Previous Radiotherapy Increases the Efficacy of IL-2 in Malignant Pleural Effusion: Potential Evidence of a Radio-Memory Effect?

Efficacy of Anti-Cancer Immune Responses Elicited Using Tumor-Targeted IL-2 Cytokine and Its Derivatives in Combined Preclinical Therapies

Effective cancer therapies must address the tumor microenvironment (TME), a complex network of tumor cells and stromal components, including endothelial, immune, and mesenchymal cells. Durable outcomes require targeting both tumor cells and the TME while minimizing systemic toxicity. Interleukin-2 (IL-2)-based therapies have shown efficacy in cancers such as metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma but are limited by severe side effects. Innovative IL-2-based immunotherapeutic approaches include immunotoxins, such as antibody-drug conjugates, immunocytokines, and antibody-cytokine fusion proteins that enhance tumor-specific delivery. These strategies activate cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, eliciting a potent Th1-mediated anti-tumor response. Modified IL-2 variants with reduced Treg cell activity further improve specificity and reduce immunosuppression. Additionally, IL-2 conjugates with peptides or anti-angiogenic agents offer improved therapeutic profiles. Combining IL-2-based therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), anti-angiogenic agents, or radiotherapy has demonstrated synergistic potential. Preclinical and clinical studies highlight reduced toxicity and enhanced anti-tumor efficacy, overcoming TME-driven immune suppression. These approaches mitigate the limitations of high-dose soluble IL-2 therapy, promoting immune activation and minimizing adverse effects. This review critically explores advances in IL-2-based therapies, focusing on immunotoxins, immunocytokines, and IL-2 derivatives. Emphasis is placed on their role in combination strategies, showcasing their potential to target the TME and improve clinical outcomes effectively. Also, the use of IL-2 immunocytokines in "in situ" vaccination to relieve the immunosuppression of the TME is discussed.

Efficacy of radiotherapy combined with atezolizumab or docetaxel in patients with previously treated NSCLC

Radiotherapy showed synergy with immunotherapy, yet the comparative effectiveness of combining immunotherapy (iRT) or chemotherapy (CRT) after platinum therapy failure in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unexplored. We analyzed 163 patients (iRT: n = 120 vs. CRT: n = 43) eligible for combination radiotherapy. Before matching, median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in iRT group (7.79 vs. 4.57 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.94, p = 0.024). After 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), iRT group showed improved OS, consistent with unmatched analysis (PSM, p = 0.033 and IPTW, p = 0.035). Exploratory analysis suggested that PD1+, central memory PD1+, and effector memory PD-L1+ CD4+ T cells were strong predictive biomarkers for iRT-treated patients (P OS = 0.025, P OS = 0.002, P OS = 0.010, respectively). Proliferative CD4+ T celllow was a prognostic (P OS = 0.008) and predictive biomarker for iRT (P OS < 0.001). Our work revealed iRT was prolonged OS in previously treated advanced NSCLC patients. Additionally, proliferative CD4+ T cell served as prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: the dawn of cancer treatment

Radiotherapy (RT) is delivered for purposes of local control, but can also exert systemic effect on remote and non-irradiated tumor deposits, which is called abscopal effect. The view of RT as a simple local treatment has dramatically changed in recent years, and it is now widely accepted that RT can provoke a systemic immune response which gives a strong rationale for the combination of RT and immunotherapy (iRT). Nevertheless, several points remain to be addressed such as the interaction of RT and immune system, the identification of the best schedules for combination with immunotherapy (IO), the expansion of abscopal effect and the mechanism to amplify iRT. To answer these crucial questions, we roundly summarize underlying rationale showing the whole immune landscape in RT and clinical trials to attempt to identify the best schedules of iRT. In consideration of the rarity of abscopal effect, we propose that the occurrence of abscopal effect induced by radiation can be promoted to 100% in view of molecular and genetic level. Furthermore, the “radscopal effect” which refers to using low-dose radiation to reprogram the tumor microenvironment may amplify the occurrence of abscopal effect and overcome the resistance of iRT. Taken together, RT could be regarded as a trigger of systemic antitumor immune response, and with the help of IO can be used as a radical and systemic treatment and be added into current standard regimen of patients with metastatic cancer.

Pulsed Radiation Therapy to Improve Systemic Control of Metastatic Cancer

Radiation therapy (RT) is emerging as an interventional modality in the cancer-immunity cycle, augmenting the activation of an adaptive immune response against tumors. RT, particularly in combination with immunotherapy, can enhance immune memory effects and shape the tumor-directed T-cell populations. However, a single cycle of RT delivered to a limited number of polymetastatic lesions is rarely sufficient to achieve systemic control. We hypothesize that several rounds of RT, akin to several rounds of immunotherapeutic drugs, is likely to provide greater clinical benefit to patients with metastatic disease. We propose that the repeated exposure to tumor antigens released by “pulsed-RT” (i.e., treating 2-4 tumor lesions with 3 irradiation cycles given one month apart) may amplify the adaptive immune response by expanding the tumor-specific T-cell receptor repertoire, the production of high-affinity tumor antibodies, and the generation of memory lymphocytes and thereby improve immune control of systemic disease.

SHP-2 and PD-L1 Inhibition Combined with Radiotherapy Enhances Systemic Antitumor Effects in an Anti-PD-1-Resistant Model of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1, have emerged as promising therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, approximately 80% of patients do not respond to immunotherapy given alone because of intrinsic or acquired resistance. Radiotherapy (XRT) can overcome PD-1 resistance and improve treatment outcomes, but its efficacy remains suboptimal. The tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, expressed in some cancers and in immune cells, has been shown to negatively affect antitumor immunity. Our hypothesis was that SHP-2 inhibition in combination with anti-PD-L1 would enhance immune-mediated responses to XRT and synergistically boost antitumor effects in an anti-PD-1-resistant mouse model. We treated 129Sv/Ev mice with anti-PD-1-resistant 344SQ NSCLC adenocarcinoma with oral SHP099 (a SHP-2 inhibitor) combined with XRT and intraperitoneal anti-PD-L1. Primary tumors were treated with XRT (three fractions of 12 Gy each), whereas abscopal (out-of-field) tumors were observed but not treated. XRT in combination with SHP099 and anti-PD-L1 promoted local and abscopal responses, reduced lung metastases, and improved mouse survival. XRT also increased SHP-2⁺ M1 tumor-associated macrophages in abscopal tumors (P = 0.019). The addition of SHP099 also associated with a higher M1/M2 ratio, greater numbers of CD8⁺ T cells, and fewer regulatory T cells. This triple-combination therapy had strong antitumor effects in a mouse model of anti-PD-1-resistant NSCLC and may be a novel therapeutic approach for anti-PD-1-resistant NSCLC in patients.

Combination treatment with radiotherapy and a novel oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor overcomes PD-1 resistance and enhances antitumor immunity

BACKGROUND

Despite outstanding responses to anti-PD-1 agents in a subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, approximately 80% of patients fail to have prolonged favorable response. Recent studies show that tumor cell oxidative metabolism is a barrier to PD-1 immunotherapy and radiotherapy could overcome PD-1 resistance, so it is urgent to determine if combination treatment with radiotherapy and a novel oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) inhibitor (IACS-010759) is an effective strategy against PD-1 resistance in NSCLC.

METHODS

The antitumor effect of this combinational treatment was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. For in vivo experiments, we treated 129Sv/Ev mice with anti-PD1-sensitive and anti-PD1-resistant 344SQ NSCLC adenocarcinoma xenografts with oral IACS-010759 combined with radiotherapy (XRT). In vitro experiments included PCR, seahorse bioenergetic profiling, flow cytometry phenotyping, and clonogenic survival assay.

RESULTS

In the current study, we found that our PD-1-resistant model utilized OXPHOS to a significantly greater extent than the PD-1-sensitive model and XRT increased OXPHOS in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we explored the effect of the novel OXPHOS inhibitor IACS-010759 on PD-1-resistant NSCLC in an effort to overcome XRT-induced immunosuppression and maximize response to PD-1. Additionally, combined XRT and IACS-010759 promoted antitumor effects in the PD-1-resistant model, but not in the sensitive model. After elucidation of the most optimal dose/fractionation scheme of XRT with IACS-010759, the combinatorial therapy with this regimen did not increase the abscopal antitumor effect, although IACS-010549 did not decrease CD45+, CD4+, and CD8+ immune cells. Finally, triple therapy with IACS-010759, XRT, and anti-PD-1 promoted abscopal responses and prolonged survival time.

CONCLUSION

OXPHOS inhibition as part of a combinatorial regimen with XRT is a promising strategy to address PD-1-resistant NSCLC, and this combination is being tested clinically.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count Predicts Abscopal Responses and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Combined Immunotherapy and Radiation Therapy: Analysis of 3 Phase 1/2 Trials

PURPOSE

Research to elucidate predictive factors of the abscopal effect is an essential first step toward potentially modifying these factors to increase the incidence of systemic antitumor effects. This study, using data from 3 institutional phase 1/2 trials, examined the predictive capacity of recorded parameters in patients undergoing combined radiation therapy (RT) and immunotherapy and explored outcomes based on those predictive factors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients underwent combined immunotherapy and RT and had at least 1 nonirradiated noncontiguous lesion to evaluate out-of-field (abscopal) responses, defined as the best Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response.

RESULTS

Altogether, 153 patients met study criteria, and the median follow-up was 21.1 months. The most common cancer types were non-small cell lung carcinoma (n = 62), small cell lung carcinoma (n = 25), head and neck cancers (n = 16), and renal cell carcinoma (n = 13). Immunotherapies included ipilimumab (n = 98) and pembrolizumab (n = 55). Multivariable linear regression indicated that post-RT absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), when analyzed as a continuous variable, correlated with abscopal responses (P < .001). For post-RT ALC, the abscopal response rate was 34.2% in the cohort with ALC higher than the median value, compared with 3.9% in patients with ALC lower than the median (P < .0001). Corresponding figures for pre-RT ALC were 30.3% versus 7.8%, respectively (P = .0004). Cox multivariate analysis confirmed that lower post-RT ALC also associated with poorer progression-free survival (P = .009) and overall survival (P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphopenia, measured as the continuous variable of post-RT ALC, may affect the occurrence of abscopal responses and thus influence prognosis in patients treated with RT and immunotherapy. Although this hypothesis-generating finding requires corroboration by additional data, it suggests the importance of ALC monitoring and the potential of therapeutic manipulation of this parameter to induce abscopal effects.