Refractive Lens Exchange Surgery in Early-Onset High Myopia Patients With Partial Cataract

Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes Between Refractive Lens Exchange and Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery in Moderate to High Myopia

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgery and refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery in moderate to high myopia patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed, and patients receiving KLEx or RLE surgeries with myopia within -3.00 to -10.00 diopter (D) were enrolled. A total of 19 and 35 patients were put into the RLE and KLEx groups after exclusion. The main outcomes are postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UDVA), the spherical equivalent (SE), and residual astigmatism via vector analysis. Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were utilized for the statistical analysis. Results: The percentages of patients who reached UDVA results of more than 20/25 and 20/20 were statistically similar between groups (both p > 0.05), and the percentages of patients who reached SE results within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D were statistically similar between groups (both p > 0.05). The change in SE in the KLEx group was lesser compared to that in the RLE group (p = 0.021). The vector analysis showed a lower DV and ME and a higher CoI in the KLEx group than in the RLE group (all p < 0.05). The percentage of patients who reached specific UDVA and SE thresholds were statistically similar between groups with different myopia degrees (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: The postoperative visual and refractive outcomes between RLE and KLEx surgeries are grossly comparable, while the KLEx may have a slight advantage in astigmatism correction.

Systematic bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and trends on the application of premium IOLs in the past 2 decades

AIM

To analysis of research hotspots and trends on the application of premium intraocular lens (PIOLs) in the past 2 decades.

METHODS

The literature search was performed on the Web of Science and included PIOLs studies published between January 2000 and December 2022. The retrieved literature was collated and analyzed by R-tool's Bibliometrix package, CitNetExplorer, CiteSpace and other software.

RESULTS

A total of 1801 articles about PIOLs were obtained, most of which were published in Spain and the United States. The organization that published the most articles was the University of Valencia in Spain. Alió JL, and Montés-Micó R, from Spain were the most influential authors in this field. The Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and Journal of Refractive Surgery were the core journals for this field; the top 10 cited articles mainly focus on postoperative satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) and postoperative results of toric IOLs. Through the keyword analysis, we found that trifocal IOLs, astigmatism and extended depth of focus (EDoF) IOLs are the most discussed topics at present, and the importance of astigmatism and the clinical application of the new generation of PIOLs are the emerging research trends.

CONCLUSION

Bibliometric analysis can effectively help to identify multilevel concerns in PIOLs research and the prevailing research trends in the realm of PIOLs encompass the adoption of EDoF IOLs, trifocal IOLs, and their respective Toric models.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes After Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation: A Retrospective Observational Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term stability of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00 intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 1,065 eyes (745 patients) who underwent implantation of a PanOptix IOL. A total of 296 eyes (mean age: 58.62 ± 5.63 years and preoperative refractive error: -0.68 ± 3.01 diopters [D]) met inclusion criteria for this study. The objective refraction, uncorrected distance and near visual acuity (UDVA and UNVA), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were evaluated at postoperative months 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36.

RESULTS

The refractive error was -0.20 ± 0.36 D at 1 month, -0.20 ± 0.35 D at 2 months (P = .503), -0.10 ± 0.37 D at 6 months (P < .001), -0.02 ± 0.38 D at 12 months (P < .001), 0.00 ± 0.38 D at 24 months (P < .001), and 0.03 ± 0.39 D at 36 months (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed long-term, independent associations for young age (beta = -0.122; P = .029) and changes in mean keratometry (beta = -0.413; P < .001). A greater refractive change was associated with a greater change in UNVA (r = 0.134; P = .026) but not with UDVA (r = -0.029; P = .631) or CDVA (r = -0.010; P = .875).

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the PanOptix IOL yields stable clinical outcomes for visual acuity and refractive error for the first 3 years. A slight hyperopic shift, causing decreased near visual acuity, is anticipated for younger patients. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(4):236-241.].