Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept®) in Combination With Low Dose Prednisolone in Moderate to Severe Graves' Orbitopathy

Management of Thyroid Eye Disease: A Consensus Statement by the American Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association

Thyroid eye disease (TED) remains challenging for clinicians to evaluate and manage. Novel therapies have recently emerged, and their specific roles are still being determined. Most patients with TED develop eye manifestations while being treated for hyperthyroidism and under the care of endocrinologists. Endocrinologists, therefore, have a key role in diagnosis, initial management, and selection of patients who require referral to specialist care. Given that the need for guidance to endocrinologists charged with meeting the needs of patients with TED transcends national borders, and to maximize an international exchange of knowledge and practices, the American Thyroid Association and European Thyroid Association joined forces to produce this consensus statement.

Management of thyroid eye disease: a Consensus Statement by the American Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association

Thyroid eye disease (TED) remains challenging for clinicians to evaluate and manage. Novel therapies have recently emerged, and their specific roles are still being determined. Most patients with TED develop eye manifestations while being treated for hyperthyroidism and under the care of endocrinologists. Endocrinologists, therefore, have a key role in diagnosis, initial management, and selection of patients who require referral to specialist care. Given that the need for guidance to endocrinologists charged with meeting the needs of patients with TED transcends national borders, and to maximize an international exchange of knowledge and practices, the American Thyroid Association and European Thyroid Association joined forces to produce this Consensus Statement.

Notes for the general paediatrician: managing thyrotoxicosis in children and young people

Thyrotoxicosis due to hyperthyroidism is a serious disorder in childhood often presenting to general paediatricians with a range of clinical manifestations. The commonest cause is Graves' disease, an autoimmune disorder resulting from thyrotropin receptor stimulation by autoantibodies. Early recognition and accurate interpretation of investigations are essential to achieve and maintain a euthyroid state. This will not only optimise growth, development and transition from childhood to young adult life but also avoid the potentially severe and life-threatening complications of acute thyrotoxicosis. In this review, we have focussed on the general paediatrician's perspective of the presentation and management of thyrotoxicosis and the need to network with specialist paediatric endocrine centres to optimise patient care. We have discussed nuances of therapy, side effects and long-term outcomes, while recognising that limited remission rates in this age group often necessitate more definitive management. While carbimazole is usually used as first-line medical therapy, we have provided useful information to guide paediatricians in the discussion of individualised safe and effective treatment plans for both short-term and long-term management.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of moderate to severe Graves' orbitopathy: a meta-analysis

The role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) has attracted much attention. This study is to evaluate the benefit and safety of MMF in moderate-to-severe GO. A meta-analysis of clinical control trials comparing MMF (with or without glucocorticoid (GC)) for the treatment of GO with GC was conducted. We searched the databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), for articles published up to 15 June 2022. The primary outcome is referred to the improvement in overall response, and secondary outcomes included the change in clinical activity score (CAS) and adverse events (AEs). Of the 289 articles initially searched, 6 studies were finally eligible for inclusion. The results showed that MMF (with or without GC) was superior to GC in the treatment of GO (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.17–5.14; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses also showed that MMF monotherapy was more effective than GC (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.52–7.87; p < 0.00001). Compared to methylprednisolone (MP) monotherapy, a combination of MP and MMF was more effective. CAS decreased even more significantly (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.48; p = 0.002) and fewer AEs occurred (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06–0.72; p = 0.01) in patients receiving MMF. The pooled data suggested that MMF treatment in GO might be promising. Compared with GC therapy, MMF is safer and more effective. However, more large-sample and high-quality studies targeting MMF use in GO patients and long-term surveillance of prognosis are urgently needed.

Network Meta-Analysis of Different Intravenous Glucocorticoid Regimes for the Treatment of Graves' Orbitopathy

Background: Intravenous glucocorticoid (GC) has been proposed to treat moderately severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO); however, the optimal regime remains debatable. We therefore performed this network meta-analysis to objectively determine the comparative efficacy and safety of different intravenous GC regimes, including daily, weekly, or monthly intravenous regimes, for the treatment of GO. Methods: We electronically searched Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE (via OVID), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (via OVID) to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the comparative efficacy and safety of different intravenous GC regimes in GO patients from the inception of each database to March 2021. The latest search was updated in June 2021. The risk of bias of original studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk bias assessment tool. A random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. Ranking probabilities of all regimes were calculated to rank all regimes. Statistical analysis was conducted using the ADDIS software. Results: A total of 10 studies involving 593 patients met the selection criteria. Network meta-analysis suggested that the weekly intravenous GC regime (WR) [response: odds ratio (OR), 4.27; 95% creditable interval (CrI); 1.82 to 11.02; clinical activity score change (CASC): standard mean difference (SMD), -0.59; 95% CrI; -1.19 to -0.03) and monthly intravenous regime (MR) (response: OR, 6.32; 95% CrI; 1.25 to 34.96; CASC: SMD, -1.17; 95% CrI; -2.32 to -0.01) were superior to the oral GC (OGC) regime in response and CASC. Meanwhile, pooled results also indicated that the WR was related to the decreased risk of AEs compared with the OGC regime (OR, 0.22; 95% CrI; 0.08-0.62) and daily intravenous GC regime (DR) (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI; 0.03-0.97). Ranking probabilities indicated that the MR and WR have a relatively higher probability of becoming the best option for response, proptosis, and AEs. Conclusion: Based on limited evidence, the WR or MR should be preferentially prescribed to treat patients with moderately severe GO. However, more studies with a large sample size should be conducted to further confirm our findings and compare the WR with the MR.