KLF2 Inhibits Chicken Preadipocyte Differentiation at Least in Part via Directly Repressing PPARγ Transcript Variant 1 Expression

Multi-Omics Insights into Regulatory Mechanisms Underlying Differential Deposition of Intramuscular and Abdominal Fat in Chickens

Excessive abdominal fat deposition in chickens disadvantages feed conversion, meat production, and reproductive performance. Intramuscular fat contributes to meat texture, tenderness, and flavor, serving as a vital indicator of overall meat quality. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the regulatory mechanisms governing differential deposition of abdominal versus intramuscular fat is essential in breeding higher-quality chickens with ideal fat distribution. This review systematically summarizes the regulatory mechanisms underlying intramuscular and abdominal fat traits at chromatin, genomic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational, and epigenetic-modification scales. Additionally, we summarize the role of non-coding RNAs and protein-coding genes in governing intramuscular and abdominal fat deposition. These insights provide a valuable theoretical foundation for the genetic engineering of high-quality and high-yielding chicken breeds.

PTPN2 dephosphorylates STAT3 to ameliorate anesthesia-induced cognitive decline in aged rats by altering the microglial phenotype and inhibiting inflammation

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PNDs) are common neurological complications after anesthesia in the elderly. Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 2 (PTPN2) regulates signal transducer and activator of transcription protein 3 (STAT3) signaling to control inflammation in certain organs, but its role in PNDs remains unknown. Herein, we constructed a PND model in 18-month-old rats by treating them with sevoflurane. PND rats developed neuroinflammation, along with a significant decrease in PTPN2 expression and a rise in STAT3 phosphorylation in the hippocampus. Ptpn2 overexpression alleviated the behavioral disorders of PND rats, ameliorated neuronal injury, inhibited neuroinflammation, inflammasome activation, microglial activation, and microglial phenotype switching. Similar results were observed in sevoflurane-treated HMC3 microglia with PTPN2 overexpression, while PTPN2 silencing showed the opposite results. Additionally, PTPN2 seems to be a target of T-box transcription factor 2 (TBX2). These results contribute to the evidence supporting the idea that PTPN2 is a regulatory factor in PND progression.

Novel insights into regulators and functional modulators of adipogenesis

Adipogenesis is a process that differentiates new adipocytes from precursor cells and is tightly regulated by several factors, including many transcription factors and various post-translational modifications. Recently, new roles of adipogenesis have been suggested in various diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms and functional modulation of these adipogenic genes remain poorly understood. This review summarizes the regulatory factors and modulators of adipogenesis and discusses future research directions to identify novel mechanisms regulating adipogenesis and the effects of adipogenic regulators in pathological conditions. The master adipogenic transcriptional factors PPARγ and C/EBPα were identified along with other crucial regulatory factors such as SREBP, Kroxs, STAT5, Wnt, FOXO1, SWI/SNF, KLFs, and PARPs. These transcriptional factors regulate adipogenesis through specific mechanisms, depending on the adipogenic stage. However, further studies related to the in vivo role of newly discovered adipogenic regulators and their function in various diseases are needed to develop new potent therapeutic strategies for metabolic diseases and cancer.

DNA methylation promotes the expression of PPARγ transcript 1 at least in part by preventing NRF1 binding to the promoter P1 of chicken PPARγ gene

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a master regulator of adipogenesis. Our previous study revealed that chicken PPARγ has 3 alternative promoters named as P1, P2, and P3, and the DNA methylation of promoter P3 was negatively associated with PPARγ mRNA expression in abdominal adipose tissue (AAT). However, the methylation status of promoters P1 and P2 is unclear. Here we assessed promoter P1 methylation status in AAT of Northeast Agricultural University broiler lines divergently selected for abdominal fat content (NEAUHLF). The results showed that promoter P1 methylation differed in AAT between the lean and fat lines of NEAUHLF at 7 wk of age (p < 0.05), and AAT expression of PPARγ transcript 1 (PPARγ1), which was derived from the promoter P1, was greatly higher in fat line than in lean line at 2 and 7 wk of age. The results of the correlation analysis showed that P1 methylation was positively correlated with PPARγ1 expression at 7 wk of age (Pearson's r = 0.356, p = 0.0242), suggesting P1 methylation promotes PPARγ1 expression. To explore the underlying molecular mechanism of P1 methylation on PPARγ1 expression, bioinformatics analysis, dual-luciferase reporter assay, pyrosequencing, and electrophoresis mobility shift assay (EMSA) were performed. The results showed that transcription factor NRF1 repressed the promoter activity of the unmethylated P1, but not the methylated P1. Of all the 4 CpGs (CpG48, CpG49, CpG50, and CpG51), which reside within or nearby the NRF1 binding sites of the P1, only CpG49 methylation in AAT was remarkably higher in the fat line than in lean line at 7 wk of age (3.18 to 0.57, p < 0.05), and CpG49 methylation was positively correlated with PPARγ1 expression (Pearson's r = 0.3716, p = 0.0432). Furthermore, EMSA showed that CpG49 methylation reduced the binding of NRF1 to the P1. Taken together, our findings illustrate that P1 methylation promotes PPARγ1 expression at least in part by preventing NRF1 from binding to the promoter P1.

The role of zinc finger proteins in the fate determination of mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation

Zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) constitute a crucial group of transcription factors widely present in various organisms. They act as transcription factors, nucleases, and RNA-binding proteins, playing significant roles in cell differentiation, growth, and development. With extensive research on ZFPs, their roles in the determination of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) fate during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation processes have become increasingly clear. ZFP521, for instance, is identified as an inhibitor of the Wnt signaling pathway and RUNX2's transcriptional activity, effectively suppressing osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, ZFP217 contributes to the inhibition of adipogenic differentiation by reducing the M6A level of the cell cycle regulator cyclin D1 (CCND1). In addition, other ZFPs can also influence the fate of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation through various signaling pathways, transcription factors, and epigenetic controls, participating in the subsequent differentiation and maturation of precursor cells. Given the prevalent occurrence of osteoporosis, obesity, and related metabolic disorders, a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory mechanisms balancing bone and fat metabolism is essential, with a particular focus on the fate determination of MSCs in osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. In this review, we provide a detailed summary of how zinc finger proteins influence the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of MSCs through different signaling pathways, transcription factors, and epigenetic mechanisms. Additionally, we outline the regulatory mechanisms of ZFPs in controlling osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation based on various stages of MSC differentiation.

KLF2/PPARγ axis contributes to trauma-induced heterotopic ossification by regulating mitochondrial dysfunction

Trauma-induced heterotopic ossification (HO) is a complex disorder after musculoskeletal injury and characterized by aberrant extraskeletal bone formation. Recent studies shed light on critical role of dysregulated osteogenic differentiation in aberrant bone formation. Krupel-like factor 2 (KLF2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) are master adapter proteins that link cellular responses to osteogenesis; however, their roles and relationships in HO remain elusive. Using a murine burn/tenotomy model in vivo, we identified elevated KLF2 and reduced PPARγ levels in tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs) during trauma-induced HO formation. Both KLF2 inhibition and PPARγ promotion reduced mature HO, whereas the effects of PPARγ promotion were abolished by KLF2 overexpression. Additionally, mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production also increased after burn/tenotomy, and improvements in mitochondrial function (ROS scavenger) could alleviate HO formation, but were abolished by KLF2 activation and PPARγ suppression by affecting redox balance. Furthermore, in vitro, we found increased KLF2 and decreased PPARγ levels in osteogenically induced TSPCs. Both KLF2 inhibition and PPARγ promotion relieved osteogenesis by improving mitochondrial function and maintaining redox balance, and effects of PPARγ promotion were abolished by KLF2 overexpression. Our findings suggest that KLF2/PPARγ axis exerts regulatory effects on trauma-induced HO through modulation of mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production in TSPCs by affecting redox balance. Targeting KLF2/PPARγ axis and mitochondrial dysfunction can represent attractive approaches to therapeutic intervention in trauma-induced HO.