Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Navigating the complexities: challenges and opportunities in conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary liver cancer ranks as the sixth most prevalent malignant tumor and stands as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, posing a significant threat to public health. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer worldwide. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for achieving radical cure and prolonged survival in HCC patients. Contrary to Western countries, the majority of HCC patients in China present with hepatitis B virus infection and consequent liver cirrhosis, with most cases diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage. This complexity results in a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in local therapeutic techniques and the introduction of systemic therapies, including targeted and immunotherapy agents, have provided new avenues for both clinical and basic conversion therapy for advanced HCC. Integrating multi-dimensional local and systemic therapies, multi-modal sequential, and comprehensive multidisciplinary approaches into the management of HCC patients has demonstrated promising conversion success rates. This holistic management strategy involves combining multiple treatment modalities vertically and coordinating various disciplines horizontally. However, significant challenges remain, including the precise selection of patients eligible for conversion therapy, the optimal choice of conversion therapy regimens, and the accurate determination of surgical timing post-conversion therapy. Addressing these challenges is crucial for hepatobiliary surgeons. High-quality, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to generate robust evidence for clinical practice. This review aims to synthesize the latest research developments both in China and internationally and examines key issues in the realm of HCC conversion therapy.

Comparative Efficacy of Lenvatinib Plus Immunotherapy and Regorafenib Plus Immunotherapy After Lenvatinib Failure for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The combination of regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has been the most popular second-line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, considering the good anti-tumor performance of lenvatinib, combined immunotherapy on the basis of lenvatinib after first-line lenvatinib failure is also popular in clinical practice. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus ICI (TACE-R-I) versus lenvatinib plus ICI (TACE-L-I) in patients with advanced HCC after lenvatinib failure.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, 164 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled from January 2019 to March 2024 in China. All patients were aged ≥ 18 years, clinically or pathologically diagnosed with HCC. All patients received trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as local treatment. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between groups. The Cox regression model was used to analyze the factors associated with OS and PFS.

RESULTS

We compared 77 patients from each group after propensity score matching (PSM). There was no significant difference in the OS (p = 0.255) or PFS (p = 0.387) between groups. However, in the subgroup (distant metastases, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C or tumor thrombus), the TACE-R-I group showed better survival benefit than the TACE-L-I group. The multivariable Cox regression model suggested that BCLC stage and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were independently associated with OS. Distant metastases, tumor thrombus and Child-Pugh were independent associated factors for PFS (p < 0.05). The frequency of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was not significantly different between groups (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that in patients with greater tumor burden, the TACE-R-I group showed better OS and PFS benefits than the TACE-L-I group. However, in the overall population of HCC patients, there was no significant difference in efficacy and safety between the groups.

Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining targeted chemotherapy and embolization. While effective, TACE can be associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, impacting a patient's quality of life.

Objectives

Quantify the prevalence of key GI complications (diarrhea, nausea, GI toxicity, abdominal pain) following TACE.

Design

Systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on studies that reported side effects of TACE. Studies not involving cTACE or drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), non-HCC studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and inaccessible publications were excluded.

Data sources and methods

A PubMed search for clinical and randomized trials was conducted. Extracted data included study identifiers, demographics, TACE details, and GI side effect prevalences. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality and bias.

Results

The analysis included data from 81 studies with 121 individual study arms and 9495 patients. Diarrhea was reported in 38 studies, with a mean prevalence of 23.46% (2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.39-28.544) and a weighted prevalence of 23.5%. Nausea was most frequently reported, mentioned in 67 studies, with a mean prevalence of 34.66% (2.4; 95% CI: 29.89-39.44) and a weighted prevalence of 32.5%. Abdominal pain was reported in 59 studies, with the highest mean prevalence of 48.07% (2.9; 95% CI: 42.20-53.93) and a weighted prevalence of 46.1%. GI toxicity was reported in 32 studies, with a mean prevalence of 8.85% (1.4; 95% CI: 5.99-11.70) and a weighted prevalence of 9.9%. DEB-TACE generally led to slightly higher rates of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and GI toxicity compared to conventional TACE. The type of chemotherapy agent influenced prevalence of GI-side effects, with high prevalences observed for agents such as zinostatin and cisplatin.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis synthesizes current evidence on managing GI side effects in TACE. Standardizing reporting and developing effective management strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes.

TRACE Model: Predicting Treatment Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To develop and validate a predictive model for predicting six-month outcome by integrating pretreatment MRI features and one-month treatment response after TACE.

Methods

A total of 108 patients with 160 hCCs from a single-arm, multicenter clinical trial (NCT03113955) were analyzed and served as the training cohort. An external multicenter dataset (ChiCTR2100046020) consisting of 63 patients with 99 hCCs served as the test dataset. Radiomics model was constructed based on the selected features from pretreatment MR images. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of clinical and radiological factors were used to identify the independent predictors for the 6-month treatment response. A combined model was further constructed by incorporating one-month treatment response, selected clinical and radiological factors and radiomics signature.

Results

Among all the clinical and radiological features, only corona enhancement and one-month treatment response were selected. The combined model, named TRACE model (Treatment response at 1 month, RAdiomics and Corona Enhancement), with AUCs of 0.91 (training cohort) and 0.84 (test cohort). The TRACE model demonstrated a significantly higher AUC than the radiomics model (P = 0.001). High-risk and low-risk groups stratified by using the TRACE model also exhibited significant differences in overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001). In contrast, none of the published scoring systems, including ART, SNACOR or ABCR score, demonstrated significant differences between the risk groups in OS prediction.

Conclusion

The TRACE model exhibited favorable predictive capability for six-month TACE response, and holds potential as a marker for long-term survival outcomes.

Progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Among primary liver cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common pathological type. Its onset is insidious, and most patients have no obvious discomfort in the early stage, so it is found late, and the opportunity for surgical radical treatment is lost, resulting in a poor prognosis. With the introduction of molecular-targeted drugs represented by sorafenib, patients with middle- and late-stage liver cancer have regained the light of day. However, their therapeutic efficacy is relatively low due to the limited target of drug action, toxic side effects, and other reasons. At this time, the emergence of immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) well breaks this embarrassing situation, which mainly achieves the anti-tumor purpose by improving the tumor immune microenvironment. Currently, ICI monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, has been widely used in the clinic, further prolonging the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This article reviews the development of monotherapy and combination therapy for ICIs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and the latest research progress.

Clinical benefits of transarterial chemoembolization combined with tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy has emerged as the focus of research for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In recent years, several studies have explored the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination therapies of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

AIM

To conduct an updated meta-analysis verifying the clinical benefits and adverse effects of the triple combination therapy for unresectable HCC.

METHODS

All eligible cohort, non-randomized controlled, and randomized controlled trial studies from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MedLine databases up to March 20, 2024 were screened for the present meta-analysis. The study endpoints included complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Stata 16/18 software was used for this meta-analysis, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies with 1754 patients were included. Among the patients who received the TACE therapy with TKIs and ICIs, the tumor response results revealed a pooled CR, ORR, and DCR of 14% [95%CI (0.11-0.18)], 61% [95%CI (0.55-0.66)], and 85% [95%CI (0.83-0.87)], respectively. In terms of the survival outcomes, the pooled median PFS and OS were 10.25 months [95%CI (9.31-11.18)] and 20.47 months [95%CI (18.98-21.97)], respectively. The pooled prevalence of all-grade AEs during the triple treatment was 90% [95%CI (0.84-0.94)] and that of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 32% [95%CI (0.24-0.42)].

CONCLUSION

The combination therapy of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs exhibits great clinical benefits for unresectable HCC in terms of tumor responses and survival outcomes without increasing the risk of severe AEs.

Omics-imaging signature-based nomogram to predict the progression-free survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND

Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it can not effectively reflect the heterogeneity within the tumor and evaluate the effect after treatment. Preoperative imaging analysis of voxel changes can effectively reflect the internal heterogeneity of the tumor and evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS).

AIM

To predict the PFS of patients with HCC before operation by building a model with enhanced MRI images.

METHODS

Delineate the regions of interest (ROI) in arterial phase, portal venous phase and delayed phase of enhanced MRI. After extracting the combinatorial features of ROI, the features are fused to obtain deep learning radiomics (DLR)_Sig. DeLong's test was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of different typological features. K-M analysis was applied to assess PFS in different risk groups, and the discriminative ability of the model was evaluated using the C-index.

RESULTS

Tumor diameter and diolame were independent factors influencing the prognosis of PFS. Delong's test revealed multi-phase combined radiomic features had significantly greater area under the curve values than did those of the individual phases (P < 0.05).In deep transfer learning (DTL) and DLR, significant differences were observed between the multi-phase and individual phases feature sets (P < 0.05). K-M survival analysis revealed a median survival time of high risk group and low risk group was 12.8 and 14.2 months, respectively, and the predicted probabilities of 6 months, 1 year and 2 years were 92%, 60%, 40% and 98%, 90%,73%, respectively. The C-index was 0.764, indicating relatively good consistency between the predicted and observed results. DTL and DLR have higher predictive value for 2-year PFS in nomogram.

CONCLUSION

Based on the multi-temporal characteristics of enhanced MRI and the constructed Nomograph, it provides a new strategy for predicting the PFS of transarterial chemoembolization treatment of HCC.

Nomogram for predicting post-therapy recurrence in BCLC A/B hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis

Introduction

This study conducts a retrospective analysis on patients with BCLC stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accompanied by Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with local ablation therapy. Our goal was to uncover risk factors contributing to post-treatment recurrence and to develop and validate an innovative 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) nomogram.

Methods

Data from 255 BCLC A/B HCC patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis treated at Beijing You'an Hospital (January 2014 - January 2020) were analyzed using random survival forest (RSF), LASSO regression, and multivariate Cox regression to identify independent risk factors for RFS. The prognostic nomogram was then constructed and validated, categorizing patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, with RFS assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

The nomogram, integrating the albumin/globulin ratio, gender, tumor number, and size, showcased robust predictive performance. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) values for the training and validation cohorts were 0.744 (95% CI: 0.703-0.785) and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.644-0.804), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS in the two cohorts were also promising. Calibration curves highlighted the nomogram's reliability and decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed its practical clinical benefits. Through meticulous patient stratification, we also revealed the nomogram's efficacy in distinguishing varying recurrence risks.

Conclusion

This study advances recurrence prediction in BCLC A/B HCC patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis following TACE combined with ablation. The established nomogram accurately predicts 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS, facilitating timely identification of high-risk populations.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as a First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Health Care System

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib showed significant clinical benefits in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess its cost effectiveness from the perspective of Chinese health care system.

METHODS

A Markov state-transition model was developed based on the Phase 3 randomized CARES-310 clinical trial data. Health state utility values were obtained from the CARES-310 clinical trial, and direct medical costs were derived from the relevant literature and local charges. The measured outcomes included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, the incremental effectiveness and cost of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib were 0.41 QALYs and $13,684.84, respectively, resulting in an ICER of $33,619.98/QALY, lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of China ($35,864.61/QALY). Subgroup analyses revealed that the ICERs of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib were $35,920.01 and $29,717.98 in patients with ALBI grade 1 and grade 2, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost of camrelizumab, the proportion of patients receiving subsequent treatment in the camrelizumab plus rivoceranib group, and the cost of rivoceranib were the most significant factors in the base-case analysis. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that the probabilities of cost effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib were 61.27%, 51.46%, and 82.78% for any grade, and ALBI grade 1 and grade 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib was more cost effective than sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable HCC in the Chinese setting.

Liver-Directed Therapy Combined with Systemic Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions

In the past several decades, major advances in both systemic and locoregional therapies have been made for many cancer patients. This has led to modern cancer treatment algorithms frequently calling for active interventions by multiple subspecialists at the same time. One of the areas where this can be clearly seen is the concomitant use of locoregional and systemic therapies in patients with primary or secondary cancers of the liver. These combined algorithms have gained favor over the last decade and are largely focused on the allure of the combined ability to control systemic disease while at the same time addressing refractory/resistant clonal populations. While the general concept has gained favor and is likely to only increase in popularity with the continued establishment of viable immunotherapy treatments, for many patients questions remain. Lingering concerns over the increase in toxicity when combining treatment methods, patient selection, and sequencing remain for multiple cancer patient populations. While further work remains, some of these questions have been addressed in the literature. This article reviews the available data on three commonly treated primary and secondary cancers of the liver, namely, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses are reviewed and future directions are discussed.