Biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma

The effectiveness and safety of therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombus in the hepatic vein, inferior vena cave and/or right atrium: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT), inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT), and/or right atrium tumor thrombus (RATT).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang databases up to 22 August 2024, was conducted, focusing on overall survival (OS), progression -free survival (PFS), and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 453 patients were analyzed. Treatment strategies included surgery alone, local ± systemic therapy, and surgery with adjuvant therapy. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates for all patients were 63.3%, 21.6% , and 8.3%, respectively. Surgery with adjuvant therapy achieved the highest 1-year OS, while local ± systemic therapy led to the best 5-year OS. The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates for all patients were 56.8%, 9.4%, and 1.6%, respectively. Surgery alone commonly caused ascites and pleural effusion; the local ± systemic therapy commonly caused hepatic dysfunction and platelet abnormalities; and surgery with adjuvant therapy commonly caused peritoneal abscess.

CONCLUSION

Local ± systemic therapy provided the best long-term OS and manageable complications among the therapeutic strategies for HCC with HVTT, IVCTT, and/or RATT.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, (CRD42024573152).

Multi-omics reveals the associations among the fecal metabolome, intestinal bacteria, and serum indicators in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the predominant form of primary liver cancer, is a key contributor to cancer-related deaths globally. However, HCC diagnosis solely based on blood biochemical markers lacks both sensitivity and specificity.

AIM

To investigate alterations of the fecal metabolome and intestinal bacteria and reveal the correlations among differential metabolites, distinct bacteria, and serum indicators.

METHODS

To uncover potentially effective therapeutic targets for HCC, we utilized non-targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and high-throughput DNA sequencing targeting the 16S rRNA gene. This comprehensive approach allowed us to investigate the metabolome and microbial community structure of feces samples obtained from patients with HCC. Furthermore, we conducted an analysis to assess the interplay between the fecal metabolome and intestinal bacterial population.

RESULTS

In comparison to healthy controls, a notable overlap of 161 differential metabolites and 3 enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways was observed in the HCC12 (comprising patients with stage I and II HCC) and HCC34 groups (comprising patients with stage III and IV HCC). Lachnospira, Streptococcus, and Veillonella had significant differences in abundance in patients with HCC. Notably, Streptococcus and Veillonella exhibited significant correlations with serum indicators such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Meanwhile, several differential metabolites [e.g., 4-keto-2-undecylpyrroline, dihydrojasmonic acid, 1,8-heptadecadiene-4,6-diyne-3,10-diol, 9(S)-HOTrE] also exhibited significant correlations with serum indicators such as γ-glutamyl transferase, total bilirubin, AFP, aspartate aminotransferase, and albumin. Additionally, these two genera also had significant associations with differential metabolites such as 1,2-Dipentadecanoyl-rac-glycerol (15:0/20:0/0:0), arachidoyl ethanolamide, and 4-keto-2-undecylpyrroline.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the metabolome of fecal samples and the composition of intestinal bacteria hold promise as potential biomarkers for HCC diagnosis.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a significant global health burden, and the need for more effective treatment options is exceptionally pressing. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in treating GI cancers.

Methods

A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was conducted for articles on the treatment of GI cancers with nivolumab combined with ipilimumab, published from 2014 up to 30 August 2024. The inclusion criteria were designed according to the principles of Participants, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS). The control group was chemotherapy or nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab in combination with other drugs. We extracted data from 10 randomized controlled trials and utilized a random effects model to assess the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), median duration of response (mDOR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The data analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4 and Stata version 12.0.

Results

Overall, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated superior outcomes, including a higher ORR (OR = 1.69, P = 0.01), prolonged mOS (MD = 1.74, P = 0.04) and extended mDOR (MD = 5.64, P < 0.00001) compared to the control group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the ORR (OR = 1.75, P = 0.02) and mOS (MD = 5.02, P = 0.003) were significantly improved in patients with esophageal cancer. Notably, the ORR in patients with biliary cancer was significantly lower (OR = 0.11, P = 0.04). Additionally, the ORR was significantly higher in the NIVO1 + IPI3group (OR = 2.82, P = 0.01) and NIVO3 + IPI1 group (OR = 1.62, P = 0.01). Regarding safety, there was no statistically significant difference between the combination regimen and the control group in terms of any grade (OR = 0.72, P = 0.26) or grade 3-4 TRAEs (OR = 1.36, P = 0.14).

Conclusions

Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated significant efficacy in GI cancers (especially esophageal cancer) without causing more adverse reactions. However, its efficacy in biliary cancer still needs to be further proven.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024590994.

Advancements in the Treatment Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment has expanded significantly with the advent of multi-kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors [...].