Glucose-Lowering and the Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Antidiabetic Therapies: A Systematic Review and Additive-Effects Network Meta-Analysis

Pharmacological regression of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with type 2 diabetes

Atherosclerosis of the coronary arteries continues to be one of the major global health burdens and acute coronary syndrome is responsible annually for at least 30 % of all deaths globally. Acute coronary syndrome may be the consequence of thrombus formation after erosion or rupture of obstructive or non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaque. The rupture of plaques is mostly caused by mechanical stress usually called cap fatigue. Vulnerable plaques are characterized by a softer atheromatous core and a thinner fibrous cap, with inflammation and hypercholesterolemia playing a crucial role in the atherothrombotic process. Based on animal studies that extend back to the 1920s, regression of atherosclerotic plaques in humans has just started to be considered and pursued. The idea that the human atherosclerotic plaques could regress at all met an important resistance over the decades; indeed, advanced plaques contain components, such as necrosis, calcification and fibrosis, which are hard to be removed. However, new animal models and imaging technics allowed a more complete and accurate quantitative assessment of plaque volume and are shedding new light on atherosclerosis regression. In this review, we are revisiting the existence of atherosclerosis regression in preclinical and clinical studies, with a focus on the latest mechanistic insights and on the newest pharmacological agents, particularly in patients with diabetes. Interestingly, we suggested that based on literature insights and preclinical studies, a combination of drugs to target hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and inflammation may be desirable for a fast-track Pharmacological regression of atherosclerotic plaque in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Major adverse cardiovascular events' reduction and their association with glucose-lowering medications and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health records

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases are a common cause of death among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) risks can be significantly reduced under adequate glycemic control (GC). This study aims to identify factors that influence MACE risk among patients with T2DM, including Hemoglobin A1c variability score (HVS) and early use of MACE-preventive glucose-lowering medications (GLMs).

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study to retrospectively review electronic health records between 2011 and 2022. Patients with T2DM ≥18 years without previous stroke or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were included. Cox regression was utilized to investigate MACE risk factors and compare MACE risk reduction associated with early use of MACE-preventive GLMs.

RESULTS

A total of 19 685 subjects were included, with 5431 having MACE, including 4453 strokes, 977 AMI, and 1 death. There were 11 123 subjects with good baseline GC. Subjects with good baseline GC had 0.837 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.782-0.895) times lower MACE risk than their counterpart. Subjects with a single MACE-preventive GLM at baseline with continuous use >365 days showed a decreased MACE hazard ratio (0.681; CI: 0.635-0.731). Among all MACE-preventive GLMs, semaglutide provided a more significant MACE-preventive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified that GLM, early GC, and HVS are MACE determinants among patients with T2DM. Novel GLM, adequate GC, and reduction of HVS can benefit MACE outcomes.

Cardiovascular protection significantly depends on HbA1c improvement with GLP-1RAs but not with SGLT2 is in type 2 diabetes: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), while developed as antihyperglycaemic medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, have proven to reduce major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) and hospitalization for heart failure (especially for SGLT2is) in dedicated cardiovascular outcome trials. The contribution of the glucose-lowering effect in the cardiovascular protection is uncertain and may differ between the two drug classes.

METHODS

This narrative review compares the relative effects of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction on the cardiovascular protection provided by GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is in placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials by using the results of either post-hoc mediation analyses or meta-regression studies.

RESULTS

Both mediation and meta-regression analyses suggest that the lower cardiovascular risk with GLP-1RAs partially but substantially tracks with their glucose-lowering effect, especially when considering the reduction in nonfatal strokes. In contrast, similar analyses fail to demonstrate any significant contribution of the glucose-lowering effect with SGLT2is, not only on MACEs but also on heart failure issues.

CONCLUSION

The contribution of improved glucose control in cardiovascular protection is limited, but is much greater for GLP-1RAs than for SGLT2is. Of note, such mediation or meta-regression analyses are exploratory and can only be viewed as hypothesis generating.