In-Silico Tool for Predicting, Scanning, and Designing Defensins

Opportunities and challenges with artificial intelligence in allergy and immunology: a bibliometric study

Introduction

The fields of allergy and immunology are increasingly recognizing the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI). Its adoption is reshaping research directions, clinical practices, and healthcare systems. However, a systematic overview identifying current statuses, emerging trends, and future research hotspots is lacking.

Methods

This study applied bibliometric analysis methods to systematically evaluate the global research landscape of AI applications in allergy and immunology. Data from 3,883 articles published by 21,552 authors across 1,247 journals were collected and analyzed to identify leading contributors, prevalent research themes, and collaboration patterns.

Results

Analysis revealed that the USA and China are currently leading in research output and scientific impact in this domain. AI methodologies, especially machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), are predominantly applied in drug discovery and development, disease classification and prediction, immune response modeling, clinical decision support, diagnostics, healthcare system digitalization, and medical education. Emerging trends indicate significant movement toward personalized medical systems integration.

Discussion

The findings demonstrate the dynamic evolution of AI in allergy and immunology, highlighting the broadening scope from basic diagnostics to comprehensive personalized healthcare systems. Despite advancements, critical challenges persist, including technological limitations, ethical concerns, and regulatory frameworks that could potentially hinder further implementation and integration.

Conclusion

AI holds considerable promise for advancing allergy and immunology globally by enhancing healthcare precision, efficiency, and accessibility. Addressing existing technological, ethical, and regulatory challenges will be crucial to fully realizing its potential, ultimately improving global health outcomes and patient well-being.

Machine learning tools for peptide bioactivity evaluation - Implications for cell culture media optimization and the broader cultivated meat industry

Although bioactive peptides have traditionally been studied for their health-promoting qualities in the context of nutrition and medicine, the past twenty years have seen a steady increase in their application to cell culture media optimization. Complex natural sources of bioactive peptides, such as hydrolysates, offer a sustainable and cost-effective means of promoting cellular growth, making them an essential component of scaling-up cultivated meat production. However, the sheer diversity of hydrolysates makes product selection difficult, highlighting the need for functional characterization. Traditional wet-lab techniques for isolating and estimating peptide bioactivity cannot keep pace with peptide identification using high-throughput tools such as mass spectrometry, requiring the development and use of machine learning-based classifiers. This review provides a comprehensive list of available software tools to evaluate peptide bioactivity, classified and compared based on the algorithm, training set, functionality, and limitations of the underlying models. We curated independent test sets to compare the predictive performance of different models based on specific bioactivity classification relevant to promoting cell culture growth: antioxidant and anti-inflammatory. A comprehensive screening of all bioactivity classifiers revealed that while there are approximately fifty tools to elucidate antimicrobial activity and sixteen that predict anti-inflammatory activity, fewer tools are available for other functionalities related to cell growth - five that predict antioxidant activity and two for growth factor and/or cell signaling prediction. A thorough evaluation of the available tools revealed significant issues with sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Despite the overall interest in estimating peptide bioactivity, our work highlights key gaps in the broader adoption of existing software for the specific application of cell culture media optimization in the context of cultivated meat and beyond.

ToxinPred 3.0: An improved method for predicting the toxicity of peptides

Toxicity emerges as a prominent challenge in the design of therapeutic peptides, causing the failure of numerous peptides during clinical trials. In 2013, our group developed ToxinPred, a computational method that has been extensively adopted by the scientific community for predicting peptide toxicity. In this paper, we propose a refined variant of ToxinPred that showcases improved reliability and accuracy in predicting peptide toxicity. Initially, we utilized a similarity/alignment-based approach employing BLAST to predict toxic peptides, which yielded satisfactory accuracy; however, the method suffered from inadequate coverage. Subsequently, we employed a motif-based approach using MERCI software to uncover specific patterns or motifs that are exclusively observed in toxic peptides. The search for these motifs in peptides allowed us to predict toxic peptides with a high level of specificity with poor sensitivity. To overcome the coverage limitations, we developed alignment-free methods using machine/deep learning techniques to balance sensitivity and specificity of prediction. Deep learning model (ANN - LSTM with fixed sequence length) developed using one-hot encoding achieved a maximum AUROC of 0.93 with MCC of 0.71 on an independent dataset. Machine learning model (extra tree) developed using compositional features of peptides achieved a maximum AUROC of 0.95 with MCC of 0.78. We also developed large language models and achieved maximum AUC of 0.93 using ESM2-t33. Finally, we developed hybrid or ensemble methods combining two or more methods to enhance performance. Our specific hybrid method, which combines a motif-based approach with a machine learning-based model, achieved a maximum AUROC of 0.98 with MCC 0.81 on an independent dataset. In this study, all models were trained and tested on 80 % of data using five-fold cross-validation and evaluated on the remaining 20 % of data called independent dataset. The evaluation of all methods on an independent dataset revealed that the method proposed in this study exhibited better performance than existing methods. To cater to the needs of the scientific community, we have developed a standalone software, pip package and web-based server ToxinPred3 (https://github.com/raghavagps/toxinpred3 and https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/toxinpred3/).

Tackling the Antimicrobial Resistance "Pandemic" with Machine Learning Tools: A Summary of Available Evidence

Antimicrobial resistance is recognised as one of the top threats healthcare is bound to face in the future. There have been various attempts to preserve the efficacy of existing antimicrobials, develop new and efficient antimicrobials, manage infections with multi-drug resistant strains, and improve patient outcomes, resulting in a growing mass of routinely available data, including electronic health records and microbiological information that can be employed to develop individualised antimicrobial stewardship. Machine learning methods have been developed to predict antimicrobial resistance from whole-genome sequencing data, forecast medication susceptibility, recognise epidemic patterns for surveillance purposes, or propose new antibacterial treatments and accelerate scientific discovery. Unfortunately, there is an evident gap between the number of machine learning applications in science and the effective implementation of these systems. This narrative review highlights some of the outstanding opportunities that machine learning offers when applied in research related to antimicrobial resistance. In the future, machine learning tools may prove to be superbugs' kryptonite. This review aims to provide an overview of available publications to aid researchers that are looking to expand their work with new approaches and to acquaint them with the current application of machine learning techniques in this field.

Bioinformatics and bioactive peptides from foods: Do they work together?

We live in the Big Data Era which affects many aspects of science, including research on bioactive peptides derived from foods, which during the last few decades have been a focus of interest for scientists. These two issues, i.e., the development of computer technologies and progress in the discovery of novel peptides with health-beneficial properties, are closely interrelated. This Chapter presents the example applications of bioinformatics for studying biopeptides, focusing on main aspects of peptide analysis as the starting point, including: (i) the role of peptide databases; (ii) aspects of bioactivity prediction; (iii) simulation of peptide release from proteins. Bioinformatics can also be used for predicting other features of peptides, including ADMET, QSAR, structure, and taste. To answer the question asked "bioinformatics and bioactive peptides from foods: do they work together?", currently it is almost impossible to find examples of peptide research with no bioinformatics involved. However, theoretical predictions are not equivalent to experimental work and always require critical scrutiny. The aspects of compatibility of in silico and in vitro results are also summarized herein.

AntiBP3: A Method for Predicting Antibacterial Peptides against Gram-Positive/Negative/Variable Bacteria

Most of the existing methods developed for predicting antibacterial peptides (ABPs) are mostly designed to target either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria. In this study, we describe a method that allows us to predict ABPs against gram-positive, gram-negative, and gram-variable bacteria. Firstly, we developed an alignment-based approach using BLAST to identify ABPs and achieved poor sensitivity. Secondly, we employed a motif-based approach to predict ABPs and obtained high precision with low sensitivity. To address the issue of poor sensitivity, we developed alignment-free methods for predicting ABPs using machine/deep learning techniques. In the case of alignment-free methods, we utilized a wide range of peptide features that include different types of composition, binary profiles of terminal residues, and fastText word embedding. In this study, a five-fold cross-validation technique has been used to build machine/deep learning models on training datasets. These models were evaluated on an independent dataset with no common peptide between training and independent datasets. Our machine learning-based model developed using the amino acid binary profile of terminal residues achieved maximum AUC 0.93, 0.98, and 0.94 for gram-positive, gram-negative, and gram-variable bacteria, respectively, on an independent dataset. Our method performs better than existing methods when compared with existing approaches on an independent dataset. A user-friendly web server, standalone package and pip package have been developed to facilitate peptide-based therapeutics.

Recent development of machine learning-based methods for the prediction of defensin family and subfamily

Nearly all living species comprise of host defense peptides called defensins, that are crucial for innate immunity. These peptides work by activating the immune system which kills the microbes directly or indirectly, thus providing protection to the host. Thus far, numerous preclinical and clinical trials for peptide-based drugs are currently being evaluated. Although, experimental methods can help to precisely identify the defensin peptide family and subfamily, these approaches are often time-consuming and cost-ineffective. On the other hand, machine learning (ML) methods are able to effectively employ protein sequence information without the knowledge of a protein's three-dimensional structure, thus highlighting their predictive ability for the large-scale identification. To date, several ML methods have been developed for the in silico identification of the defensin peptide family and subfamily. Therefore, summarizing the advantages and disadvantages of the existing methods is urgently needed in order to provide useful suggestions for the development and improvement of new computational models for the identification of the defensin peptide family and subfamily. With this goal in mind, we first provide a comprehensive survey on a collection of six state-of-the-art computational approaches for predicting the defensin peptide family and subfamily. Herein, we cover different important aspects, including the dataset quality, feature encoding methods, feature selection schemes, ML algorithms, cross-validation methods and web server availability/usability. Moreover, we provide our thoughts on the limitations of existing methods and future perspectives for improving the prediction performance and model interpretability. The insights and suggestions gained from this review are anticipated to serve as a valuable guidance for researchers for the development of more robust and useful predictors.