Endoscopic Management of Weight Recurrence Following Bariatric Surgery

Trends in bariatric surgery revisions: a 25-year single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) is now the third most performed metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in the USA. This study aims to describe trends in MBS revisions at a single large academic institution over 25 years.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent an MBS revision between 2000 and 2024 at a single large quaternary referral center from a prospectively maintained database. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records to collect pertinent data related to MBS history and conducted a descriptive review of the data to evaluate trends.

RESULTS

A total of 667 patients underwent a first-time bariatric surgery revision; 364 (54.5%) performed surgically and 303 (45.5%) endoscopically. There was a noticeable trend toward endoscopic revisions indicated for weight-related indications, particularly over the past decade. For surgical revisions, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was the most revised primary MBS operation overall, surpassed by sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in recent years. A greater diversity of indications was observed for surgical compared with endoscopic revisions. Additionally, 14.9% of patients required more than one bariatric revision procedure.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery revisions are increasingly common, highlighting the chronicity of obesity and the need for long-term management. We identified general trends over time toward therapeutic interventions increasingly utilizing minimally invasive surgery and transoral endoscopic techniques. Transoral endoscopic revisions were primarily used for weight-related indications after RYGB, with many other indications managed exclusively through surgery.

Endoscopic bariatric surgery for adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic bariatric surgery (EBS) is a new treatment for obesity. We compared the efficacy, safety, and probability of metabolic complications of different EBSs with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) included searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2017, to December 27, 2022, to find comparative trials of EBS procedures and EBS with LSG. We performed a frequentist model NMA to summarize the evidence and ranked the interventions according to SUCRA scores.

RESULTS

The search for this NMA yielded 14,160 articles, of which 18 eligible trials recruited 766,135 participants for procedures including LSG, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), nonadjustable intragastric balloon (NIB), BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB), and adjustable intragastric balloon (AIB). Definitive evidence suggests that LSG is most effective for weight reduction. Compared with LSG, NIB, SMD = -0.49 [95% CI -0.79, -0.18]; AIB, SMD = -0.41 [95% CI -0.76, -0.06] and ESG, SMD = -0.31 [95% CI -0.33, -0.29] in the index of percentage total weight loss under six months. In terms of safety outcomes, ESG had the lowest incidence of adverse events; the order of the observed incidence of adverse events from small to large was ESG, NIB, AIB, LSG, and BIB.

CONCLUSIONS

ESG is an effective and safe minimally invasive surgical method for people with overweight and obesity. Its 12-month effect is better than that of NIB, and its influence on lipid metabolism makes it more protective of the cardiovascular system and liver.

PROSPERO

CRD42022375343.

Endoscopic Management of Weight Regain After Bariatric Surgery

Weight regain, also known as recurrent weight gain, is common following bariatric surgeries. While anti-obesity medications and surgical revisions offer effective treatment options, they are not without their challenges and limitations. Over the last few decades, there have been significant advancements in endoscopic interventions to address weight regain following bariatric surgery. These procedures have demonstrated feasibility, safety, efficacy, and durability, offering minimally invasive treatment options for this patient population.

Challenges in the care and treatment of patients with extreme obesity

Obesity is a prevalent chronic disease. The management of extreme obesity - i.e., body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2 or obesity class IV and V - is still far from ideal. Individuals with extreme obesity have a high risk of surgical complications, mortality, comorbidities, and reduced weight loss following bariatric surgery. Although lifestyle changes and anti-obesity medications are recommended for all patients with extreme obesity as adjuvants to weight loss, these measures are less effective than bariatric surgery. As a first step, sleeve gastrectomy or an inpatient very-low-calorie diet should be incentivized to enhance weight loss before definitive surgery. Although malabsorptive procedures lead to greater weight loss, they are associated with an increased risk of early complications and malnutrition. Nonstandard techniques employed in clinical trial protocols, such as transit bipartition, may be performed as they maintain a weight loss potency comparable to that of the classic duodenal switch but with fewer nutritional problems. Anatomical causes should be investigated in patients with postoperative suboptimal clinical response or recurrent weight gain. In these cases, the initiation of anti-obesity drugs, endoscopic therapies, or a conversion procedure might be recommended. More studies are needed to address the specific population of patients with extreme obesity, as their outcomes are expected to be distinct from those of patients with lower BMI.

The Trajectory of Revisional Bariatric Surgery: Open to Laparoscopic to Robotic

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective therapeutic intervention for patients with obesity, with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) being the most commonly performed primary MBS procedure. Long-term studies have demonstrated that 15-20% of patients require revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) due to weight-related issues or surgical complications. Despite the gold standard being laparoscopic revision, there are other available approaches such as open or robotic-assisted. An extensive literature review was performed for articles from their inception to February 2024. A descriptive review of MBS procedures (SG, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy (SADI) and biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS)) was carried out to report and compare outcomes between primary and revisional bariatric surgery. A similar review was conducted to compare outcomes of revisional approaches (open, laparoscopic, robotic). RYGB remains the dominant RBS with a similar safety profile compared to revisional SADI and BPD-DS. In terms of the RBS surgical approach, all three options showed comparable short and long-term outcomes, with robotic RBS being associated with longer operative time and variable length of stay. Additional long-term studies are required to further validate our conclusions.

Transoral gastric outlet reduction for post-prandial hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Post-prandial hypoglycemia is an uncommon but disabling late complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Most patients can be treated with dietary interventions and medications; however, some patients develop refractory hypoglycemia that may lead to multiple daily episodes and seizures. While RYGB reversal surgery is an effective treatment, complication rates are high, and patients inevitably experience weight regain. Transoral gastric outlet reduction (TORe) is a minimally invasive treatment that is effective for early and late dumping syndrome. However, prior studies have not distinguished the effectiveness of TORe specifically for patients with post-prandial hypoglycemia. This study aims to describe a single institution's experience of TORe for treating post-prandial hypoglycemia.

METHODS

This is a case series of patients with prior RYGB complicated by post-prandial hypoglycemia who underwent TORe from February 2020 to September 2021. Pre-procedural characteristics and post-procedural outcomes were obtained. Outcomes assessed included post-prandial hypoglycemia episodes, dumping syndrome symptoms, and weight change.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients underwent TORe from 2020 to 2021 for post-prandial hypoglycemia. Three (27%) patients had a history of seizures due to hypoglycemia. All had been advised on dietary changes, and ten patients (91%) were on medications for dumping. All patients reported a reduction in post-prandial hypoglycemic events as well as the majority of dumping syndrome symptoms during an average follow-up time of 409 ± 125 days. Ten patients (91%) had experienced weight regain from their post-RYGB nadir weight. For these patients, the average total body weight loss 12 months post-TORe was 12.4 ± 12%. There were no complications requiring hospitalization. One patient experienced post-TORe nausea and vomiting requiring dilation of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with resolution in symptoms.

CONCLUSION

TORe is a safe and effective treatment for post-prandial hypoglycemia and weight regain after RYGB in patients with symptoms refractory to medications and dietary changes.

Management of abdominal wall hernias in patients with severe obesity

Obesity is a risk factor for abdominal wall hernia development and hernia recurrence. The management of these two pathologies is complex and often entwined. Bariatric and ventral hernia surgery require careful consideration of physiologic and technical components for optimal outcomes. In this review, a multidisciplinary group of Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons' bariatric and hernia surgeons present the various weight loss modalities available for the pre-operative optimization of patients with severe obesity and concurrent hernias. The group also details the technical aspects of managing abdominal wall defects during weight loss procedures and suggests the optimal timing of definitive hernia repair after bariatric surgery. Since level one evidence is not available on some of the topics covered by this review, expert opinion was implemented in some instances. Additional high-quality research in this area will allow for better recommendations and therefore treatment strategies for these complex patients.

Revision Endoscopic Gastroplasty: An Overview and Review of Literature

The main aim of this paper was to examine the efficacy and safety of revision endoscopic gastroplasty and some of the adverse events likely to arise from the procedure, as well as the implications for future scholarly research. The study is a systematic review in which the PRISMA protocol was used to govern the article's inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies include those on revising endoscopic gastroplasty's effectiveness and safety. The studies were selected based on multiple parameters. The outcome included weight recidivism, excessive BMI loss, and absolute, total, or percentage weight loss. The outcome of this review confirmed that revision endoscopic gastroplasty is effective and safe. Mainly, revision endoscopic gastroplasty (R-EG) was found to counter-weight recidivism, especially short-term and mid-term. However, there is a need for additional scholarly investigations that would last several years to decades to inform the long-term efficacy of R-EG with precision.

Bariatric endoscopy: from managing complications to primary metabolic procedures

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic and is the second leading cause of preventable death. The approach to treating obesity involves a multidisciplinary approach including lifestyle interventions, pharmacological therapies, and bariatric surgery. Endoscopic interventions are emerging as important tools in the treatment of obesity with primary and revisional bariatric endoscopic therapies. These include intragastric balloons, aspiration therapy, suturing and plication, duodenal-jejunal bypass liners, endoscopic duodenal mucosal resurfacing, and incisionless magnetic anastomosis systems. Endoscopic interventions have also demonstrated efficacy in treating complications of bariatric surgery. Approaches include stenting, endoscopic internal drainage, and endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure. This review aimed to discuss the current endoscopic procedures used as primary and revisional bariatric therapy including those used for managing bariatric surgical complications.