Construction of the Classification Model Using Key Genes Identified Between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules From Comprehensive Transcriptomic Data

MultiClassMetabo: A Superior Classification Model Constructed Using Metabolic Markers in Multiclass Metabolomics

Multiclass metabolomics has become a popular technique for revealing the mechanisms underlying certain physiological processes, different tumor types, or different therapeutic responses. In multiclass metabolomics, it is highly important to uncover the underlying biological information on biosamples by identifying the metabolic markers with the most associations and classifying the different sample classes. The classification problem of multiclass metabolomics is more difficult than that of the binary problem. To date, various methods exist for constructing classification models and identifying metabolic markers consisting of well-established techniques and newly emerging machine learning algorithms. However, how to construct a superior classification model using these methods remains unclear for a given multiclass metabolomic data set. Herein, MultiClassMetabo has been developed for constructing a superior classification model using metabolic markers identified in multiclass metabolomics. MultiClassMetabo can enable online services, including (a) identifying metabolic markers by marker identification methods, (b) constructing classification models by classification methods, and (c) performing a comprehensive assessment from multiple perspectives to construct a superior classification model for multiclass metabolomics. In summary, MultiClassMetabo is distinguished for its capability to construct a superior classification model using the most appropriate method through a comprehensive assessment, which makes it an important complement to other available tools in multiclass metabolomics. MultiClassMetabo can be accessed at http://idrblab.cn/multiclassmetabo/.

Evaluating Machine Learning Methods of Analyzing Multiclass Metabolomics

Multiclass metabolomic studies have become popular for revealing the differences in multiple stages of complex diseases, various lifestyles, or the effects of specific treatments. In multiclass metabolomics, there are multiple data manipulation steps for analyzing raw data, which consist of data filtering, the imputation of missing values, data normalization, marker identification, sample separation, classification, and so on. In each step, several to dozens of machine learning methods can be chosen for the given data set, with potentially hundreds or thousands of method combinations in the whole data processing chain. Therefore, a clear understanding of these machine learning methods is helpful for selecting an appropriate method combination for obtaining stable and reliable analytical results of specific data. However, there has rarely been an overall introduction or evaluation of these methods based on multiclass metabolomic data. Herein, detailed descriptions of these machine learning methods in multiple data manipulation steps are reviewed. Moreover, an assessment of these methods was performed using a benchmark data set for multiclass metabolomics. First, 12 imputation methods for imputing missing values were evaluated based on the PSS (Procrustes statistical shape analysis) and NRMSE (normalized root-mean-square error) values. Second, 17 normalization methods for processing multiclass metabolomic data were evaluated by applying the PMAD (pooled median absolute deviation) value. Third, different methods of identifying markers of multiclass metabolomics were evaluated based on the CWrel (relative weighted consistency) value. Fourth, nine classification methods for constructing multiclass models were assessed using the AUC (area under the curve) value. Performance evaluations of machine learning methods are highly recommended to select the most appropriate method combination before performing the final analysis of the given data. Overall, detailed descriptions and evaluation of various machine learning methods are expected to improve analyses of multiclass metabolomic data.

Classification for psychiatric disorders including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder using machine learning

Schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BP), and major depressive disorder (MDD) are the most common psychiatric disorders. Because there were lots of overlaps among these disorders from genetic epidemiology and molecular genetics, it is hard to realize the diagnoses of these psychiatric disorders. Currently, plenty of studies have been conducted for contributing to the diagnoses of these diseases. However, constructing a classification model with superior performance for differentiating SCZ, BP, and MDD samples is still a great challenge. In this study, the transcriptomic data was applied for discovering key genes and constructing a classification model. In this dataset, there were 268 samples including four groups (67 SCZ patients, 40 BP patients, 57 MDD patients, and 104 healthy controls), which were applied for constructing a classification model. First, 269 probes of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among four sample groups were identified by the feature selection method. Second, these DEGs were validated by the literature review including disease relevance with the psychiatric disorders of these DEGs, the hub genes in the PPI (protein–protein interaction) network, and GO (gene ontology) terms and pathways. Third, a classification model was constructed using the identified DEGs by machine learning method to classify different groups. The ROC (receiver operator characteristic) curve and AUC (area under the curve) value were used to assess the classification capacity of the model. In summary, this classification model might provide clues for the diagnoses of these psychiatric disorders.