Factors Associated With the Microbiome in Moderate-Late Preterm Babies: A Cohort Study From the DIAMOND Randomized Controlled Trial

Sociodemographic Factors and Intestinal Microbiome Development in Preterm, Very Low Birth Weight Infants

OBJECTIVE

 Preterm very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are at risk for intestinal morbidities and dysbiotic development of the intestinal microbiome. Despite the influence of sociodemographic factors on premature infant health outcomes, whether they shape the intestinal microbiome early in life is not clear. The objective was to explore the associations between race, sex, and socioeconomic status and the intestinal microbiome of VLBW infants during the first 4 weeks of life.

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a secondary analysis of data from an ongoing randomized trial of 79 infants ≤30 weeks' gestation and ≤1,500 g. Stool samples were collected at week 1 through week 4, frozen to -80°C and analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing of the V4 region using Illumina MiSeq. Reads were analyzed to measure α and β diversity as well as relative abundance of bacteria in the intestinal microbiome.

RESULTS

 Of the 79 infants, 63 had at least one sample available. Twenty-three (37%) of infants were African American, 30 (48%) were male, and 44 (71%) had Medicaid insurance. There were no statistically significant (<0.05) differences in α diversity or β diversity, and the differential abundance analysis suggests limited patterns of distinction in the intestinal microbiome between non-African American and African American infants, male and female infants, and infants with maternal private or Medicaid insurance.

CONCLUSION

 Our results suggest race, sex, and socioeconomic status shape colonization of specific microorganisms to a limited extent. Future studies should confirm these findings and determine clinical relevance through further study of differentially abundant microorganisms and additional factors contributing to colonization patterns.

KEY POINTS

· Diversity of the gut microbiome was similar between infants of varying race, sex, and socioeconomic status.. · We observed sociodemographic-linked differences in colonization of individual taxa.. · Further study is required to confirm these results and the clinical relevance of these findings..

Sociobiome - Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status influence the gut microbiome in a multi-ethnic population in the US

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is related to increased incidence and mortality due to chronic diseases in adults. Association between SES variables and gut microbiome variation has been observed in adults at the population level, suggesting that biological mechanisms may underlie the SES associations; however, there is a need for larger studies that consider individual- and neighborhood-level measures of SES in racially diverse populations. In 825 participants from a multi-ethnic cohort, we investigated how SES shapes the gut microbiome. We determined the relationship of a range of individual- and neighborhood-level SES indicators with the gut microbiome. Individual education level and occupation were self-reported by questionnaire. Geocoding was applied to link participants' addresses with neighborhood census tract socioeconomic indicators, including average income and social deprivation in the census tract. Gut microbiome was measured using 16SV4 region rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. We compared α-diversity, β-diversity, and taxonomic and functional pathway abundance by SES. Lower SES was significantly associated with greater α-diversity and compositional differences among groups, as measured by β-diversity. Several taxa related to low SES were identified, especially an increasing abundance of Prevotella copri and Catenibacterium sp000437715, and decreasing abundance of Dysosmobacter welbionis in terms of their high log-fold change differences. In addition, nativity and race/ethnicity have emerged as ecosocial factors that also influence the gut microbiota. Together, these results showed that lower SES was strongly associated with compositional and taxonomic measures of the gut microbiome, and may contribute to shaping the gut microbiota.

Sociobiome - Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status influence the gut microbiome in a multi-ethnic population in the US

Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is related to increased incidence and mortality due to chronic diseases in adults. Association between SES variables and gut microbiome variation has been observed in adults at the population level, suggesting that biological mechanisms may underlie the SES associations; however, there is a need for larger U.S. studies that consider individual- and neighborhood-level measures of SES in racially diverse populations. In 825 participants from a multi-ethnic cohort, we investigated how SES shapes the gut microbiome. We determined the relationship of a range of several individual- and neighborhood-level SES indicators with the gut microbiome. Individual education level and occupation were self-reported by questionnaire. Geocoding was applied to link participants' addresses with neighborhood census tract socioeconomic indicators, including average income and social deprivation in the census tract. Gut microbiome was measured using 16SV4 region rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. We compared α-diversity, β-diversity, and taxonomic and functional pathway abundance by socioeconomic status. Lower SES was significantly associated with greater α-diversity and compositional differences among groups, as measured by β-diversity. Several taxa related to low SES were identified, especially an increasing abundance of Genus Catenibacterium and Prevotella copri. The significant association between SES and gut microbiota remained even after considering the race/ethnicity in this racially diverse cohort. Together, these results showed that lower socioeconomic status was strongly associated with compositional and taxonomic measures of the gut microbiome, suggesting that SES may shape the gut microbiota.

Impact of early antibiotic exposure on the risk of colonization with potential pathogens in very preterm infants: a retrospective cohort analysis

Background

Sepsis is one of the most important complications in preterm infants. For this reason, most preterm infants receive antibiotics during their first postnatal week. Since 2013, a weekly colonization screening has been installed in German neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), including multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) and pathogens with increased epidemic potential. We here investigated the impact of early antibiotic exposure on the colonization with these pathogens.

Methods

Data from 1407 preterm infants with gestational age < 32 + 0 weeks and born in three NICUs in Germany between January 2014 and December 2019 were analysed.

Results

Antibiotics were administered to 911/1407 (64.7%) participating infants during their first postnatal week. Screening-targeted pathogens were detected in 547/1407 (38.9%). Early antibiotic exposure did not increase the risk of colonization with screening-targeted pathogens. The only independent risk factor for colonisation with potential pathogens was the admitting hospital. Interestingly, longer antibiotic therapy (> 7 days) decreased the risk for acquiring pathogens with increased epidemic potential.

Conclusion

Early antibiotic exposure did not impact the risk for colonization with MDRO or highly epidemic pathogens in preterm infants. Further studies are needed to identify risk factors for the acquisition of MDRO and highly epidemic pathogens and potential associations with long-term outcome.

Effect of prophylactic dextrose gel on the neonatal gut microbiome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of prophylactic dextrose gel on the infant gut microbiome.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study nested in a randomised trial.

SETTING

Three maternity hospitals in New Zealand.

PATIENTS

Infants at risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia whose parents consented to participation in the hypoglycaemia Prevention in newborns with Oral Dextrose trial (hPOD). Infants were randomised to receive prophylactic dextrose gel or placebo gel, or were not randomised and received no gel (controls). Stool samples were collected on days 1, 7 and 28.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was microbiome beta-diversity at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes were beta-diversity, alpha-diversity, bacterial DNA concentration, microbial community stability and relative abundance of individual bacterial taxa at each time point.

RESULTS

We analysed 434 stool samples from 165 infants using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. There were no differences between groups in beta-diversity at 4 weeks (p=0.49). There were also no differences between groups in any other microbiome measures including beta-diversity (p=0.53 at day 7), alpha-diversity (p=0.46 for day 7 and week 4), bacterial DNA concentration (p=0.91), microbial community stability (p=0.52) and microbial relative abundance at genus level. There was no evidence that exposure to any dextrose gel (prophylaxis or treatment) had any effect on the microbiome. Mode of birth, type of milk fed, hospital of birth and ethnicity were all associated with differences in the neonatal microbiome.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and consumers can be reassured that dextrose gel used for prophylaxis or treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia does not alter the neonatal gut microbiome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

12614001263684.

An Updated Narrative Mini-Review on the Microbiota Changes in Antenatal and Post-Partum Depression

Background: Antenatal depression (AND) and post-partum depression (PPD) are long-term debilitating psychiatric disorders that significantly influence the composition of the gut flora of mothers and infants that starts from the intrauterine life. Not only does bacterial ratio shift impact the immune system, but it also increases the risk of potentially life-threatening disorders. Material and Methods: Therefore, we conducted a narrative mini-review aiming to gather all evidence published between 2018–2022 regarding microflora changes in all three stages of pregnancy. Results: We initially identified 47 potentially eligible studies, from which only 7 strictly report translocations; 3 were conducted on rodent models and 4 on human patients. The remaining studies were divided based on their topic, precisely focused on how probiotics, breastfeeding, diet, antidepressants, exogenous stressors, and plant-derived compounds modulate in a bidirectional way upon behavior and microbiota. Almost imperatively, dysbacteriosis cause cognitive impairments, reflected by abnormal temperament and personality traits that last up until 2 years old. Thankfully, a distinct technique that involves fecal matter transfer between individuals has been perfected over the years and was successfully translated into clinical practice. It proved to be a reliable approach in diminishing functional non- and gastrointestinal deficiencies, but a clear link between depressive women’s gastrointestinal/vaginal microbiota and clinical outcomes following reproductive procedures is yet to be established. Another gut-dysbiosis-driving factor is antibiotics, known for their potential to trigger inflammation. Fortunately, the studies conducted on mice that lack microbiota offer, without a shadow of a doubt, insight. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the microbiota is a powerful organ, and its optimum functionality is crucial, likely being the missing puzzle piece in the etiopathogenesis of psychiatric disorders.

Infections and antibiotics during fetal life and childhood and their relationship to juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aetiology of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is poorly understood. It has been shown that use of antibiotics is associated with JIA. However, whether the association is due to increased occurrence of infection in these individuals is unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to measure the association between number of infections and use of antibiotics during childhood with development of JIA.

METHODS

In ABIS (All Babies in Southeast Sweden) a population-based prospective birth cohort of 17,055 children, data were collected on infections and antibiotic exposure during pregnancy and childhood. 102 individuals with JIA were identified. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Exposure to antibiotics during the periods 1-12 months, 1-3 years and 5-8 years was significantly associated with increased risk for JIA. The odds of developing JIA were three times higher in those exposed to antibiotics during the first 3 years of life compared with those not exposed (aOR 3.17; 95% CI 1.11-9.03, p = 0.031), and more than twice as high in those exposed to antibiotics during the first 5 years of life compared with those not exposed (aOR 2.18; 95% CI 1.36-3.50, p = 0.001). The odds of developing JIA were 78% higher in those exposed to antibiotics during the first 8 years of life compared with those not exposed (aOR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15-2.73, p = 0.009). Occurrence of infection during fetal life or childhood showed no significant association with the risk of developing JIA, after confounder adjustment. The cumulative number of courses of antibiotics was significantly higher during childhood for the individuals who developed JIA (p < 0.001). Penicillins were more frequently used than non-penicillins, but both had an equal effect on the risk of developing JIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to antibiotics early in life is associated with later onset of JIA in a large birth cohort from the general population. The relationship was dose dependent. These results suggest that further, more restrictive, antibiotic policies during the first years of life would be advisable.