DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: All Roads Lead to HeterochROMAtin Marks

Gene Therapy Strategies for RAG1 Deficiency: Challenges and Breakthroughs

Mutations in the recombination activating genes (RAG) cause various forms of immune deficiency. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is the only cure for patients with severe manifestations of RAG deficiency; however, outcomes are suboptimal with mismatched donors. Gene therapy aims to correct autologous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) and is emerging as an alternative to allogeneic HSCT. Gene therapy based on viral gene addition exploits viral vectors to add a correct copy of a mutated gene into the genome of HSPCs. Only recently, after a prolonged phase of development, viral gene addition has been approved for clinical testing in RAG1-SCID patients. In the meantime, a new technology, CRISPR/Cas9, has made its debut to compete with viral gene addition. Gene editing based on CRISPR/Cas9 allows to perform targeted genomic integrations of a correct copy of a mutated gene, circumventing the risk of virus-mediated insertional mutagenesis. In this review, we present the biology of the RAG genes, the challenges faced during the development of viral gene addition for RAG1-SCID, and the current status of gene therapy for RAG1 deficiency. In particular, we highlight the latest advances and challenges in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and their potential for the future of gene therapy.

Histone H3 mutations and their impact on genome stability maintenance

Histones are essential for maintaining chromatin structure and function. Histone mutations lead to changes in chromatin compaction, gene expression, and the recruitment of DNA repair proteins to the DNA lesion. These disruptions can impair critical DNA repair pathways, such as homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining, resulting in increased genomic instability, which promotes an environment favorable to tumor development and progression. Understanding these mechanisms underscores the potential of targeting DNA repair pathways in cancers harboring mutated histones, offering novel therapeutic strategies to exploit their inherent genomic instability for better treatment outcomes. Here, we examine how mutations in histone H3 disrupt normal chromatin function and DNA damage repair processes and how these mechanisms can be exploited for therapeutic interventions.

Multifunctional histone variants in genome function

Histones are integral components of eukaryotic chromatin that have a pivotal role in the organization and function of the genome. The dynamic regulation of chromatin involves the incorporation of histone variants, which can dramatically alter its structural and functional properties. Contrary to an earlier view that limited individual histone variants to specific genomic functions, new insights have revealed that histone variants exert multifaceted roles involving all aspects of genome function, from governing patterns of gene expression at precise genomic loci to participating in genome replication, repair and maintenance. This conceptual change has led to a new understanding of the intricate interplay between chromatin and DNA-dependent processes and how this connection translates into normal and abnormal cellular functions.

New facets in the chromatin-based regulation of genome maintenance

The maintenance of genome integrity by DNA damage response machineries is key to protect cells against pathological development. In cell nuclei, these genome maintenance machineries operate in the context of chromatin, where the DNA wraps around histone proteins. Here, we review recent findings illustrating how the chromatin substrate modulates genome maintenance mechanisms, focusing on the regulatory role of histone variants and post-translational modifications. In particular, we discuss how the pre-existing chromatin landscape impacts DNA damage formation and guides DNA repair pathway choice, and how DNA damage-induced chromatin alterations control DNA damage signaling and repair, and DNA damage segregation through cell divisions. We also highlight that pathological alterations of histone proteins may trigger genome instability by impairing chromosome segregation and DNA repair, thus defining new oncogenic mechanisms and opening up therapeutic options.

Role of condensates in modulating DNA repair pathways and its implication for chemoresistance

For cells, it is important to repair DNA damage, such as double strand and single strand DNA breaks, because unrepaired DNA can compromise genetic integrity, potentially leading to cell death or cancer. Cells have multiple DNA damage repair pathways that have been the subject of detailed genetic, biochemical, and structural studies. Recently, the scientific community has started to gain evidence that the repair of DNA double strand breaks may occur within biomolecular condensates and that condensates may also contribute to DNA damage through concentrating genotoxic agents used to treat various cancers. Here, we summarize key features of biomolecular condensates and note where they have been implicated in the repair of DNA double strand breaks. We also describe evidence suggesting that condensates may be involved in the repair of other types of DNA damage, including single strand DNA breaks, nucleotide modifications (e.g., mismatch and oxidized bases) and bulky lesions, among others. Finally, we discuss old and new mysteries that could now be addressed considering the properties of condensates, including chemoresistance mechanisms.

Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions

CRISPR nucleases can introduce double-stranded DNA breaks in genomes at positions specified by guide RNAs. When repaired by the cell, this may result in the introduction of insertions and deletions or nucleotide substitutions provided by exogenous DNA donors. However, cellular repair can also result in unintended on-target effects, primarily larger deletions and loss of heterozygosity due to gene conversion. Here we present a strategy that allows easy and reliable detection of unintended on-target effects as well as the generation of control cells that carry wild-type alleles but have demonstratively undergone genome editing at the target site. Our 'sequence-ascertained favorable editing' (SAFE) donor approach relies on the use of DNA donor mixtures containing the desired nucleotide substitutions or the wild-type alleles together with combinations of additional 'diagnostic' substitutions unlikely to have any effects. Sequencing of the target sites then results in that two different sequences are seen when both chromosomes are edited with 'SAFE' donors containing different sets of substitutions, while a single sequence indicates unintended effects such as deletions or gene conversion. We analyzed more than 850 human embryonic stem cell clones edited with 'SAFE' donors and detect all copy number changes and almost all clones with gene conversion.

Developing H3K27M mutant selective radiosensitization strategies in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a rare but highly lethal pediatric and adolescent tumor located in the pons of the brainstem. DIPGs harbor unique and specific pathological and molecular alterations, such as the hallmark lysine 27-to-methionine (H3K27M) mutation in histone H3, which lead to global changes in the epigenetic landscape and drive tumorigenesis. While fractionated radiotherapy, the current standard of care, improves symptoms and delays tumor progression, DIPGs inevitably recur, and despite extensive efforts chemotherapy-driven radiosensitization strategies have failed to improve survival. Advances in our understanding of the role of epigenetics in the cellular response to radiation-induced DNA damage, however, offer new opportunities to develop combinational therapeutic strategies selective for DIPGs expressing H3K27M. In this review, we provide an overview of preclinical studies that explore potential radiosensitization strategies targeting the unique epigenetic landscape of H3K27M mutant DIPG. We further discuss opportunities to selectively radiosensitize DIPG through strategic inhibition of the radiation-induced DNA damage response. Finally, we discuss the potential for using radiation to induce anti-tumor immune responses that may be potentiated in DIPG by radiosensitizing-therapeutic strategies.

Double-strand break repair and mis-repair in 3D

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are lesions that arise frequently from exposure to damaging agents as well as from ongoing physiological DNA transactions. Mis-repair of DSBs leads to rearrangements and structural variations in chromosomes, including insertions, deletions, and translocations implicated in disease. The DNA damage response (DDR) limits pathologic mutations and large-scale chromosome rearrangements. DSB repair initiates in 2D at DNA lesions with the stepwise recruitment of repair proteins and local chromatin remodeling which facilitates break accessibility. More complex structures are then formed via protein assembly into nanodomains and via genome folding into chromatin loops. Subsequently, 3D reorganization of DSBs is guided by clustering forces which drive the assembly of repair domains harboring multiple lesions. These domains are further stabilized and insulated into condensates via liquid-liquid phase-separation. Here, we discuss the benefits and risks associated with this 3D reorganization of the broken genome.

KAT5 histone acetyltransferase mutations in cancer cells

Cancer cells are characterized by accumulation of mutations due to improperly repaired DNA damage. The DNA double strand break is one of the most severe form of damage and several redundant mechanisms have evolved to facilitate accurate repair. During DNA replication and in mitosis, breaks are primarily repaired by homologous recombination which is facilitated by several genes. Key to this process is the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 as well as the accessory RAD52 gene. Proper chromatin remodeling is also essential for repair and the KAT5 histone acetyltransferase facilitates histone removal at the break. Here we undertook a pan cancer analysis to investigate mutations within the KAT5 gene in cancer cells. We employed two standard artificial algorithms to classify mutations as either driver (CHASMPlus algorithm) or pathogenic (VEST4 algorithm). We find that most predicted driver and disease-causing mutations occur in the catalytic site or within key regulatory domains. In silico analysis of protein structure using AlphaFold shows that these mutations are likely to destabilize the function of KAT5 or interactions with DNA or its other partners. The data presented here, although preliminary, could be used to inform clinical strategies.

Histones and their chaperones: Adaptive remodelers of an ever-changing chromatinic landscape

Chromatin maintenance and remodeling are processes that take place alongside DNA repair, replication, or transcription to ensure the survival and adaptability of a cell. The environment and the needs of the cell dictate how chromatin is remodeled; particularly where and which histones are deposited, thus changing the canonical histone array to regulate chromatin structure and gene expression. Chromatin is highly dynamic, and histone variants and their chaperones play a crucial role in maintaining the epigenetic regulation at different genomic regions. Despite the large number of histone variants reported to date, studies on their roles in physiological processes and pathologies are emerging but continue to be scarce. Here, we present recent advances in the research on histone variants and their chaperones, with a focus on their importance in molecular mechanisms such as replication, transcription, and DNA damage repair. Additionally, we discuss the emerging role they have in transposable element regulation, aging, and chromatin remodeling syndromes. Finally, we describe currently used methods and their limitations in the study of these proteins and highlight the importance of improving the experimental approaches to further understand this epigenetic machinery.

Imaging the Response to DNA Damage in Heterochromatin Domains

The eukaryotic genome is assembled in a nucleoprotein complex called chromatin, whose organization markedly influences the repair of DNA lesions. For instance, compact chromatin states, broadly categorized as heterochromatin, present a challenging environment for DNA damage repair. Through transcriptional silencing, heterochromatin also plays a vital role in the maintenance of genomic integrity and cellular homeostasis. It is thus of critical importance to decipher whether and how heterochromatin affects the DNA damage response (DDR) to understand how this chromatin state is preserved after DNA damage. Here, we present two laser micro-irradiation-based methods for imaging the DDR in heterochromatin domains in mammalian cells. These methods allow DNA damage targeting to specific subnuclear compartments, direct visualization of the DDR and image-based quantification of the repair response. We apply them to study DNA double-strand break repair pathways in facultative heterochromatin and the repair of UV photoproducts in constitutive heterochromatin. We discuss the advantages and limitations of these methods compared to other targeted approaches for DNA damage induction.

Large-Scale Chromatin Rearrangements in Cancer

Simple Summary

Cancers have many genetic mutations such as nucleotide changes, deletions, amplifications, and chromosome gains or losses. Some of these genetic alterations directly contribute to the initiation and progression of tumors. In parallel to these genetic changes, cancer cells acquire modifications to their chromatin landscape, i.e., to the marks that are carried by DNA and the histone proteins it is associated with. These “epimutations” have consequences for gene expression and genome stability, and also contribute to tumoral initiation and progression. Some of these chromatin changes are very local, affecting just one or a few genes. In contrast, some chromatin alterations observed in cancer are more widespread and affect a large part of the genome. In this review, we present different types of large-scale chromatin rearrangements in cancer, explain how they may occur, and why they are relevant for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Abstract

Epigenetic abnormalities are extremely widespread in cancer. Some of them are mere consequences of transformation, but some actively contribute to cancer initiation and progression; they provide powerful new biological markers, as well as new targets for therapies. In this review, we examine the recent literature and focus on one particular aspect of epigenome deregulation: large-scale chromatin changes, causing global changes of DNA methylation or histone modifications. After a brief overview of the one-dimension (1D) and three-dimension (3D) epigenome in healthy cells and of its homeostasis mechanisms, we use selected examples to describe how many different events (mutations, changes in metabolism, and infections) can cause profound changes to the epigenome and fuel cancer. We then present the consequences for therapies and briefly discuss the role of single-cell approaches for the future progress of the field.

Joining the PARty: PARP Regulation of KDM5A during DNA Repair (and Transcription?)

The lysine demethylase KDM5A collaborates with PARP1 and the histone variant macroH2A1.2 to modulate chromatin to promote DNA repair. Indeed, KDM5A engages poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains at damage sites through a previously uncharacterized coiled-coil domain, a novel binding mode for PAR interactions. While KDM5A is a well-known transcriptional regulator, its function in DNA repair is only now emerging. Here we review the molecular mechanisms that regulate this PARP1-macroH2A1.2-KDM5A axis in DNA damage and consider the potential involvement of this pathway in transcription regulation and cancer. Using KDM5A as an example, we discuss how multifunctional chromatin proteins transition between several DNA-based processes, which must be coordinated to protect the integrity of the genome and epigenome. The dysregulation of chromatin and loss of genome integrity that is prevalent in human diseases including cancer may be related and could provide opportunities to target multitasking proteins with these pathways as therapeutic strategies.

Genomic Reporter Constructs to Monitor Pathway-Specific Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs) can be error-free or highly mutagenic, depending on which of multiple mechanistically distinct pathways repairs the break. Hence, DSB-repair pathway choice directly affects genome integrity, and it is therefore of interest to understand the parameters that direct repair towards a specific pathway. This has been intensively studied using genomic reporter constructs, in which repair of a site-specific DSB by the pathway of interest generates a quantifiable phenotype, generally the expression of a fluorescent protein. The current developments in genome editing with targetable nucleases like Cas9 have increased reporter usage and accelerated the generation of novel reporter constructs. Considering these recent advances, this review will discuss and compare the available DSB-repair pathway reporters, provide essential considerations to guide reporter choice, and give an outlook on potential future developments.

DNA Repair in Space and Time: Safeguarding the Genome with the Cohesin Complex

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a deleterious form of DNA damage, which must be robustly addressed to ensure genome stability. Defective repair can result in chromosome loss, point mutations, loss of heterozygosity or chromosomal rearrangements, which could lead to oncogenesis or cell death. We explore the requirements for the successful repair of DNA DSBs by non-homologous end joining and homology-directed repair (HDR) mechanisms in relation to genome folding and dynamics. On the occurrence of a DSB, local and global chromatin composition and dynamics, as well as 3D genome organization and break localization within the nuclear space, influence how repair proceeds. The cohesin complex is increasingly implicated as a key regulator of the genome, influencing chromatin composition and dynamics, and crucially genome organization through folding chromosomes by an active loop extrusion mechanism, and maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Here, we consider how this complex is now emerging as a key player in the DNA damage response, influencing repair pathway choice and efficiency.

A Simulated Shift Work Schedule Does Not Increase DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by NHEJ in the Drosophila Rr3 System

Long-term shift work is widely believed to increase the risk of certain cancers, but conflicting findings between studies render this association unclear. Evidence of interplay between the circadian clock, cell cycle regulation, and DNA damage detection machinery suggests the possibility that circadian rhythm disruption consequent to shift work could alter the DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway usage to favor mutagenic non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair. To test this hypothesis, we compared relative usage of NHEJ and single-strand annealing (SSA) repair of a complementary ended chromosomal double-stranded break using the Repair Reporter 3 (Rr3) system in Drosophila between flies reared on 12:12 and 8:8 (simulated shift work) light:dark schedules. Actimetric analysis showed that the 8:8 light:dark schedule effectively disrupted the rhythms in locomotor output. Inaccurate NHEJ repair was not a frequent outcome in this system overall, and no significant difference was seen in the usage of NHEJ or SSA repair between the control and simulated shift work schedules. We conclude that this circadian disruption regimen does not alter the usage of mutagenic NHEJ DSB repair in the Drosophila male pre-meiotic germline, in the context of the Rr3 system.