Legal issues and underexplored data protection in medical 3D printing: A scoping review

Role of 3D printing in healthcare: A comprehensive review on treatment and training

Additive manufacturing (AM) is revolutionizing healthcare by enabling the creation of customized 3D printed (3DP) medical equipment, implants, orthoses, prosthetics, drugs, and organs. With the availability of different types of materials suitable for 3DP and healthcare applications, this technology allows for the precise fabrication of patient-oriented prosthetics, dental implants, and orthopedic devices, significantly improving fit and functionality. Additionally, 3DP drugs, such as Oral Dispersible Formulations (ODFs) and polypills, are surpassing the traditional "one pill fits all" concept, offering more tailored medication solutions. This innovation also supports the development of personalized medications and bioprinted tissues, opening the way for advancements in regenerative medications and tailored therapies. 3D-bioprinted organs are addressing the growing demand for organ transplants. In surgical planning, 3D-printed anatomical models provide students and professionals with hands-on practice, which is crucial for skill development and understanding complex anatomies. Surgeons can also practice and refine techniques before actual procedures, enhancing precision and improving outcomes during real operations. This paper focus on highlighting the progression and motivations behind the cross-disciplinary applications of AM within the healthcare sector providing customized medical devices, drug delivery systems and diagnostic tools for personalized treatment and skill refinement. This paper is designed for a broad audience, including manufacturing professionals and researchers, who are interested in exploring the medical implications of this transformative technology.

Clinical applications of 3D printing in spine surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review is to present a comprehensive summary of existing research on the use of 3D printing in spinal surgery.

METHODS

The researchers conducted a thorough search of four digital databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase) to identify relevant studies published between January 1999 and December 2022. The review focused on various aspects, including the types of objects printed, clinical applications, clinical outcomes, time and cost considerations, 3D printing materials, location of 3D printing, and technologies utilized. Out of the 1620 studies initially identified and the 17 added by manual search, 105 met the inclusion criteria for this review, collectively involving 2088 patients whose surgeries involved 3D printed objects.

RESULTS

The studies presented a variety of 3D printed devices, such as anatomical models, intraoperative navigational templates, and customized implants. The most widely used type of objects are drill guides (53%) and anatomical models (25%) which can also be used for simulating the surgery. Custom made implants are much less frequently used (16% of papers). These devices significantly improved clinical outcomes, particularly enhancing the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Most studies (88%) reported reduced operation times, although two noted longer times due to procedural complexities. A variety of 3DP technologies and materials were used, with STL, FDM, and SLS common for models and guides, and titanium for implants via EBM, SLM, and DMLS. Materialise software (Mimics, 3-Matic, Magics) was frequently utilized. While most studies mentioned outsourced production, in-house printing was implied in several cases, indicating a trend towards localized 3D printing in spine surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

3D printing in spine surgery, a rapidly growing area of research, is predominantly used for creating drill guides for screw insertion, anatomical models, and innovative implants, enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing operative time. While cost-efficiency remains uncertain due to insufficient data, some 3D printing applications, like pedicle screw drill guides, are already widely accepted and routinely used in hospitals.

Materials for 3D printing in healthcare sector: A review

Additive Manufacturing (AM) encompasses various techniques creating intricate components from digital models. The aim of incorporating 3D printing (3DP) in the healthcare sector is to transform patient care by providing personalized solutions, improving medical procedures, fostering research and development, and ultimately optimizing the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare delivery. This review delves into the historical beginnings of AM's 9 integration into medical contexts exploring various categories of AM methodologies and their roles within the medical sector. This survey also dives into the issue of material requirements and challenges specific to AM's medical applications. Emphasis is placed on how AM processes directly enhance human well-being. The primary focus of this paper is to highlight the evolution and incentives for cross-disciplinary AM applications, particularly in the realm of healthcare by considering their principle, materials and applications. It is designed for a diverse audience, including manufacturing professionals and researchers, seeking insights into this transformative technology's medical dimensions.

Core Legal Challenges for Medical 3D Printing in the EU

3D printing has been adopted into routine use for certain medical applications, but more widespread usage has been hindered by, among other things, unclear legislation. We performed an analysis, using legal doctrinal study and legal informatics, of relevant EU legislation and case law in four issues relevant to medical 3D printing (excluding bioprinting or pharmacoprinting): pre-market approval, post-market liability, intellectual property rights, and data protection. Several gaps and uncertainties in the current legislation and interpretations were identified. In particular, we regard the current EU regulatory framework to be quite limiting and inflexible, exemplifying a cautionary approach common in EU law. Though the need to establish high safety standards in order to protect patients as a disadvantaged population is understood, both legal uncertainties and overregulation are seen as harmful to innovation. Hence, more adaptive legislation is called for to ensure continuous innovation efforts and enhanced patient outcomes.

Low temperature vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization of 3D printed devices

BACKGROUND

Low temperature vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization (VH2O2) is used in hospitals today to sterilize reusable medical devices. VH2O2 sterilized 3D printed materials were evaluated for sterilization, biocompatibility and material compatibility.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Test articles were printed at Formlabs with BioMed Clear™ and BioMed Amber™, and at Stratasys with MED610™, MED615™ and MED620™. Sterilization, biocompatibility and material compatibility studies with 3D printed materials were conducted after VH2O2 sterilization in V-PRO™ Sterilizers. The overkill method was used to evaluate sterilization in a ½ cycle. Biocompatibility testing evaluated the processed materials as limited contact (< 24-hours) surface or externally communicating devices. Material compatibility after VH2O2 sterilization (material strength and dimensionality) was evaluated via ASTM methods and dimensional analysis.

RESULTS

3D printed devices, within a specific design window, were sterile after VH2O2 ½ cycles. After multiple cycle exposure, the materials were not cytotoxic, not sensitizing, not an irritant, not a systemic toxin, not pyrogenic and were hemo-compatible. Material compatibility via ASTM testing and dimensionality evaluations did not indicate any significant changes to the 3D printed materials after VH2O2 sterilization.

CONCLUSION

Low temperature vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization is demonstrated as a suitable method to sterilize 3D printed devices. The results are a subset of the data used in a regulatory submission with the US FDA to support claims for sterilization of 3D printed devices with specified materials, printers, and device design 1.