1
|
Knoedler L, Dean J, Diatta F, Thompson N, Knoedler S, Rhys R, Sherwani K, Ettl T, Mayer S, Falkner F, Kilian K, Panayi AC, Iske J, Safi AF, Tullius SG, Haykal S, Pomahac B, Kauke-Navarro M. Immune modulation in transplant medicine: a comprehensive review of cell therapy applications and future directions. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1372862. [PMID: 38650942 PMCID: PMC11033354 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1372862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Balancing the immune response after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) remains an ongoing clinical challenge. While immunosuppressants can effectively reduce acute rejection rates following transplant surgery, some patients still experience recurrent acute rejection episodes, which in turn may progress to chronic rejection. Furthermore, these immunosuppressive regimens are associated with an increased risk of malignancies and metabolic disorders. Despite significant advancements in the field, these IS related side effects persist as clinical hurdles, emphasizing the need for innovative therapeutic strategies to improve transplant survival and longevity. Cellular therapy, a novel therapeutic approach, has emerged as a potential pathway to promote immune tolerance while minimizing systemic side-effects of standard IS regiments. Various cell types, including chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), regulatory myeloid cells (RMCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), offer unique immunomodulatory properties that may help achieve improved outcomes in transplant patients. This review aims to elucidate the role of cellular therapies, particularly MSCs, T cells, Tregs, RMCs, macrophages, and dendritic cells in SOT and VCA. We explore the immunological features of each cell type, their capacity for immune regulation, and the prospective advantages and obstacles linked to their application in transplant patients. An in-depth outline of the current state of the technology may help SOT and VCA providers refine their perioperative treatment strategies while laying the foundation for further trials that investigate cellular therapeutics in transplantation surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard Knoedler
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Jillian Dean
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Fortunay Diatta
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Noelle Thompson
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Samuel Knoedler
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Richmond Rhys
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Khalil Sherwani
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, Berufsgenossenschaft (BG) Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Tobias Ettl
- Department of Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Simon Mayer
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Florian Falkner
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, Berufsgenossenschaft (BG) Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Katja Kilian
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, Berufsgenossenschaft (BG) Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Adriana C. Panayi
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, Berufsgenossenschaft (BG) Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Jasper Iske
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ali-Farid Safi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Craniologicum, Center for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan G. Tullius
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Siba Haykal
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Martin Kauke-Navarro
- Department of Plastic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Role of Innate Immune Cells in the Prediction of Early Renal Allograft Injury Following Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11206148. [PMID: 36294469 PMCID: PMC9605224 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite recent advances and refinements in perioperative management of kidney transplantation (KT), early renal graft injury (eRGI) remains a critical problem with serious impairment of graft function as well as short- and long-term outcome. Serial monitoring of peripheral blood innate immune cells might be a useful tool in predicting post-transplant eRGI and graft outcome after KT. Methods: In this prospective study, medical data of 50 consecutive patients undergoing KT at the University Hospital of Leipzig were analyzed starting at the day of KT until day 10 after the transplantation. The main outcome parameter was the occurrence of eRGI and other outcome parameters associated with graft function/outcome. eRGI was defined as graft-related complications and clinical signs of renal IRI (ischemia reperfusion injury), such as acute tubular necrosis (ATN), delayed graft function (DGF), initial nonfunction (INF) and graft rejection within 3 months following KT. Typical innate immune cells including neutrophils, natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, basophils and dendritic cells (myeloid, plasmacytoid) were measured in all patients in peripheral blood at day 0, 1, 3, 7 and 10 after the transplantation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were performed to assess their predictive value for eRGI. Cutoff levels were calculated with the Youden index. Significant diagnostic immunological cutoffs and other prognostic clinical factors were tested in a multivariate logistic regression model. Results: Of the 50 included patients, 23 patients developed eRGI. Mean levels of neutrophils and monocytes were significantly higher on most days in the eRGI group compared to the non-eRGI group after transplantation, whereas a significant decrease in NK cell count, basophil levels and DC counts could be found between baseline and postoperative course. ROC analysis indicated that monocytes levels on POD 7 (AUC: 0.91) and NK cell levels on POD 7 (AUC: 0.92) were highly predictive for eRGI after KT. Multivariable analysis identified recipient age (OR 1.53 (95% CI: 1.003−2.350), p = 0.040), recipient body mass index > 25 kg/m2 (OR 5.6 (95% CI: 1.36−23.9), p = 0.015), recipient cardiovascular disease (OR 8.17 (95% CI: 1.28−52.16), p = 0.026), donor age (OR 1.068 (95% CI: 1.011−1.128), p = 0.027), <0.010), deceased-donor transplantation (OR 2.18 (95% CI: 1.091−4.112), p = 0.027) and cold ischemia time (CIT) of the renal graft (OR 1.005 (95% CI: 1.001−1.01), p = 0.019) as clinically relevant prognostic factors associated with increased eRGI following KT. Further, neutrophils > 9.4 × 103/μL on POD 7 (OR 16.1 (95% CI: 1.31−195.6), p = 0.031), monocytes > 1150 cells/ul on POD 7 (OR 7.81 (95% CI: 1.97−63.18), p = 0.048), NK cells < 125 cells/μL on POD 3 (OR 6.97 (95% CI: 3.81−12.7), p < 0.01), basophils < 18.1 cells/μL on POD 10 (OR 3.45 (95% CI: 1.37−12.3), p = 0.02) and mDC < 4.7 cells/μL on POD 7 (OR 11.68 (95% CI: 1.85−73.4), p < 0.01) were revealed as independent biochemical predictive variables for eRGI after KT. Conclusions: We show that the combined measurement of immunological innate variables (NK cells and monocytes on POD 7) and specific clinical factors such as prolonged CIT, increased donor and recipient age and morbidity together with deceased-donor transplantation were significant and specific predictors of eRGI following KT. We suggest that intensified monitoring of these parameters might be a helpful clinical tool in identifying patients at a higher risk of postoperative complication after KT and may therefore help to detect and—by diligent clinical management—even prevent deteriorated outcome due to IRI and eRGI after KT.
Collapse
|