Influence of maternal age on the birthweight of infants delivered from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles

Effect of post-vitrification cryopreservation duration on singleton birth-weight in frozen-thawed blastocysts transfer cycles

Introduction

This study aimed to explore the effect of cryopreservation duration after blastocyst vitrification on the singleton birth-weight of newborns to assess the safety of long-term preservation of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study conducted at the Gynecological Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction Center of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients who gave birth to singletons between January 2006 and December 2021 after undergoing FBT cycles were included. Five groups were formed according to the duration of cryopreservation of embryos at FBT: Group I included 274 patients with a storage time < 3 months. Group II included 607 patients with a storage time of 3-6 months. Group III included 322 patients with a storage time of 6-12 months. Group IV included 190 patients with a storage time of 12-24 months. Group V included 118 patients with a storage time of > 24 months. Neonatal outcomes were compared among the groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate birth-weights and other birth-related outcomes.

Results

A total of 1,511 patients were included in the analysis. The longest cryopreservation period was 12 years. The birth-weights of neonates in the five groups were 3344.1 ± 529.3, 3326.1 ± 565.7, 3260.3 ± 584.1, 3349.9 ± 582.7, and 3296.7 ± 491.9 g, respectively (P > 0.05). The incidences of preterm birth, very preterm birth, low birth-weight, and very low birth-weight were similar in all groups (P > 0.05). The large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age rates did not differ significantly among the groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors that may affect neonatal outcomes, a trend for an increased risk of low birth-weight with prolonged cryopreservation was observed. However, cryopreservation duration and neonatal birth-weight were not significantly correlated (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The duration of cryopreservation after blastocyst vitrification with an open device for more than 2 years had no significant effect on the birth-weight of FBT singletons; however, attention should be paid to a possible increase in the risk of low birth-weight.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes among patients of different ages who underwent frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of performing frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer in women of different ages.

METHODS

A total of 1,279 women were divided into four groups: a 38-40-year-old group (n = 147), 35-37-year-old group (n = 164), 30-34-year-old group (n = 483), and < 30-year-old group (n = 485). Intergroup comparisons of baseline characteristics and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were made.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate (47.6%), and live birth rate (34.0%) in the 38-40-year-old group were significantly lower than those in the 30-34-year-old group (64.4%, 50.9%, respectively; all P < 0.001) and < 30-year-old group (62.9%, 50.7%, respectively; all P < 0.001). However, the 35-37-year-old group did not differ from the other three groups in these two dimensions (all P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no differences in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, or obstetric or neonatal complications among the four groups (all P > 0.05). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the 35-37-year-old group was not associated with non-live birth outcomes, adverse pregnancy outcomes, or obstetric or neonatal complications. However, being 38-40 years of age was a risk factor for non-live birth (OR = 2.121, 95% CI: 1.233-3.647) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR = 1.630, 95% CI: 1.010-2.633). Post hoc power analysis showed that the study was sufficiently powered to detect meaningful differences.

CONCLUSION

Frozen-thawed high-quality single blastocyst transfer produces the same satisfactory pregnancy outcomes for women aged 35-37 years as younger patients. Future prospective randomized controlled studies with larger populations are needed to verify the feasibility and safety of this method.

Effect of development speed and quality of blastocyst on singleton birthweight in single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles

Background

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has revolutionized infertility treatment, leading to a surge in ART-conceived children. Despite its success, ART-born offspring face higher risks of preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA). The mechanisms behind these outcomes remain unclear, partly attributed to multiple embryo transfers. Recent advancements advocate single blastocyst transfers for improved outcomes. However, the influence of blastocyst quality and development speed on neonatal outcomes is underexplored.

Objective

This study investigated whether blastocyst development speed and quality affect singleton birthweight when the blastocyst is selected for single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT).

Methods

Data from patients who performed an FBT cycle at our center from July 2011 to June 2021 were collected and analyzed. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 420 single FBT cycles were assessed. The women were divided into four groups, Group A (day 5, good-quality blastocysts), Group B (day 5, non-good-quality blastocysts), Group C (day 6, good-quality blastocysts), and Group D (day 6, non-good-quality blastocysts) according to the developmental speed and quality of the transferred blastocyst.

Results

The birthweight was relatively the highest in Group A, which developed rapidly and transferred good quality blastocysts. However, no significant difference existed among the groups (P>0.05). The prevalence of premature birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), or high birth weight (HBW) was similar among the four groups (P > 0.05). No correlation existed between birth weight and blastocyst development speed or quality after adjusting for possible confounders (P > 0.05 respectively). However, the difference in the proportion of males born among the four groups was significant, especially in Group D, which was significantly lower than that in Group A (adjusted odds ratio = 0.461, 95% confidence interval: 0.230-0.921, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This retrospective cohort study suggests that the combined effect of blastocyst development speed and quality on neonatal birthweight is insignificant. The transfer of slow-growing, non-good-quality blastocysts increases the chance of a female baby being born.