An open, observational, three-arm clinical study of 2–3 cycles of treatment as neoadjuvant therapy in operable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: An interim analysis

Analysis of surgical complexity and short-term prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients: neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy improves survival benefits in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer but increases tissue density, presenting challenges for surgeons.

Objectives

To compare the differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between neoadjuvant targeted therapy (NTT) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI).

Design/methods

This study enrolled 106 patients underwent curative surgery after neoadjuvant therapy between January 2020 and December 2023 at the National Cancer Center of China. Differences in surgical complexity and short-term prognostic outcomes between the two neoadjuvant therapy cohorts were evaluated. The pathological indicators such as pathological response rate and lymph node upstaging/downstaging were then analyzed.

Results

In total, 33 patients underwent NTT and 73 underwent NCI preoperatively. Patients who received NTT showed a higher minimally invasive surgery rate (84.8% versus 53.4%, p < 0.01), shorter operative time (144 versus 184 min, p < 0.01), lower conversion rate (3.3% versus 17.8%, p = 0.03), less postoperative drainage (day 3: 140 versus 200 mL, p = 0.03), and lower incidence of postoperative complications including arrhythmias (6.1% versus 26%, p = 0.02). The pathological response rate in the NTT and NCI groups was 70% and 75%, respectively, with the latter group showing a higher complete pathological response rate. The two groups had no significant differences in major pathological response and lymph node pathological response rate.

Conclusion

Patients who received NTT presented fewer surgical challenges for surgeons and had better surgical outcomes than those who received NCI therapy, with comparable pathological response rates between the two cohorts. Accordingly, NTT is the preferred induction regimen for patients harboring mutation status.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

To date, no meta-analyses have comprehensively assessed the association of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized and nonrandomized settings. In addition, there exists controversy concerning the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with NSCLC with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels less than 1%.

Objective

To compare neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapy by adverse events and surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes using recently published randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized trials.

Data Sources

MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2013, to October 25, 2023, for all clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy that included at least 10 patients.

Study Selection

Observational studies and trials reporting the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy monotherapy, were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Surgical, pathological, and efficacy end points and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

Among 43 eligible trials comprising 5431 patients (4020 males [74.0%]; median age range, 55-70 years), there were 8 randomized clinical trials with 3387 patients. For randomized clinical trials, pooled overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; I2 = 0%), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67; I2 = 14.9%), major pathological response (risk ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.83-4.15; I2 = 31.2%), and complete pathological response (risk ratio, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.25-7.15; I2 = 27.4%) favored neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with baseline tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1%, there was a significant benefit in event-free survival for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion and Relevance

This study found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy across surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes. These findings suggest that patients with resectable NSCLC with tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1% may have an event-free survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Recent death early warning value of ECG changes in patients with NSCLC

We aimed to explore the predictive value of abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in non-small-cell lung carcinoma non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for near-term mortality. Seventy-eight NSCLC patients hospitalized in Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from October 2017 to August 2021 were selected as the observation group. Baseline medical history and type of ECG abnormalities were the same. Seventy-eight patients were included in the control group. To compare the difference in mortality within 3 months between the observation group and the control group after the occurrence of the same type of electrocardiogram abnormalities, and to explore the value of electrocardiogram abnormalities in the early warning of NSCLC patients recent death. When the average ventricular rate of patients in the observation group was ≥100 beats/minute, ST-segment depression ≥0.05 mm, QRS voltage decrease ≥0.5 mm, new atrial fibrillation and other electrocardiogram changes, all patients died within 3 months. The control group with the same abnormal ECG had no death within 3 months (P < .05). In the resting 12-lead synchronous ECG in NSCLC patients, when the average ventricular rate ≥100 beats/minute, QRS wave voltage significantly decreased ≥0.5 mm, ST segment depression ≥0.05 mm, new atrial fibrillation appeared, it suggested that the patients' cardiac function decreased and the potential for near-term adverse outcomes is high.

What is the ideal endpoint in early-stage immunotherapy neoadjuvant trials in lung cancer?

Numerous clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been performed over the last 5 years. As the number of neoadjuvant trials increases, attention must be paid to identifying informative trial endpoints. Complete pathologic response has been shown to be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for clinical outcomes, such as event-free survival or overall survival, in breast cancer and bladder cancer, but it is less established for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The simultaneous advances reported with adjuvant ICI make the optimal strategy for early-stage disease debatable. Considering the long time required to conduct trials, it is important to identify optimal endpoints and discover surrogate endpoints for survival that can help guide ongoing clinical research. Endpoints can be grouped into two categories: medical and surgical. Medical endpoints are measures of survival and drug activity; surgical endpoints describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant approaches at a surgical level as well as perioperative attrition and complications. There are also several exploratory endpoints, including circulating tumor DNA clearance and radiomics. In this review, we outline the advantages and disadvantages of commonly reported endpoints for clinical trials of neoadjuvant regimens in NSCLC.

An open, observational clinical study of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Background

This open, observational clinical study aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy with(out) chemotherapy and neoadjuvant targeted therapy among resectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (NCT04197076) in real world. 48 of the 57 evaluable patients were included in this interim analysis.

Methods

This study was conducted at Shanghai Chest Hospital and included eligible NSCLC patients who were 18 years or older and had resectable clinical stage III disease. Surgical resection was conducted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (13 patients), immunotherapy with(out) chemotherapy (26 patients), and targeted therapy (9 patients). Disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Clinical response rate (cRR), related adverse events (AEs), surgical feasibility and pathological features were also discussed in this study.

Results

Significant differences in DFS were noted between chemotherapy and immunotherapy [7.7 months (range, 3.1 to 23.2 months) vs. 9.6 months (range, 4.0 to 47.9 months); P=0.032], and between chemotherapy and targeted therapy [7.7 months (range, 3.1 to 23.2 months) vs. 13.2 months (range, 7.5 to 32.2 months); P=0.015], but not between immunotherapy and targeted therapy (P=0.500). Subgroup analysis also favored neoadjuvant immunotherapy and targeted therapy. 5 patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR), all of whom were in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy arm, leading to a pCR rate of 19.2% in this arm. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of over grade 3 occurred in 11 patients (19.3%), with 5 (29.4%) in the chemotherapy arm, 5 (16.7%) in the immunotherapy arm and 1 (10.0%) in the targeted therapy arm. One grade 4 and one grade 2 surgery-related serious adverse event occurred in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy arm, respectively.

Conclusion

In patients diagnosed with resectable stage III NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant targeted therapy were associated with significantly longer disease-free survival compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical and pathological response rates were also higher in the immunotherapy and targeted therapy arm. Adverse events were found to be manageable and similar across all three groups, and surgical feasibility favored immunotherapy or targeted therapy rather than chemotherapy.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04197076.

Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has been increasingly applied to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in the feasibility and oncological efficacy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is scarce. This study aims to assess the superiorities of RATS over (VATS) concerning short-term outcomes in treating NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.

Methods

NSCLC patients receiving RATS or VATS lobectomy following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were retrospectively identified. Baseline clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival profiles were analyzed.

Results

Forty-six NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were included and divided into the RATS (n=15) and VATS (n=31) groups. The baseline clinical characteristics and induction-related adverse events were comparable between the two groups (all p>0.050). The 30-day mortality in the RATS and VATS groups were 0% and 3.23%, respectively (p=1.000). Patients undergoing RATS were associated with reduced surgical-related intensive unit care (ICU) stay than those receiving VATS (0.0 [0.0-0.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-1.0] days, p=0.026). Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 LNs (6.27 ± 1.94 vs 4.90 ± 1.92, p=0.042) and LN stations (3.07 ± 1.03 vs 2.52 ± 0.57, p=0.038) compared with VATS. By comparison, no difference was found in surgical outcomes, pathological results, and postoperative complications between the RATS and VATS groups (all p>0.050). Finally, RATS and VATS achieved comparable one-year recurrence-free survival (82.96% vs. 85.23%, p=0.821) and the timing of central nervous system, LN, and bone recurrences (all p>0.050).

Conclusion

RATS is safe and feasible for NSCLC patients with neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, reducing surgical-related ICU stay, assessing increased N1 LNs and stations, and achieving similar survival profiles to VATS.