1
|
AlSalloom A, Kalevaru CS, Alomeri K, Alsayegh S. Peritoneal Dialysis of Three-Cuff Catheter Experience in Qassim Province, Saudi Arabia. Int J Nephrol 2024; 2024:5554703. [PMID: 39512664 PMCID: PMC11540897 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5554703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 10/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The global rise in noncommunicable diseases, including chronic kidney diseases (CKDs), has led to a significant increase in the use of dialysis units to enhance patient longevity and quality of life. Over time, two-cuff catheters have been replaced by three-cuff catheters, with their usage expanding in nephrology centers across Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits, complications, and duration of therapy associated with three-cuff catheters in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methodology: To ensure the reliability of our results, we conducted a comprehensive cross-sectional study involving 257 patients who underwent three-cuff PD catheter (PDC) insertion and omentopexy. Data were retrospectively collected from 2016 to 2023 at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraidah. The questionnaire was designed based on available variables in the records section and validated by subject experts and experienced research faculty. Data were then entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. Descriptive statistics were employed for inferential statistics, while the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to identify predictors of PD outcomes. Results: The average duration of therapy was 27.84 months, with a standard deviation of 27.23 months. Early complications were minimal, with just 5.1% (n = 13) experiencing peritonitis, 0.8% (n = 2) facing catheter migration, and 0.4% (n = 1 each) encountering omental wrap and exit site infection (ESI) within 30 days of catheter insertion. Remarkably, only 7.8% (n = 20) required catheter reinsertion. In addition, catheter removal due to catheter-related issues was low, affecting only 3.8% of patients. Conclusions: According to the study findings, three-cuff catheters exhibited fewer complications, superior performance, and longer therapy duration. These outcomes may be attributed to the thorough design of the three-cuff catheters, the dedication of the staff, and the implementation of strict policies. To maintain these positive results, it is crucial for the Ministry of Health and the Health Cluster to adopt long-term supportive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed AlSalloom
- King Fahd Specialist Hospital Buraidah, Buraydah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Kholoud Alomeri
- King Fahd Specialist Hospital Buraidah, Buraydah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sultan Alsayegh
- King Fahd Specialist Hospital Buraidah, Buraydah, Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu YH, Liu YL, Meng LF, Zhang YX, Cui WP. Selection of dialysis methods for end-stage kidney disease patients with diabetes. World J Diabetes 2024; 15:1862-1873. [PMID: 39280188 PMCID: PMC11372645 DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i9.1862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of diabetes has led to a growing population of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients with diabetes. Currently, kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for ESKD patients; however, it is limited by the lack of donors. Therefore, dialysis has become the standard treatment for ESKD patients. However, the optimal dialysis method for diabetic ESKD patients remains controversial. ESKD patients with diabetes often present with complex conditions and numerous complications. Furthermore, these patients face a high risk of infection and technical failure, are more susceptible to malnutrition, have difficulty establishing vascular access, and experience more frequent blood sugar fluctuations than the general population. Therefore, this article reviews nine critical aspects: Survival rate, glucose metabolism disorder, infectious complications, cardiovascular events, residual renal function, quality of life, economic benefits, malnutrition, and volume load. This study aims to assist clinicians in selecting individualized treatment methods by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, thereby improving patients' quality of life and survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Hua Hu
- Department of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ya-Li Liu
- Department of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ling-Fei Meng
- Department of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Yi-Xian Zhang
- Department of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Wen-Peng Cui
- Department of Nephrology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fernàndez Labadía E, Masot O, Tejero Vidal LL, Botigué T, Bielsa-Gracia S. Educational interventions and identification of risk factors to prevent and reduce peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: A scoping review. J Ren Care 2024; 50:307-318. [PMID: 38378190 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritonitis is a common and serious complication of peritoneal dialysis and is one of the main causes of peritoneal dialysis technique failure and long-term hemodialysis conversion. OBJECTIVES The aim of the review was to identify and clarify peritonitis risk factors and learn about strategies employed at international level to prevent and reduce the occurrence of peritoneal dialysis associated infections and their complications. DESIGN A scoping review. PARTICIPANTS Adults in pertitoneal dialysis. MEASUREMENTS The methodology framework of Arksey and O'Malley and PRISMA for Scoping Reviews guidelines were applied. A search was conducted of PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL using terms to identify peritoneal dialysis -associated risk factors and interventions carried out for the prevention and reduction of peritonitis in adult persons living at home. RESULTS The 17 studies selected were based on work carried out in nine different countries. Eleven articles analysed modifiable risk factors (low educational level, being a foreigner and low adherence to aseptic technique) and non-modifiable risk factors (age and comorbidities) that predispose to peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis. The other six studies applied an intervention to improve the prevalence of peritonitis considering educational practices adapted to patient characteristics and the application of retraining. CONCLUSIONS Personalised patient training and the identification of risk factors for peritonitis are key to reducing complications and enhancing the survival of peritoneal dialysis patients and the effectiveness of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fernàndez Labadía
- Dyvision of Nephrology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Olga Masot
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group (GRECS), Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research Dr. Pifarré Foundation, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Education, Nursing, Sustainability and Innovation Research Group, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Botigué
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Care Research Group (GRECS), Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research Dr. Pifarré Foundation, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain
- Health Education, Nursing, Sustainability and Innovation Research Group, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Sara Bielsa-Gracia
- Dyvision of Nephrology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cho Y, Chow KM, Kam-Tao Li P, Runnegar N, Johnson DW. Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 19:641-649. [PMID: 37574658 PMCID: PMC11108252 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) represents an important treatment choice for patients with kidney failure. It allows them to dialyze outside the hospital setting, facilitating enhanced opportunities to participate in life-related activities, flexibility in schedules, time and cost savings from reduced travel to dialysis centers, and improved quality of life. Despite its numerous advantages, PD utilization has been static or diminishing in parts of the world. PD-related infection, such as peritonitis, exit-site infection, or tunnel infection, is a major concern for patients, caregivers, and health professionals-which may result in hesitation to consider this as treatment or to cease therapy when these complications take place. In this review, the definition, epidemiology, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of PD-related infection on the basis of the contemporary evidence will be described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeoungjee Cho
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kai-Ming Chow
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Carol and Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Philip Kam-Tao Li
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Carol and Richard Yu Peritoneal Dialysis Research Centre, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Naomi Runnegar
- Infectious Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David W. Johnson
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sakurada T, Kojima S, Yamada S, Koitabashi K, Taki Y, Matsui K, Murasawa M, Kawarazaki H, Shimizu S, Kobayashi H, Asai T, Hashimoto K, Hoshino T, Sugitani S, Maoka T, Nagase A, Sato H, Fukuoka K, Sofue T, Koibuchi K, Nagayama K, Washida N, Koide S, Okamoto T, Ishii D, Furukata S, Uchiyama K, Takahashi S, Nishizawa Y, Naito S, Toda N, Naganuma T, Kikuchi H, Suzuki T, Komukai D, Kimura T, Io H, Yoshikawa K, Naganuma T, Morishita M, Oshikawa J, Tamagaki K, Fujisawa H, Ueda A, Kanaoka T, Nakamura H, Yanagi M, Udagawa T, Yoneda T, Sakai M, Gunji M, Osaki S, Saito H, Yoshioka Y, Kaneshiro N. A multi-institutional, observational study of outcomes after catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis in Japan. Perit Dial Int 2023; 43:457-466. [PMID: 37632293 DOI: 10.1177/08968608231193240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This multi-institutional, observational study examined whether the outcomes after peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement in Japan meet the audit criteria of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guideline and identified factors affecting technique survival and perioperative complications. METHODS Adult patients who underwent first PD catheter placement for end-stage kidney disease between April 2019 and March 2021 were followed until PD withdrawal, kidney transplantation, transfer to other facilities, death, 1 year after PD start or March 2022, whichever came first. Primary outcomes were time to catheter patency failure and technique failure, and perioperative infectious complications within 30 days of catheter placement. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcomes of interest. RESULTS Of the total 409 patients, 8 who underwent the embedded catheter technique did not have externalised catheters. Of the 401 remaining patients, catheter patency failure occurred in 25 (6.2%). Technical failure at 12 months after PD catheter placement calculated from cumulative incidence function was 15.3%. On Cox proportional hazards model analysis, serum albumin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.70) and straight type catheter (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.24-3.69) were the independent risk factors for technique failure. On logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was the only independent risk factor for perioperative infectious complications (odds ratio 2.70, 95% CI 1.30-5.58). The occurrence rate of perioperative complications generally met the audit criteria of the ISPD guidelines. CONCLUSION PD catheter placement in Japan was proven to be safe and appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Sakurada
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigeki Kojima
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shohei Yamada
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Yasuhiro Taki
- Department of Nephrology, Inagi Municipal Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuomi Matsui
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, St Marianna University School of Medicine Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masaru Murasawa
- Department of Nephrology, Gyotoku General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroo Kawarazaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sayaka Shimizu
- Institute for Health Outcomes and Process Evaluation Research (iHope International), Kyoto University, Japan
| | - Hironori Kobayashi
- Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Asai
- Department of Urology, Osaka City General Hospital, Japan
| | - Koji Hashimoto
- Department of Nephrology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Taro Hoshino
- Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hospital, Japan
| | - Seita Sugitani
- Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center, Japan
| | - Tomochika Maoka
- Department of Nephrology, NTT Medical Center Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Akihiko Nagase
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Sato
- Department of Nephrology, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Kosuke Fukuoka
- Department of Nephrology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tadashi Sofue
- Department of CardioRenal and Cerebrovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Japan
| | - Kiyoto Koibuchi
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Japan
| | | | - Naoki Washida
- Department of Nephrology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigehisa Koide
- Department of Nephrology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Okamoto
- Department of Nephrology, Kyowakai Medical Corporation Kyoritsu Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ishii
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Satoshi Furukata
- Department of Nephrology, Fukaya Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Uchiyama
- Department of Nephrology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nephrology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Takahashi
- Department of Nephrology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Nishizawa
- Department of Nephrology, Ichiyokai Harada Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shotaro Naito
- Department of Nephrology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Japan
| | - Naohiro Toda
- Department of Nephrology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Naganuma
- Department of Nephrology, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Nephrology, National Hospital Organization Beppu Medical Center, Oita, Japan
| | - Tomo Suzuki
- Department of Nephrology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daisuke Komukai
- Department of Nephrology, Kawasaki-Saiwai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takahide Kimura
- Department of Nephrology, International University of Health and Welfare Atami Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Io
- Department of Nephrology, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Yoshikawa
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | | | - Jin Oshikawa
- Department of Nephrology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Keiichi Tamagaki
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
| | - Hajime Fujisawa
- Department of Nephrology, Yokohama City Minato Red Cross Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ueda
- Department of Nephrology, Hitachi General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Kanaoka
- Department of Medical Science and Cardiorenal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Mai Yanagi
- Department of Nephrology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Udagawa
- Department of Nephrology, Nippon Koukan Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Yoneda
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Japan
| | - Masashi Sakai
- Department of Nephrology, Fujisawa City Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masanobu Gunji
- Department of Nephrology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Shinichi Osaki
- Department of Surgery, Gengendo Kimitsu Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hisako Saito
- Department of Nephrology, Showa General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuuki Yoshioka
- Department of Nephrology, Tachikawa General Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|