The IgH Eµ-MAR regions promote UNG-dependent error-prone repair to optimize somatic hypermutation

RNA processing mechanisms contribute to genome organization and stability in B cells

RNA processing includes post-transcriptional mechanisms controlling RNA quality and quantity to ensure cellular homeostasis. Noncoding (nc) RNAs that are regulated by these dynamic processes may themselves fulfill effector and/or regulatory functions, and recent studies demonstrated the critical role of RNAs in organizing both chromatin and genome architectures. Furthermore, RNAs can threaten genome integrity when accumulating as DNA:RNA hybrids, but could also facilitate DNA repair depending on the molecular context. Therefore, by qualitatively and quantitatively fine-tuning RNAs, RNA processing contributes directly or indirectly to chromatin states, genome organization, and genome stability. B lymphocytes represent a unique model to study these interconnected mechanisms as they express ncRNAs transcribed from key specific sequences before undergoing physiological genetic remodeling processes, including V(D)J recombination, somatic hypermutation, and class switch recombination. RNA processing actors ensure the regulation and degradation of these ncRNAs for efficient DNA repair and immunoglobulin gene remodeling while failure leads to B cell development alterations, aberrant DNA repair, and pathological translocations. This review highlights how RNA processing mechanisms contribute to genome architecture and stability, with emphasis on their critical roles during B cell development, enabling physiological DNA remodeling while preventing lymphomagenesis.

A dual function for the chromatin organizer Special A-T rich Binding Protein 1 in B-lineage cells

SATB1 (Special A-T rich Binding protein 1) is a cell type-specific factor that regulates the genetic network in developing T cells and neurons. In T cells, SATB1 is required for lineage commitment, VDJ recombination, development and maturation. Considering that its expression varies during B-cell differentiation, the involvement of SATB1 needs to be clarified in this lineage. Using a KO mouse model in which SATB1 was deleted from the pro-B-cell stage, we examined the consequences of SATB1 deletion in naive and activated B-cell subsets. Our model indicates first, unlike its essential function in T cells, that SATB1 is dispensable for B-cell development and the establishment of a broad IgH repertoire. Second, we show that SATB1 exhibits an ambivalent function in mature B cells, acting sequentially as a positive and negative regulator of Ig gene transcription in naive and activated cells, respectively. Third, our study indicates that the negative regulatory function of SATB1 in B cells extends to the germinal center response, in which this factor limits somatic hypermutation of Ig genes.