How to Optimize Treatment With Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Lessons Learned From Clinical Trials and Real-World Data

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Real-world long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab in ulcerative colitis: results from a spanish open-label cohort

OBJECTIVE

Ustekinumab was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Although data from the UNIFI clinical trial are encouraging, real-world data assessing effectiveness and safety are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab in a large cohort of refractory UC patients.

METHODS

Multicenter observational study of UC patients who received ustekinumab for active disease. The Partial Mayo Score (PMS), endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FC) were recorded at baseline and at different time points. Demographic and clinical data, adverse events (AEs) and surgeries were documented.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were analyzed from 4 referral Spanish hospitals. The clinical remission rates were 59%, 56.5%, 57% and 69% of patients at weeks 8, 16, 24 and 52, respectively. Normalization of FC was achieved in 39.6%, 41% and 51% at weeks 8, 24 and 52, respectively. CRP normalization was observed in 79%, 75% and 76.5% of patients at weeks 8, 24 and 52, respectively. Fewer previous anti-TNF agents and loss of response to anti-TNF were associated with clinical response and normalization of FC, respectively. AEs were observed in 5 patients, and 9 underwent colectomy. Ustekinumab persistence rates were 91%, 83% and 81% at 24, 48 and 96 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ustekinumab demonstrated, in the real-world setting, long-term effectiveness and a favorable safety profile in a cohort of refractory UC patients.

Alopecia Areata: Current Treatments and New Directions

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune hair loss disease that is non-scarring and is characterized by chronic inflammation at the hair follicle level. Clinically, patients' presentation varies from patchy, circumscribed scalp involvement to total body and scalp hair loss. Current management is guided by the degree of scalp and body involvement, with topical and intralesional steroid injections as primarily first-line for mild cases and broad immunosuppressants as the mainstay for more severe cases. Until recently, the limited number of blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials for this disease had made establishing an evidence-based treatment paradigm challenging. However, growing insights into the pathogenesis of alopecia areata through blood and tissue analysis of human lesions have identified several promising targets for therapy. T-helper (Th) 1/interferon skewing has traditionally been described as the driver of disease; however, recent investigations suggest activation of additional immune mediators, including the Th2 pathway, interleukin (IL)-9, IL-23, and IL-32, as contributors to alopecia areata pathogenesis. The landscape of alopecia areata treatment has the potential to be transformed, as several novel targeted drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials. Given the recent US FDA approval of baricitinib and ritlecitinib, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a promising drug class for treating severe alopecia areata cases. This article will review the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current treatments for alopecia areata, and will provide an overview of the emerging therapies that are leading the revolution in the management of this challenging disease.

Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with active polymyositis and dermatomyositis who have not adequately responded to one or more standard-of-care treatments

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adult Japanese patients with active polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM).

METHODS

Fifty-one Japanese adults diagnosed with active PM/DM who did not respond adequately to one or more standard-of-care treatments were randomised 1:1 to receive UST (n=25) or placebo (n=26). Participants received body weight-range based intravenous administration of UST (6 mg/kg) or placebo at week 0 followed by 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) administration of UST or placebo every 8 weeks from week 8 to week 24. At week 24, placebo group crossed over to receive body weight-range based intravenous administration of UST, and thereafter, all participants received/were to receive SC administration of UST 90 mg every 8 weeks (week 32 through to week 72). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who achieved minimal improvement (≥20) in the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at week 24.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was seen in the proportion of participants who achieved minimal improvement (≥20) in IMACS TIS at week 24 between the treatment groups (UST 64.0% vs placebo 61.5%, p=0.94) based on the primary estimand of the primary endpoint analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

UST was safe and well tolerated but did not meet the primary efficacy endpoint in adult Japanese participants with active PM/DM based on the primary analysis at week 24 in the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03981744.

Use of real-world data to assess the effectiveness of ustekinumab in treating IBD patients: a retrospective linked database study in northwest London

BACKGROUND

Data on the optimum positioning of biologics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a longitudinal retrospective study of linked health-care data from northwest London, UK, for adults who started ustekinumab for IBD from 1 April 20161 April 2016 to 1 April 20211 April 2021. We compared outcomes by line of therapy (1 vs. 2 or 3+) and age group (18‒59 years or ≥ 60 years). In an analysis of CD patients, we calculated risks of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related abdominal surgery, ustekinumab persistence, and switching by line of therapy.

RESULTS

Of 163 patients screened, 149 were eligible. Age had no effect on outcomes. Elective all-cause hospital admissions were significantly higher when ustekinumab was used as second-line or third-line therapy compared with first-line treatment (p = 0.0048 and p = 0.001, respectively). In CD patients the numbers of hospital admissions were also higher with second-line or third-line therapy (p = 0.040 and p = 0.018, respectively). Use of ustekinumab as third-line therapy significantly increased the risk of IBD-related hospitalization (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.1‒5.6, p = 0.029), IBD-related abdominal surgery (9.45, 1.2‒75.7, p = 0.03), and switching (14.6, 1.6‒131.0, p = 0.02). Drug persistence risks did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the use of ustekinumab as first-line therapy.

Predictive factors of the clinical efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with refractory Crohn's disease: tertiary centers experience in Japan

PURPOSE

Therapeutic efficacy of ustekinumab in the real-world data is limited in patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD). In addition, factors predictive of better therapeutic efficacy of ustekinumab remains unsolved in CD. We aimed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with refractory CD and to identify the factors associated with the efficacy of ustekinumab.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 72 patients treated with ustekinumab for refractory CD. Therapeutic efficacy was assessed at weeks 8, 26, 52, and 104 on the basis of dual remission, defined as the combination of Crohn's Disease Activity Index < 150 and CRP < 0.3 mg/dL, and factors predictive of the induction and maintenance of dual remission were investigated. The cumulative continuation rates and safety of ustekinumab were assessed.

RESULTS

The dual remission rates at weeks 8, 26, 52, and 104 were 31.9%, 37.9%, 47.5%, and 42.6%, respectively. A short disease duration (≤ 2 years) and higher baseline serum albumin levels (≥ 3.1 g/dL) were positively associated with dual remission at weeks 8 and 52. Meanwhile, higher serum CRP levels (≥ 1.19 mg/dL) were negatively associated with dual remission at week 8. The cumulative ustekinumab continuation rate was favorable, and no severe adverse events were found.

CONCLUSION

A short disease duration and higher baseline serum albumin levels might be predictive of favorable therapeutic efficacy of ustekinumab in refractory CD. Induction efficacy appears to be lower in patients with higher serum CRP levels.

The Impact of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab on Articular Extra-Intestinal Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Real-Life Multicentre Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Extra-intestinal manifestations are frequently reported in inflammatory bowel diseases. However, data comparing the effect of vedolizumab and ustekinumab on articular extra-intestinal manifestations are limited. The aim here was to evaluate differences in new-onset and the evolution of pre-existing joint extra-intestinal manifestations during both treatments.

METHODS

An international multicentre retrospective study was performed on inflammatory bowel disease patients who started vedolizumab or ustekinumab between May 2010 and December 2020. Extra-intestinal manifestations were assessed at baseline and joint extra-intestinal manifestations were evaluated throughout the 2-year follow-up. Arthropathy was defined by joint inflammation [arthritis/sacroiliitis], diagnosed by a rheumatologist, and arthralgia as articular pain without confirmed inflammation. Additionally, skin, ocular and hepatic extra-intestinal manifestations were assessed at baseline. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 911 patients [vedolizumab: 584; ustekinumab: 327] were included. Deterioration of pre-existing arthropathy and rate of new-onset arthropathy were not significantly associated with vedolizumab over ustekinumab. Arthropathy was used as reason to stop treatment in six vedolizumab and two ustekinumab patients. The odds of developing new arthralgia within 6 months was higher in patients who took vedolizumab compared to ustekinumab (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.28 [1.01-5.15], p = 0.047). However, this effect was not sustained during the 2-year follow-up (aOR: 1.35 [0.80-2.29], p = 0.259). Deterioration of pre-existing arthralgia was comparable between ustekinumab and vedolizumab-treated patients. In two vedolizumab-treated patients arthralgia was given as the reason to stop treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be used safely in patients with articular extra-intestinal manifestations. Only a temporary increased risk for developing arthralgia has been observed under vedolizumab.

Treatment persistence and maintenance dose titration among ulcerative colitis patients on biologics: a pooled study of three United States claim databases

OBJECTIVE

This real-world study evaluated biologic treatment patterns in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

IQVIA PharMetrics, IBM MarketScan, and Optum Clinformatics were pooled to identify UC patients with ≥1 claim for UC and ≥1 claim for adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), or vedolizumab (VDZ). The index date for each biologic was the first claim for that biologic. Patients could be included in >1 cohort if they switched biologics during the identification period. Continuous eligibility for medical/pharmacy benefits was required for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. Patients lacking claims for any biologic during baseline were categorized as bio-naïve; those with any biologic claim were categorized as bio-experienced. Persistence was defined as the proportion of patients that remained on the index biologic without a gap between claims of >28 days for ADA, >56 days for GOL, and >112 days for IFX and VDZ. Dose titration was assessed among patients with ≥2 maintenance doses during follow-up among ADA, GOL, and VDZ patients.

RESULTS

In total, 6,106 bio-naïve UC patients and 1,027 bio-experienced UC patients were identified. Patients treated with VDZ and IFX had the highest persistence followed by ADA and GOL patients for bio-naïve and bio-experienced, respectively. ADA patients had a numerically higher proportion of patients with 50% dose escalation, followed by VDZ and GOL; 50% dose reduction was observed in ≤1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this descriptive study of UC patients without confounder adjustment, VDZ persistence was numerically highest followed by IFX, GOL, and ADA across both populations.

Management of Non-response and Loss of Response to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been successfully used as first-line biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in both “step-up” and “top-down” approaches, and has become a cornerstone of IBD management. However, in a proportion of patients the effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy is sub-optimal. Either patients do not achieve adequate initial response (primary non-response) or they lose response after initial success (loss of response). Therapeutic drug monitoring determines drug serum concentrations and the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) and can help guide treatment optimization to improve patient outcomes. For patients with low drug concentrations who are ADAb-negative or display low levels of ADAbs, dose escalation is recommended. Should response remain unchanged following dose optimization the question whether to switch within class (anti-TNF) or out of class (different mechanism of action) arises. If ADAb levels are high and the patient has previously benefited from anti-TNF therapy, then switching within class is a viable option as ADAbs are molecule specific. Addition of an immunomodulator may lead to a decrease in ADAbs and a regaining of response in a proportion of patients. If a patient does not achieve a robust therapeutic response with an initial anti-TNF despite adequate drug levels, then switching out of class is appropriate. In conjunction with the guidance above, other factors including patient preference, age, comorbidities, disease phenotype, extra-intestinal manifestations, and treatment costs need to be factored into the treatment decision. In this review we discuss current evidence in this field and provide guidance on therapeutic decision-making in clinical situations.

Feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Ustekinumab to Predict Clinical Remission and Relapse in Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab was recently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). Although the ustekinumab Clinical Decision Support Tool (UST-CDST) was able to predict ustekinumab responsiveness in a clinical trial, it is not clear whether UST-CDST can also predict a future clinical relapse following ustekinumab therapy in the real-life setting.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with moderate to severe CD who were refractory to conventional therapies and who showed a clinical response after induction therapy with ustekinumab and monitored them until the relapse. We performed a Cox proportional hazard analysis to investigate the predictive capability of UST-CDST for a clinical disease relapse.

RESULTS

Clinical remission rates at week 20 were 25.0% for low-probability responders, 66.7% for intermediate-probability responders, and 75.0% for high-probability responders. The high-probability responders were more likely to achieve clinical remission at week 20 compared with the low-probability responders. Among 99 patients with moderate to severe CD, 37 (37.4%) experienced a clinical relapse during the median follow-up period of 18.0 months of ustekinumab treatment. The cumulative relapse rates were 70.0% in the low-probability responders, 35.9% in the intermediate-probability responders, and 22.5% in the high-probability responders (P = .001). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the high-probability responders and intermediate-probability responders had a lower risk of clinical relapse than the low-probability responders. Receiver operating characteristic analysis using UST-CDST to predict relapse revealed an area under the curve of 0.698.

CONCLUSIONS

The UST-CDST can predict clinical relapse in patients with moderate to severe CD subjected to ustekinumab therapy.

Case Series: Re-induction of Intravenous, Weight-Based Ustekinumab Is Well Tolerated in Patients With Moderate-Severe Crohn's Disease

Background

Crohn's disease (CD) patients may benefit from biologic optimization.

Methods

We retrospectively assessed adverse events (AEs) and clinical/endoscopic response after ustekinumab re-induction in CD patients.

Results

We identified 28 patients, all with prior biologic exposure. Eight weeks following re-induction, 10.7% reported ≥1 AE. Three serious AEs occurred in a single patient (CD flares). No infusion reactions occurred. 53.8% and 38.5% achieved clinical response and remission, respectively. 42.8% achieved both endoscopic improvement and remission.

Conclusions

Ustekinumab re-induction was well tolerated. Clinical and endoscopic disease activity improved in some patients. Further larger studies are needed to verify these findings in a broader population.

A propensity score-matched, real-world comparison of ustekinumab vs vedolizumab as a second-line treatment for Crohn's disease. The Cross Pennine study II

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of biological agents after failure of anti-tumour-necrosis-factor-(TNF)α agent in Crohn's disease (CD) is yet to be defined.

AIMS

To assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab compared to vedolizumab as second-line treatment in CD patients who failed anti-TNFα therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical response and remission at 14 and 52 weeks to ustekinumab by physician global assessment (PGA). A propensity score-matched analysis with a cohort treated with vedolizumab was performed.

RESULTS

Of 282 patients (mean age 40 ± 15, F:M ratio 1.7:1) treated with ustekinumab, clinical response or remission was reached by 200/282 patients (70.9%) at 14 weeks, and 162/259 patients (62.5%) at 52 weeks. Overall, 74 adverse events occurred, of which 26 were labelled as serious (8.3 per 100 person-year). After exclusion of patients without prior anti-TNFα exposure and patients previously exposed to vedolizumab or ustekinumab, we analysed 275/282 patients (97.5%) on ustekinumab and 118/135 patients (87.4%) on vedolizumab. Propensity score analysis revealed that at 14 weeks, patients treated with ustekinumab were 38% (95% CI 25%-50%; P < 0.001) more likely to achieve clinical remission, while at 52 weeks, the difference of 9% (95% CI -15% to 33%; P = 0.462) was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Ustekinumab was effective and well tolerated in this real-world cohort. While ustekinumab proved more effective at 14-weeks, we found no statistically significant differences at 52 weeks compared to vedolizumab.

Effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with refractory Crohn's disease: a multicentre real-life study in Italy

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD) has been investigated in several real-world studies. However, very few data concerning the real-life experience in Italy have been reported. Therefore, this study assessed the effectiveness of ustekinumab in a large cohort of Italian patients with refractory CD.

METHODS

All patients who had started on ustekinumab after failure of or intolerance to antitumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) treatment at five tertiary centres between November 2018 and February 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. The coprimary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission, defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) score of ⩽4, at weeks 26 and 52. The secondary outcomes were changes in the HBI and C-reactive protein (CRP) values at weeks 8, 26, and 52 from baseline and the normalization of CRP in patients with initially abnormal values.

RESULTS

Totally, 140 patients who had previously received at least one anti-TNF-α agent were enrolled; 40.0% received two anti-TNF-α agents and 20.0% received vedolizumab. At baseline, 108 patients (77.1%) had HBI scores of >4; of these, 56.5% and 58.3% achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission at weeks 26 and 52, respectively. Significant decreases in HBI and CRP values were observed at weeks 8, 26, and 52 in the entire study cohort (all p < 0.0001). The CRP values were normalized in 34.9%, 37.8%, and 49.3% of the patients by weeks 8, 26, and 52, respectively. The baseline HBI score of ⩾8 was a negative predictor of corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 52 (odds ratio: 0.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.56, p = 0.002). The probability of remaining on ustekinumab after 52 weeks was 92.1%. Eleven (7.9%) patients discontinued ustekinumab (three for adverse events).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings confirm the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with CD after failure of or intolerance to anti-TNF-α therapy.

Crohn disease: Identification, diagnosis, and clinical management

ABSTRACT

Crohn disease is an inflammatory bowel disorder affecting children and adults. With its increasing prevalence, healthcare providers need adequate resources to assist with diagnosis and management. This article discusses early diagnosis, disease severity and classification, familial predisposition and genomics, and clinical management in the primary care setting.

Ustekinumab trough concentration affects clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with refractory Crohn's disease: a Chinese real-world study

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST), a newly-used biologic targeting p40 subunit of IL12 and IL23 in China, exerts a confirmed therapeutic effect on the induction and maintenance therapies for refractory Crohn's disease (CD). Therapeutic drug monitoring based on trough and antibody concentration is of core importance when treating patients who lose response to UST. We aimed to analyze the UST exposure-response relationship in CD treatment in the real-world setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with CD who received UST between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, at the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center of the Sun Yat-Sun Affiliated Sixth Hospital. Baseline characteristic information, biomarker examination, clinical outcomes determined by the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), and endoscopic outcomes evaluated using a simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) at week 16/20 were collected. The optimal UST cut-off trough concentration was identified using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible patients were included in the study, the mean age was 29.1 ± 9.1 years and the mean disease duration was 5.5 ± 4.7 years. At the initiation of the study, 89.5% of the patients had been exposed to prior biologics, 42.1% had previous CD-related surgeries, and 52.6% had perianal diseases. At week 16/20 after the UST initiation, clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission were 89.5%, 84.2%, 42.2%, and 73.7%, respectively. The cut-off optimal trough concentration for UST was 1.12 μg/mL, as determined by the ROC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78, sensitivity of 87.5%, and specificity of 72.7%. Patients with a UST trough concentration > 1.12 μg/mL had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic remission than those without (70.0% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

UST is an effective therapeutic option for refractory CD treatment. A UST trough concentration above 1.12 μg/mL was associated with endoscopic remission at week 16/20 after UST initiation. Trial registration This study was approved and retrospectively registered by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University (2021ZSLYEC-066, March 29, 2021) and the Clinical Trial Registry (NCT04923100, June 10, 2021).

Biological Treatments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Complex Mix of Mechanisms and Actions

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease that requires lifelong medication and whose incidence is increasing over the world. There is currently no cure for IBD, and the current therapeutic objective is to control the inflammatory process. Approximately one third of treated patients do not respond to treatment and refractoriness to treatment is common. Therefore, pharmacological treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies, are urgently needed, and new treatment guidelines are regularly published. Due to the extremely important current role of biologics in the therapy of IBD, herein we have briefly reviewed the main biological treatments currently available. In addition, we have focused on the mechanisms of action of the most relevant groups of biological agents in IBD therapy, which are not completely clear but are undoubtfully important for understanding both their therapeutic efficacy and the adverse side effects they may have. Further studies are necessary to better understand the action mechanism of these drugs, which will in turn help us to understand how to improve their efficacy and safety. These studies will hopefully pave the path for a personalized medicine.