Differential nasal swab cytology represents a valuable tool for therapy monitoring but not prediction of therapy response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with Dupilumab

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence

Dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab have demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in phase 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). With recent regulatory approvals, there has been a surge in real-world studies (RWSs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarise the efficacy and safety of these four biologics in real-world settings. Primary outcomes were nasal polyp score and sino-nasal outcome test-22 score. Secondary outcomes included smell identification test score, loss of smell score, nasal congestion score, overall nasal symptom score, treatment response, and adverse events (AEs) prompting discontinuation. Efficacy outcomes at 4, 6, 12, and over 12 months were summarised, and meta-analyses of mean changes from baseline were conducted. Sixty-four RWSs involving 3921 patients were included. Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed at most follow-up time points, with dupilumab showing particularly notable effects. The efficacy observed in these RWSs was superior to that demonstrated in phase 3 RCTs. All biologics exhibited low discontinuation rates due to AEs. Overall, biologic treatments for CRSwNP in real-world settings demonstrate strong efficacy and good safety. However, the limitations in current RWSs highlight the need for long-term, high-quality multicentre prospective studies and comprehensive healthcare database analyses.

The essential oils from Asarum sieboldii Miq. Alleviate allergic rhinitis by regulating tight junction and inflammation; Network analysis and preclinical validation

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Essential oils from herbs, including those from Asarum sieboldii Miq., are readily absorbed through mucous membranes, explaining their widespread use in inhalation formulations. Asarum sieboldii Miq. has a long history of traditional use for various medicinal purposes, attributed to its anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, and antioxidant properties. Despite research on Asarum sieboldii Miq. for allergic inflammation in respiratory diseases, detailed mechanistic studies are still lacking.

AIM OF THE STUDY

We utilized bioinformatics and network pharmacology to identify the effectiveness of Asarum sieboldii Miq. in treating allergic rhinitis (AR). Our aim is to elucidate the potential therapeutic effects of essential oil derived from Asarum sieboldii Miq. (ASO), which is recognized for its diverse pharmacological properties, on AR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Common genes associated with the active compounds of ASO and AR were utilized to construct a related network and predict their mode of action. AR was induced in BALB/c mice by exposing them to ovalbumin (OVA) and particulate matter 10 (PM10; airborne particles <10 μm). With induction, aerosolized ASO (0.0002% and 0.02%) were administered via nebulizer for 5 min per day, three times a week for 7 weeks. Mice were examined for histopathological changes in the nasal tissue, nasal epithelial inflammation, the production of allergen-specific cytokine response in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

The common genes of ASO and AR were predicted to include 'Tight junction', 'Apoptosis', and 'TGF-beta signaling', which are the main pathways of pathogenesis in AR. Consistent with network prediction, nebulized ASO treatment effectively improved the expression of tight junction-related factors, zonula occludens-1, claudin-1, occludin and junction adhesion molecule A, in OVA + PM10 induced mice. Additionally, it reduced hyperplasia of nasal epithelial thickness, goblet cell counts, and inflammatory cell infiltration (eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes) in nasal lavage fluid, while also alleviating allergic symptoms such as sneezing, rubbing, and serum IgE level when compared to the AR-induced group. The levels of mRNA and protein expression related to tight junctions were restored to normal levels by ASO, as confirmed in immunofluorescence analysis in nasal epithelial cells RPMI2650. Furthermore, treatment of ASO on PM10-treated nasal epithelial cells significantly reduced ROS production, recovered mitochondria membrane potential, and inhibition of the production of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-4, and IL-13) and inflammatory mediators linked to the MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal nebulization of ASO improves TJs and alleviates allergic nasal inflammation in AR. It supports the potential pharmaceutical application of ASO treatment for AR.

Effect of Dupilumab in CRSwNP Sinonasal Outcomes from Real Life Studies: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a debilitating inflammatory condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Despite treatment advances, recurrence is common, prompting the exploration of novel therapies such as monoclonal antibodies targeting the type 2 immune response, notably dupilumab. This research aims to evaluate the real-world evidence (RWE) of dupilumab in treating severe CRSwNP, comparing sinonasal outcomes to those observed in randomized clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant improvements were noted, with the average SNOT-22 score reduction being 37.2 points post-dupilumab treatment. The nasal polyp size (NPS) showed an average decrease of 3.6 points. The analysis highlighted the practical effectiveness of dupilumab, emphasizing its benefit over conventional therapies in reducing NPS and improving nasal symptoms. The findings advocate for the integration of dupilumab into standard treatment protocols for severe CRSwNP, providing a robust alternative that could potentially reduce the high recurrence rates associated with current management strategies. This study underscores the utility of RWE in assessing the effectiveness of new medical treatments, suggesting that dupilumab offers substantial real-world benefits for patients suffering from this challenging condition.

Comparison between clinical and cytological findings in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with Dupilumab

PURPOSE

Biologics represent a new therapeutic strategy for severe and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Usually, their actual therapeutic effectiveness is assessed by reduction in nasal polyps and/or improvement in nasal symptoms and quality of life. However, these measures do not consider nasal immunophlogosis, which can be evaluated through nasal cytology. The purpose of this study was to assess not only the clinical impact but also the cellular changes in the nasal inflammatory infiltrate observed through nasal cytology of CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab for 24 months.

METHODS

Fifty-five CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab were collected. Patients were evaluated before starting treatment and at one, three, six, nine months, one year, one and a half years, and two years after the first drug administration. During follow-up visits patients underwent endoscopic evaluation, nasal symptoms and quality of life assessment, complete blood count and nasal cytology.

RESULTS

During follow-up, significant improvement was found in Nasal Polyps Score (NPS), nasal patency, olfaction, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Regarding nasal cytology, a reduction in eosinophils and mast cells in the cellular infiltrate was observed over the two-year follow-up period compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab has demonstrated broad efficacy in the management of CRSwNP from both clinical and cytological findings. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate the biologics' impact on nasal mucosal inflammatory cells by nasal cytology with the aim of better identifying each patient's endotype and predicting the response to biologics.

Dupilumab's impact on nasal citology: Real life experience after 1 year of treatment

BACKGROUND

Biologic agents are considered a new revolutionized therapy for severe and recurrent forms of CRSwNP which disease burden is not sufficiently controlled by conservative and/or surgical treatments. Recent Research has focused on evaluating their real-life efficacy in CRSwNP, as only limited reports on real-life data are available. However, in most studies, the response to treatment is evaluated in terms of improvement in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) or in Sino-Nasal Outcome test (SNOT-22) scores. However, both criteria do not consider nasal immunophlogosis, which can be easily assessed by nasal cytology. The aim of our study was to evaluate changings in the nasal inflammatory infiltrate of CRSwNP patients treated with Dupilumab for 12 months.

METHODS

27 patients suffering from severe CRSwNP treated with Dupilumab were recruited. Nasal cytology findings, NPS, SNOT-22, ACT scores and blood eosinophil count at T0 (before treatment) and at T1 (after 1 year of treatment) were compared.

RESULTS

After 1 year of biological therapy with Dupilumab, NPS, SNOT-22 and, among the 17 asthmatic patients, ACT scores improved significantly. At T1, a statistically significant percentage of patients showed negative citology. Moreover, a significant reduction in the mast cell-eosinophilic pattern and an increase of neutrophils and bacteria was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The response to treatment can be considered both in the case of negative nasal cytology and in the case of the appearance of neutrophils and bacteria. In this context, eosinophils, the specific target of biological therapies, play a crucial role in regulating tissue homeostasis and, consequently, the nasal immunophlogosis.

Remission in Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases: Current Evidence, Unmet Needs, and Suggestions for Defining Remission in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of biological therapies for type 2 inflammatory diseases raises the possibility of addressing remission in those dis-immune conditions. No consensus exists for a definition of remission in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This review aims to critically evaluate the published data to provide the basis for defining remission in CRSwNP.

RECENT FINDINGS

The published evidence has yet to provide an unequivocal definition on remission in type 2 inflammatory diseases, in part reflecting differences in approaches to diagnosis and follow-up. A multidimensional evaluation is necessary when considering complete remission, including clinical, inflammatory, and histologic criteria, but how to combine or tailor the three perspectives according to disease severity at baseline or timing of assessment of treatment category is yet to reach consensus. We suggest defining remission starting from the approach taken in asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis, that is, including the resolution of symptoms and improvements in objective parameters of disease severity and/or inflammatory activity. Future studies and consensuses should provide validated criteria with cutoffs for the day-to-day definition of remission. The definition of remission in CRSwNP should include the following criteria, to be verified and maintained for a period of ≥ 12 months: absence of symptoms (nasal obstruction, loss of smell, rhinorrhea as the main ones); no impact of symptoms on quality of life; no need of surgery; no chronic or rescue medications (systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics); and recovery of smell function, possibly evaluated by objective test. Assessment of underlying inflammation should also be considered once accurate and feasible biomarkers are available in clinical practice.

Type 2 Biomarkers for the Indication and Response to Biologics in CRSwNP

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Three biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have been approved for the treatment of severe and uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Nevertheless, around 40-60% of patients do not respond well to these biological treatments. Selecting appropriate patients is crucial to improve treatment outcome of biologics. This review summarizes the literature data on type 2 biomarkers, with a specific focus on the indication to biologics for severe CRSwNP.

RECENT FINDINGS

No consensus has been reached on how to define mucosal type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. Clinical markers (e.g., 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, Lund-Mackay CT score (LMS), ethmoid/maxillary sinus CT score, and CT-radiomics), nasal secretion biomarkers (e.g., eosinophil cationic protein and interleukin-5), blood and nasal cytology eosinophil counts, and nasal swab eosinophil peroxidase activity have been reported to be associated with type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. The time duration since the last surgery, SNOT-22 score at 1 week of treatment, and baseline serum osteoprotegerin levels might indicate the response to dupilumab. LMS and asthma control test scores were found to have moderate predictive value for acceptable improvement after 24-week treatment of omalizumab. High blood eosinophil levels at baseline were associated with treatment response to mepolizumab and benralizumab. Although several clinical and biological markers might be associated with type 2 inflammation and response to biologics in patients with CRSwNP, their validity requires further investigation. Identifying clinically applicable biomarkers for biologic treatment holds significant promise for advancing personalized approaches to biologics and optimizing treatment outcomes for patients with CRSwNP.