Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the International Guidelines

Interventional treatment for post-thrombotic chronic venous obstruction: Progress and challenges

Chronic venous obstruction, including nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions and post-thrombotic syndrome, presents a significant burden on patients' quality of life and health care systems. Venous recanalization and stenting have emerged as promising minimally invasive approaches, yet challenges in patient selection, procedural techniques, and long-term outcomes persist. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the interventional treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome, focusing on the evolution of endovascular techniques and stenting. Patient selection criteria, procedural details, and the characteristics of dedicated venous stents are discussed. Particular emphasis is given to the role of inflow and other anatomical considerations, along with postoperative management protocols for an optimal long-term outcome.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria-related thrombosis in the era of novel therapies: a 2043-patient-year analysis

ABSTRACT

Thrombophilia is one of the principal features of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and constitutes the main cause of disease morbidity/mortality. Anticomplement treatment has revolutionized the natural history of PNH, with control of the hemolytic process and abolition of thrombotic events (TEs). However, no guidelines exist for the management of thromboembolic complications in this setting, with type and duration of anticoagulation depending on individual practices. Besides, a scarcity of data is present on the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Herein, we accrued a large real-world cohort of patients with PNH from 4 US centers to explore features, predictors of TE, and anticoagulation strategies. Among 267 patients followed up for a total of 2043 patient-years, 56 (21%) developed TEs. These occurred at disease onset in 43% of cases, involving more frequently the venous system, typically as Budd-Chiari syndrome. Rate of TEs was halved in patients receiving complement inhibitors (21 vs 40 TEs per 1000 patient-years in untreated cases, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of thrombosis of 3.9% vs 18.3%, respectively), and varied according to PNH granulocytes and erythrocytes clone size, type, disease activity parameters, as well as number (≥2 mutations, or less) and variant allelic frequency of PIGA mutations. Anticoagulation with warfarin (39%), DOACs (37%), and low-molecular weight heparin (16%) was administered for a median of 29 months (interquartile range [IQR], 9-61.8). No thrombotic recurrence was observed in 19 patients treated with DOACs at a median observation of 17.1 months (IQR, 8.9-45) whereas 14 cases discontinued anticoagulation without TE recurrence at a median time of 51.4 months (IQR, 29.9-86.8).

Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Current guidelines recommend that direct anticoagulants should not be used in prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, except for triple-positive APS and rivaroxaban use, little evidence supports such recommendation. In a real-life cohort study, we evaluated the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with APS on apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We enrolled 152 patients with APS (aged 44 years [interquartile range 36-56], 83% women), including 66 patients treated with apixaban 5 mg bid and 86 with warfarin (target international normalized ratio [INR] 2-3). During a median follow-up of 53 months, we recorded venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, or myocardial infarction, along with major bleeding. We observed 4 thrombotic events (6.1%, 3 venous thromboembolism and 1 ischemic stroke) in patients on apixaban and 12 events (14%, 9 venous thromboembolism, 2 ischemic strokes and 1 myocardial infarction) in VKA patients. Patients with APS on apixaban had similar risk of recurrent thromboembolism compared with those on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.327, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.104-1.035). Thromboembolic events occurred less commonly in statin users (8% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and more frequently in triple-positive APS (50% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.028) and in patients with higher D-dimer at baseline ( P = 0.023); the latter difference was present in the apixaban group ( P = 0.02). Patients on apixaban had similar risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.201-1.448). In real-life patients with APS, apixaban appears to be similar to VKA for the prevention of thromboembolism and risk of bleeding, which might suggest that some patients with APS could be treated with apixaban.

Risks Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Antiphospholipid Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is recognized as a thrombophilic autoimmune condition characterized by a tendency to develop venous thromboembolism. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a prevalent procedure in patients who have advanced knee arthritis. Notably, TKA is unequivocally considered a thrombotic risk factor. However, outcomes of APS patients after TKA are still poorly documented in literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate APS as a potential risk factor for complications after TKA.

METHODS

Using the PearlDiver Mariner database from 2010 to 2022, APS patients undergoing primary TKA were identified and compared to 10:1 matched control based on age, sex, and relevant comorbidities. A total of 7,478 patients undergoing primary TKA were analyzed, of which 683 had APS. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were done for medical complications up to 90 days and surgical complications including revision up to 2 years. Ninety-day emergency department visit and inpatient readmission were also documented.

RESULTS

Within 90 days after TKA, patients who have APS exhibited higher rates of cerebrovascular accident (adjusted odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 3.57; P = .014) and deep vein thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.99 to 4.06; P < .001) as compared to matched controls. No difference in surgical or nonthrombotic medical complications was observed between 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significantly higher rates of stroke and deep vein thrombosis in APS patients. Our study did not find statistical differences in other surgical complications or readmissions between the 2 groups. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider appropriate prophylaxis of thrombosis in this patient population undergoing TKA perioperatively.

Taipan snake venom time has high sensitivity for lupus anticoagulants in non-anticoagulated, triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients

INTRODUCTION

Dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are the mainstay assays in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection yet they have limitations, particularly in relation to interferences and specificity. The recently validated Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) screening with ecarin time (ET) confirmatory assays overcome many of those limitations due to the innate specificity engendered from direct prothrombin activation, and insensitivity to the effects of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The present study aimed to further evidence diagnostic utility of TSVT/ET by performing them in samples from 116 nonanticoagulated patients with established triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

METHODS

Samples were identified in three expert centres who performed dRVVT, APTT and solid phase antiphospholipid antibody assays with reagents from a variety of manufacturers. All samples additionally received TSVT/ET analysis using standardised reagents.

RESULTS

Ninety seven of 116 (83.6%) were dRVVT- and APTT-positive, 85/97 (87.6%) of which were TSVT/ET-positive, 9/116 (7.8%) were dRVVT-positive only, 6 of which were TSVT/ET-positive, and 10/116 (8.6%) were APTT-positive only, 5 of which were TSVT/ET-positive. 96/116 TSVT/ET-positivity returned a high sensitivity for LA of 82.8%. Low coefficients of determination revealed weak relationships between LA potency and anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody titres for all three LA assays.

CONCLUSIONS

TSVT/ET has high sensitivity for the clinically significant LA found in triple positive APS patients. TSVT/ET can establish multiple LA assay positivity in nonanticoagulated patients negative for one of dRVVT or APTT, and is the only assay pairing insensitive to VKAs, the recommended anticoagulation for APS.

Management of Cardiovascular Complications in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Narrative Review with a Focus on Older Adults

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes syndrome, is an acquired autoimmune and procoagulant condition that predisposes individuals to recurrent thrombotic events and obstetric complications. Central is the role of three types of antiphospholipid antibodies that target phospholipid-binding proteins: lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI-Ab), and anti-cardiolipin (aCL). Together with clinical data, these antibodies are the diagnostic standard. However, the diagnosis of APS in older adults may be challenging and, in the diagnostic workup of thromboembolic complications, it is an underestimated etiology. The therapeutic management of APS requires distinguishing two groups with differential risks of thromboembolic complications. The standard therapy is based on low-dose aspirin in the low-risk group and vitamin K antagonists in the high-risk group. The value of direct oral anticoagulants is currently controversial. The potential role of monoclonal antibodies is investigated. For example, rituximab is currently recommended in catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Research is ongoing on other monoclonal antibodies, such as daratumumab and obinutuzumab. This narrative review illustrates the pathophysiological mechanisms of APS, with a particular emphasis on cardiovascular complications and their impact in older adults. This article also highlights advancements in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of APS.

Factor Xa inhibitors vs. warfarin in patients with Hughes syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The optimal treatment regimen for patients with Hughes syndrome remains unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of warfarin vs. factor Xa inhibitors in patients with Hughes syndrome.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 8 efficacy and safety of warfarin and factor Xa inhibitors in patients with Hughes syndrome. Recurrent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, stroke, adverse reactions, and bleeding were among 10 outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate 11 relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.

Results

The analysis included 625 patients from four RCTs and one post-hoc analysis. Meta-analysis showed a statistically non-significant difference between factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin in the recurrent thrombosis risk (arterial or venous) [RR 2.77 (95%, CI 0.79, 9.65); P=0.11, I2=50%]. Consistent results were revealed among patients with a previous history of arterial thrombosis [RR 2.76 (95% CI 0.93, 8.16); P=0.75, I2=0%], venous thrombosis [RR 1.71 (95% CI 0.60, 4.84); P=0.31, I2=15%] and patients who were triple antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) positive [RR 4.12 (95% CI 0.46, 37.10); 21 P=0.21, I2=58%]. Factor Xa inhibitors were significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke [RR 8.51 (95% CI 2.35, 13.82); P=0.47, I2=0%].

Conclusion

Factor Xa inhibitors exhibited an increased risk of stroke among patients with Hughes syndrome. In addition, although not significant, the higher RRs among patients on factor Xa inhibitors may indicate a higher risk of thrombotic events associated with factor Xa inhibitors.

Targeting factor XI and factor XIa to prevent thrombosis

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that inhibit the coagulation proteases thrombin or factor Xa (FXa) have replaced warfarin and other vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for most indications requiring long-term anticoagulation. In many clinical situations, DOACs are as effective as VKAs, cause less bleeding, and do not require laboratory monitoring. However, because DOACs target proteases that are required for hemostasis, their use increases the risk of serious bleeding. Concerns over therapy-related bleeding undoubtedly contribute to undertreatment of many patients who would benefit from anticoagulation therapy. There is considerable interest in the plasma zymogen factor XI (FXI) and its protease form factor XIa (FXIa) as drug targets for treating and preventing thrombosis. Laboratory and epidemiologic studies support the conclusion that FXI contributes to venous and arterial thrombosis. Based on 70 years of clinical observations of patients lacking FXI, it is anticipated that drugs targeting this protein will cause less severe bleeding than warfarin or DOACs. In phase 2 studies, drugs that inhibit FXI or FXIa prevent venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty as well as, or better than, low molecular weight heparin. Patients with heart disease on FXI or FXIa inhibitors experienced less bleeding than patients taking DOACs. Based on these early results, phase 3 trials have been initiated that compare drugs targeting FXI and FXIa to standard treatments or placebo. Here, we review the contributions of FXI to normal and abnormal coagulation and discuss results from preclinical, nonclinical, and clinical studies of FXI and FXIa inhibitors.

Effectiveness of rivaroxaban in preventing cerebral venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cerebral venous thromboembolism (CVT) poses a significant risk of venous infarction and haemorrhage, which can lead to neurological deficits and, in severe cases, even death. The optimal treatment regimen for patients with CVT remains unclear.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science (WoS), and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with CVT. All-site venous thromboembolism (VTE), risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, incidence of partial recanalization, complete recanalization and major haemorrhage were among outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.

Results

The analysis included 1 RCT and 3 observational studies containing 211 patients. Compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban did not significantly decrease the all-site VTE [RR 0.31 (95% CI 0.01, 8.43); P=0.49, I2=0%]. Compared with VKAs, patients on rivaroxaban did not show a significantly reduced risk of recurrent cerebral venous thrombosis. In terms of incidence of partial recanalization, there was no discernible difference between rivaroxaban and VKAs [RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.66, 1.22); P=0.49, I2=0%]. There was no discernible difference in incidence of complete recanalization [RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.32, 3.03); P=0.97, I2=28%] and incidence of major haemorrhage [RR 0.19 (95% CI 0.01, 4.54); P=0.30].

Conclusion

Rivaroxaban was found to have similar efficacy to VKAs. Due to its lower risk of severe bleeding and no need for INR monitoring, rivaroxaban may be a preferable treatment option for CVT.

Vintage Victory: Warfarin Versus Apixaban in the Antiphospholipid Arena

This case report explores the efficacy of warfarin compared to apixaban in managing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent thrombosis. We emphasize the constraints of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as apixaban in APS management. This case discusses a 41-year-old female patient with APS who did not respond to apixaban therapy. The report details her transition to warfarin, resulting in symptom resolution and no further complications, thus alluding to warfarin's effectiveness in APS management over apixaban. The case contributes to the ongoing debate on the suitability of modern DOACs in APS treatment.

How I treat pediatric venous thromboembolism in the DOAC era

ABSTRACT

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) rivaroxaban and dabigatran are newly licensed for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children and mark a renaissance in pediatric anticoagulation management. They provide a convenient option over standard-of-care anticoagulants (heparins, fondaparinux, and vitamin K antagonists) because of their oral route of administration, child-friendly formulations, and significant reduction in monitoring. However, limitations related to therapeutic monitoring when needed and the lack of approved reversal agents for DOACs in children raise some safety concerns. There is accumulating experience of safety and efficacy of DOACs in adults for a broad scope of indications; however, the cumulative experience of using DOACs in pediatrics, specifically for those with coexisting chronic illnesses, is sparse. Consequently, clinicians must often rely on their experience for treating VTE and extrapolate from data in adults while using DOACs in children. In this article, the authors share their experience of managing 4 scenarios that hematologists are likely to encounter in their day-to-day practice. Topics addressed include (1) appropriateness of indication; (2) use for special populations of children; (3) considerations for laboratory monitoring; (4) transition between anticoagulants; (5) major drug interactions; (6) perioperative management; and (7) anticoagulation reversal.

Do we need more guidance on thrombophilia testing? Challenges and special considerations

INTRODUCTION

Thrombophilia testing (TT) is a laboratory procedure designed to detect the risk factors involved in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusions. The role of TT is also controversial because it has a limited impact on the choice and duration of antithrombotic treatments.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed, by examining MEDLINE up to October 2023. Accepted and not accepted thrombophilia markers are discussed along with the appropriateness or not of prescribing TT in several conditions such as: provoked and unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE), women who are planning a pregnancy whose relatives had VTE or have a hereditary thrombophilia, before assumption of estro-progestins, after multiple pregnant loss, arterial thrombosis, retinal vein occlusion, and splanchnic vein thrombosis.

EXPERT OPINION

TT is not essential in the management of VTE, but it may be useful for limiting adverse events in case of thrombophilia. We expose our criticism of items afforded by other guidelines by presenting our opinion based on both the scientific evidence and clinical practice. We also deal with common mistakes in prescribing and interpretations of TT hoping to purpose an educational approach on this topic. Finally, we emphasize the creation of the expert in hemostasis and thrombosis who should be present in every hospital.

How to diagnose and manage antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are autoimmune antibodies directed toward phospholipids or phospholipid-protein complexes, particularly those containing β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI). Persistently positive aPL accompanied by arterial or venous thrombosis, or recurrent pregnancy loss, constitutes the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Several types of aPL with different specificities have been defined and may be detected in the clinical lab, including lupus anticoagulants (detected using clotting assays) and anticardiolipin, anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin/phosphatidylserine antibodies (detected by ELISA); each of the last 3 aPL may be either IgG, IgM, or IgA, though IgA antibodies are not included in criteria for APS. Due to the relative rarity of APS and the heterogeneity of aPL, thrombosis risk stratification is challenging, and randomized clinical trials for thrombosis treatment and prevention have been limited. This lack of high-quality data has made the clinical management of APS difficult, and existing guidelines are few and could not possibly cover many of the scenarios encountered in managing patients with APS. In this review, we present 3 patients with aPL and/or APS who highlight treatment dilemmas, and we discuss background information that may help guide clinical judgment in developing individualized treatment plans for patients with these enigmatic antibodies.

Diagnosis and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by aberrant myeloid lineage hematopoiesis with excessive red blood cell and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Patients with PV present with a range of thrombotic and hemorrhagic symptoms that affect quality of life and reduce overall survival expectancy. Thrombotic events, transformation into acute myeloid leukemia, and myelofibrosis are largely responsible for the observed mortality. Treatment of PV is thus primarily focused on symptom control and survival extension through the prevention of thrombosis and leukemic transformation. Patients with PV frequently experience thrombotic events and have elevated cardiovascular risk, including hypertension, dyslipidemias, obesity, and smoking, all of which negatively affect survival. To reduce the risk of thrombotic complications, PV therapy should aim to normalize hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocytosis and, in addition, identify and modify cardiovascular risk factors. Herein, we review what is currently known about the associated cardiovascular risk and propose strategies for diagnosing and managing patients with PV.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in autoimmune diseases: A comprehensive review

Autoimmune diseases have specific pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies according to the type and stage of the disease, and to concomitant treatments. In this review, we revise the most common autoimmune disease such as antiphospholipid syndrome, inflammatory myositis, polymyositis and dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, Sjogren syndrome, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, vasculitis and inflammatory bowel disease. We also provide an overview of pathophysiology responsible for the risk of VTE in each autoimmune disorder, and report current indications to anticoagulant treatment for primary and secondary prevention of VTE.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in rural, remote, and First Nations peoples in the Top End of the Northern Territory, Australia

Background

The Northern Territory of Australia has a high proportion of First Nations peoples living in remote communities and a high burden of chronic autoimmune diseases. The epidemiology and clinical outcomes of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in First Nations Australians are poorly characterized.

Objectives

To determine the epidemiology, presenting features, and outcomes of patients with APS using an 18-year retrospective cohort of newly diagnosed patients presenting to Royal Darwin Hospital (2002-2020).

Methods

Patients admitted to Royal Darwin Hospital with a new incident diagnosis of APS between January 2002 and December 2020 were identified and followed until December 2022, with data on baseline demographics, clinical and laboratory features, and overall survival extracted from electronic and paper medical records.

Results

Fifty-three patients with APS were included, of whom 40 (75%) were First Nations and 46 (87%) were female. Thirty (75%) of First Nations patients with APS resided in very remote Australia vs 0 (0%) non-First Nations patients. Eighteen cases (34%) had primary APS, and 35 cases (66%) had secondary APS, most in association with lupus. Eight (15%) cases developed catastrophic APS (CAPS), all in First Nations patients. There were 13 deaths (of which 11 were among First Nations patients). Patients with CAPS had significantly shorter median overall survival (8.3 years from diagnosis), with median survival in non-CAPS patients not reached (P = .003).

Conclusion

There is a high prevalence of APS in First Nations patients living in very remote Australia admitted for tertiary care in the tropical north of the Northern Territory, Australia. The rate of CAPS in First Nations patients was high, and CAPS was associated with significantly shorter survival. Larger prospective studies are required to inform improved models of care for First Nations and remote Australians living with APS.

Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Unmet Needs and Review of the Literature

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require long-term anticoagulation due to the high-thrombotic recurrence risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been traditionally considered the standard of care in thrombotic APS. Nevertheless, the risk of recurrence persists with VKA. There are publications considering different intensities of anticoagulation with VKA; however, the standard-intensity anticoagulation (international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 3.0) is the most recommended. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the role of antiplatelet treatment in thrombotic APS. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as an alternative to VKA for many indications. There are, however, discrepancies regarding the management with NOACs in thrombotic APS. In this review, we update the different clinical trials with NOACs in venous, arterial, and microvascular thrombosis and suggest how these patients should be managed in agreement with the expert panels. Although scarce data are published regarding the current role of NOACs in thrombotic APS, the clinical trials failed to demonstrate noninferiority of NOACs compared with VKA, especially in patients with triple antiphospholipid antibodies positivity and/or arterial thrombosis. Single or double antiphospholipid positivity should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. In addition, we focus on different areas of uncertainty that still remain in thrombotic APS and NOACs. To summarize, emerging clinical trials are needed to provide robust data on the management of thrombotic APS.

Adrenal hemorrhage and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: an antiphospholipid syndrome dilemma

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can affect different organ systems, including the heart and adrenal glands. Despite being known for its prothrombotic characteristics, APS can have serious bleeding complications. Occasionally, thrombotic and bleeding episodes can present simultaneously in an APS patient. Whenever these events co-occur, resuming anticoagulation becomes a topic of debate. As such, we present the case of a 43-year-old male with triple positive antiphospholipid antibodies, indicating APS, who presented with chest pain. Anticoagulants were switched one month before presentation from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant, rivaroxaban. Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, as well as new-onset left-sided adrenal hemorrhage, were diagnosed. The patient developed adrenal insufficiency; therefore, corticosteroids were administered, and warfarin was resumed to prevent further thrombotic episodes.

Diagnostic Work-Up in Patients with Nonbacterial Thrombotic Endocarditis

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is a form of endocarditis that occurs in patients with predisposing conditions, including malignancies, autoimmune diseases (particularly antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, which accounts for the majority of lupus-associated cases), and coagulation disturbances for which the correlation with classical determinants is unclear. The condition is commonly referred to as "marantic", "verrucous", or Libman-Sacks endocarditis, although these are not synonymous, representing clinical-pathological nuances. The clinical presentation of NBTE involves embolic events, while local valvular complications, generally regurgitation, are typically less frequent and milder compared to infective forms of endocarditis. In the past, the diagnosis of NBTE relied on post mortem examinations, while at present, the diagnosis is primarily based on echocardiography, with the priority of excluding infective endocarditis through comprehensive microbiological and serological tests. As in other forms of endocarditis, besides pathology, transesophageal echocardiography remains the diagnostic standard, while other imaging techniques hold promise as adjunctive tools for early diagnosis and differentiation from infective vegetations. These include cardiac MRI and 18FDG-PET/CT, which already represents a major diagnostic criterion of infective endocarditis in specific settings. We will herein provide a comprehensive review of the current knowledge on the clinics and therapeutics of NBTE, with a specific focus on the diagnostic tools.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Thrombotic and Vascular Complications

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a rare, autoimmune thrombophilia defined by vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity, in the setting of documented persistent antiphospholipid antibodies including the lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies can be completely asymptomatic, or they can lead to clinical manifestations as severe as catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, which involves widespread coagulopathy over a very short period of time. The degree of risk associated with antiphospholipid syndrome depends on the characteristics of the antiphospholipid antibody profile and on the presence of additional thrombotic risk factors. The current standard treatment for unprovoked thrombosis is long-term warfarin. Treatment to prevent recurrent obstetric complications is low-dose aspirin and prophylactic heparin in pregnant patients. The use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is still being debated. Their use is generally contraindicated, especially in high-risk patients, such as those with all 3 antiphospholipid antibodies present, but they may potentially be of some use in some low-risk patients.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: State of the Art of Clinical Management

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder clinically characterized by recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Currently, treatment is mainly focused on anticoagulation, but therapies targeting mechanisms involved in APS autoimmune pathogenesis could play an important role in specific settings. An evidence-based therapeutic approach is limited by the broad clinical spectrum of the syndrome and the nature of a "rare disease" that makes it difficult to carry out well-designed prospective studies. Vitamin K antagonists (AVK), notably warfarin, are the standard treatment for preventing recurrent venous thrombosis and perhaps also arterial thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not recommended at least in patients with triple positivity APS. Treatment options for the prevention of pregnancy complications in obstetric APS, as combined use of aspirin and heparin, low-dose prednisolone, hydroxychloroquine, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), may improve pregnancy outcome. The catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is the most severe form of APS with acute multiple organ involvement and small vessel thrombosis. Glucocorticoids, heparin, plasma exchange or IVIG, rituximab, or eculizumab must be added to concurrent treatment of precipitating factors (e.g. infections) as rescue therapies. Finally, it has been observed that SARS COV2 infection may produce vascular complications mimicking the clinical and pathophysiological features of APS and particularly of CAPS. From this point of view, attention has been focused on the "protective" role of anticoagulant therapy in preventing thrombotic complication when these clinical conditions coexist.

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: A therapeutic challenge case report and literature review

The anticoagulants of choice for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic disease during pregnancy are unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is introduced as a rare but critical side effect of heparin products raising the thromboembolic event paradoxically. Here, we present a case of HIT in pregnancy with challenging management due to coincidence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) and limited anticoagulant options in the pharmaceutical market of our country of residence. We describe a 6-week pregnant patient with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), which developed HIT during antenatal care. Therapeutic anticoagulation was initiated with argatroban, then switched to apixaban due to limited access to argatroban. Another therapeutic challenge was the concurrent incidence of LA. The interdisciplinary care team decided on adding up warfarin and scheduled termination at 12 weeks regarding the hazardous condition of the patient. We also reviewed related case literature to convey a new insight into managing pregnancy-related HIT. HIT is a pro-coagulatory and lethal complication associated with heparin therapy that can be diagnosed by clinical suspicion, the 4T score system, and confirmatory laboratory analyses. Alternative anticoagulation is the cornerstone of the treatment and an interdisciplinary plan will be worthwhile to make the best clinical decision regarding the critical situation and least the thromboembolic events mortality during pregnancy.

Choice of anticoagulation in patients with low risk antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired hypercoagulable state necessitating long-term anticoagulation for secondary thrombosis prevention. Anticoagulation guidelines are predominantly based on data in high risk, triple positive patients, and favor Vitamin K antagonists over other forms of anticoagulation. The efficacy of alternative anticoagulants for secondary thrombosis prevention in low risk, single and double positive APS remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the incidence of recurrent thrombosis and major bleeding for patient with low risk APS on long-term anticoagulation. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who met revised criteria for thrombotic APS between January, 2001 and April, 2021 and received care through the Lifespan Health System. Primary outcomes included recurrent thrombosis and WHO Grades 3 and 4 major bleeding. A total of 190 patients were followed over a median duration of 3.1 years. At time of APS diagnosis, 89 patients were treated with warfarin and 59 patients with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). There were similar rates of recurrent thrombosis in low risk patients on warfarin versus DOACs (adjusted IRR 6.91; 95% CI 0.90-53.40, p = 0.064). Major bleeding events only occurred in low risk patients on warfarin (n = 8, log-rank p = 0.13). In conclusion, despite the choice of anticoagulation, patients with low risk APS had similar rates of recurrent thrombosis suggesting DOACs may be a potential treatment option for this cohort. There was a non-significant increase in major bleeding rates in low risk patients on warfarin versus DOACs. Study limitations include a retrospective study design and small event numbers.

Antiphospholipid syndrome management: a 2023 update and practical algorithm-based approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombo-inflammatory disease that has morbid and sometimes devastating effects on patients and their families. This review will discuss the most recent international societal treatment guidelines and propose practical management algorithms for various APS sub-types.

RECENT FINDINGS

APS represents a disease spectrum. Although thrombosis and pregnancy morbidities are traditional hallmarks of APS, a variety of extra-criteria clinical phenotypes can often be seen, which makes clinical management more challenging. Primary APS thrombosis prophylaxis should take a risk-stratified approach. Although vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or heparin/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) remain the preferred treatment for secondary APS thrombosis prophylaxis, some international society guidelines support the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in certain circumstances. Careful monitoring and individualized obstetric care with the use of aspirin and heparin/LMWH will improve pregnancy outcomes among pregnant individuals with APS. Treatment of microvascular and catastrophic APS remains challenging. While the addition of various immunosuppressive agents is often utilized, further systemic evaluations of their use are warranted before definitive recommendations can be made. Several new therapeutic strategies are on the horizon that might enable more personalized and targeted APS management in the near future.

SUMMARY

Although the knowledge of APS pathogenesis has grown in recent years, the management principles and strategies are largely unchanged. There is an unmet need for evaluating pharmacological agents, beyond anticoagulants, that target diverse thromboinflammatory pathways.

Controversies in the Management of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

ABSTRACT

Strategies to prevent thrombosis in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients are of the utmost importance. The risk of thrombosis in patients with aPLs varies, depending on additional venous thrombosis and cardiovascular risk factors, as well as associated comorbidities. Recurrent thrombosis despite treatment with vitamin K antagonists is relatively common in daily practice. In this context, the effectiveness of the new direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome is debated, as well as that of low-dose aspirin for primary thromboprophylaxis. There is an urgent unmet need to recognize the subgroup of patients that may benefit from low-dose aspirin use. Here we also discuss different points of view on primary and secondary thrombosis preventions in aPL-positive patients, which were presented as a debate during the 2021 PANLAR Congress (Pan-American League of the Association of Rheumatology) and that was organized by GESAF (Argentine Society of Rheumatology APS Study Group). It is the intention of this article to provide a useful discussion to aid treatment decision-making in daily clinical practice.

Direct oral anticoagulant adsorption and laboratory detection of lupus anticoagulant

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with many coagulation assays, mostly in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection, causing false positive and negative results. Despite guidelines recommendations, LA testing may be important during anticoagulation when the clinician has to decide whether to prolong or discontinue the drug.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the effect of activated charcoal (DOAC-Stop, DS) as a DOAC-adsorbent was investigated on samples from DOACs treated and untreated patients.

BASIC METHODS

165 plasma samples with a LA request were collected in three laboratories: 105 were from patients receiving DOACs and 60 were from nonanticoagulated patients with 30 LA negative and 30 LA positive. All coagulation screening assays and LA assays were evaluated before and after DS treatment.

RESULTS

The adsorption technique reduced DOACs concentration below the Lower Limit of Quantification. For nonanticoagulated patients: no significant difference in ratio results of coagulation screening (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and thrombin time) and LA tests were observed before and after addition of DS in LA positive and negative patients. Every LA was correctly classified. For anticoagulated patients: a statistically significant difference was found for coagulation screening assays and LA assays. Final LA conclusions changed after DS addition from positive to negative in 58.9% of patients (more frequently with Rivaroxaban) and from negative to positive in 8% of patients (more frequently with Apixaban).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that DOAC-Stop can be used in daily laboratory practice to remove DOACs interference for a more accurate assessment of LA that is essential for diagnosis and management of APS patients.

Effect of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation with mitral or aortic stenosis: A review

Background

Several studies have summarized the clinical performance of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with mitral stenosis or aortic stenosis. The significance of this review was to provide clinicians the latest update of the clinical application of DOACs in managing this specific population.

Methods

Literatures from the PubMed database up to July 2022 were screened for inclusion. Studies on the effect of DOACs in patients suffering from AF with mitral or aortic stenosis were assessed for further selection.

Results

Results from four studies were gathered: the RISE MS trial, the DAVID-MS study, and two observational studies. In the Korean observational study with a 27-month follow-up duration and a sample population consisted of patients with mitral stenosis and AF, the thromboembolic events happened at a rate of 2.22%/ year in the DOAC group and 4.19%/year in the warfarin group (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.18–0.45). Intracranial hemorrhage occurred at rates of 0.49% and 0.93% in the DOAC and the warfarin groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.22–1.26). In the Danish observational study, which had a sample pool with AF patients with aortic stenosis, reported that the adjusted hazard ratios for thromboembolism and major bleeding were 1.62 (95% CI, 1.08–2.45) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59–0.91) for DOACs compared with warfarin during 3 years of follow-up. In the RISE-MS trial involving AF patients with mitral stenosis, there were no differences in ischemic stroke, systemic embolic events, or major bleeding between the rivaroxaban vs. warfarin groups during a 1-year follow-up as well as equal rate of increased thrombogenicity in the left atrial appendage at 6 months. The rate of silent cerebral ischemia at 12 months was higher in the warfarin group (17.6%) than that in the rivaroxaban group (13.3%).

Conclusions

Current published studies supported DOACs' effectiveness in preventing thromboembolism in patients of AF with mitral or aortic stenosis. Further clinical trials could confirm these findings.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus Vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thromboprophylaxis is the cornerstone strategy for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Data comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the secondary prevention of thrombosis in APS patients remain contentious. We aim to review and analyse literature on the efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with VKAs in treating patients with APS. A literature search was performed from inception to 31 December 2021. Subgroups were analysed based on the risk stratification of APS profiles and different DOAC types. A total of nine studies with 1131 patients were included in the meta-analysis. High-risk APS patients (triple positive APS) who used DOACs displayed an increased risk of recurrent thrombosis [risk ratio = 3.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-8.93; I2  = 29%, P  = 0.005] compared with those taking VKAs. Similar risk of recurrent thrombosis or major bleeding was noted in low-risk APS patients (single or double antibody-positive) upon administering DOACs or VKAs. The utilization of Rivaroxaban was associated with a high risk of recurrent thromboses (RR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.56-4.42; I2  = 0, P  = 0.0003), particularly recurrent arterial thromboses (RR = 4.52; 95% CI: 1.99-10.29; I2  = 0, P  = 0.18) in overall APS patients. Comparisons of the rate of recurrent thrombosis events and major bleeding events when using dabigatran or apixaban versus VKAs yielded no statistical differences. In the absence of contraindications, this meta-analysis suggests that VKAs remain the first-choice treatment for high-risk APS patients, with DOACs a more appropriate option for low-risk APS patients. Different DOACs may exhibit different levels of efficacy and safety for thromboprophylaxis in APS patients and require further exploration.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Due to a high risk of recurrent thromboembolism in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), long-term anticoagulation is recommended. For decades, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been the gold standard for thromboprophylaxis in these patients. Due to the widespread use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in various thromboembolic conditions and their potential advantages compared to VKAs, several studies have been conducted to evaluate their safety and efficacy in APS. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing DOACs to VKAs in patients with APS. Relative risk (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for recurrent thromboembolic events, bleeding, and mortality. A total of 1437 patients pooled from 12 studies were analyzed. The risk of recurrent thrombosis, especially arterial thrombosis, doubled with DOACs compared to VKAs (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.44-4.71; p=0.001). The risk further increased in patients with a triple-positive antiphospholipid antibody profile (RR 4.50, 95% CI 1.91-10.63; p=0.0006) and with the use of rivaroxaban (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.10-3.45; p=0.02). The risk of major bleeding and mortality were not significantly different between the two arms. A trend favoring DOACs compared to VKAs was observed for all bleeding events.  This meta-analysis comes in agreement with previous studies and supports the use of VKAs in APS. Our study revealed that VKAs remain the gold standard for the management of APS, especially triple-positive APS. DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, are not as effective in preventing recurrent thromboembolism in high-risk APS patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of DOACs apart from rivaroxaban with a focus on their efficacy in the management of isolated or double-positive APS.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with single antibody-positive anti-phospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) remains unclear. Warfarin has been shown to be superior to DOACs among high-risk APLS patients (particularly those with triple-positive APLS). However, it remains unknown whether DOACs may be appropriate for lower-risk patients such as those with single-positive APLS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study comparing the risk of recurrent thrombosis among single-positive APLS patients treated with DOACs (apixaban or rivaroxaban), and those treated with warfarin.

RESULTS

One-hundred-forty-three single-positive APLS patients, newly started on anticoagulation following a first thrombotic event, were included. Median follow-up was 54 months (IQR 29-73 months). Ninety-one patients (64%) received warfarin and 52 patients (36%) received a DOAC. Six patients (6.6%) who received warfarin experienced a recurrent thrombotic event compared with 3 of 52 (5.8%) patients who received a DOAC (p = .845). There was no difference in event-free survival between groups (HR DOAC:Warfarin = 0.952, 95% CI 0.232 - 3.908). Major bleeding was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that DOACs may be a safe and effective option for patients with single-positive APLS. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Adverse Reaction to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in a Patient With VEXAS Syndrome

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a rare genetic disorder originating from a somatic mutation in the hematopoietic stem cells. This syndrome was first described in 2020 and carries many clinical features that other conditions cannot explain. Widespread autoinflammation is the primary process the disease presents, with high morbidity and mortality in those who show signs of bone marrow failure. Treatment is complex, and response to current therapies is poor. Long-term prognosis carries a mortality of 50%. In addition, the advancement of new-generation messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines raises concerns about their safety in this population since it could trigger a vaccine-related autoimmune response. This case describes the hospital course of a male in his 50s exhibiting an unexplained cutaneous reaction to an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. He was later diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome based on symptoms presentation and diagnostic workup.

Direct oral anticoagulants for use in paediatrics

With the increasing incidence of thromboembolism in children and improvement in management for patients with medically complex diseases, expanded availability of safe and effective anticoagulant medications is needed. Traditionally, the most common anticoagulants used for the treatment or prevention of venous thromboembolism or embolic stroke in children were either unfractionated heparin or the low-molecular-weight heparins. These medications require either intravenous access or daily subcutaneous injections, in addition to multiple venepunctures to monitor drug concentrations. Direct oral anticoagulants provide an alternative, and potentially safer, choice for children, as they are available in oral formulations and do not require drug monitoring. With the approval of the direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban (by the European Medicines Agency and Health Canada), and the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran (by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration), the field of paediatric anticoagulation is changing. In this Review, we provide an overview of the four direct oral anticoagulants approved in adults for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis and the completed and ongoing paediatric trials.

Severe thrombotic events associated with pre-procedural interruption of anticoagulation in systemic lupus erythematosus with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome: Cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and National Institutes for health and care Excellence in the United Kingdom (NICE) recommend that patients who are high risk for thrombotic events but require cessation of oral anticoagulation with warfarin, due to bleeding risk of a planned procedure, undergo bridging therapy with heparin. However, those conditions which are considered high risk are not universal, nor do guidelines differentiate between low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin. Triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thrombophilic state with a very high risk for thrombotic events during periods of anticoagulation cessation. Patients with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome in the setting of SLE may be at an even greater risk of thrombotic events during the perioperative period.

PURPOSE

Along with a review of the literature for perioperative management in APS we present three cases of triple positive secondary APS in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who had severe thrombotic complications after cessation of their oral anticoagulation despite being bridged with LWMH.

CONCLUSION

Given the severity and rapidity of thrombotic complications with low molecular weight heparin bridging, we propose that all patients with triple positive APS, especially secondary APS with SLE should undergo bridging therapy with intravenous UFH to reduce time without anticoagulation and minimize risk of thrombotic complications. Furthermore, we propose that NICE include APS in the list of medical conditions which are high risk for thrombotic complications and require bridging therapy.

Venous thromboembolism in antiphosholipid syndrome

Antiphosholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by the presence of clinical and laboratory criteria, it means by presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Venous thromboembolism belongs to the most frequent clinical manifestation of this syndrome. Here we summarised basic pathophysiological mechanisms of venous thrombosis and lung embolism development, epidemiology of APS, and also the situations when this syndrome should be considered. The possible difficulties of laboratory diagnosis and their therapy involvement are mentioned.

Recurrent Mural Thrombosis of the Ascending Aorta in a Patient with Antiphospholipid Syndrome

A 38-year-old man presented with embolic occlusion of the brachial artery. As per his computed tomography results, a pedunculated mass in the proximal ascending aorta was detected. Since discrimination between a thrombus and a tumor was deemed difficult, the patient underwent replacement of the ascending aorta. Histopathology revealed the mass to be a thrombus. The diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome was then confirmed postoperatively. Six months post-surgery, a new thrombus was detected in the vascular prosthesis. The thrombus resolved after treatment with edoxaban and aspirin. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on graft thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome, highlighting the importance of seamless anticoagulation therapy.