1
|
Channaiah CY, Memon SS, Lila AR, Sarathi V, Karlekar M, Barnabas R, Patil VA, Sharma A, Phadte A, Malhotra G, Shah N, Bandgar T. Diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in localizing ectopic ACTH syndrome: A systematic review. ANNALES D'ENDOCRINOLOGIE 2024; 85:596-603. [PMID: 39002895 DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2024.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To elucidate the role of various imaging modalities for tumor localization in ectopic ACTH Cushing's syndrome (EAS). DESIGN AND METHOD Systematic review of the literature published between January 2015-2024 was performed. Patients (290 EAS patients, 23.8% Occult) who underwent contrast enhanced CT (CECT) and at least one PET/CT-scan (68Ga-SSTR, FDG and/or F-DOPA) were included. RESULTS The sensitivity for identifying EAS tumor was comparable across CECT (63.1%, n=290), SSTR-PET/CT (58.2%, n=187), and FDG-PET/CT (57.6%, n=191), but was poor for DOPA-PET/CT (30.8%, n=26). Sensitivity for detecting metastasis was also comparable across CECT (78%, n=73), SSTR-PET/CT (85.3%, n=41), and FDG-PET (73.7%, n=38). For localised lesions, sensitivity as per etiology and grade of NET were similar for three scans, with exception of Thymic NET and grade 1 NET where CECT was better than FDG PET/CT. In patients not localised on CECT, sensitivity of SSTR PET/CT was 33.3% (vs. 18.9% FDG-PET/CT) whereas for patients negative on CECT and FDG-PET, sensitivity of SSTR-PET/CT was 15%. In cases where CECT and SSTR-PET/CT failed to localize, the sensitivities of FDG-PET/CT and DOPA-PET/CT were only 5.7% (2/35) and 0% (0/9), respectively. SSTR-PET/CT has a distinct advantage with significantly lesser false positive (FP) lesions (2.6%, mostly in thyroid/or pancreas). In comparison, CECT and FDG-PET/CT had FP ∼11% (mostly in lung and/or mediastinum), most of which were negative on SSTR-PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS As per the current evidence, SSTR-PET/CT can be considered as the scan of choice in EAS evaluation, and further research is needed as one-fourth of the lesions remain occult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan Yami Channaiah
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Saba Samad Memon
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Anurag Ranjan Lila
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Vijaya Sarathi
- Department of Endocrinology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, 560066 Bengaluru, India
| | - Manjiri Karlekar
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Rohit Barnabas
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Virendra Ashokrao Patil
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Anima Sharma
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Phadte
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Gaurav Malhotra
- Radiation medical Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 400012 Mumbai, India
| | - Nalini Shah
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Tushar Bandgar
- Department of Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, 400012 Parel, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ganni R, Torpy DJ, Falhammar H, Louise Rushworth R. Adrenal Medullary Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108:e885-e892. [PMID: 36896586 PMCID: PMC10438876 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Adrenal medullary hyperplasia (AMH) is a rare, incompletely described disorder of the adrenal medulla that is associated with catecholamine excess. OBJECTIVE To increase knowledge about AMH by reviewing the reported cases of this disorder. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of the genotype/phenotype relationship in all reported cases of AMH. SETTING Literature review and analysis. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS All cases of AMH published to date. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Characteristics of AMH cases and genotype-phenotype relationships. RESULTS A total of 66 patients, median age of 48 years, were identified from 29 reports. More than one-half were male (n = 39, 59%). The majority had unilateral (73%, n = 48) disease; 71% (n = 47) were sporadic and 23% (n = 15) were associated with the MEN2. Most (91%, n = 60) displayed signs and symptoms of excess catecholamine secretion, particularly hypertension. Elevated catecholamine concentrations (86%, n = 57) and adrenal abnormalities on imaging were common (80%, n = 53). More than one-half (58%, n = 38) had concurrent tumors: pheochromocytoma (42%, n = 16/38); medullary thyroid cancer (24%, n = 9/38); and adrenocortical adenoma (29%, n = 11/38). Most (88%, n = 58) underwent adrenalectomy with 45/58 achieving symptom resolution. Adrenalectomy was less common in patients under 40 years and those with bilateral disease (both P < .05). CONCLUSION AMH may be sporadic or associated with MEN2, most have catecholamine excess and imaging abnormalities. Unilateral involvement is more common. Most reported patients have been treated with adrenalectomy, which is usually curative with regard to catecholamine hypersecretion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafal Ganni
- School of Medicine, Sydney, The University of Notre Dame, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| | - David J Torpy
- Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Henrik Falhammar
- Department of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Louise Rushworth
- School of Medicine, Sydney, The University of Notre Dame, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|