Epiblast cells gather onto the anterior mesendoderm and initiate brain development without the direct involvement of the node in avian embryos: Insights from broad-field live imaging

Chicken embryo cultures in the dorsal-upward orientation for the manipulation of epiblasts

Chicken embryos have many advantages in the study of amniote embryonic development. In particular, culture techniques developed for early-stage embryos have promoted the advancement of modern developmental studies using chicken embryos. However, the standard technique involves placing chicken embryos in the ventral-upward (ventral-up) orientation, limiting manipulation of the epiblast at the dorsal surface, which is the primary source of ectodermal and mesodermal tissues. To circumvent this limitation, we developed chicken embryo cultures in the dorsal-up orientation and exploited this technique to address diverse issues. In this article, we first review the history of chicken embryo culture techniques to evaluate the advantages and limitations of the current standard technique. Then, the dorsal-up technique is discussed. These technological discussions are followed by three different examples of experimental analyses using dorsal-up cultures to illustrate their advantages: (1) EdU labeling of epiblast cells to assess potential variation in the cell proliferation rate; (2) migration behaviors of N1 enhancer-active epiblast cells revealed by tracking cells with focal fluorescent dye labeling in dorsal-up embryo culture; and (3) neural crest development of mouse neural stem cells in chicken embryos.

Wnt signal-dependent antero-posterior specification of early-stage CNS primordia modeled in EpiSC-derived neural stem cells

The specification of the embryonic central nervous system (CNS) into future brain (forebrain, midbrain, or hindbrain) and spinal cord (SC) regions is a critical step of CNS development. A previous chicken embryo study indicated that anterior epiblast cells marked by Sox2 N2 enhancer activity are specified to the respective brain regions during the transition phase of the epiblast to the neural plate-forming neural primordium. The present study showed that the SC precursors positioned posterior to the hindbrain precursors in the anterior epiblast migrated posteriorly in contrast to the anterior migration of brain precursors. The anteroposterior specification of the CNS precursors occurs at an analogous time (∼E7.5) in mouse embryos, in which an anterior-to-posterior incremental gradient of Wnt signal strength was observed. To examine the possible Wnt signal contribution to the anteroposterior CNS primordium specification, we utilized mouse epiblast stem cell (EpiSC)-derived neurogenesis in culture. EpiSCs maintained in an activin- and FGF2-containing medium start neural development after the removal of activin, following a day in a transitory state. We placed activin-free EpiSCs in EGF- and FGF2-containing medium to arrest neural development and expand the cells into neural stem cells (NSCs). Simultaneously, a Wnt antagonist or agonist was added to the culture, with the anticipation that different levels of Wnt signals would act on the transitory cells to specify CNS regionality; then, the Wnt-treated cells were expanded as NSCs. Gene expression profiles of six NSC lines were analyzed using microarrays and single-cell RNA-seq. The NSC lines demonstrated anteroposterior regional specification in response to increasing Wnt signal input levels: forebrain-midbrain-, hindbrain-, cervical SC-, and thoracic SC-like lines. The regional coverage of these NSC lines had a range; for instance, the XN1 line expressed Otx2 and En2, indicating midbrain characteristics, but additionally expressed the SC-characteristic Hoxa5. The ranges in the anteroposterior specification of neural primordia may be narrowed as neural development proceeds. The thoracic SC is presumably the posterior limit of the contribution by anterior epiblast-derived neural progenitors, as the characteristics of more posterior SC regions were not displayed.

The Epiblast and Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines

All somatic cells develop from the epiblast, which occupies the upper layer of two-layered embryos and in most mammals is formed after the implantation stage but before gastrulation initiates. Once the epiblast is established, the epiblast cells begin to develop into various somatic cells via large-scale cell reorganization, namely, gastrulation. Different pluripotent stem cell lines representing distinct stages of embryogenesis have been established: mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), and mouse epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs), which represent the preimplantation stage inner cell mass, an early  post-implantation stage epiblast, and a later-stage epiblast, respectively. Together, these cell lines provide excellent in vitro models of cell regulation before somatic cells develop. This chapter addresses these early developmental stages.

How the Brain Develops from the Epiblast: The Node Is Not an Organizer

Studies using early-stage avian embryos have substantially impacted developmental biology, through the availability of simple culture methods and easiness in tissue manipulation. However, the regulations underlying brain and head development, a central issue of developmental biology, have not been investigated systematically. Yoshihi et al. (2022a) devised a technique to randomly label the epiblast cells with a green fluorescent protein before their development into the brain tissue. This technique was combined with grafting a node or node-derived anterior mesendoderm labeled with a cherry-colored fluorescent protein. Then cellular events were live-recorded over 18 hours during the brain and head development. The live imaging-based analyses identified previously undescribed mechanisms central to brain development: all anterior epiblast cells have a potential to develop into the brain tissues and their gathering onto a proximal anterior mesendoderm forms a brain primordium whereas the remaining cells develop into the covering head ectoderm. The analyses also ruled out the direct participation of the node's activity in the brain development. Yoshihi et al. (2022a) also demonstrate how the enigmatic data from classical models can be reinterpreted in the new model.This chapter was adapted from Yoshihi K, Iida H, Teramoto M, Ishii Y, Kato K, Kondoh H. (2022b). Epiblast cells gather onto the anterior mesendoderm and initiate brain development without the direct involvement of the node in avian embryos: Insights from broad-field live imaging. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:1019845. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1019845.

Gastrulation: Its Principles and Variations

As epiblast cells initiate development into various somatic cells, they undergo a large-scale reorganization, called gastrulation. The gastrulation of the epiblast cells produces three groups of cells: the endoderm layer, the collection of miscellaneous mesodermal tissues, and the ectodermal layer, which includes the neural, epidermal, and associated tissues. Most studies of gastrulation have focused on the formation of the tissues that provide the primary route for cell reorganization, that is, the primitive streak, in the chicken and mouse. In contrast, how gastrulation alters epiblast-derived cells has remained underinvestigated. This chapter highlights the regulation of cell and tissue fate via the gastrulation process. The roles and regulatory functions of neuromesodermal progenitors (NMPs) in the gastrulation process, elucidated in the last decade, are discussed in depth to resolve points of confusion. Chicken and mouse embryos, which form a primitive streak as the site of mesoderm precursor ingression, have been investigated extensively. However, primitive streak formation is an exception, even among amniotes. The roles of gastrulation processes in generating various somatic tissues will be discussed broadly.