Potentials and challenges of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotype Analysis for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetuses With Abnormal Ultrasound Soft Markers

OBJECTIVE

To explore and evaluate the value of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with abnormal ultrasound soft markers.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 193 fetuses with abnormal ultrasound soft markers who received prenatal diagnosis at Meizhou People's Hospital, between October 2022 and February 2024. Genetic detection of fetal specimens obtained by ultrasound-guided puncture was carried out. The detection rates of karyotype analysis and CMA for chromosomal abnormalities in different ultrasonic abnormalities were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 193 fetuses, there were 77 (39.9%) fetuses with increased nuchal translucency(NT) thickness, 33 (17.1%) with ventriculomegaly, 29 (15.0%) with nasal bone hypoplasia, followed by choroid plexus cyst, pyelic separation, echogenic bowel, single umbilical artery, with persistent left superior vena cava, and persistent right umbilical vein. Aneuploidy was mainly found in fetuses with increased NT thickness or and nasal bone hypoplasia, while P/LP CNVs were mainly concentrated in fetuses with increased NT thickness or ventriculomegaly. The detection rate of karyotype was 5.7% (11/193), the detection rate of aneuploidy plus P/LP CNVs in fetuses with abnormal ultrasonic soft markers by CMA was 10.9% (21/193), and the additional detection rate of CMA was 5.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

CMA can significantly improve the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with abnormal ultrasonic soft markers compared with karyotype analysis. There was a significant difference in detection rates of chromosomal abnormality between CMA and karyotype analysis in the single ultrasonic abnormality group, but none in the multiple ultrasonic abnormalities group.

Analysis of Copy Number Variants Is an Important Consideration in Exome Sequencing

Copy number variants (CNVs) contribute significantly to the pathogenicity of rare genetic diseases and tend to have a more severe effect on phenotype compared to single nucleotide variants (SNVs). In the past decades, exome sequencing (ES) has proven valuable input in the characterization of underlying genetic defects. Our aim was to investigate the impact of integrating CNV analysis tools into standard ES analysis on its diagnostic yield. We worked on ES data from an original cohort of 840 patients, in whom the first analysis was able to detect causative SNVs and indels in 383 (45.6%). Using the ExomeDepth algorithm, clinically relevant CNVs were identified in 55 patients out of the 457 unsolved cases, thus enhancing the diagnostic yield to 52.1%. Among the enrolled subjects, neurodevelopmental delay was the most prevalent phenotype. The detected CNVs comprised 43 deletions (74.1%) and 15 duplications (25.9%), ranging in size from 94 bp to 94.3 Mb, and were classified as 56 pathogenic/likely pathogenic and 2 uncertain with high interest. The study presents further evidence that incorporating CNV analysis tools into ES pipelines improves the diagnostic yield and emphasizes the involvement of CNVs in the etiology of genetic disorders.

CRISPR/Cas-Based Prenatal Screening for Aneuploidy: Challenges and Opportunities for Early Diagnosis

Aneuploidy is increasingly recognized globally as a common cause of miscarriage among expectant mothers. The existing prenatal screening techniques for detecting aneuploidy have several limitations. The ability to diagnose aneuploidy early in a non-invasive manner is not feasible with the current screening methods, as they may produce false positive or false negative results. Recently, the widely used gene editing tool CRISPR/Cas has shown great promise in diagnostics. This review summarizes the prenatal screening tests used in the first trimester to assess aneuploidy conditions. Additionally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of molecular diagnostic tests, including the benefits and challenges of CRISPR/Cas-based trisomy detection. Thus, the proposed prenatal screening using CRISPR/Cas could provide significant benefits to expectant mothers by potentially enabling the early diagnosis of trisomy, helping to prevent miscarriage and birth defects. Furthermore, it opens new avenues for research, allowing clinicians and researchers to develop, optimize, and implement CRISPR/Cas-based prenatal screening assays in the future.

The assessing of clinical relevance of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction

OBJECTIVE

Chromosomal variations are known to play a role in the etiology of fetal growth restriction (FGR). Here, we intend to investigate the significance of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) in the prenatal diagnosis of definite FGR.

METHOD

182 pregnant women with FGR participated in our study, undergoing CMA to identify chromosomal abnormalities. The cohort was categorized into isolated FGR, FGR with ultrasound soft marker abnormalities, and FGR associated with structural malformations.

RESULTS

The detection rates of PCNVs in FGR with structural anomalies are significantly higher than those in the isolated FGR group and the FGR group with abnormal ultrasound soft markers (19.0% vs. 2.1%, 19% vs. 1.5%; χ²=9.33, p = 0.005). Compared to FGR with a single system malformation, the diagnostic rate of chromosomal variations in FGR with multiple system malformations is markedly increased (60% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.028). Advanced maternal age, early-onset FGR, and severe FGR do not appear to influence the diagnostic rate of chromosomal variations (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Chromosomal variations pose a significant risk in FGR with structural abnormalities, associated with the number of organ systems involved. Notably, advanced maternal age, early-onset FGR, and severe FGR do not affect the diagnostic rate of chromosomal variations in FGR.

Evaluating Chromosomal Mosaicism in Prenatal Diagnosis: The Complementary Roles of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotyping

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of in vitro cell subculture on prenatal diagnostic sample results and compare the efficacy of conventional karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in detecting chromosome mosaicism.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of G-banding karyotyping and CMA data from 2007 amniocentesis cases to investigate chromosome mosaicism.

RESULTS

Chromosome mosaicism was detected in 1.49% of cases (30/2007). Sex chromosome mosaicism was the most common form of mosaicism. Among the 30 mosaicisms, 18 results were consistent between the two methods. In four cases, CMA indicated mosaicism but the karyotypes were normal. In eight cases, CMA was normal while the karyotypes suggested mosaicism.

CONCLUSIONS

CMA and karyotyping complement each other in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Combining both methods enhances detection accuracy, particularly in cases of chromosomal mosaicism, which may be missed after the subculture of adherent cells in karyotype analysis.

Chromosomal Abnormalities Detected by Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Karyotype in Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities

Objective

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is a first-line test to assess the genetic etiology of fetal ultrasound abnormalities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CMA in detecting chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities, including structural abnormalities and non-structural abnormalities.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 368 fetuses with abnormal ultrasound who received interventional prenatal diagnosis at Meizhou People's Hospital from October 2022 to December 2023. Samples of villi, amniotic fluid, and umbilical cord blood were collected according to different gestational weeks, and karyotype and CMA analyses were performed. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in different ultrasonic abnormalities was analyzed.

Results

There were 368 fetuses with abnormal ultrasound, including 114 (31.0%) with structural abnormalities, 225 (61.1%) with non-structural abnormalities, and 29 (7.9%) with structural combined with non-structural abnormalities. The detection rate of aneuploidy and pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) copy number variations (CNVs) of CMA in fetuses with structural abnormalities was 5.26% (6/114), the detection rate of karyotype was 2.63% (3/114), and the additional diagnosis rate of CMA was 2.63%. In the fetuses with ultrasonic non-structural abnormalities, the detection rate of karyotype was 6.22% (14/225), the detection rate of aneuploidy and P/LP CNVs in fetuses with ultrasonic structural abnormalities was 9.33% (21/225), and the additional diagnosis rate of CMA was 3.11%. There was no significant difference in chromosome abnormality detection rate of CMA among structural abnormality, non-structural abnormality, and structural abnormality combined with non-structural abnormality groups (5.3%, 9.3%, and 13.8%, p = 0.241), also among multiple ultrasonic abnormality and single ultrasonic abnormality groups (14.8%, and 7.3%, p = 0.105).

Conclusion

CMA can significantly improve the detection rate of genetic abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis of ultrasonic abnormal fetuses compared with karyotype analysis. CMA is a more effective tool than karyotyping alone in detecting chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities.

Extending the new era of genomic testing into pregnancy management: A proposed model for Australian prenatal services

BACKGROUND

Trio exome sequencing can be used to investigate congenital abnormalities identified on pregnancy ultrasound, but its use in an Australian context has not been assessed.

AIMS

Assess clinical outcomes and changes in management after expedited genomic testing in the prenatal period to guide the development of a model for widespread implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three prospective referrals for whole exome sequencing, including 40 trios (parents and pregnancy), two singletons and one duo were assessed in a tertiary hospital setting with access to a state-wide pathology laboratory. Diagnostic yield, turn-around time (TAT), gestational age at reporting, pregnancy outcome, change in management and future pregnancy status were assessed for each family.

RESULTS

A clinically significant genomic diagnosis was made in 15/43 pregnancies (35%), with an average TAT of 12 days. Gestational age at time of report ranged from 16 + 5 to 31 + 6 weeks (median 21 + 3 weeks). Molecular diagnoses included neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, RASopathies and a range of other rare Mendelian disorders. The majority of families actively used the results in pregnancy decision making as well as in management of future pregnancies.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid second trimester prenatal genomic testing can be successfully delivered to investigate structural abnormalities in pregnancy, providing crucial guidance for current and future pregnancy management. The time-sensitive nature of this testing requires close laboratory and clinical collaboration to ensure appropriate referral and result communication. We found the establishment of a prenatal coordinator role and dedicated reporting team to be important facilitators. We propose this as a model for genomic testing in other prenatal services.

Centromeres in cancer: Unraveling the link between chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis

Centromeres are critical structures involved in chromosome segregation, maintaining genomic stability, and facilitating the accurate transmission of genetic information. They are key in coordinating the assembly and help keep the correct structure, location, and function of the kinetochore, a proteinaceous structure vital for ensuring proper chromosome segregation during cell division. Abnormalities in centromere structure can lead to aneuploidy or chromosomal instability, which have been implicated in various diseases, including cancer. Accordingly, abnormalities in centromeres, such as structural rearrangements and dysregulation of centromere-associated proteins, disrupt gene function, leading to uncontrolled cell growth and tumor progression. For instance, altered expression of CENP-A, CENP-E, and others such as BUB1, BUBR1, MAD1, and INCENP, have been shown to ascribe to centromere over-amplification, chromosome missegregation, aneuploidy, and chromosomal instability; this, in turn, can culminate in tumor progression. These centromere abnormalities also promoted tumor heterogeneity by generating genetically diverse cell populations within tumors. Advanced techniques like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray analysis are crucial for detecting centromere abnormalities, enabling accurate cancer classification and tailored treatment strategies. Researchers are exploring strategies to disrupt centromere-associated proteins for targeted cancer therapies. Thus, this review explores centromere abnormalities in cancer, their molecular mechanisms, diagnostic implications, and therapeutic targeting. It aims to advance our understanding of centromeres' role in cancer and develop advanced diagnostic tools and targeted therapies for improved cancer management and treatment.

Genomic insights into prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: value of CNV-seq and WES in clinical practice

This study aimed to assess the efficiency of CNV-seq and WES in detecting genetic cause of congenital heart disease (CHDs) in prenatal diagnoses and to compare CNV detection rate between isolated and non-isolated CHD cases. We conducted a retrospective study of 118 Chinese fetuses diagnosed with CHD by prenatal ultrasound. Participants underwent CNV-seq and, if necessary, WES to detect chromosomal and single nucleotide variations. The overall detection rate for pathogenic or likely pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities was 16.9%, including 7.6% aneuploidies and 9.3% pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs), predominantly 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (54.4%). The sensitivity and specificity of CNV-Seq for detecting P/Lp CNVs were 95% and 100%, respectively. CNV-Seq offered a 6.7% improvement in detecting chromosomal abnormalities over karyotyping. WES further identified significant single nucleotide and small indel variations contributing to CHD in genes such as TMEM67, PLD1, ANKRD11, and PNKP, enhancing diagnostic yield by 14.8% in cases negative for CNVs. Non-isolated CHD cases exhibited higher rates of detectable chromosomal abnormalities compared to isolated cases (32.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.005), underlining the genetic complexity of these conditions. The combined use of CNV-seq and WES provides a comprehensive approach to prenatal genetic testing for CHDs, unveiling significant genetic cause that could impact clinical management and parental decision-making. This study supports the integration of these advanced genomic technologies in routine prenatal diagnostics to increase detection diagnostic yields of causal genetic variants associated with CHDs.

Evaluation the Application of Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray in Prenatal Diagnosis

Background

We aimed to compare the difference of the chromosomal abnormalities using karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) as well as to evaluate their application in different prenatal diagnosis indications.

Methods

Overall, 3007 pregnant women with prenatal diagnosis indications from Medical Genetics Department of Linyi Women and Children's Health Care Hospital, who underwent standard G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA, were enrolled from 2018-2022. G-banded karyotype analysis and CMA were undergone simultaneously. All fetuses with genetic variants were enrolled for further analyzing. The frequency and differences of chromosomal abnormalities of the two methods were compared in different prenatal diagnosis indications groups.

Results

CMA improved 4.09% (123/3007) of genetic changes compared karyotype analysis. CMA is on par with karyotyping for detection of aneuploidies and gross unbalanced rearrangements. Serological screening and ultrasound abnormalities were the main indications of prenatal diagnosis. The detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was highest in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) abnormal group. In the ultrasound abnormality group, the detection rate of genetic variants in nuchal translucency (NT) increased group was higher than other subgroups and there was statistically significant difference in the detection rate of pCNVs. CMA can detect 5.57% (40/718) more genetic abnormalities in ultrasound abnormality group on the normal karyotype. CMA improved 0.67% (20/3007) of genetic changes with clinically significant compared karyotype, brought 3.42% (103/3007) of variants with uncertain significance (VOUS).

Conclusion

CMA identified additional, clinically significant genetic variants on the basis of normal karyotype analysis, brought a proportion of unclear significant variants. All the pregnant women accepted amniocentesis should be informed about their characteristics of karyotype analysis and CMA by genetic counselors.

Chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is a valuable tool in prenatal diagnosis for the detection of chromosome uniparental disomy (UPD). This retrospective study examines fetuses undergoing invasive prenatal diagnosis through Affymetrix CytoScan 750 K array analysis. We evaluated both chromosome G-banding karyotyping data and CMA results from 2007 cases subjected to amniocentesis.

RESULTS

The detection rate of regions of homozygosity (ROH) ≥ 10 Mb was 1.8% (33/2007), with chromosome 11 being the most frequently implicated (17.1%, 6/33). There were three cases where UPD predicted an abnormal phenotype based on imprinted gene expression.

CONCLUSION

The integration of UPD detection by CMA offers a more precise approach to prenatal genetic diagnosis. CMA proves effective in identifying ROH and preventing the birth of children affected by imprinting diseases.

Prenatal diagnosis and outcomes in 320 fetuses with nasal bone anomalies

Object: To investigate the chromosome abnormalities associated with absent or hypoplastic fetal nasal bone. Methods: Patients with fetal nasal bone anomalies (NBA) referred to our center for prenatal diagnosis between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. All these patients underwent chromosomal microarray and/or karyotyping and received genetic counseling before and after testing. Results: Among 320 fetuses with NBA, chromosomal abnormalities were diagnosed in 89 (27.8%) cases, including 53 cases of trisomy 21, which was the most common type of chromosomal aneuploidy, accounting for 59.6% of all detected abnormalities. In addition to aneuploidies, 29 cases of copy number variants (CNVs) were detected. In cases of isolated NBA with low-risk screening results and without other risk factors, the incidence of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies and pathogenic CNVs is 5.3% (7 in 132 cases). Conclusion: This study suggests that parents of fetuses should be informed about the possibility of fetal aneuploidy and pathogenic CNVs and that discussion with the parents is also recommended, providing data support and reference for clinical counseling.

Advanced maternal age: copy number variations and pregnancy outcomes

Objective: Adverse pregnancy outcomes are closely related to advanced maternal age (AMA; age at pregnancy ≥35 years). Little research has been reported on aneuploid abnormalities and pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) affecting pregnancy outcomes in women with AMA. The purpose of this study was to assess CNVs associated with AMA in prenatal diagnosis to determine the characteristics of pathogenic CNVs and assist with genetic counseling of women with AMA. Methods: Among 277 fetuses of women with AMA, 218 (78.7%) were isolated AMA fetuses and 59 (21.3%) were non-isolated AMA fetuses and showed ultrasound anomalies from January 2021 to October 2022. Isolated AMA was defined as AMA cases without sonographic abnormalities. Non-isolated AMA was defined as AMA cases with sonographic abnormalities such as sonographic soft markers, widening of the lateral ventricles, or extracardiac structural anomalies. The amniotic fluid cells underwent routine karyotyping followed by single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) analysis. Results: Of the 277 AMA cases, karyotype analysis identified 20 chromosomal abnormalities. As well as 12 cases of chromosomal abnormalities corresponded to routine karyotyping, the SNP array identified an additional 14 cases of CNVs with normal karyotyping results. There were five pathogenetic CNVs, seven variations of uncertain clinical significance (VOUS), and two benign CNVs. The detection rate of abnormal CNVs in non-isolated AMA cases was increasing (13/59; 22%) than in isolated AMA cases (13/218; 5.96%) (p < 0.001). We also determined that pathogenic CNVs affected the rate of pregnancy termination in women with AMA. Conclusion: Aneuploid abnormalities and pathogenic CNVs affect pregnancy outcomes in women with AMA. SNP array had a higher detection rate of genetic variation than did karyotyping and is an important supplement to karyotype analysis, which enables better informed clinical consultation and clinical decision-making.

Evaluation and Analysis of Absence of Homozygosity (AOH) Using Chromosome Analysis by Medium Coverage Whole Genome Sequencing (CMA-seq) in Prenatal Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Absence of homozygosity (AOH) is a genetic characteristic known to cause human diseases mainly through autosomal recessive or imprinting mechanisms. The importance and necessity of accurate AOH detection has become more clinically significant in recent years. However, it remains a challenging task for sequencing-based methods thus far.

METHODS

In this study, we developed and optimized a new bioinformatic algorithm based on the assessment of minimum sequencing coverage, optimal bin size, the Z-score threshold of four types of allele count and the frequency for accurate genotyping using 28 AOH negative samples, and redefined the AOH detection cutoff value. We showed the performance of chromosome analysis by five-fold coverage whole genome sequencing (CMA-seq) for AOH identification in 27 typical prenatal/postnatal AOH positive samples, which were previously confirmed by chromosomal microarray analysis with single nucleotide polymorphism array (CMA/SNP array).

RESULTS

The blinded study indicated that for all three forms of AOH, including whole genomic AOH, single chromosomal AOH and segmental AOH, and all kinds of sample types, including chorionic villus sampling, amniotic fluid, cord blood, peripheral blood and abortive tissue, CMA-seq showed equivalent detection power to that of routine CMA/SNP arrays (750K). The subtle difference between the two methods is that CMA-seq is prone to detect small inconsecutive AOHs, while CMA/SNP array reports it as a whole.

CONCLUSION

Based on our newly developed bioinformatic algorithm, it is feasible to detect clinically significant AOH using CMA-seq in prenatal diagnosis.