Structural Roles for the Juxtamembrane Linker Region and Transmembrane Region of Synaptobrevin 2 in Membrane Fusion

A lever hypothesis for Synaptotagmin-1 action in neurotransmitter release

Neurotransmitter release is triggered in microseconds by Ca2+-binding to the Synaptotagmin-1 C2-domains and by SNARE complexes that form four-helix bundles between synaptic vesicles and plasma membranes, but the coupling mechanism between Ca2+-sensing and membrane fusion is unknown. Release requires extension of SNARE helices into juxtamembrane linkers that precede transmembrane regions (linker zippering) and binding of the Synaptotagmin-1 C2B domain to SNARE complexes through a "primary interface" comprising two regions (I and II). The Synaptotagmin-1 Ca2+-binding loops were believed to accelerate membrane fusion by inducing membrane curvature, perturbing lipid bilayers, or helping bridge the membranes, but SNARE complex binding through the primary interface orients the Ca2+-binding loops away from the fusion site, hindering these putative activities. To clarify this paradox, we have used NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. NMR experiments reveal that binding of C2B domain arginines to SNARE acidic residues at region II remains after disruption of region I, and that a mutation that impairs spontaneous and Ca2+-triggered neurotransmitter release enhances binding through region I. Moreover, fluorescence assays show that Ca2+ does not induce dissociation of Synaptotagmin-1 from membrane-anchored SNARE complex but causes reorientation of the C2B domain. Based on these results and electrophysiological data described by Toulme et al. (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2409636121), we propose that upon Ca2+ binding the Synaptotagmin-1 C2B domain reorients on the membrane and dissociates from the SNAREs at region I but not region II, acting remotely as a lever that pulls the SNARE complex and facilitates linker zippering or other SNARE structural changes required for fast membrane fusion.

After their membrane assembly, Sec18 (NSF) and Sec17 (SNAP) promote membrane fusion

The energy that drives membrane fusion can come from either complete SNARE zippering, from Sec17 and Sec18, or both. Sec17 and Sec18 initially form a complex which binds membranes. Sec17, Sec18, and the apolarity of a loop on the N-domain of Sec17 are required for their interdependent membrane association. To determine whether Sec18 and the Sec17 loop apolarity are still required for fusion after their membrane arrival, a hydrophobic transmembrane (TM) anchor was affixed to the N-terminus of Sec17, forming TM-Sec17. Fusion without energy from complete SNARE zippering requires Sec18 as well as either Sec17 or TM-Sec17. Even without the need for membrane targeting, the TM-Sec17 apolar loop strongly stimulates Sec17/18-driven fusion. Thus, Sec18 and the Sec17 apolar loop are first required for membrane targeting, and once bound, drive rapid fusion. Each of these variables-the absence or presence of Sec17, its N-loop apolarity, addition or omission of Sec18, and unimpeded or diminished energy from SNARE zippering-has almost no effect on the amount of trans-SNARE complex, but instead regulates the capacity of docked membranes to fuse.

Neurotransmitter release is triggered by a calcium-induced rearrangement in the Synaptotagmin-1/SNARE complex primary interface

The Ca2+ sensor synaptotagmin-1 (Syt1) triggers neurotransmitter release together with the neuronal sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex formed by syntaxin-1, SNAP25, and synaptobrevin. Moreover, Syt1 increases synaptic vesicle (SV) priming and impairs spontaneous vesicle release. The Syt1 C2B domain binds to the SNARE complex through a primary interface via two regions (I and II), but how exactly this interface mediates distinct functions of Syt1 and the mechanism underlying Ca2+ triggering of release are unknown. Using mutagenesis and electrophysiological experiments, we show that region II is functionally and spatially subdivided: Binding of C2B domain arginines to SNAP-25 acidic residues at one face of region II is crucial for Ca2+-evoked release but not for vesicle priming or clamping of spontaneous release, whereas other SNAP-25 and syntaxin-1 acidic residues at the other face mediate priming and clamping of spontaneous release but not evoked release. Mutations that disrupt region I impair the priming and clamping functions of Syt1 while, strikingly, mutations that enhance binding through this region increase vesicle priming and clamping of spontaneous release, but strongly inhibit evoked release and vesicle fusogenicity. These results support previous findings that the primary interface mediates the functions of Syt1 in vesicle priming and clamping of spontaneous release and, importantly, show that Ca2+ triggering of release requires a rearrangement of the primary interface involving dissociation of region I, while region II remains bound. Together with biophysical studies presented in [K. Jaczynska et al., bioRxiv [Preprint] (2024). https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.17.599417 (Accessed 18 June 2024)], our data suggest a model whereby this rearrangement pulls the SNARE complex to facilitate fast SV fusion.

Neurotransmitter release is triggered by a calcium-induced rearrangement in the Synaptotagmin-1/SNARE complex primary interface

The Ca2+ sensor synaptotagmin-1 triggers neurotransmitter release together with the neuronal SNARE complex formed by syntaxin-1, SNAP25 and synaptobrevin. Moreover, synaptotagmin-1 increases synaptic vesicle priming and impairs spontaneous vesicle release. The synaptotagmin-1 C2B domain binds to the SNARE complex through a primary interface via two regions (I and II), but how exactly this interface mediates distinct functions of synaptotagmin-1, and the mechanism underlying Ca2+-triggering of release is unknown. Using mutagenesis and electrophysiological experiments, we show that region II is functionally and spatially subdivided: binding of C2B domain arginines to SNAP-25 acidic residues at one face of region II is crucial for Ca2+-evoked release but not for vesicle priming or clamping of spontaneous release, whereas other SNAP-25 and syntaxin-1 acidic residues at the other face mediate priming and clamping of spontaneous release but not evoked release. Mutations that disrupt region I impair the priming and clamping functions of synaptotagmin-1 while, strikingly, mutations that enhance binding through this region increase vesicle priming and clamping of spontaneous release, but strongly inhibit evoked release and vesicle fusogenicity. These results support previous findings that the primary interface mediates the functions of synaptotagmin-1 in vesicle priming and clamping of spontaneous release, and, importantly, show that Ca2+-triggering of release requires a rearrangement of the primary interface involving dissociation of region I, while region II remains bound. Together with modeling and biophysical studies presented in the accompanying paper, our data suggest a model whereby this rearrangement pulls the SNARE complex to facilitate fast synaptic vesicle fusion.

Molecular mechanism underlying SNARE-mediated membrane fusion enlightened by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations

The SNAP receptor (SNARE) proteins syntaxin-1, SNAP-25, and synaptobrevin mediate neurotransmitter release by forming tight SNARE complexes that fuse synaptic vesicles with the plasma membranes in microseconds. Membrane fusion is generally explained by the action of proteins on macroscopic membrane properties such as curvature, elastic modulus, and tension, and a widespread model envisions that the SNARE motifs, juxtamembrane linkers, and C-terminal transmembrane regions of synaptobrevin and syntaxin-1 form continuous helices that act mechanically as semirigid rods, squeezing the membranes together as they assemble ("zipper") from the N to the C termini. However, the mechanism underlying fast SNARE-induced membrane fusion remains unknown. We have used all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to investigate this mechanism. Our results need to be interpreted with caution because of the limited number and length of the simulations, but they suggest a model of membrane fusion that has a natural physicochemical basis, emphasizes local molecular events over general membrane properties, and explains extensive experimental data. In this model, the central event that initiates fast (microsecond scale) membrane fusion occurs when the SNARE helices zipper into the juxtamembrane linkers which, together with the adjacent transmembrane regions, promote encounters of acyl chains from both bilayers at the polar interface. The resulting hydrophobic nucleus rapidly expands into stalk-like structures that gradually progress to form a fusion pore, aided by the SNARE transmembrane regions and without clearly discernible intermediates. The propensity of polyunsaturated lipids to participate in encounters that initiate fusion suggests that these lipids may be important for the high speed of neurotransmitter release.

Mechanisms of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) are a family of small conserved eukaryotic proteins that mediate membrane fusion between organelles and with the plasma membrane. SNAREs are directly or indirectly anchored to membranes. Prior to fusion, complementary SNAREs assemble between membranes with the aid of accessory proteins that provide a scaffold to initiate SNARE zippering, pulling the membranes together and mediating fusion. Recent advances have enabled the construction of detailed models describing bilayer transitions and energy barriers along the fusion pathway and have elucidated the structures of SNAREs complexed in various states with regulatory proteins. In this Review, we discuss how these advances are yielding an increasingly detailed picture of the SNARE-mediated fusion pathway, leading from first contact between the membranes via metastable non-bilayer intermediates towards the opening and expansion of a fusion pore. We describe how SNARE proteins assemble into complexes, how this assembly is regulated by accessory proteins and how SNARE complexes overcome the free energy barriers that prevent spontaneous membrane fusion.

Efficient fusion requires a membrane anchor on the vacuolar Qa-SNARE

As a prelude to fusion, the R-SNARE on one membrane zippers with Qa-, Qb-, and Qc-SNAREs from its apposed fusion partner, forming a four-helical bundle that draws the two membranes together. Because Qa- and Qb-SNAREs are anchored to the same membrane and are adjacent in the 4-SNARE bundle, their two anchors might be redundant. Using the recombinant pure protein catalysts of yeast vacuole fusion, we now report that the specific distribution of transmembrane (TM) anchors on the Q-SNAREs is critical for efficient fusion. A TM anchor on the Qa-SNARE supports rapid fusion even when the other two Q-SNAREs are unanchored, while a TM anchor on the Qb-SNARE is dispensable and is insufficient for rapid fusion as the sole Q-SNARE anchor. This does not depend on which specific TM domain is attached to the Qa-SNARE but rather is due to the Qa-SNARE being anchored per se. The need for Qa-SNARE anchoring is even seen when the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting protein (HOPS), the physiological catalyst of tethering and SNARE assembly, is replaced by an artificial tether. The need for a Qa TM anchor is thus a fundamental property of vacuolar SNARE zippering-induced fusion and may reflect the need for the Qa juxtamembrane (JxQa) region to be anchored between its SNARE and TM domains. This requirement for Qa-SNARE anchoring and correct JxQa position is bypassed by Sec17/Sec18, exploiting a platform of partially zippered SNAREs. Because Qa is the only synaptic Q-SNARE with a TM anchor, the need for Qa-specific anchoring may reflect a general requirement for SNARE-mediated fusion.

Direct determination of oligomeric organization of integral membrane proteins and lipids from intact customizable bilayer

Hierarchical organization of integral membrane proteins (IMP) and lipids at the membrane is essential for regulating myriad downstream signaling. A quantitative understanding of these processes requires both detections of oligomeric organization of IMPs and lipids directly from intact membranes and determination of key membrane components and properties that regulate them. Addressing this, we have developed a platform that enables native mass spectrometry (nMS) analysis of IMP-lipid complexes directly from intact and customizable lipid membranes. Both the lipid composition and membrane properties (such as curvature, tension, and fluidity) of these bilayers can be precisely customized to a target membrane. Subsequent direct nMS analysis of these intact proteolipid vesicles can yield the oligomeric states of the embedded IMPs, identify bound lipids, and determine the membrane properties that can regulate the observed IMP-lipid organization. Applying this method, we show how lipid binding regulates neurotransmitter release and how membrane composition regulates the functional oligomeric state of a transporter.

SNARE Proteins in Synaptic Vesicle Fusion

Neurotransmitters are stored in small membrane-bound vesicles at synapses; a subset of synaptic vesicles is docked at release sites. Fusion of docked vesicles with the plasma membrane releases neurotransmitters. Membrane fusion at synapses, as well as all trafficking steps of the secretory pathway, is mediated by SNARE proteins. The SNAREs are the minimal fusion machinery. They zipper from N-termini to membrane-anchored C-termini to form a 4-helix bundle that forces the apposed membranes to fuse. At synapses, the SNAREs comprise a single helix from syntaxin and synaptobrevin; SNAP-25 contributes the other two helices to complete the bundle. Unc13 mediates synaptic vesicle docking and converts syntaxin into the permissive "open" configuration. The SM protein, Unc18, is required to initiate and proofread SNARE assembly. The SNAREs are then held in a half-zippered state by synaptotagmin and complexin. Calcium removes the synaptotagmin and complexin block, and the SNAREs drive vesicle fusion. After fusion, NSF and alpha-SNAP unwind the SNAREs and thereby recharge the system for further rounds of fusion. In this chapter, we will describe the discovery of the SNAREs, their relevant structural features, models for their function, and the central role of Unc18. In addition, we will touch upon the regulation of SNARE complex formation by Unc13, complexin, and synaptotagmin.

Predicting the Assembly of the Transmembrane Domains of Viral Channel Forming Proteins and Peptide Drug Screening Using a Docking Approach

A de novo assembly algorithm is provided to propose the assembly of bitopic transmembrane domains (TMDs) of membrane proteins. The algorithm is probed using, in particular, viral channel forming proteins (VCPs) such as M2 of influenza A virus, E protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus (SARS-CoV), 6K of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), SH of human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV), and Vpu of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2). The generation of the structures is based on screening a 7-dimensional space. Assembly of the TMDs can be achieved either by simultaneously docking the individual TMDs or via a sequential docking. Scoring based on estimated binding energies (EBEs) of the oligomeric structures is obtained by the tilt to decipher the handedness of the bundles. The bundles match especially well for all-atom models of M2 referring to an experimentally reported tetrameric bundle. Docking of helical poly-peptides to experimental structures of M2 and E protein identifies improving EBEs for positively charged (K,R,H) and aromatic amino acids (F,Y,W). Data are improved when using polypeptides for which the coordinates of the amino acids are adapted to the Cα coordinates of the respective experimentally derived structures of the TMDs of the target proteins.

Syntaxin-1A modulates vesicle fusion in mammalian neurons via juxtamembrane domain dependent palmitoylation of its transmembrane domain

SNAREs are undoubtedly one of the core elements of synaptic transmission. Contrary to the well characterized function of their SNARE domains bringing the plasma and vesicular membranes together, the level of contribution of their juxtamembrane domain (JMD) and the transmembrane domain (TMD) to the vesicle fusion is still under debate. To elucidate this issue, we analyzed three groups of STX1A mutations in cultured mouse hippocampal neurons: (1) elongation of STX1A’s JMD by three amino acid insertions in the junction of SNARE-JMD or JMD-TMD; (2) charge reversal mutations in STX1A’s JMD; and (3) palmitoylation deficiency mutations in STX1A’s TMD. We found that both JMD elongations and charge reversal mutations have position-dependent differential effects on Ca²⁺-evoked and spontaneous neurotransmitter release. Importantly, we show that STX1A’s JMD regulates the palmitoylation of STX1A’s TMD and loss of STX1A palmitoylation either through charge reversal mutation K260E or by loss of TMD cysteines inhibits spontaneous vesicle fusion. Interestingly, the retinal ribbon specific STX3B has a glutamate in the position corresponding to the K260E mutation in STX1A and mutating it with E259K acts as a molecular on-switch. Furthermore, palmitoylation of post-synaptic STX3A can be induced by the exchange of its JMD with STX1A’s JMD together with the incorporation of two cysteines into its TMD. Forced palmitoylation of STX3A dramatically enhances spontaneous vesicle fusion suggesting that STX1A regulates spontaneous release through two distinct mechanisms: one through the C-terminal half of its SNARE domain and the other through the palmitoylation of its TMD.

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Neurotransmitter Release

Major recent advances and previous data have led to a plausible model of how key proteins mediate neurotransmitter release. In this model, the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein (SNAP) receptor (SNARE) proteins syntaxin-1, SNAP-25, and synaptobrevin form tight complexes that bring the membranes together and are crucial for membrane fusion. NSF and SNAPs disassemble SNARE complexes and ensure that fusion occurs through an exquisitely regulated pathway that starts with Munc18-1 bound to a closed conformation of syntaxin-1. Munc18-1 also binds to synaptobrevin, forming a template to assemble the SNARE complex when Munc13-1 opens syntaxin-1 while bridging the vesicle and plasma membranes. Synaptotagmin-1 and complexin bind to partially assembled SNARE complexes, likely stabilizing them and preventing fusion until Ca²⁺ binding to synaptotagmin-1 causes dissociation from the SNARE complex and induces interactions with phospholipids that help trigger release. Although fundamental questions remain about the mechanism of membrane fusion, these advances provide a framework to investigate the mechanisms underlying presynaptic plasticity.

Neuronal SNARE complex assembly guided by Munc18-1 and Munc13-1

Neurotransmitter release by Ca²⁺ -triggered synaptic vesicle exocytosis is essential for information transmission in the nervous system. The soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) syntaxin-1, SNAP-25, and synaptobrevin-2 form the SNARE complex to bring synaptic vesicles and the plasma membranes together and to catalyze membrane fusion. Munc18-1 and Munc13-1 regulate synaptic vesicle priming via orchestrating neuronal SNARE complex assembly. In this review, we summarize recent advances toward the functions and molecular mechanisms of Munc18-1 and Munc13-1 in guiding neuronal SNARE complex assembly, and discuss the functional similarities and differences between Munc18-1 and Munc13-1 in neurons and their homologs in other intracellular membrane trafficking systems.

Fusion with wild-type SNARE domains is controlled by juxtamembrane domains, transmembrane anchors, and Sec17

Membrane fusion requires tethers, SNAREs of R, Qa, Qb, and Qc families, and chaperones of the SM, Sec17/SNAP, and Sec18/NSF families. SNAREs have N-domains, SNARE domains that zipper into 4-helical RQaQbQc coiled coils, a short juxtamembrane (Jx) domain, and (often) a C-terminal transmembrane anchor. We reconstitute fusion with purified components from yeast vacuoles, where the HOPS protein combines tethering and SM functions. The vacuolar Rab, lipids, and R-SNARE activate HOPS to bind Q-SNAREs and catalyze trans-SNARE associations. With SNAREs initially disassembled, as they are on the organelle, we now report that R- and Qa-SNAREs require their physiological juxtamembrane (Jx) regions for fusion. Swap of the Jx domain between the R- and Qa-SNAREs blocks fusion after SNARE association in trans. This block is bypassed by either Sec17, which drives fusion without requiring complete SNARE zippering, or transmembrane-anchored Qb-SNARE in complex with Qa. The abundance of the trans-SNARE complex is not the sole fusion determinant, as it is unaltered by Sec17, Jx swap, or the Qb-transmembrane anchor. The sensitivity of fusion to Jx swap in the absence of a Qb transmembrane anchor is inherent to the SNAREs, because it remains when a synthetic tether replaces HOPS.