3D Heads-Up Display vs. Standard Operating Microscope Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

OBJECTIVE QUANTIFICATION OF DEPTH-OF-FIELD ADVANTAGE IN 3D SURGICAL VIDEO SYSTEM FOR VITREORETINAL SURGERY: Safety and Efficacy in Macular Diseases

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to demonstrate, based on objective clinical indicators, the advantages of depth of field provided by the 3D surgical video system compared with the traditional microscope during vitrectomy for treating epiretinal membranes or macular holes.

METHODS

A total of 38 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned to either the 3D surgical video group or the conventional microscope group. Surgical parameters, such as the focal plane adjustment frequency, membrane peeling time, and number of attempts to peel the membrane, were recorded for each patient. In addition, patients were followed up for 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in age, sex, operated eyes, or follow-up rates between the groups. The 3D group had significantly lower focal plane adjustment frequency in macular hole surgery and epiretinal membrane surgery. No significant differences were observed in peeling maneuvers, time, or total surgical time. Postoperative follow-up data showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the 3D surgical video system exhibits potential advantages in depth of field. The 3D surgical video system is a safe and effective technology in vitrectomy for macular diseases.

Enhancing surgical precision and efficiency: a study and comparison of a three-dimensional surgical video system in proliferative diabetic retinopathy surgery

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) surgical video systems for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Methods

This retrospective clinical case study included 30 patients (30 eyes) with PDR. Patients were divided into two groups: one underwent surgery using a 3D surgical video system (14 cases, 14 eyes), while the other underwent traditional microscope surgery (16 cases, 16 eyes). Safety and efficacy were assessed through predetermined surgical parameters, including surgical duration, intraoperative membrane removal rate, and occurrences during intraoperative and postoperative phases.

Results

Our study revealed noteworthy differences in various aspects between the 3D surgical video system group and the traditional microscope surgery group. Specifically, the mean surgical time was 30.25 ± 14.43 mins in the 3D surgical video system group, while it was 38.56 ± 18.71 mins in the traditional microscope surgery group (p = 0.051). Furthermore, the mean membrane removal time was significantly shorter in the 3D group at 2.53 ± 1.52 mins, as compared to 3.23 ± 1.76 mins in the traditional group (p = 0.042). Importantly, the membrane removal rate also displayed a significant difference, with the 3D group at 0.55 ± 0.07 and the traditional group at 0.41 ± 0.11 (p = 0.018). However, no notable differences were observed between the two groups in terms of intraoperative and postoperative incidences.

Conclusion

The safety and efficacy obtained using the 3D surgical video system in PDR surgery were comparable to those obtained in traditional microscopic surgery.

Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Viewing Systems in Vitreoretinal Surgery: An Updated Perspective

Three-Dimensional (3D) heads-up visualization systems have significantly advanced vitreoretinal surgery, providing enhanced detail and improved ergonomics. This review discusses the application of 3D systems in vitreoretinal surgery, their use in various procedures, their combination with other imaging modalities, and the role of this technology in medical education and telementoring. Furthermore, the review highlights the benefits of 3D systems, such as improved ergonomics, reduced phototoxicity, enhanced depth of field, and the use of color filters. Potential challenges, including the learning curve and additional costs, are also addressed. The review concludes by exploring promising future applications, including teleophthalmology for remote assistance and specialist availability expansion, virtual reality integration for global clinical education, and the combination of remotely robotic-guided surgery with artificial intelligence for precise, efficient surgical procedures. This comprehensive review offers insights into the current state and future potential of 3D heads-up visualization systems in vitreoretinal surgery, underscoring the transformative impact of this technology on ophthalmology.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL HEADS-UP VITRECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MICROSCOPIC VITRECTOMY FOR PATIENTS WITH EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of 3D heads-up display (3D-HUD) vitrectomy compared with conventional microscopy (CM) vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.

METHODS

Epiretinal membrane removal with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was performed using a 3D-HUD or CM system. The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in central macular thickness (CMT) and postoperative complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were comparable except for the follow-up period. Both BCVA and CMT improved at the final visit (all P < 0.05). The ERM recurrence and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) rates were lower in the 3D group (both P < 0.05). conventional microscopic vitrectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 12.86, P = 0.02) and absence of ILM peeling (OR = 45.25, P < 0.05) were associated with ERM recurrence. In the DONFL, CM vitrectomy (OR = 1.98, <0.05) and combined phacovitrectomy (OR = 2.33, P = 0.03) were analyzed as risk factors for DONFL.

CONCLUSION

The improvement in BCVA and CMT in ERM surgery using a 3D-HUD is comparable with that of CM vitrectomy, with a significantly low rate of ERM recurrence and DONFL occurrence. Therefore, 3D vitrectomy might have an advantage for ERM surgery.

Three-Dimensional Visualization System for Vitreoretinal Surgery: Results from a Monocentric Experience and Comparison with Conventional Surgery

PURPOSE

To describe the experience of our centre (Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy) in using a heads-up three-dimensional (3D) surgical viewing system in vitreoretinal surgery, making a comparison with the conventional microscope surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data taken from 240 patients (240 eyes) with surgical macular diseases (macular hole and epiretinal membrane), retinal detachment or vitreous hemorrhage who underwent vitreoretinal surgeries, by means of the NGENUITY 3D Visualization System (Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA), in comparison with 210 patients (210 eyes) who underwent vitreoretinal surgeries performed using a conventional microscope. All surgeries were performed with standardized procedures by the same surgeons. We analyzed data over a follow-up period of 6 months, comparing the surgical outcomes (best-corrected visual acuity, anatomical success rate and postoperative complication rate) between the two groups.

RESULTS

the 3D group included 74 patients with retinal detachment, 78 with epiretinal membrane, 64 with macular hole and 24 with vitreous hemorrhage. There were no significant differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics between the 3D group and the conventional group. We found no significant differences in outcome measures at three and six months follow-up between the two groups (p-value ≥ 0.05 for all comparisons). Surgery durations were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, a heads-up 3D surgical viewing system provided comparable functional and anatomical outcomes in comparison with conventional microscope surgery, proving to be a valuable tool for vitreoretinal surgery in the treatment of different retinal diseases.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of a 3-Dimensional Heads-up Display vs a Standard Operating Microscope in Retinal Detachment Repair

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of the Ngenuity 3-dimensional (3D) heads-up display (HUD) visualization system for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair at a large academic medical center in the United States. Methods: This retrospective review comprised consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who had primary RRD repair (pars plana vitrectomy [PPV] alone or combined PPV and scleral buckle) performed by the same fellowship-trained vitreoretinal surgeon using the 3D visualization system and a traditional standard operating microscope (SOM) at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from June 2017 to December 2021. The minimum follow-up was 90 days. Results: The 3D HUD group comprised 50 eyes of 47 patients and the SOM group, 138 eyes of 136 patients. There were no between-group differences in single surgery anatomic success rates at 3 months (98% HUD vs 99% SOM; P = 1.00) or at the last follow-up (94% HUD vs 98% SOM; P = .40). The rate of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy was similar between the 2 groups (3 months: 3% HUD vs 5% SOM, P = .94; last follow-up, 2% HUD vs 3% SOM, P = .93). There was no difference in the mean duration of surgery (57.4 ± 28.9 minutes HUD vs 59.4 ± 29.9 minutes SOM; P = .68). Conclusions: Anatomic and functional outcomes, in addition to surgical efficiency, of noncomplex primary RRD repair with a 3D HUD system were similar to those of surgery performed with an SOM.

Effects of image-sharpening algorithm on surgical field visibility during 3D heads-up surgery for vitreoretinal diseases

We conducted clinical and experimental studies to investigate the effects of image-sharpening algorithms and color adjustments, which enabled real-time processing of live surgical images with a delay of 0.004 s. The images were processed with image-sharpening intensities of 0%, 12.5%, 25%, and 50% during cataract surgery, vitrectomy, peeling of epiretinal membrane, and peeling of internal limiting membrane (ILM) with the Ngenuity 3D visualization system. In addition, the images obtained with a yellow filter during the ILM peeling were processed with color adjustments. Five vitreoretinal surgeons scored the clarity of the images on a 10-point scale. The images of a 1951 United States Air Force grating target placed in no fluid (control), saline, and 0.1% and 1% milk solution were evaluated. The results showed that the mean visibility score increased significantly from 5.0 ± 0.6 at 0% to 6.4 ± 0.6 at 12.5%, 7.3 ± 0.7 at 25%, and 7.5 ± 0.9 at 50% (P < 0.001). The visibility scores during ILM peeling improved significantly with color adjustments (P = 0.005). In the experimental study, the contrast of the grating targets blurred by the 0.1% and 1% milk solution increased significantly by the image-sharpening procedure. We conclude that the image-sharpening algorithms and color adjustments improved the intraoperative visibility of 3D heads-up surgery.

Vitrectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery for Retinal Detachment Using a Three-Dimensional Viewing System

Purpose: To evaluate the results of a pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with cataract surgery for primary rhematogenous retinal detachment (RD) using a three-dimensional (3D) viewing system and a conventional microscope (CM). Methods: Medical reports of 82 patients were retrospectively reviewed: 26 patients were operated on with 3D and 56 patients were operated on with CM. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, duration of the surgery, and the rate of postoperative complications. Results: No statistically significant differences in pre- and postoperative visual acuity were found between both groups. There was significant improvement in the visual acuity in both groups. The best postoperative visual acuity was achieved with SF6 gas tamponade, followed by C3F8 gas and silicone oil in both groups. The duration of the surgery (60 min vs. 55 min) and the rate of postoperative complications (15% vs. 14%) were similar in both groups. Conclusions: The similar postoperative visual acuity and rate of complications detected using 3D and CM indicate that the 3D viewing system may be advantageous in the treatment of rhematogenous RD with PPV combined with cataract surgery, i.e., a complex procedure involving both anterior and posterior segment manipulations.