Zidebactam restores sulbactam susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates

Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Infections: New Treatment Options in the Antibiotic Pipeline

Acinetobacter baumannii complex (ABC) can result in a panoply of severe syndromes, including pneumonia and septic shock. Options available for treating infections caused by ABC and, more importantly, by carbapenem-resistant ABC (CRAB) are limited because of the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, many older agents, such as polymyxin and colistin, have limited lung penetration and are associated with significant toxicities. These factors underscore the urgent need for new paradigms to address ABC and CRAB. Two agents, cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, are now available to treat CRAB infections. In addition, several anti-infectives that target CRAB are in later-stage clinical trials. In order to place these newer molecules in context and to help clinicians appreciate the emerging potential drug development pipeline, we describe the in vitro activity, mechanisms of action, and clinical trial data not only for the commercially now available alternatives, such as cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam, but also review these topics for molecules undergoing phase II and III clinical trials. Specifically, we discuss and analyze data related to four novel drugs from ABC: BV-100, cefepime-zidebactam, zosurabalpin, and OMN6.

Antibacterial Therapy Options for Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

The review presents current treatment regimens for infections associated with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, which are leading nosocomial pathogens exhibiting multidrug resistance to available antibacterial drugs. To date, widely used beta-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, have lost their effectiveness in combating acinetobacter infections, while new antibiotics remain poorly available to patients. Therefore, the only measure to combat the antibiotic resistance of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii is to evaluate the efficiency of combination therapy in vitro and in vivo, which is of particular interest to Russian and foreign researchers.

Defining optimal sulbactam regimens for treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia and impact of blaOXA-23 on efficacy

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacies of human-simulated regimens (HSRs) of two clinically utilized sulbactam regimens: 1 g q6h 0.5 h infusion (maximum FDA-approved dosage) and 3 g q8h 4 h infusion (high-dose, prolonged-infusion regimen), against Acinetobacter baumannii in a translational murine model.

METHODS

Thirty-two clinical A. baumannii isolates were investigated, of which 16 were sulbactam resistant (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), 6 were sulbactam intermediate (MIC = 8 mg/L) and 10 were sulbactam susceptible (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L). Efficacies of the two sulbactam HSRs were assessed in the neutropenic murine pneumonia model. Changes in log10 cfu/lungs at 24 h compared with 0 h controls were measured, and efficacy was defined as achieving 1 log kill relative to baseline. WGS of the isolates and bioinformatics analysis were performed to explore potential associations between the genomic backgrounds and the in vivo responses.

RESULTS

Eleven isolates harboured blaOXA-23, of which 10 were sulbactam resistant, 1 was sulbactam intermediate while none was sulbactam susceptible. Both sulbactam HSRs achieved >1 log kill against sulbactam-susceptible isolates. Against sulbactam-intermediate and sulbactam-resistant isolates, lack of efficacy correlated with the presence of the blaOXA-23 gene; sulbactam 1 g HSR and 3 g HSR did not show efficacy against 11/11 and 9/11 blaOXA-23-positive isolates, respectively, while efficacy was observed against all 11 blaOXA-23-negative sulbactam-intermediate and sulbactam-resistant isolates (i.e. harbouring other resistance genes).

CONCLUSIONS

A sulbactam high-dose prolonged-infusion regimen provides comparable activity to the standard dose against isolates currently considered sulbactam susceptible. However, the activity against isolates with intermediate and resistant susceptibility could be predicted by the detection of blaOXA-23. Enhancing detection capabilities of common diagnostic modalities to include OXA-23 can improve patient outcome.

Strategies to combat Gram-negative bacterial resistance to conventional antibacterial drugs: a review

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance raises the fear of untreatable diseases. Antimicrobial resistance is a multifaceted and dynamic phenomenon that is the cumulative result of different factors. While Gram-positive pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile, were previously the most concerning issues in the field of public health, Gram-negative pathogens are now of prime importance. The World Health Organization's priority list of pathogens mostly includes multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms particularly carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. The spread of Gram-negative bacterial resistance is a global issue, involving a variety of mechanisms. Several strategies have been proposed to control resistant Gram-negative bacteria, such as the development of antimicrobial auxiliary agents and research into chemical compounds with new modes of action. Another emerging trend is the development of naturally derived antibacterial compounds that aim for targets novel areas, including engineered bacteriophages, probiotics, metal-based antibacterial agents, odilorhabdins, quorum sensing inhibitors, and microbiome-modifying agents. This review focuses on the current status of alternative treatment regimens against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, aiming to provide a snapshot of the situation and some information on the broader context.

The Role of the Respiratory Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of Aspiration Pneumonia: Implications for Diagnosis and Potential Therapeutic Choices

Although the lungs were considered to be sterile until recently, the advent of molecular biology techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction, 16 S rRNA sequencing and metagenomics has led to our expanding knowledge of the lung microbiome. These methods may be particularly useful for the identification of the causative agent(s) in cases of aspiration pneumonia, in which there is usually prior administration of antibiotics. The most common empirical treatment of aspiration pneumonia is the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics; however, this may result in negative cultures from specimens taken from the respiratory tract. Therefore, in such cases, polymerase chain reaction or metagenomic next-generation sequencing may be life-saving. Moreover, these modern molecular methods may assist with antimicrobial stewardship. Based upon factors such as age, altered mental consciousness and recent hospitalization, there is a shift towards the predominance of aerobes, especially Gram-negative bacteria, over anaerobes in aspiration pneumonia. Thus, the therapeutic choices should be expanded to cover multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria in selected cases of aspiration pneumonia.