Risk Factors for Fever After Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Its Derived Technique

Association of local steroid injection as a risk factor for electrocoagulation syndrome after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Postendoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is commonly observed after performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal neoplasia. However, data on the incidence and risk factors for PEECS in the esophagus are lacking due to an unclear definition of PEECS and varied clinical settings. Therefore, we aimed to determine the risk factors for PEECS in patients undergoing ESD for esophageal neoplasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of relevant clinical and endoscopy-specific parameters from 202 consecutive patients with esophageal neoplasias (139 carcinomas and 63 dysplasias) who underwent ESD under general anesthesia. Esophageal PEECS was defined by satisfying at least two of the following criteria: fever ≥ 37.8 °C, leukocytosis ≥ 10,800/mm3, and localized chest pain ≥ 5/10 points as assessed on a numeric rating scale within 24 h after ESD. Significant factors associated with PEECS were determined by regression analysis.

RESULTS

PEECS was recorded in 98 of 202 (48.5%) patients. Patients with PEECS exhibited a larger tumor size (25.0 vs. 17.0 mm, P = 0.002), longer procedure (40.0 vs. 29.5 min, P = 0.021) and hemostasis times (5.0 vs. 3.5 min, P = 0.004), required greater submucosal injection volume (60.0 mL vs. 50.0 mL, P = 0.030), and had a lower rate of local steroid injection (4.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.029) than those without PEECS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed tumor size ≥ 17 mm (P = 0.047), procedure time ≥ 33 min (P = 0.027), and hemostasis time ≥ 5 min (P = 0.007) as risk factors for PEECS. In addition, local steroid injection was a significant negatively associated factor (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a large tumor, prolonged procedure and hemostasis times are at a high risk of PEECS occurrence. Further, local steroid injection is a negatively associated factor.

A nomogram for predicting the risk of postoperative fever in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection of the upper gastrointestinal tract

To explore the risk factors of postoperative fever in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). A total of 439 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into training (n = 311) and validation (n = 128) cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Independent risk factors were screened by single-factor and multiple-factor logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram was established using them. The nomogram was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, decision curve analysis, and calibration plot using the "rms" package in R software (R4.2.1). The study included 439 patients. Female (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.5-4.33), diabetes (OR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.17-4.85), operation time (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1-1.02) were lesion located in the esophagus (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.44-3.88), maximum tumor diameter (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.07-1.57), and placement of a urinary catheter (OR = 7.09, 95%CI: 1.43-35.17) were independent risk factors for postoperative fever in elderly ESD patients (P < .05). Female sex, diabetes, lesions located in the esophagus, lesion size, operation time, and placement of a urinary catheter are risk factors for postoperative fever in ESD patients, and patients with these risk factors should be vigilant for postoperative fever and receive appropriate treatment.

Prospective cross-organ analysis for the causes of fever and increased inflammatory response after endoscopic resection

OBJECTIVES

Fever and increased inflammatory responses sometimes occur following endoscopic resection (ER). However, the differences in causes according to the organ are scarcely understood, and several modified ER techniques have been proposed. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive prospective study to investigate the cause of fever and increased inflammatory response across multiple organs after ER.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection at our hospital between January 2020 and April 2022. Primary endpoints were fever and increased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels following ER. The secondary endpoints were risk factors for aspiration pneumonia. Blood tests and radiography were performed on the day after ER, and computed tomography was performed if the cause was unknown.

RESULTS

Among the 822 patients included, aspiration pneumonia was the most common cause of fever and increased CRP levels after ER of the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, 53%; stomach, 48%; and duodenum, 71%). Post-ER coagulation syndrome was most common after colorectal ESD (38%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, lesions located in the esophagus (odds ratio [OR] 3.57; P < 0.001) and an amount of irrigation liquid of ≥1 L (OR 3.71; P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspiration pneumonia was the most common cause of fever after upper gastrointestinal ER and post-ER coagulation syndrome following colorectal ESD. Lesions in the esophagus and an amount of irrigation liquid of ≥1 L were independent risk factors for aspiration pneumonia.

Routine nasogastric tube placement in patients with small esophageal perforation after endoscopic foreign body removal may be unnecessary: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Nasogastric tube (NGT) placement is part of the post-operative management of upper gastrointestinal perforation, but its routine use in esophageal perforation (EP) caused by foreign bodies remains unclear. The purpose of this research was to investigate the necessity for routine NGT placement in patients with EP after endoscopic foreign body removal.

Methods

A total of 323 patients diagnosed with EP caused by foreign bodies at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2012 and December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into the NGT group and the non-NGT group according to whether or not NGT placement was performed. The perforation healing rate, post-operative adverse events, hospital stay, and death rate were analysed using a 1:1 propensity score matching model.

Results

Before matching, there were 263 patients in the NGT group and 60 patients in the non-NGT group. There were significant differences in the time to treatment, infection, albumin, and types of endoscopy between the two groups, while the length of hospital stay in the NGT group was significantly longer than that in the non-NGT group. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 48 pairs of patients were matched between the two groups. The perforation healing rate, post-operative adverse events, length of hospital stay, and death rate did not show significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions

For patients with small EP caused by foreign bodies, routine NGT placement after endoscopic foreign body removal may be unnecessary.

Routine nasogastric tube placement after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection of tumor size ≤ 2 cm may be unnecessary: a propensity score-matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic full-thickness resection is a common endoscopic procedure for treating gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Nasogastric tube placement is frequently performed after abdominal surgery, but the routine use of this approach remains controversial. The aim of this research was to explore whether nasogastric tube placement after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection is necessary.

METHODS

A retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection in our hospital between January 2014 and January 2019, and all the patients had a tumor size ≤ 2 cm. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether a nasogastric tube was placed. Postprocedural adverse events and hospital stay duration were compared between the two groups using 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 461 patients were enrolled in this study, including 385 patients in the nasogastric tube group (NGT group) and 76 patients in the non-nasogastric tube group (non-NGT group). After matching, the baseline characteristics of 73 patients in the NGT group and 73 patients in the non-NGT group were balanced (p > 0.05). The postprocedural fever rate in the NGT group was significantly higher than that in the non-NGT group (23.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.044). 6.9% (5/73) of patients experienced severe nasogastric tube-related throat discomfort. However, the duration of hospitalization stay was not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm, routine nasogastric tube placement after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection may be unnecessary.