1
|
Vu Trung K, Heise C, Abou-Ali E, Auriemma F, Karam E, van der Wiel SE, Bruno MJ, Caillol F, Giovannini M, Masaryk V, Will U, Anderloni A, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Dugic A, Meier B, Paik WH, Petrone MC, Wichmann D, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Gonçalves TC, Wedi E, Schmidt A, Gulla A, Hoffmeister A, Rosendahl J, Ratone JP, Saadeh R, Repici A, Deprez P, Sauvanet A, Souche FR, Fabre JM, Muehldorfer S, Caca K, Löhr M, Michl P, Krug S, Regner S, Gaujoux S, Hollenbach M. Endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary lesions of minor papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:587-595.e1. [PMID: 37951279 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Ampullary lesions (ALs) of the minor duodenal papilla are extremely rare. Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a routinely used treatment for AL of the major duodenal papilla, but the role of EP for minor AL has not been accurately studied. METHODS We identified 20 patients with ALs of minor duodenal papilla in the multicentric database from the Endoscopic Papillectomy vs Surgical Ampullectomy vs Pancreatitcoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm study, which included 1422 EPs. We used propensity score matching (nearest-neighbor method) to match these cases with ALs of the major duodenal papilla based on age, sex, histologic subtype, and size of the lesion in a 1:2 ratio. Cohorts were compared by means of chi-square or Fisher exact test as well as Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS Propensity score-based matching identified a cohort of 60 (minor papilla 20, major papilla 40) patients with similar baseline characteristics. The most common histologic subtype of lesions of minor papilla was an ampullary adenoma in 12 patients (3 low-grade dysplasia and 9 high-grade dysplasia). Five patients revealed nonneoplastic lesions. Invasive cancer (T1a), adenomyoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasia were each found in 1 case. The rate of complete resection, en-bloc resection, and recurrences were similar between the groups. There were no severe adverse events after EP of lesions of minor papilla. One patient had delayed bleeding that could be treated by endoscopic hemostasis, and 2 patients showed a recurrence in surveillance endoscopy after a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range, 12-50 months). CONCLUSIONS EP is safe and effective in ALs of the minor duodenal papilla. Such lesions could be managed according to guidelines for EP of major duodenal papilla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kien Vu Trung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Heise
- Medical Department I, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Einas Abou-Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology, and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Elias Karam
- Department of Digestive Surgery, INSERM U1086 ANTICIPE, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Sophia E van der Wiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Viliam Masaryk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Uwe Will
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
- Interventional Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France; Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Ana Dugic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Benjamin Meier
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Diabetes, and Infectious Diseases, RKH Clinic Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Woo H Paik
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Maria C Petrone
- Endosonography Unit, Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dörte Wichmann
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto, Porto, Portugal; RISE@CI-IPO (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal; Department of Community Medicine, Health Information, and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Tiago C Gonçalves
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal; School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal; PT Government Associate Laboratory, ICVS/3B, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Edris Wedi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Aiste Gulla
- Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Santaros Klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania; General Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, John Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jonas Rosendahl
- Medical Department I, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Rita Saadeh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Deprez
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Diabetes, and Infectious Diseases, RKH Clinic Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Francois R Souche
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean M Fabre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Steffen Muehldorfer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Diabetes, and Infectious Diseases, RKH Clinic Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Löhr
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patrick Michl
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Krug
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sara Regner
- Section for Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Pancreatic and Endocrine Surgery, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Médecine Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Zhang X, Yang Z, Wang T, Zhu D, Gao J, Zhang PP, Wang P, Shi X. Long-term follow-up of endoscopic papillectomy and the value of preventive pancreatic stent placement (with videos). Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goad050. [PMID: 37867926 PMCID: PMC10585593 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early-stage ampullary adenomas have only been reported in a small case series on endoscopic management. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of early ampullary adenoma with endoscopic management and identify the risk factors for acute pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy (EP). Methods In this study, 115 patients who underwent EP at Changhai Hospital (Shanghai, China) between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Endoscopy was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after EP. Data were statistically analysed using the t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Results A total of 107 patients were included in this study and the follow-up period was 75 ± 43 months. The average age of the 107 patients was 54.6 years and the average tumor size was 17 mm. The average age of the patients (53.7 ± 10.7 years vs 55.2 ± 10.5 years, P = 0.482), minimum tumor size (13 vs 19 mm, P = 0.063), and complete resection rate (84.78% vs 85.25%, P = 0.947) did not differ significantly between the stent placement and non-stent placement groups. Post-EP acute pancreatitis rates in the non-stent placement and stent placement groups were 11.48% and 4.35%, respectively. The risk of post-EP acute pancreatitis was significantly associated with the preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis. The risk of post-EP acute pancreatitis was not significantly associated with the placement of the pancreatic stent in either univariate or multivariate analysis. Moreover, delayed proximal pancreatic duct stenosis was not noted in either group during long-term follow-up. Conclusions EP is a satisfactory option for treating adenomas of the ampulla of the duodenum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuling Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Xiaoqing Zhang
- Department of Emergency, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Zhenhua Yang
- Department of Nephrology, Gongli Hospital, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Teng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Dongqing Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Jie Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Ping-Ping Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Peiqin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Xingang Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vu Trung K, Abou-Ali E, Caillol F, Paik WH, Napoleon B, Masaryk V, van der Wiel SE, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Musquer N, Halimi A, Soares K, Souche FR, Seyfried S, Petrone MC, Crippa S, Kleemann T, Albers D, Weismüller TJ, Dugic A, Meier B, Wedi E, Schiemer M, Regner S, Gaujoux S, Hollenbach M. Endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary lesions in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis compared with sporadic lesions: a propensity score-matched cohort. Endoscopy 2023; 55:709-718. [PMID: 36746390 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-2935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a rare inherited syndrome that predisposes the patient to cancer. Treatment of FAP-related ampullary lesions is challenging and the role of endoscopic papillectomy has not been elucidated. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy in matched cohorts of FAP-related and sporadic ampullary lesions (SALs). METHODS This retrospective multicenter study included 1422 endoscopic papillectomy procedures. Propensity score matching including age, sex, comorbidity, histologic subtype, and size was performed. Main outcomes were complete resection (R0), technical success, complications, and recurrence. RESULTS Propensity score matching identified 202 patients (101 FAP, 101 SAL) with comparable baseline characteristics. FAP patients were mainly asymptomatic (79.2 % [95 %CI 71.2-87.3] vs. 46.5 % [95 %CI 36.6-56.4]); P < 0.001). The initial R0 rate was significantly lower in FAP patients (63.4 % [95 %CI 53.8-72.9] vs. 83.2 % [95 %CI 75.8-90.6]; P = 0.001). After repeated interventions (mean 1.30 per patient), R0 was comparable (FAP 93.1 % [95 %CI 88.0-98.1] vs. SAL 97.0 % [95 %CI 93.7-100]; P = 0.19). Adverse events occurred in 28.7 %. Pancreatitis and bleeding were the most common adverse events in both groups. Severe adverse events were rare (3.5 %). Overall, 21 FAP patients (20.8 % [95 %CI 12.7-28.8]) and 16 SAL patients (15.8 % [95 %CI 8.6-23.1]; P = 0.36) had recurrence. Recurrences occurred later in FAP patients (25 [95 %CI 18.3-31.7] vs. 2 [95 %CI CI 0.06-3.9] months). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic papillectomy was safe and effective in FAP-related ampullary lesions. Criteria for endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions can be extended to FAP patients. FAP patients have a lifetime risk of relapse even after complete resection, and require long-time surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kien Vu Trung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Einas Abou-Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Woo H Paik
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Viliam Masaryk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Sophia E van der Wiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
- Interventional Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Asif Halimi
- Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Kevin Soares
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Francois R Souche
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maria C Petrone
- Endosonography Unit, Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Tobias Kleemann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Cottbus, Germany
| | - David Albers
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Contilia Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias J Weismüller
- Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Oncology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ana Dugic
- Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Benjamin Meier
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Diabetes and Infectious Diseases; RKH Clinic Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Edris Wedi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Moritz Schiemer
- Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sara Regner
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Section for Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sebastien Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive and HBP Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP, Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Division of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karam E, Hollenbach M, Abou Ali E, Auriemma F, Anderloni A, Barbier L, Belfiori G, Caillol F, Crippa S, Del Chiaro M, De Ponthaud C, Dahel Y, Falconi M, Giovannini M, Heling D, Inoue Y, Jarnagin WR, Leung G, Lupinacci RM, Mariani A, Masaryk V, Miksch RC, Musquer N, Napoleon B, Oba A, Partelli S, Petrone MC, Prat F, Repici A, Sauvanet A, Salzmann K, Schattner MA, Schulick R, Schwarz L, Soares K, Souche FR, Truant S, Vaillant JC, Wang T, Wedi E, Werner J, Weismüller TJ, Wichmann D, Will U, Zaccari P, Gulla A, Heise C, Regner S, Gaujoux S. Endoscopic and Surgical Management of Non-Metastatic Ampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Multi-Institutional Pancreas2000/EPC Study. Neuroendocrinology 2023; 113:1024-1034. [PMID: 37369186 DOI: 10.1159/000531712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ampullary neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is rare and evidence regarding their management is scarce. This study aimed to describe clinicopathological features, management, and prognosis of ampullary NEN according to their endoscopic or surgical management. METHODS From a multi-institutional international database, patients treated with either endoscopic papillectomy (EP), transduodenal surgical ampullectomy (TSA), or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ampullary NEN were included. Clinical features, post-procedure complications, and recurrences were assessed. RESULTS 65 patients were included, 20 (30.8%) treated with EP, 19 (29.2%) with TSA, and 26 (40%) with PD. Patients were mostly asymptomatic (n = 46; 70.8%). Median tumor size was 17 mm (12-22), tumors were mostly grade 1 (70.8%) and pT2 (55.4%). Two (10%) EP resulted in severe American Society for Gastrointestinal Enterology (ASGE) adverse post-procedure complications and 10 (50%) were R0. Clavien 3-5 complications did not occur after TSA and in 4, including 1 postoperative death (15.4%) of patients after PD, with 17 (89.5%) and 26 R0 resection (100%), respectively. The pN1/2 rate was 51.9% (n = 14) after PD. Tumor size larger than 1 cm (i.e., pT stage >1) was a predictor for R1 resection (p < 0.001). Three-year overall survival and disease-free survival after EP, TSA, and PD were 92%, 68%, 92% and 92%, 85%, 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION Management of ampullary NEN is challenging. EP should not be performed in lesions larger than 1 cm or with a endoscopic ultrasonography T stage beyond T1. Local resection by TSA seems safe and feasible for lesions without nodal involvement. PD should be preferred for larger ampullary NEN at risk of nodal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Karam
- Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Visceral Surgery, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Medical Department II - Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Rozzano, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Louise Barbier
- Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Visceral Surgery, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Charles De Ponthaud
- Department of Digestive and HBP Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP, Paris, France
| | - Yanis Dahel
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Department of Endoscopy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Dominik Heling
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Galen Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Renato M Lupinacci
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Mariani
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Viliam Masaryk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Rainer Christoph Miksch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Atsushi Oba
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria C Petrone
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Frédéric Prat
- Department of Digestive, hepatobiliary and endocrine surgery, Cochin Hospital, APHP, and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Rozzano, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Departement of Digestive Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Clichy, France
| | - Katrin Salzmann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard Schulick
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Kevin Soares
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - François R Souche
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Deparment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire De Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean C Vaillant
- Department of Digestive and HBP Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière APHP, Paris, France
| | - Tiegong Wang
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
| | - Edris Wedi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology and Interventional Endoscopy, Sana Clinic Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias J Weismüller
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Oncology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dörte Wichmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Will
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Diabetes and General Internal Medicine, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
| | - Piera Zaccari
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Aiste Gulla
- Institute of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, General Surgery, Georgetown, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Christian Heise
- Department of Medicine I - Gastroenterology, Pulmonology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Sara Regner
- Section for Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
- Department of Surgery, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xu JX, Hu JB, Yang XY, Feng N, Huang XS, Zheng XZ, Rao QP, Wei YG, Yu RS. A nomogram diagnostic prediction model of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1106525. [PMID: 36727067 PMCID: PMC9885140 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1106525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma (PM-SCLC), and establish a convenient nomogram diagnostic predictive model to differentiate PM-SCLC from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) preoperatively. Methods A total of 299 patients with meeting the criteria (PM-SCLC n=93; PDAC n=206) from January 2016 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 249 patients from hospital 1 (training/internal validation cohort) and 50 patients from hospital 2 (external validation cohort). We searched for meaningful clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers and determined the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Three models: clinical model, CT imaging model, and combined model, were developed for the diagnosis and prediction of PM-SCLC. Nomogram was constructed based on independent predictors. The receiver operating curve was undertaken to estimate the discrimination. Results Six independent predictors for PM-SCLC diagnosis in multivariate logistic regression analysis, including clinical symptoms, CA199, tumor size, parenchymal atrophy, vascular involvement and enhancement type. The nomogram diagnostic predictive model based on these six independent predictors showed the best performance, achieved the AUCs of the training cohort (n = 174), internal validation cohort (n = 75) and external validation cohort (n = 50) were 0.950 (95%CI, 0.917-0.976), 0.928 (95%CI, 0.873-0.971) and 0.976 (95%CI, 0.944-1.00) respectively. The model achieved 94.50% sensitivity, 83.20% specificity, 86.80% accuracy in the training cohort and 100.00% sensitivity, 80.40% specificity, 86.70% accuracy in the internal validation cohort and 100.00% sensitivity, 88.90% specificity, 87.50% accuracy in the external validation cohort. Conclusion We proposed a noninvasive and convenient nomogram diagnostic predictive model based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers to preoperatively differentiate PM-SCLC from PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Xia Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jin-Bao Hu
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Yang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Na Feng
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Shan Huang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Zhong Zheng
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qin-Pan Rao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yu-Guo Wei
- Precision Health Institution, General Electric (GE) Healthcare, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ri-Sheng Yu
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China,*Correspondence: Ri-Sheng Yu,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Karam E, Hollenbach M, Ali EA, Auriemma F, Gulla A, Heise C, Regner S, Gaujoux S, Regimbeau JM, Kähler G, Seyfried S, Vaillant JC, De Ponthaud C, Sauvanet A, Birnbaum D, Regenet N, Truant S, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Bruzzi M, Lupinacci RM, Brunel M, Belfiori G, Barbier L, Salamé E, Souche FR, Schwarz L, Maggino L, Salvia R, Gagniére J, Del Chiaro M, Leung G, Hackert T, Kleemann T, Paik WH, Caca K, Dugic A, Muehldorfer S, Schumacher B, Albers D. Outcomes of rescue procedures in the management of locally recurrent ampullary tumors: A Pancreas 2000/EPC study. Surgery 2023; 173:1254-1262. [PMID: 36642655 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ampullary lesions are rare and can be locally treated either with endoscopic papillectomy or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy. Management of local recurrence after a first-line treatment has been poorly studied. METHODS Patients with a local recurrence of an ampullary lesion initially treated with endoscopic papillectomy or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy were retrospectively included from a multi-institutional database (58 centers) between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were included, 21 (20.4%) treated with redo endoscopic papillectomy, 14 (13.6%) with transduodenal surgical ampullectomy, and 68 (66%) with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Redo endoscopic papillectomy had low morbidity with 4.8% (n = 1) severe to fatal complications and a R0 rate of 81% (n = 17). Transduodenal surgical ampullectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy after a first procedure had a higher morbidity with Clavien III and more complications, respectively, 28.6% (n = 4) and 25% (n = 17); R0 resection rates were 85.7% (n = 12) and 92.6% (n = 63), both without statistically significant difference compared to endoscopic papillectomy (P = .1 and 0.2). Pancreaticoduodenectomy had 4.4% (n = 2) mortality. No deaths were registered after transduodenal surgical ampullectomy or endoscopic papillectomy. Recurrences treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy were more likely to be adenocarcinomas (79.4%, n = 54 vs 21.4%, n = 3 for transduodenal surgical ampullectomy and 4.8%, n = 1 for endoscopic papillectomy, P < .0001). Three-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable. CONCLUSION Endoscopy is appropriate for noninvasive recurrences, with resection rate and survival outcomes comparable to surgery. Surgery applies more to invasive recurrences, with transduodenal surgical ampullectomy rather for carcinoma in situ and early cancers and pancreaticoduodenectomy for more advanced tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Karam
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Tours University Hospital, France.
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- University of Leipzig Medical Center, Medical Department II-Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases, Pulmonology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology, and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Milan, Italy
| | - Aiste Gulla
- Department of Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania; Johns Hopkins University, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, General Surgery, Washington, DC
| | - Christian Heise
- Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg Department of Medicine I-Gastroenterology, Pulmonology, Halle, Germany
| | - Sara Regner
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | - Jean M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Center Hospitalo-Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Georg Kähler
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Surgery, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Department of Surgery, Mannheim Medical Center, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jean C Vaillant
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Charles De Ponthaud
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Clichy, France
| | - David Birnbaum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Regenet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Deparment of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Lille, France
| | | | - Matthieu Bruzzi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Renato M Lupinacci
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Martin Brunel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital André Mignot, Versailles, France
| | - Giulio Belfiori
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Louise Barbier
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Tours University Hospital, France
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Unit, Tours University Hospital, France
| | - Francois R Souche
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, France
| | - Laura Maggino
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics, and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics, and Gynaecology, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Johan Gagniére
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France; U1071 Inserm / Clermont-Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO
| | - Galen Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, PA
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Kleemann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Germany
| | - Woo H Paik
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology, Hematology, Oncology, Pneumology, Diabetes and Infectious Diseases, RKH Clinic Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Ana Dugic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Steffen Muehldorfer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Medical Campus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany
| | | | - David Albers
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Contilia Clinic Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen J, Chen Q, Deng Y, Jiang Y, Huang Z, Zhou J, Zhao H, Cai J. Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomograms for Periampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A SEER Database Analysis. Curr Oncol 2022; 30:344-357. [PMID: 36661677 PMCID: PMC9858183 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Periampullary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumors that lack a prognostic prediction model. We aimed to design comprehensive and effective nomograms to predict prognosis; (2) Methods: Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to screen out significant variables for the construction of the nomograms. The discrimination and calibration of the nomograms were carried out using calibration plots, concordance indices (C-indices), and area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (time-dependent AUCs). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to compare the clinical applicability of the nomograms, TNM (Tumor- Node-Metastasis) stage, and SEER stage; (3) Results: The independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with periampullary NENs included age, tumor size, histology, differentiation, N stage, M stage, and surgery, which were used to construct the nomograms. The calibration curves and C-indices showed a high degree of agreement between the predicted and actual observed survival rates. The AUCs displayed good calibration and acceptable discrimination of the nomograms. Additionally, the DCA curves indicated that the nomograms showed better clinical applicability; (4) Conclusions: We developed and validated nomogram prognostic models for patients with periampullary NENs. The nomograms provided insightful and applicable tools to evaluate prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinghua Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Qichen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yiqiao Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yujuan Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhen Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianguo Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seyfried S, Kähler G, Belle S, Hirsch D, Reißfelder C, Rahbari N, Hardt J. Endoscopic papillectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary lesions: a single center retrospective cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:1381-1389. [PMID: 35723057 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2088243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare post-operative morbidity, mortality, and completeness of resection following endoscopic vs. radical surgical resection for ampullary lesions. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data from a surgical database for patients with ampullary lesions at our institution was performed. All consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic papillectomy (EP) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ampullary lesions between 2007 and 2021 were eligible for this analysis. RESULTS A total of 85 patients were included of whom 42 underwent EP whereas 43 received a PD. The resected lesion was a tubulovillous adenoma in 26 patients (61.9%) in the EP cohort, and 37 patients (86.0%) in the PD cohort had adenocarcinomas. The completeness of resection was equal in both cohorts. Significantly more patients of the PD cohort had to undergo reinterventions. After a mean follow up of 36 months (EP) vs. 16 months (PD), the rate of tumor recurrence did not differ between both groups. CONCLUSION Equivalently high completeness of resection rates and correspondingly low recurrence rates can be achieved after EP and PD. Our results regarding residual tumor and recurrence rates show that even large tumors can be resected endoscopically with high primary success and completeness of resection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Kähler
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sebastian Belle
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniela Hirsch
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reißfelder
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nuh Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julia Hardt
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Scroggie DL, Mavroeidis VK. Surgical ampullectomy: A comprehensive review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1338-1350. [PMID: 34950424 PMCID: PMC8649570 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumours of the ampulla of Vater are relatively uncommon lesions of the digestive system. They are typically diagnosed at an earlier stage than other types of tumours in this region, due to their tendency to invoke symptoms by obstructing the bile duct or pancreatic duct. Consequently, many are potentially curable by excision. Surgical ampullectomy (SA) (or transduodenal ampullectomy) for an ampullary tumour was first described in 1899, but was soon surpassed by pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), which offered a more extensive resection resulting in a lower risk of recurrence. Ongoing innovation in endoscopic techniques over recent decades has led to the popularization of endoscopic papillectomy (EP), particularly for adenomas and even early cancers. The vast majority of resectable ampullary tumours are now treated using either PD or EP. However, SA continues to play a role in specific circumstances. Many authors have suggested specific indications for SA based on their own data, practices, or interpretations of the literature. However, certain issues have attracted controversy, such as its use for early ampullary cancers. Consequently, there has been a lack of clarity regarding indications for SA, and no evidence-based consensus guidelines have been produced. All studies reporting SA have employed observational designs, and have been heterogeneous in their methodologies. Accordingly, characteristics of patients and their tumours have differed substantially across treatment groups. Therefore, meaningful comparisons of clinical outcomes between SA, PD and EP have been elusive. Nevertheless, it appears that suitably selected cases of ampullary tumours subjected to SA may benefit from favourable peri-operative and long-term outcomes with very low mortality and significantly long survival, hence its role in this setting warrants further clarification, while it can also be useful in the management of specific benign entities. Whilst the commissioning of a randomised controlled trial seems unlikely, well-designed observational studies incorporating adjustments for confounding variables may become the best available comparative evidence for SA, potentially informing the eventual development of consensus guidelines. In this comprehensive review, we explore the role of SA in the modern management of ampullary lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren L Scroggie
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Bristol BS8 2PS, United Kingdom
| | - Vasileios K Mavroeidis
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heise C, Abou Ali E, Hasenclever D, Auriemma F, Gulla A, Regner S, Gaujoux S, Hollenbach M. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Endoscopic and Surgical Resection for Ampullary Lesions. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9113622. [PMID: 33182806 PMCID: PMC7696506 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Ampullary lesions (ALs) can be treated by endoscopic (EA) or surgical ampullectomy (SA) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, EA carries significant risk of incomplete resection while surgical interventions can lead to substantial morbidity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for R0, adverse-events (AEs) and recurrence between EA, SA and PD. Electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2018. Outcomes were calculated as pooled means using fixed and random-effects models and the Freeman-Tukey-Double-Arcsine-Proportion-model. We identified 59 independent studies. The pooled R0 rate was 76.6% (71.8–81.4%, I2 = 91.38%) for EA, 96.4% (93.6–99.2%, I2 = 37.8%) for SA and 98.9% (98.0–99.7%, I2 = 0%) for PD. AEs were 24.7% (19.8–29.6%, I2 = 86.4%), 28.3% (19.0–37.7%, I2 = 76.8%) and 44.7% (37.9–51.4%, I2 = 0%), respectively. Recurrences were registered in 13.0% (10.2–15.6%, I2 = 91.3%), 9.4% (4.8–14%, I2 = 57.3%) and 14.2% (9.5–18.9%, I2 = 0%). Differences between proportions were significant in R0 for EA compared to SA (p = 0.007) and PD (p = 0.022). AEs were statistically different only between EA and PD (p = 0.049) and recurrence showed no significance for EA/SA or EA/PD. Our data indicate an increased rate of complete resection in surgical interventions accompanied with a higher risk of complications. However, studies showed various sources of bias, limited quality of data and a significant heterogeneity, particularly in EA studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Heise
- Department of Medicine I—Gastroenterology, Pulmonology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, Germany;
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, 75014 Paris, France;
| | - Dirk Hasenclever
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology (IMISE), University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Aiste Gulla
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania;
- General Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Sara Regner
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Section for Surgery, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden;
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Pancreatic and Endocrine Surgery, Pitié-Salpetriere Hospital, Médecine Sorbonne Université, 75000 Paris, France;
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Medical Department II, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-34-1971-2362
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shiratori Y, Nakamura K, Suzuki K, Fukuda K. Endoscopic papillectomy for an ampullary neuroendocrine tumor. Clin J Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1144-1149. [PMID: 32816239 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-020-01212-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Ampullary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are extremely rare, have a high rate of transmural invasion and lymph node metastasis, and are generally recommended for surgery. In contrast, endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for ampullary NET, a low-grade type within the submucosal layer, is feasible and useful to avoid surgery. However, EP for ampullary NET is controversial, there are no consensus guidelines, and international recommendations are lacking. We present the case of a 60-year-old man with an ampullary NET who was successfully treated with EP via a hexagonal snare. Prior to EP, endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraductal ultrasonography in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were performed to assess for ductal infiltration of the NET. The specimen revealed a low-grade NET measuring 1.0 × 0.8 × 0.7 cm without venous or lymphatic infiltration, which was negative for horizontal and vertical margins. No recurrence was observed over a 12-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasutoshi Shiratori
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koyu Suzuki
- Division of Pathology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| |
Collapse
|