1
|
Sharma S, Ruiz J, Nativi J, Patel P, Leoni J, Goswami R. The 90-Day Risk of Hospitalization in Heart Transplant Recipients After COVID-19 Infection. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:1496-1501. [PMID: 39097517 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart transplant recipients are at a high-risk of complications from the coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) infection. Heart transplant recipients are a special group of persistently immunosuppressed people, and COVID-19 may cause them to experience an unpredictable course of infection, with a risk of hospitalization occurring well beyond their initial infection period. The seriousness of COVID-19 disease in heart transplant recipients emphasizes how vital it is to refer patients promptly and early to specialized heart transplant centers. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all heart transplant recipients at a single center between March 2019 and October 2021. All recipients with positive nasopharyngeal reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction tests for COVID-19 were included in this study. After IRB approval, we obtained medical records and patient data from electronic medical records. RESULTS This study followed 126 heart transplant patients from March 2019 to October 2021 of which only 49 had COVID-19 infections. The median age at infection was 58 years (49-65), with 41% female. Race distribution was as follows: 59% Caucasian and 39% African American. The median time from transplant to infection was 384 days (237-677). All infected patients had a 50% dose reduction in mycophenolate mofetil per institutional protocol. The majority of symptoms were cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, and fever. Among all patients with COVID-19, 45 (92%) were vaccinated. Of those vaccinated, 27 (60%) patients received Pfizer initial and booster doses, whereas 18 (40%) received Moderna initial and booster doses. Twelve patients (24%) were hospitalized within 90 days of infection, with only two requiring ICU level of care. The median duration of hospitalization was 5 days (4-9). Of the hospitalized patients, 11 (92%) were discharged, and 1 (8%) died in the hospital. Three of the four unvaccinated patients were hospitalized, and one died while hospitalized. The remaining 37 patients were managed as outpatients. CONCLUSION Heart transplant recipients have an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 and developing severe symptoms due to multiple healthcare contacts, preexisting health conditions, and weakened immune systems. Our data highlight that most vaccinated patients do not require hospitalization within 90 days of infection, and those hospitalized have a high likelihood of survival without needing ICU care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shriya Sharma
- Division of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jose Ruiz
- Division of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jose Nativi
- Division of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Parag Patel
- Division of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Juan Leoni
- Division of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Rohan Goswami
- Division of Heart Failure and Transplant, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
García JCLA, Marco I, Martín JG, López-Medrano F, Eixerés-Esteve A, Pérez PC, Bagudá JDJ, López-Jiménez EA, Arribas F, Delgado-Jiménez JF, Carmena MDGC. Evolution of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on heart transplant recipients: Decreasing risk, improving perspective. Transpl Infect Dis 2024; 26:e14250. [PMID: 38375958 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS Heart transplant recipients (HTr) have a higher probability of suffer from severe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in comparison to general population, but their risk has changed over the course of the pandemic in relation to various factors. We conducted a prospective study including all HTr at risk of COVID-19 in a tertiary center between February 2020 and October 2022. The aim was to analyze how the prognosis (incidence of pneumonia and mortality) of COVID-19 in HTr has evolved over time, contextualizing variants, vaccination, and other treatments. RESULTS Of 308 HTr included, 124 got the infection (39.2%). COVID and non-COVID HTr had similar baseline characteristics. COVID-19 patients with pneumonia had a poorer prognosis than those with less severe presentations, with a higher rate of hospitalization (93.3 vs. 14.1%, p < .001) and death (41.0 vs. 1.2%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified age ≥60 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-11.49, p = .027), and chronic kidney disease ≥3a (OR 4.95, 95% CI 1.39-17.54, p = .014) as predictors of pneumonia. Two-dose vaccination (OR 0.20, CI 95% 0.05-0.72, p = .02) and early remdesivir administration (OR 0.17, CI 0.03-0.90, p = .037) were protective factors. Over the course of the pandemic considering three periods in the follow-up (prevaccination February-December 2020, postvaccination January-December 2021, and post early remdesivir indication January-October 2022), we observed a reduction in pneumonia incidence from 62% to 19% (p < .001); and mortality (from 23% to 4%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS The prognosis of COVID-19 in HTr has improved over time, likely due to vaccination and early administration of remdesivir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos López-Azor García
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Marco
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier González Martín
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco López-Medrano
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC; CB21/13/00009), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Pedro Caravaca Pérez
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier de Juan Bagudá
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Ana López-Jiménez
- Clinical Biochemistry Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Arribas
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Francisco Delgado-Jiménez
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ordaya EE, Higgins EM, Vergidis P, Razonable RR, Beam E. Real-world experience of tixagevimab-cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14040. [PMID: 36847413 PMCID: PMC10271948 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab-cilgavimab (tix-cil) may be associated with cardiovascular adverse events. Also, in vitro studies have reported a reduced activity of tix-cil against emerging SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. Our study aimed to report the real-world outcomes of tix-cil prophylaxis in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients METHODS: We retrospectively studied all OHT recipients who received one dose of tix-cil (150-150 mg or 300-300 mg) at Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota, between February 5, 2022 and September 8, 2022. We collected data on cardiovascular adverse events and breakthrough COVID-19 following tix-cil administration. RESULTS One hundred sixty-three OHT recipients were included. The majority were male (65.6%), and the median age was 61 years (IQR 48, 69). During the median follow-up of 164 days (IQR 123, 190), one patient presented an episode of asymptomatic hypertensive urgency that was managed with outpatient antihypertensive treatment optimization. Twenty-four patients (14.7%) experienced breakthrough COVID-19 at the median of 63.5 days (IQR 28.3, 101.3) after tix-cil administration. The majority (70.8%) completed the primary vaccine series and received at least one booster dose (70.8%). Only one patient with breakthrough COVID-19 required hospitalization. All patients survived. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of OHT recipients, no patients developed severe cardiovascular events related to tix-cil. The high incidence of breakthrough COVID-19 could be due to the reduced activity of tix-cil against current circulating SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants. These results emphasize the need for a multimodal prevention strategy against SARS-CoV-2 in these high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloy E. Ordaya
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Eibhlin M. Higgins
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Paschalis Vergidis
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Raymund R. Razonable
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| | - Elena Beam
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|