Zoledronic Acid for Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes in Patients With Osteoporosis After Hip Arthroplasty-An Updated Meta-Analysis of Six Randomized Controlled Trials

Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Accurately evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) is crucial for diagnosing osteoporosis and selecting implants for hip arthroplasty. Our goal was to measure the BMD differences between sides, examine contributing factors, and identify the optimal side for BMD assessment in these patients.

METHODS

We analyzed 108 women with unilateral hip OA. Bilateral hip BMD was assessed automatically through quantitative CT (QCT) utilizing a validated, deep-learning-based approach. We evaluated BMD variations between the OA and healthy hips across total, neck, and distal regions. To determine their contributions, we analyzed factors, including patient demographics, Crowe classification, Bombelli classification, knee OA status, hip functional score, and gluteal muscle volume and density. Furthermore, we examined how side-to-side BMD differences influenced osteoporosis diagnosis using T-scores based on QCT.

RESULTS

The average BMD on the OA side was 6.9 % lower in the total region, 14.5 % higher in the neck region, and 9.4 % lower in the distal region than on the healthy side. Contributing factors to the reduced BMD in the OA hip included younger age, Bombelli classification (atrophic type), and significant gluteal muscle atrophy. Diagnoses from the OA side revealed lower sensitivity (61 %) than those from the healthy side (88 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis on one side alone yields a more precise osteoporosis diagnosis from the healthy side. Nonetheless, bilateral BMD assessment remains crucial, particularly in younger individuals and those with atrophic OA types. Although based on QCT, our findings support bilateral analysis by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for these patients.

Preoperative Osteoporosis Treatment Reduces Stress Shielding in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely used surgical intervention for hip osteoarthritis (HOA), with a rising demand driven by an aging population. Osteoporosis is associated with increased risks of bone loss and implant loosening after THA. While medications such as bisphosphonates and denosumab have shown promise in mitigating these risks, the impact of preoperative osteoporosis treatment on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. This study investigates the effect of preoperative osteoporosis treatment intervention on stress shielding and clinical outcomes in THA patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 107 patients who underwent cementless THA between April 2019 and March 2022. Patients under 60 years old, with a follow-up period of less than one year, or with prior hip surgery were excluded. Participants were divided into two groups: a treatment group receiving osteoporosis medication preoperatively and a non-treatment group. The outcomes assessed included preoperative bone metabolism markers, Bombelli classification, stress shielding grade, and clinical scores. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-squared test, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The preoperative osteoporosis treatment intervention rate was 28.9%. Stress shielding grades were significantly lower in the treatment group (p = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in clinical scores one year postoperatively. Conclusion: Preoperative osteoporosis treatment significantly reduced stress shielding incidence, potentially influencing long-term outcomes by preventing bone atrophy-related pain and fractures. Preoperative bone density assessment and osteoporosis treatment intervention are recommended to improve THA outcomes. Larger studies are needed for further validation.

Anti-osteoporotic drug efficacy for periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic bone loss following total hip arthroplasty (THA) threatens prosthesis stability. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of anti-osteoporotic drugs for measures of hip function according to functional outcomes, periprosthetic femoral bone mineral density loss in each Gruen zone, and revision surgery after THA.

METHODS

The systematic search of six literature databases was conducted in December 2021 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Adult participants who underwent primary THA were included. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed within a frequentist framework, and the confidence in the evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the CINeMA tool, which assessed the credibility of results from the network meta-analysis. We included 22 randomized controlled trials (1243 participants) comparing the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates (including etidronate, clodronate, alendronate, risedronate, pamidronate, and zoledronate), denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulator, teriparatide, calcium + vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin D. We defined the period for revision surgery as the final follow-up period.

RESULTS

Raloxifene, bisphosphonate, calcium + vitamin D, and denosumab for prosthetic hip function might have minimal differences when compared with placebos. The magnitude of the anti-osteoporotic drug effect on periprosthetic femoral bone loss varied across different Gruen zones. Bisphosphonate, denosumab, teriparatide might be more effective than placebo in Gruen zone 1 at 12 months after THA. Additionally, bisphosphonate might be more effective than placebo in Gruen zones 2, 5, 6, and 7 at 12 months after THA. Denosumab was efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zones 6 and 7 at 12 months after THA. Teriparatide was likely to be efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zone 7 at 12 months after THA. Raloxifene was slightly efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zones 2 and 3 at 12 months after THA. Calcium was slightly efficacious in preventing bone loss in Gruen zone 5 at 12 months after THA. None of the studies reported revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonate and denosumab may be effective anti-osteoporotic drugs for preventing periprosthetic proximal femoral bone loss due to stress shielding after THA, particularly in cementless proximal fixation stems, which are the most commonly used prostheses worldwide.

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Hip Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review

Osteoporosis and osteopenia can affect patients undergoing arthroplasty of the hip, which is typically recommended for patients with severe osteoarthritis or elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture. Preoperative screening for this type of bone loss could be helpful to patients and prevent poor outcomes due to the rate of underdiagnosis of osteoporosis, which can reach 73% in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Complications associated with low bone mineral density include periprosthetic fractures as well as an increased revision rate. Although the benefit of antiresorptive medications postoperatively has been demonstrated, when administered preoperatively, worse outcomes were reported compared to its non-usage. Surgical management is as important as pre-medication. According to general recommendations, cemented implants provide greater benefit in osteoporotic patients. However, when using cementless implants, ribbed stems, straight tapered stems, stems with medial calcar contact, and titanium-composed stems can be used to prevent periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density; however, they should not be placed in a varus position. These stems can also be coated with zoledronate and other products.

Comparing the Efficacy of Antiosteoporotic Drugs in Preventing Periprosthetic Bone Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic bone loss is a well-known phenomenon following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the choice of drugs for prevention remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the best drug to treat periprosthetic bone loss by comparing changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at different times after THA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of five databases and two clinical trial registration platforms was undertaken from their inception through to August 31, 2023 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out for calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of the BMD in calcar (Gruen zone 7) at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months and over.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine trials involving 1427 patients and 10 different interventions were included. The results demonstrated that at 6 months, denosumab had the highest ranking (SUCRA = 0.90), followed by alendronate (SUCRA = 0.76), and zoledronate (SUCRA = 0.73). At 12 months, clodronate ranked highest (SUCRA = 0.96), followed by denosumab (SUCRA = 0.84) and teriparatide (SUCRA = 0.82). For interventions with a duration of 24 months and over, denosumab had the highest SUCRA value (SUCRA = 0.96), followed by raloxifene (SUCRA = 0.90) and zoledronate (SUCRA = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Investigating the existing body of evidence revealed that denosumab demonstrates potential as an intervention of superior efficacy at the three specifically examined time points. However, it remains crucial to conduct further research to confirm these findings and determine the most effective treatment strategy.

Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The scientific literature suggests that, if periprosthetic osteolysis (PPO) is not treated, it may have a negative impact on the results of a total hip replacement and possibly result in failure. This systematic review aimed to determine the efficacy of using bisphosphonates preventatively to limit PPO after a total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A PICOS template was developed to ensure a structured approach. A search for relevant studies was performed across four databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane. They were all last searched on March 1st and were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised studies.

RESULTS

The final analysis included seven studies with a total of 126 study group participants and 144 control group participants. The studies looked at Bony Mass Density in terms of bone loss on Gruen's femoral zones after THA in a bisphosphonate (treatment) and control group (placebo/no treatment). The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in favour of the bisphosphonate group in many of the included studies at 6, 12, and 24 postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis, using the most recent applicable studies, showed the efficacy of bisphosphonates in limiting periprosthetic osteolysis after THA in a period between 6 and 24 postoperative months. Future studies should focus increasing group sizes and collecting results beyond the 2-year mark.

The Microbial Revolution in the World of Joint Replacement Surgery

Background

The prevalence of revision surgery due to aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip and knee arthroplasty is growing. Strategies to prevent the need for revision surgery and its associated health-care costs and patient morbidity are needed. Therapies that modulate the gut microbiota to influence bone health and systemic inflammation are a novel area of research.

Methods

A literature review of preclinical and clinical peer-reviewed articles relating to the role of the gut microbiota in bone health and PJI was performed.

Results

There is evidence that the gut microbiota plays a role in maintaining bone mineral density, which can contribute to osseointegration, osteolysis, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fractures. Similarly, the gut microbiota influences gut permeability and the potential for bacterial translocation to the bloodstream, increasing susceptibility to PJI.

Conclusions

Emerging evidence supports the role of the gut microbiota in the development of complications such as aseptic loosening and PJI after total hip or knee arthroplasty. There is a potential for microbial therapies such as probiotics or fecal microbial transplantation to moderate the risk of developing these complications. However, further investigation is required.

Clinical Relevance

Modulation of the gut microbiota may influence patient outcomes following total joint arthroplasty.

Bisphosphonates' use and risk of aseptic loosening following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review

Purpose

The main indication of bisphosphonates (BPs) is osteoporosis treatment. However, there is growing interest in the peri- and postoperative use of BPs to mitigate total hip arthroplasty (THA) aseptic loosening (AL) risk. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the implant survival and the AL rate in patients with elective THA receiving BPs compared to those that do not receive BPs. Secondary outcomes included the comparison of revision rate, postoperative complications, and patients' functional scores.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted under the PRISMA 2020 guidelines with a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol. Three engines and grey literature were searched up until May 2022. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies assessing BP and control therapy impact on THA survival were included.

Results

Twelve studies embraced the inclusion criteria. A total of 99 678 patients and 99 696 THAs were included; 10 025 patients received BPs (BP group), and 89 129 made up the control group. The overall revision and AL rates were lower in the BP group (2.17% and 1.85%) than in the control group (4.06% and 3.2%). Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) cases were higher in the BP group (0.24%) than in the control group (0.04%); however, the majority of PPF cases were derived from a single study. Further complication risk was similar between groups. Most studies reported comparable functional scores between groups.

Conclusion

BP treatment after elective THA seems to reduce the overall revision and AL risk. Other complications' risk and functional scores were similar between groups. Further high-quality studies are needed to validate the results due to the multifactorial AL pathogenesis.

Bone Remodelling of the Proximal Femur After Hip Revision with a Metaphyseal-Fixation Femoral Stem Component

Background

Whether hip revision with a metaphyseal-fixation femoral stem component can restore the bone mass of the proximal femur remains unclear. The aims of this study were to identify whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur increases following hip revision with a metaphyseal-fixation femoral stem and to identify the factors associated with BMD recovery.

Methods

This was a retrospective study involving 36 patients who underwent hip arthroplasty with a metaphyseal-diaphyseal fixation stem (standard length stem) and had indications for hip revision, which was performed with a proximal press-fit short-stem prosthesis for each patient. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to obtain, evaluate, and compare the BMD at baseline and one year and two years postoperatively. The proximal femur was divided into several independent areas according to the Gruen zone (Gruen 1 to Gruen 7 from the greater trochanter counterclockwise to the lesser trochanter). Logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential factors significantly associated with an increase in BMD.

Results

An increased BMD was obviously identified in the proximal femur. Two years after the surgery, the BMD of the Gruen 1, Gruen 2, Gruen 6, and Gruen 7 areas had increased by 22.6%, 12.6%, 16.2% and 24.2%, respectively, relative to baseline. Three independent risk factors associated with bone mineral density recovery were identified: age (OR=1.100, 95% CI=1.005-1.203, P=0.038), osteoporosis (OR=14.921, 95% CI=1.223-182.101, P=0.034) and fair to poor hip function (OR=13.142, 95% CI=1.024-168.582, P=0.048).

Conclusion

This study confirms that metaphyseal-fixation stem hip revision can indeed help restore bone mass in the proximal femur, especially in the Gruen 1, Gruen 2, Gruen 6 and Gruen 7 zones. It was also found that advanced age, osteoporosis, and fair to poor hip joint function were three important risk factors affecting the recovery of proximal femur bone mass after surgery.

Trial Registration

Retrospectively registered.

Correlation between Bone Mineral Density and Progression of Hip Osteoarthritis in Adult Men and Women in Bulgaria-Results from a 7-Year Study

Changes in clinical presentation, radiographic progression (RP), bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover (BT), and cartilage turnover (CT) markers were compared in two groups of patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA) over a period of 7 years. Each group consisted of 150 patients, including a control group on standard-of-care therapy (SC) with simple analgesics and physical exercises, and a study group (SG) on standard-of-care therapy supplemented by vitamin D3 and intravenous administration of zoledronic acid (5 mg) yearly for 3 consecutive years. Patient groups were homogenized regarding the following: (1) radiographic grade (RG), including 75 patients with hip OA RG II according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system (K/L), and 75 with RG III on K/L; (2) radiographic model (RM), as each of the K/L grades was subdivided into three subgroups consisting of 25 patients of different RMs: atrophic ('A'), intermediate ('I'), and hypertrophic ('H'); (3) gender-equal ratio of men and women in each subgroup (Female/Male = 15/10). The following parameters were assessed: (1) clinical parameters (CP), pain at walking (WP-VAS 100 mm), functional ability (WOMAC-C), and time to total hip replacement (tTHR); (2) radiographic indicators(RI)-joint space width (JSW) and speed of joint space narrowing (JSN), changes in BMD (DXA), including proximal femur (PF-BMD), lumbar spine (LS-BMD), and total body (TB-BMD); (3) laboratory parameters (LP)-vitamin D3 levels and levels of BT/CT markers. RV were assessed every 12 months, whereas CV/LV were assessed every 6 months. Results: Cross-sectional analysis (CsA) at baseline showed statistically significant differences (SSD) at p < 0.05 in CP (WP, WOMAC-C); BMD of all sites and levels of CT/BT markers between the 'A' and 'H' RM groups in all patients. Longitudinal analysis (LtA) showed SSD (p < 0.05) between CG and SG in all CP (WP, WOMAC-C, tTHR) parameters of RP (mJSW, JSN), BMD of all sites, and levels of CT/BT markers for all 'A' models and in 30% of 'I'-RMs (those with elevated markers for BT/CT at baseline and during the observation period). Conclusion: The presence of SSD at baseline ('A' vs. 'H') supported the thesis that at least two different subgroups of HOA exist: one associated with 'A' and the other with 'H' models. D3 supplementation and the intravenous administration of bisphosphonate were the treatment strategies that slowed down RP and postponed tTHR by over 12 months in the 'A' and 'I' RM with elevated BT/CT markers.

Curative Effect of Prebiotics/Probiotics Preparations Combined with Zoledronic Acid + Calcitriol Regimen on Patients with Primary Osteoporosis and Their Influences on Bone Metabolism Markers

Objective

To explore the curative effect of prebiotics/probiotics preparations combined with zoledronic acid + calcitriol regimen on patients with primary osteoporosis (POP) and the influences of prebiotics/probiotics preparations combined with zoledronic acid + calcitriol regimen on markers of bone metabolism.

Methods

126 elderly hospitalized patients with POP in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were divided into the control group (n = 63) and the observation group (n = 63) by the random number table method. The patients in the control group were treated with zoledronic acid and calcitriol, while the patients in the observation group were additionally treated with prebiotics/probiotics preparations. The clinical curative effect, bone metabolism, calcium-phosphorus metabolism indexes, intestinal floras, and cytokines levels before and via treatment between the two groups were compared.

Results

The total efficiency of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of bone gla protein (BGP), total propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), and β-crosslaps (β-CTX) in both groups were lower than those before treatment, and the levels of BGP, total PINP, and β-CTX in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of serum P in the both groups after treatment were lower than those before treatment, and the level of serum P in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of Escherichia coli after treatment in the two groups were less than that before treatment, and the number of Escherichia coli in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the two groups after treatment were more than that before treatment, and the number of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the observation group were more than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, and the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the observation group was lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The levels of IGF-1 in the two groups after treatment were higher than those before treatment, and the levels of IGF-1 in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The response rate of prebiotics/probiotics preparations combined with zoledronic acid + calcitriol regimen is high in the treatment of POP patients, which ameliorates bone metabolism and intestinal floras, and suppresses cytokines release in patients with POP.