects, especially for the two-level CDA and one-level ACDF construct. But a more appropriate CDA prosthesis should be explored in the future.

The Evidence for the Use of Osteobiologics in Hybrid Constructs (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Total Disc Replacement) in Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the clinical evidence for the use of osteobiologics in hybrid surgery (combined anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and total disc replacement (TDR)) in patients with multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD).

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched between January 2000 and August 2020. Clinical studies investigating 18-80 year old patients with multilevel cervical DDD who underwent hybrid surgery with or without the use of osteobiologics were considered eligible. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed the identified articles. The methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool and the risk of bias (RoB 2.0) assessment tool were used to assess risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to evaluate quality of evidence across studies per outcome.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included. A decrease in cervical range of motion was observed in most studies for both the hybrid surgery and the control groups consisting of stand-alone ACDF or TDR. Fusion rates of 70-100% were reported in both the hybrid surgery and control groups consisting of stand-alone ACDF. The hybrid surgery group performed better or comparable to the control group in terms of adjacent segment degeneration. Studies reported an improvement in visual analogue scale for pain and neck disability index values after surgery compared to preoperative scores for both treatment groups. The included studies had moderate methodological quality.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence for assessing the use of osteobiologics in multilevel hybrid surgery and additional high quality and controlled research is deemed essential.

Biomechanical evaluation of the novel assembled internal fixed system in C2-C3 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

To analyze and compare the biomechanical characteristics of the new combined cervical fusion device (NCCFD) and the traditional cage-plate construct (CPC) to ascertain its effectiveness in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using finite element analysis.

METHODS

A finite element model of the cervical spine, inclusive of the occipital bone was created and validated. In the ACDF model, either CPC or NCCFD was implanted at the C2-C3 segment of the model. A pure moment of 1.0 Nm combined with a follower load of 50 N was directed onto the superior surfaces of the occipital bone to determine flexion, extension, lateral bending (left and right), and axial rotation (left and right). The range of motion (ROM), stress distribution at the bone-implant interface, and facet joint forces were investigated and compared between CPC and NCCFD systems.

RESULT

The results showed that the ROMs of the fused levels in both models were nearly zero, and the motions of the unfused segments were similar. In addition, the maximum displacement exhibited nearly identical values for both models. The maximum stress of NCCFD screws in lateral bending and rotational conditions is significantly higher than that of the CPC, while the NCCFD model's maximum stress remains within an acceptable range. Comparing the maximum fusion stress, it was found that the CPC experiences much lower fusion stress in anterior flexion and extension than the NCCFD, with no significant difference between the two in lateral bending and rotational states. Stress on the cage was mainly concentrated on both sides of the wings. Comparing the maximum IDP in the CPC and NCCFD, it was observed that maximum stresses rise in extension and lateral bending for both models. Lastly, stress distributions of the facet joints were generally similar across the two devices.

CONCLUSION

NCCFD not only provides the same level of biomechanical stability as CPC but also avoids postoperative complications associated with uneven force damage to the implant. The device offers a novel surgical alternative for ACDF in C2-C3 level.

Biomechanical study of anterior transpedicular root screw intervertebral fusion system of lower cervical spine: a finite element analysis

Background: The cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation technology can provide adequate stability for cervical three-column injuries. However, its high risk of screw insertion and technical complexity have restricted its widespread clinical application. As an improvement over the ATPS technology, the cervical anterior transpedicular root screw (ATPRS) technology has been introduced to reduce the risk associated with screw insertion. This study aims to use finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of a cervical spine model after using the novel ATPRS intervertebral fusion system, providing insights into its application and potential refinement. Methods: A finite element (FE) model of the C3-C7 lower cervical spine was established and validated. After two-level (C4-C6) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery, FE models were constructed for the anterior cervical locked-plate (ACLP) internal fixation, the ATPS internal fixation, and the novel ATPRS intervertebral fusion system. These models were subjected to 75N axial force and 1.0 Nm to induce various movements. The range of motion (ROM) of the surgical segments (C4-C6), maximum stress on the internal fixation systems, and maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs were tested and recorded. Results: All three internal fixation methods effectively reduced the ROM of the surgical segments. The ATPRS model demonstrated the smallest ROM during flexion, extension, and rotation, but a slightly larger ROM during lateral bending. Additionally, the maximum bone-screw interface stresses for the ATPRS model during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were 32.69, 64.24, 44.07, 35.89 MPa, which were lower than those of the ACLP and ATPS models. Similarly, the maximum stresses on the adjacent intervertebral discs in the ATPRS model during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation consistently remained lower than those in the ACLP and ATPS models. However, the maximum stresses on the cage and the upper endplate of the ATPRS model were generally higher. Conclusion: Although the novel ATPRS intervertebral fusion system generally had greater endplate stress than ACLP and ATPS, it can better stabilize cervical three-column injuries and might reduce the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Furthermore, further studies and improvements are necessary for the ATPRS intervertebral fusion system.

Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: A finite element analysis

In recent years, artificial cervical discs have been used in intervertebral disc replacement surgery and hybrid surgery (HS). The advantages and disadvantages of different artificial cervical discs in artificial cervical disc replacement surgery have been compared. However, few scholars have studied the biomechanical effects of various artificial disc prostheses on the human cervical spine in HS which include the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA). This study compared the biomechanical behavior of Mobi-C and Prestige LP in the operative and adjacent segments during two-level hybrid surgery. A three-dimensional finite element model of C2-C7 was first established and validated. Subsequently, clinical surgery was then simulated to establish a surgical model of anterior cervical fusion at the C4-C5 level. Mobi-C and Prestige-LP artificial disc prostheses were implanted at the C5-C6 level to create two hybrid models. All finite element models were fixed on the lower endplate of the C7 vertebra and subjected to a load of 73.6 N and different directions of 1 Nm torque on the odontoid process of the C2 vertebra to simulate human flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. This paper compares the ROM, intervertebral pressure, and facet joint force after hybrid surgery with the intact model. The results show that compared with Prestige LP, Mobi-C can improve ROM of the replacement segment and compensate for the intervertebral pressure of the adjacent segment more effectively, but the facet joint pressure of the replacement segment may be higher.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel individualized zero-profile cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for treating symptomatic cervical degenerative disease. The cage and plate constructs (CPCs) are widely employed in ACDF to maintain spinal stability and to provide immediate support. However, several instrument-related complications such as dysphagia, cage subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration have been reported in the previous literature. This study aimed to design a novel individualized zero-profile (NIZP) cage and evaluate its potential to enhance the biomechanical performance between the instrument and the cervical spine. Methods: The intact finite element models of C3-C7 were constructed and validated. A NIZP cage was designed based on the anatomical parameters of the subject's C5/6. The ACDF procedure was simulated and the CPCs and NIZP cage were implanted separately. The range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and peak von Mises stresses of annulus fibrosus were compared between the two surgical models after ACDF under four motion conditions. Additionally, the biomechanical performance of the CPCs and NIZP cage were evaluated. Results: Compared with the intact model, the ROM of the surgical segment was significantly decreased for both surgical models under four motion conditions. Additionally, there was an increase in IDP and peak von Mises stress of annulus fibrosus in the adjacent segment. The NIZP cage had a more subtle impact on postoperative IDP and peak von Mises stress of annulus fibrosus in adjacent segments compared to CPCs. Meanwhile, the peak von Mises stresses of the NIZP cage were reduced by 90.0-120.0 MPa, and the average von Mises stresses were reduced by 12.61-17.56 MPa under different motion conditions. Regarding the fixation screws, the peak von Mises stresses in the screws of the NIZP cage increased by 10.0-40.0 MPa and the average von Mises stresses increased by 2.37-10.10 MPa. Conclusion: The NIZP cage could effectively reconstruct spinal stability in ACDF procedure by finite element study. Compared with the CPCs, the NIZP cage had better biomechanical performance, with a lower stress distribution on the cage and a more moderate effect on the adjacent segmental discs. Therefore, the NIZP cage could prevent postoperative dysphagia as well as decrease the risk of subsidence and adjacent disc degeneration following ACDF. In addition, this study could serve as a valuable reference for the development of personalized instruments.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed Using a CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 Bioactive Glass Ceramic or Polyetheretherketone Cage Filled with Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

A CaO-SiO₂-P₂O₅-B₂O₃ bioactive glass-ceramic (BGS-7) spacer provides high mechanical stability, produces a chemical bond to the adjacent endplate, and facilitates fusion after spine surgery. This prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial aimed to evaluate the radiographic outcomes and clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a BGS-7 spacer for treating cervical degenerative disorders. Thirty-six patients underwent ACDF using a BGS-7 spacer (Group N), and 40 patients underwent ACDF using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages filled with a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disorders. The spinal fusion rate was assessed 12 months postoperatively using three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and dynamic radiographs. Clinical outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures, visual analog scale scores for neck and arm pain, and scores from the neck disability index (NDI), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12v2). All participants were randomly assigned to undergo ACDF using either a BGS-7 spacer or PEEK cage filled with HA and β-TCP. The primary outcome was the fusion rate on CT scan image at 12 months after ACDF surgery based on a per-protocol strategy. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were also assessed. The 12-month fusion rates for the BGS-7 and PEEK groups based on CT scans were 81.8% and 74.4%, respectively, while those based on dynamic radiographs were 78.1% and 73.7%, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Neck pain, arm pain, NDI, EQ-5D, and SF-12v2 scores significantly improved postoperatively, with no significant differences between the groups. No adverse events were observed in either group. In ACDF surgery, the BGS-7 spacer showed similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes as PEEK cages filled with HA and β-TCP.

Biomechanical performance of the novel assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element analysis

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely accepted as the gold standard surgical procedure for treating cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. However, there is concern about the low fusion rate in the early period after ACDF surgery using the Zero-P fusion cage. We creatively designed an assembled uncoupled joint fusion device to improve the fusion rate and solve the implantation difficulties. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical performance of the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level ACDF and compare it with the Zero-P device.

Methods: A three-dimensional finite element (FE) of a healthy cervical spine (C2−C7) was constructed and validated. In the one-level surgery model, either an assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage or a zero-profile device was implanted at the C5–C6 segment of the model. A pure moment of 1.0 Nm combined with a follower load of 75 N was imposed at C2 to determine flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The segmental range of motion (ROM), facet contact force (FCF), maximum intradiscal pressure (IDP), and screw−bone stress were determined and compared with those of the zero-profile device.

Results: The results showed that the ROMs of the fused levels in both models were nearly zero, while the motions of the unfused segments were unevenly increased. The FCF at adjacent segments in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group was less than that that of the Zero-P group. The IDP at the adjacent segments and screw–bone stress were slightly higher in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group than in those of the Zero-P group. Stress on the cage was mainly concentrated on both sides of the wings, reaching 13.4–20.4 Mpa in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group.

Conclusion: The assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage provided strong immobilization, similar to the Zero-P device. When compared with the Zero-P group, the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage achieved similar resultant values regarding FCF, IDP, and screw–bone stress. Moreover, the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage effectively achieved early bone formation and fusion, probably due to proper stress distributions in the wings of both sides.

Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes

Background: Prosthetic reconstruction after type I + II+ III internal hemipelvectomy remains challenging due to the lack of osseointegration and presence of giant shear force at the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the novel 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis with pedicle screw-rod system and sacral tray using finite element analysis. Methods: Four models that included one intact pelvis were established for validation. Forces of 500 N and 2,000 N were applied, respectively, to simulate static bipedal standing and the most loaded condition during a gait cycle. Biomechanical analysis was performed, and the results were compared; the preliminary outcomes of four patients were recorded. Results: For the reconstructed hemipelvis, stress was mainly concentrated on the sacral screws, bone-prosthesis interface, and upper endplate of the L5 vertebra. The optimization of the design with the sacral tray structure could decrease the peak stress of the sacral screws by 18.6%, while the maximal stress of the prosthesis increased by 60.7%. The addition of the lumbosacral pedicle-rod system further alleviated stress of the sacral screws and prosthesis by 30.2% and 19.4%, respectively. The site of peak stress was contemporaneously transferred to the connecting rods within an elastic range. In the retrospective clinical study, four patients who had undergone prosthetic reconstruction were included. During a follow-up of 16.6 ± 7.5 months, the walking ability was found preserved in all patients who are still alive and no prosthesis-related complications had occurred except for one hip dislocation. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was found to be 19.5 ± 2.9. Conclusion: The novel reconstructive system yielded favorable biomechanical characteristics and demonstrated promising preliminary outcomes. The method can be used as a reference for reconstruction after type I + II + III hemipelvectomy.

Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

BACKGROUND

The retrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) by evaluating clinical and radiologic outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed 151 patients to assess the effects of treatment for one or two levels localized OPLL. Perioperative parameters, such as blood loss, operation time and complications, were recorded. Radiologic outcomes, such as the occupying ratio (OR), fusion status, cervical lordosis angle, segmental angle, disc space height, T1 slope, and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), were assessed. Clinical indices, such as the JOA scores and VAS scores, were investigated to compare the two surgical options.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the JOA scores or VAS scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). The operation time, volume of blood loss and incidence of dysphagia were significantly less in the ACDF group than in the ACCF group (p < 0.05). In addition, cervical lordosis, segmental angle and disc space height were significantly different from their preoperative evaluations. No adjacent segment degenerated in the ACDF group. The subsidence rates of implants were 5.2% in the ACDF group and 28.4% in the ACCF group. The degeneration of the ACCF group was 4.1%. The incidence of CSF leaks was 7.8% in the ACDF group and 13.5% in the ACCF group. All the patients ultimately achieved successful fusion.

CONCLUSION

Although both options achieved satisfactory primary clinical and radiographic efficacies, ACDF was associated with a shorter surgical procedure, less intraoperative blood loss, better radiologic outcomes, and lower incidence of dysphagia than ACCF.

Changes in cervical alignment of Zero-profile device versus conventional cage-plate construct after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely accepted as a gold standard for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, there was insufficient evidence to compare the changes in the cervical alignment with different fusion devices in a long follow-up period. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the radiologic outcomes and loss of correction (LOC) in cervical alignment of Zero-profile (ZP) device versus cage-plate (CP) construct for the treatment of CSM.

METHODS

Retrospective and prospective studies directly comparing the outcomes between the ZP device and CP construct in ACDF were included. Data extraction was conducted and study quality was assessed independently. A meta-analysis was carried out by using fixed effects and random effects models to calculate the odds ratio and mean difference in the ZP group and the CP group.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials with a total of 1067 participants were identified. ZP group had a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia at the 2- or 3-month and 6-month follow-up than CP group, and ZP group was associated with a decreased ASD rate at the last follow-up when compared with the CP group. The pooled data of radiologic outcomes revealed that there was no significant difference in postoperative and last follow-up IDH. However, postoperative and last follow-up cervical Cobb angle was significantly smaller in the ZP group when compared with the CP group. In subgroup analyses, when the length of the last follow-up was less than 3 years, there was no difference between two groups. However, as the last follow-up time increased, cervical Cobb angle was significantly lower in the ZP group when compared with the CP group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our analysis, the application of ZP device in ACDF had a lower rate of postoperative dysphagia and ASD than CP construct. Both devices were safe in anterior cervical surgeries, and they had similar efficacy in correcting radiologic outcomes. However, as the last follow-up time increased, ZP group showed greater changes cervical alignment. In order to clarify the specific significance of LOC, additional large clinical studies with longer follow-up period are required.