Tissue Damage Caused by Myeloablative, but Not Non-Myeloablative, Conditioning before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Results in Dermal Macrophage Recruitment without Active T-Cell Interaction

Plasma from patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation promotes NETOSIS in vitro and correlates with inflammatory parameters and clinical severity

Introduction

NETosis, the mechanism by which neutrophils release extracellular traps (NETs), is closely related to inflammation. During the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), different stimuli can induce NETs formation. Inflammation and endothelial injury have been associated with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and complications after allo-HSCT. We focus on the study of NETosis and its relation with cytokines, hematological and biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes before, during and after allo-HSCT.

Methods

We evaluate the capacity of plasma samples from allo-HSCT patients to induce NETosis, in a cell culture model. Plasma samples from patients undergoing allo-HSCT had a stronger higher NETs induction capacity (NETsIC) than plasma from healthy donors throughout the transplantation process. An optimal cut-off value by ROC analysis was established to discriminate between patients whose plasma triggered NETosis (NETs+IC group) and those who did not (NETs-IC group).

Results

Prior to conditioning treatment, the capacity of plasma samples to trigger NETosis was significantly correlated with the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) score. At day 5 after transplant, patients with a positive NETsIC had higher interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and also a higher Modified EASIX score (M-EASIX) than patients with a negative NETsIC. EASIX and M-EASIX scores seek to determine inflammation and endothelium damage, therefore it could indicate a heightened immune response and inflammation in the group of patients with a positive NETsIC. Cytokine levels, specifically IL-8 and IL-6, significantly increased after allo-HSCT with peak levels reached on day 10 after graft infusion. Only, IL-10 and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with a positive NETsIC. In our small cohort, higher IL-6 and IL-8 levels were related to early severe complications (before day 15 after transplant).

Discussion

Although early complications were not related to NETosis by itself, NETosis could predict overall non-specific but clinically significant complications during the full patient admission. In summary, NETosis can be directly induced by plasma from allo-HSCT patients and NETsIC was associated with clinical indicators of disease severity, cytokines levels and inflammatory markers.

Risk factors for graft-versus-host-disease after donor lymphocyte infusion following T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Introduction

Unmodified donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can boost the beneficial Graft-versus-Leukemia (GvL) effect but may also induce severe Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). To improve the balance between GvL and GvHD, it is crucial to identify factors that influence the alloreactivity of DLI.

Methods

We investigated the effects of the presence of patient-derived antigen-presenting cells at time of DLI as estimated by the bone marrow (BM) chimerism status, lymphopenia as measured by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at time of DLI, and the presence of a viral infection (de novo or reactivation) close to DLI on the risk of GvHD after DLI. The cohort consisted of patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome who prophylactically or pre-emptively received DLI as standard care after alemtuzumab-based alloSCT. In patients at high risk for relapse, DLI was administered at 3 months after alloSCT (n=88) with a dose of 0.3x106 or 0.15x106 T cells/kg in case of a related or unrelated donor, respectively. All other patients (n=76) received 3x106 or 1.5x106 T cells/kg, respectively, at 6 months after alloSCT.

Results

For both DLIs, patients with reduced-intensity conditioning and an unrelated donor had the highest risk of GvHD. For DLI given at three months, viral infection within 1 week before and 2 weeks after DLI was an additional significant risk factor (hazard ratio (HR) 3.66 compared to no viral infection) for GvHD. At six months after alloSCT, viral infections were rare and not associated with GvHD. In contrast, mixed BM chimerism (HR 3.63 for ≥5% mixed chimerism compared to full donor) was an important risk factor for GvHD after DLI given at six months after alloSCT. ALC of <1000x106/l showed a trend for association with GvHD after this DLI (HR 2.05 compared to ≥1000x106/l, 95% confidence interval 0.94-4.45). Furthermore, the data suggested that the presence of a viral infection close to the DLI at three months or ≥5% mixed chimerism at time of the DLI at six months correlated with the severity of GvHD, thereby increasing their negative impact on the current GvHD-relapse-free survival.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate that the risk factors for GvHD after DLI depend on the setting of the DLI.

Perspectives on oral chronic graft-versus-host disease from immunobiology to morbid diagnoses

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) is a major long-term complication, associated with morbidity and mortality in patients following allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for immune hematopoietic disorders. The mouth is one of the most frequently affected organs after HCT (45-83%) and oral cGVHD, which may appear as the first visible sign. Manifestations present with mucosal lichenoid lesions, salivary gland dysfunction and limited oral aperture. Diagnosis of oral cGVHD severity is based on mucosal lesions with symptoms of sensitivity and pain and reduced oral intake. However, diagnostic difficulties arise due to subjective definitions and low specificity to cover the spectrum of oral cGVHD. In recent years there have been significant improvements in our understanding of the underlying oral cGVHD disease mechanisms. Drawing upon the current knowledge on the pathophysiology and biological phases of oral cGVHD, we address oral mucosa lichenoid and Sjogren's Syndrome-like sicca syndromes. We consider the response of alloreactive T-cells and macrophages to recipient tissues to drive the pathophysiological reactions and biological phases of acute inflammation (phase 1), chronic inflammation and dysregulated immunity (phase 2), and subsequent aberrant fibrotic healing (phase 3), which in time may be associated with an increased malignant transformation rate. When formulating treatment strategies, the pathophysiological spectrum of cGVHD is patient dependent and not every patient may progress chronologically through the biological stages. As such there remains a need to address and clarify personalized diagnostics and management to improve treatment descriptions. Within this review, we highlight the current state of the art knowledge on oral cGVHD pathophysiology and biological phases. We address knowledge gaps of oral cGVHD, with a view to facilitate clinical management and improve research quality on lichenoid biology and morbid forms of oral cGVHD.

HTLV-1 infection of donor-derived T cells might promote acute graft-versus-host disease following liver transplantation

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is a rare, but severe complication of liver transplantation (LT). It is caused by the activation of donor immune cells in the graft against the host shortly after transplantation, but the contributing pathogenic factors remain unclear. Here we show that human T cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1) infection of donor T cells is highly associated with aGVHD following LT. The presence of HTLV-1 in peripheral blood and tissue samples from a discovery cohort of 7 aGVHD patients and 17 control patients is assessed with hybridization probes (TargetSeq), mass cytometry (CyTOF), and multiplex immunohistology (IMC). All 7 of our aGVHD patients display detectable HTLV-1 Tax signals by IMC. We identify donor-derived cells based on a Y chromosome-specific genetic marker, EIF1AY. Thus, we confirm the presence of CD4⁺Tax⁺EIF1AY⁺ T cells and Tax⁺CD68⁺EIF1AY⁺ antigen-presenting cells, indicating HTLV-1 infection of donor immune cells. In an independent cohort of 400 patients, we verify that HTLV-1 prevalence correlates with aGVHD incidence, while none of the control viruses shows significant associations. Our findings thus provide new insights into the aetio-pathology of liver-transplantation-associated aGVHD and raise the possibility of preventing aGVHD prior to transplantation.

Risk Factors of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in the Iranian Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 10-Year Experience

Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Thus, it is necessary to evaluate the risk factors of GVHD in allo-HSCT. Herein, we studied the effects of some risk factors on GVHD incidence in patients with allo-HSCT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the GVHD incidences and risk factors in 199 patients diagnosed with hematological disorders who underwent allo-HSCT in Taleghani hospital, Tehran, Iran, between 2007 and 2017. The univariable and multivariable analyses of time to event data were performed using the Logistic regression model. Computations were performed using SAS, and the level of statistical significance for univariable and multivariable analyses was set at 20% and 10%, respectively. Results: Acute GVHD (aGVHD) was seen in 59 (29.6%) patients, and 18 (9%) patients developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The odds of GVHD incidence in male to female transplants was 3.49 times greater than the male-to-male transplantations (CI, 1.16, 11.5; p<0.001). The patients with body mass index (BMI) below 18.5 had 96% lower odds of GVHD incidence compared with those with BMI above 30 (CI, 0.007-0.27; p=0.013). The odds of GVHD incidence in patients who were negative for cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen was 76% lower than patients with positive CMV antigen (CI, 0.06-0.93; p=0.081). Conclusion: In a nutshell, our results indicated that the donor-recipient gender disparity, the recipient's BMI, and CMV infection/reactivation status might be pivotal risk factors, which should be taken into account for prevention and management of GVHD.