1
|
Hsiung CCS, Wilson CM, Sambold NA, Dai R, Chen Q, Teyssier N, Misiukiewicz S, Arab A, O'Loughlin T, Cofsky JC, Shi J, Gilbert LA. Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a for higher-order combinatorial chromatin perturbations. Nat Biotechnol 2025; 43:369-383. [PMID: 38760567 PMCID: PMC11919711 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02224-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Multiplexed genetic perturbations are critical for testing functional interactions among coding or non-coding genetic elements. Compared to double-stranded DNA cutting, repressive chromatin formation using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) avoids genotoxicity and is more effective for perturbing non-coding regulatory elements in pooled assays. However, current CRISPRi pooled screening approaches are limited to targeting one to three genomic sites per cell. We engineer an Acidaminococcus Cas12a (AsCas12a) variant, multiplexed transcriptional interference AsCas12a (multiAsCas12a), that incorporates R1226A, a mutation that stabilizes the ribonucleoprotein-DNA complex via DNA nicking. The multiAsCas12a-KRAB fusion improves CRISPRi activity over DNase-dead AsCas12a-KRAB fusions, often rescuing the activities of lentivirally delivered CRISPR RNAs (crRNA) that are inactive when used with the latter. multiAsCas12a-KRAB supports CRISPRi using 6-plex crRNA arrays in high-throughput pooled screens. Using multiAsCas12a-KRAB, we discover enhancer elements and dissect the combinatorial function of cis-regulatory elements in human cells. These results instantiate a group testing framework for efficiently surveying numerous combinations of chromatin perturbations for biological discovery and engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C C-S Hsiung
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Arc Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - C M Wilson
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Arc Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - R Dai
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Arc Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Q Chen
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - N Teyssier
- Biological and Medical Informatics Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Misiukiewicz
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A Arab
- Arc Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - T O'Loughlin
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - J C Cofsky
- Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Shi
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - L A Gilbert
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Arc Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu J, Xu X, Huang D, Luo Y, Lin L, Bai X, Zheng Y, Yang Q, Cheng Y, Huang A, Shi J, Bo X, Gu J, Chen H. A comprehensive benchmarking with interpretation and operational guidance for the hierarchy of topologically associating domains. Nat Commun 2024; 15:4376. [PMID: 38782890 PMCID: PMC11116433 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48593-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Topologically associating domains (TADs), megabase-scale features of chromatin spatial architecture, are organized in a domain-within-domain TAD hierarchy. Within TADs, the inner and smaller subTADs not only manifest cell-to-cell variability, but also precisely regulate transcription and differentiation. Although over 20 TAD callers are able to detect TAD, their usability in biomedicine is confined by a disagreement of outputs and a limit in understanding TAD hierarchy. We compare 13 computational tools across various conditions and develop a metric to evaluate the similarity of TAD hierarchy. Although outputs of TAD hierarchy at each level vary among callers, data resolutions, sequencing depths, and matrices normalization, they are more consistent when they have a higher similarity of larger TADs. We present comprehensive benchmarking of TAD hierarchy callers and operational guidance to researchers of life science researchers. Moreover, by simulating the mixing of different types of cells, we confirm that TAD hierarchy is generated not simply from stacking Hi-C heatmaps of heterogeneous cells. Finally, we propose an air conditioner model to decipher the role of TAD hierarchy in transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingxuan Xu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xiang Xu
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Dandan Huang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
- Center for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer and Inflammatory Diseases, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Yawen Luo
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Lin Lin
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China
- School of Computer Science and Information Technology& KLAS, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China
| | - Xuemei Bai
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Yang Zheng
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Qian Yang
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Yu Cheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - An Huang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jingyi Shi
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xiaochen Bo
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China.
| | - Jin Gu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
- Department of Oncology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China.
- Center for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer and Inflammatory Diseases, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
- Peking University International Cancer Institute, Beijing, China.
| | - Hebing Chen
- Academy of Military Medical Science, Beijing, 100850, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hsiung CC, Wilson CM, Sambold NA, Dai R, Chen Q, Misiukiewicz S, Arab A, Teyssier N, O'Loughlin T, Cofsky JC, Shi J, Gilbert LA. Higher-order combinatorial chromatin perturbations by engineered CRISPR-Cas12a for functional genomics. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.09.18.558350. [PMID: 37781594 PMCID: PMC10541102 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.18.558350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Multiplexed genetic perturbations are critical for testing functional interactions among coding or non-coding genetic elements. Compared to double-stranded DNA cutting, repressive chromatin formation using CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) avoids genotoxicity and is more effective for perturbing non-coding regulatory elements in pooled assays. However, current CRISPRi pooled screening approaches are limited to targeting 1-3 genomic sites per cell. To develop a tool for higher-order ( > 3) combinatorial targeting of genomic sites with CRISPRi in functional genomics screens, we engineered an Acidaminococcus Cas12a variant -- referred to as mul tiplexed transcriptional interference AsCas12a (multiAsCas12a). multiAsCas12a incorporates a key mutation, R1226A, motivated by the hypothesis of nicking-induced stabilization of the ribonucleoprotein:DNA complex for improving CRISPRi activity. multiAsCas12a significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art Cas12a variants in combinatorial CRISPRi targeting using high-order multiplexed arrays of lentivirally transduced CRISPR RNAs (crRNA), including in high-throughput pooled screens using 6-plex crRNA array libraries. Using multiAsCas12a CRISPRi, we discover new enhancer elements and dissect the combinatorial function of cis-regulatory elements. These results instantiate a group testing framework for efficiently surveying potentially numerous combinations of chromatin perturbations for biological discovery and engineering.
Collapse
|
4
|
Onengut-Gumuscu S, Webb-Robertson BJM, Sarkar S, Manichaikul A, Hu X, Frazer-Abel A, Holers VM, Rewers MJ, Rich SS. Genetic variants in the complement system and their potential link in the aetiology of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40:e3716. [PMID: 37649398 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which one's own immune system destroys insulin-secreting beta cells in the pancreas. This process results in life-long dependence on exogenous insulin for survival. Both genetic and environmental factors play a role in disease initiation, progression, and ultimate clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. This review will provide background on the natural history of type 1 diabetes and the role of genetic factors involved in the complement system, as several recent studies have identified changes in levels of these proteins as the disease evolves from pre-clinical through to clinically apparent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suna Onengut-Gumuscu
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
- Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Soumyadeep Sarkar
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA
| | - Ani Manichaikul
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Xiaowei Hu
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Ashley Frazer-Abel
- Exsera BioLabs, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - V Michael Holers
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marian J Rewers
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Stephen S Rich
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fulton JE, Drobik-Czwarno W, Wolc A, McCarron AM, Lund AR, Schmidt CJ, Taylor RL. The Chicken A and E Blood Systems Arise from Genetic Variation in and around the Regulators of Complement Activation Region. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2022; 209:1128-1137. [DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2101010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
The tightly linked A and E blood alloantigen systems are 2 of 13 blood systems identified in chickens. Reported herein are studies showing that the genes encoding A and E alloantigens map within or near to the chicken regulator of complement activation (RCA) gene cluster, a region syntenic with the human RCA. Genome-wide association studies, sequence analysis, and sequence-derived single-nucleotide polymorphism information for known A and/or E system alleles show that the most likely candidate gene for the A blood system is C4BPM gene (complement component 4 binding protein, membrane). Cosegregation of single-nucleotide polymorphism–defined C4BPM haplotypes and blood system A alleles defined by alloantisera provide a link between chicken blood system A and C4BPM. The best match for the E blood system is the avian equivalent of FCAMR (Fc fragment of IgA and IgM receptor). C4BPM is located within the chicken RCA on chicken microchromosome 26 and is separated from FCAMR by 89 kbp. The genetic variation observed at C4BPM and FCAMR could affect the chicken complement system and differentially guide immune responses to infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet E. Fulton
- *Research and Development, Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA
| | - Wiola Drobik-Czwarno
- †Department of Animal Genetics and Conservation, Institute of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Wolc
- *Research and Development, Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA
- ‡Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
| | - Amy M. McCarron
- *Research and Development, Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA
| | - Ashlee R. Lund
- *Research and Development, Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA
| | - Carl J. Schmidt
- §Department of Animal and Food Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE; and
| | - Robert L. Taylor
- ¶Division of Animal and Nutritional Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| |
Collapse
|