Research Progress of Imaging Methods for Detection of Microvascular Angina Pectoris in Diabetic Patients

Deciphering the Dilemma: Anticoagulation for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

Impairment in ventricular relaxation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction are the two main features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) a difficult clinical condition. Therapeutic choices for HFpEF patients are still scarce despite its rising frequency and negative effects on morbidity and mortality, necessitating creative methods to enhance results. The increased thromboembolic risk seen in these individuals raises questions about the relevance of anticoagulation in the therapy of HFpEF. Although anticoagulation has been shown to be beneficial in heart failure with decreased ejection fraction (HFrEF) and other high-risk cardiovascular disorders, its efficacy and safety in HFpEF present a challenging therapeutic challenge. Anticoagulants have been the subject of clinical trials in HFpEF, but the results have been conflicting, giving clinicians only a little information with which to make decisions. The decision-making process is made more difficult by worries about potential bleeding hazards, particularly in susceptible elderly HFpEF patients with other comorbidities. The link between heart failure and anticoagulant medication in HFpEF is thoroughly analyzed in this narrative review. In HFpEF, cardiac fibrosis and endothelial dysfunction create a prothrombotic milieu, as is highlighted in this passage. Also covered are recent developments in innovative biomarker research and cutting-edge imaging techniques, which may provide ways to spot HFpEF patients who might benefit from anticoagulation. This therapeutic conundrum may be resolved by using precision medicine strategies based on risk classification and individualized therapy choices. This review emphasizes the need for more research to establish the best use of anticoagulation in HFpEF within the framework of personalized therapy and shared decision-making. To successfully manage thromboembolic risk and reduce bleeding consequences in HFpEF patients, it is essential to perform well-designed clinical studies and advance our understanding of the pathophysiology of HFpEF. These developments may ultimately improve the prognosis and quality of life for people who suffer from this difficult and mysterious ailment.

Strengths and weaknesses of alternative noninvasive imaging approaches for microvascular ischemia

Structural and functional abnormalities of coronary microvasculature are highly prevalent in several clinical settings and often associated with worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is a growing interest in the detection and treatment of this, often overlooked, disease. Coronary angiography allows the assessment of the Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). However, the measurement of these parameters is not always feasible because of limited technical availability and the need for a cardiac catheterization with a small but real risk of potential complications. Recent advances in non-invasive imaging techniques allow the assessment of coronary microvascular function with good accuracy and reproducibility. The objective of this review is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of alternative non-invasive approaches used in the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), highlighting the most recent advances for each imaging modality.