1
|
Narsai K, Masekela FB, Leufkens HGM, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK. Outer packaging labelling of medicines in Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries: comparative analysis of requirements and transition terms for harmonisation. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:111. [PMID: 38245720 PMCID: PMC10799382 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10585-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted an urgent need for harmonised requirements for the regulation of medicines. To fully implement harmonised medicines regulations across Africa, common technical standards of medicine regulations are needed. One such technical standard is the labelling of medicines on outer packaging. In this study, we compared outer packaging labelling requirements and transition terms for harmonization for countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. METHODS Data on legislation and/or regulatory guidelines for medicine outer packaging labelling from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities (NMRAs) were obtained for countries in the SADC region (n = 16) by February 2023. A detailed comparative content analysis was conducted to determine alignment with the requirements of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) harmonised labelling guidelines to assess readiness levels of each country to transition to the SADC harmonised labelling guideline for outer packaging of medicines. RESULTS Content analysis showed at least 11 out of 16 countries require national legal reform to transition to the SADC harmonised labelling guideline. In all cases where countries specified labelling requirements for outer packaging of medicines, these were stipulated in national medicines legislation. CONCLUSION Even though there is a high level of alignment across the countries in terms of national labelling requirements, most countries in the SADC region would still require national legislative reform to transition to regional harmonised labelling requirements and then ultimately to continental requirements of the African Medicines Agency (AMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Narsai
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Nelson Mandela School of Public Governance, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - F B Masekela
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ), Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - H G M Leufkens
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A K Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Murombedzi C, Chirinda L, Chareka GT, Chirenje ZM, Mgodi NM. Efficient regulatory approval of two novel HIV prevention interventions in a resource-limited setting: experiences from Zimbabwe. FRONTIERS IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 5:1279124. [PMID: 38034413 PMCID: PMC10682080 DOI: 10.3389/frph.2023.1279124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The global burden of HIV remains unacceptably high despite significant progress made in HIV treatment and prevention. There is an urgent need to scale up the comprehensive HIV prevention strategies that include pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Oral PrEP is highly effective in preventing HIV acquisition when taken regularly, but this remains a challenge for some at-risk individuals. Therefore, there is a need for other HIV prevention options. The dapivirine vaginal ring (DVR) and long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) are novel biomedical interventions that are safe and efficacious for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, as demonstrated in recently completed clinical trials. Timely roll-out and scalability of efficacious interventions depend on the registration process with the national medicine regulatory authorities (NMRAs). The Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe (MCAZ) was the first NMRA globally to approve the DVR in July 2021 and the first in Africa to approve CAB-LA for HIV prevention in July 2022. The regulatory review process for DVR and CAB-LA by MCAZ took 4.5 and 5.5 months, respectively. This efficient review process of the two interventions by MCAZ, a regulatory body in a resource-limited setting, provides important lessons to shorten timelines between the completion of the clinical development process and the registration of essential medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Murombedzi
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Clinical Trial Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Libert Chirinda
- Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Trials Division, Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gift T. Chareka
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Clinical Trial Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Z. Mike Chirenje
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nyaradzo M. Mgodi
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Clinical Trial Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miletic N, Adam S, Acquah J, Aziz Z, Joos A, Mwangi JM. What makes joint assessment procedures attractive to the innovative industry: successes, challenges, and proposed improvements. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1207954. [PMID: 37731723 PMCID: PMC10507468 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1207954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Regulatory harmonization and convergence have been identified as the key driver in promoting efficient evaluation of medicines, reducing workload, and supporting earlier access to medicines on the African continent. There has been great progress to date in enhancing regulatory harmonization and convergence on the African continent via the Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and with the establishment of the Africa Medicines Agency (AMA). In this article, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations (IFPMA) Africa Regulatory Network (ARN) presents its perspective based on the available literature review and results from a survey conducted with innovative biopharmaceutical companies to gather experiences using regional joint assessment procedures (JAPs) in Africa, such as the East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (EAC-MRH), the West African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (WA-MRH), and the Southern African Development Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization (SADC-MRH) initiative through the ZAZIBONA Collaborative Procedure for Medicines Registration (ZaZiBoNa), and provides best practices in this evolving landscape. The article also assesses other collaborative registration pathways available to facilitating registration of pharmaceutical products in African countries, such as WHO Collaborative Registration Procedures (CRP), Swissmedic's Marketing Authorisation for Global Health Products (MAGHP) and EU Medicines for All (EU-M4ALL). Benefits and challenges of each of the existing pathways are discussed in this article. Main benefits include building more expert capacity and improved collaboration amongst experts, as well as shorter review timelines in some cases. Key challenges include the lack of predictability in the adherence to procedural timelines as defined per guidelines, lengthy timeline to achieve national marketing authorization following joint assessment, the lack of dedicated personnel, administrative issues during the submission process as well as additional country-specific requirements on top of JAP-specific requirements. Our recommendations for improvements include harmonization of requirements across countries and regions and with international standards, appropriate resource allocation for JAP activities to ensure adherence to timelines, use of JAPs throughout the entire product lifecycle and all product categories, adequate use of digital technologies, and improved communication and transparency with applicants. These improvements will allow industry to better plan their filing strategies for the region which will lead to overall improved usability of the JAPs in Africa and enable faster patient access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Adam
- The International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Associations, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Zainab Aziz
- Novartis South Africa (Pty) Ltd, Magwa Crescent West, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
McAuslane N, Bujar M, Sithole T, Ngum N, Owusu-Asante M, Walker S. Evaluation of Risk-Based Approaches to the Registration of Medicines: Current Status Among African Regulatory Authorities. Pharmaceut Med 2023; 37:251-260. [PMID: 37074548 PMCID: PMC10113993 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-023-00472-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the worldwide need for increased access to safe and effective medicines, there is a lack of innovative medicines in many low- to middle-income countries. On the African continent, this is partly due to capacity limitations of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs). One important approach to address this issue is work sharing and regulatory reliance. Therefore, the aim of this study of regulatory authorities on the African continent was to identify which risk-based approaches are being used as well as their foreseen role in the future. METHODS The study employed a questionnaire to identify which risk-based models are used for the regulatory approval of medicines and to determine which frameworks are in place to enable a risk-based approach, as well as to provide insight into the future direction for risk-based models. The questionnaire was sent electronically to 26 NRAs in the African Continent. RESULTS Twenty-one authorities (80%) completed the questionnaire. Work sharing was the most commonly used model, followed closely by unilaterial reliance, information sharing, and collaborative review. These methods were perceived to be an effective and efficient use of resources, enabling faster medicine availability for patients. The unilateral reliance approach by the authorities included abridged (85%), verification (70%) and recognition (50%) models for a range of products. However, challenges included a lack of guidelines to undertake a reliance review together with resource constraints, while access to assessment reports was the most common barrier to using a unilateral reliance model. CONCLUSIONS Many authorities in Africa have adopted a risk-based approach to medicines registration and created work sharing, unilateral reliance pathways and regionalisation models to facilitate the availability of medicines. The authorities believe that in future, assessment routes should move from stand-alone reviews to risk-based models. However, this study indicated that there would be challenges to implement this approach in practice, which would include improving resource capacity and the number of expert reviewers as well as implementing electronic tracking systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil McAuslane
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, 70 St Mary Axe, London, UK
| | - Magda Bujar
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, 70 St Mary Axe, London, UK
| | - Tariro Sithole
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Nancy Ngum
- African Union Development Agency-New Partnership for Africa's Development (AUDA-NEPAD), Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Stuart Walker
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, 70 St Mary Axe, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mudyiwenyama LG, Khoza S, Dube A. Situation analysis on the regulation of nanomedicines in Southern Africa. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1098830. [PMID: 37153083 PMCID: PMC10157474 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1098830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Medical products incorporating nanoparticle drug delivery systems (nanomedicines) are therapeutic or imaging agents, which comprise a delivery system within the nanometer size range (1 - 1000 nm). As medical products, nanomedicines meet definitions of medicines according to various national legislations for regulation of medicines. However, for the regulation of nanomedicines, additional assessments including toxicological issues have to be considered. These complexities require extra regulatory effort. In the resource-limited context of low- and middle-income countries, many National Medicines Regulatory Authorities (NMRAs) lack resources and capacities to effectively assure the quality of medicinal products in their countries. With emerging trends in innovative technologies, including nanotechnology, this burden is worsened. The need to overcome regulatory challenges drove the formation of a work sharing initiative in the Southern African Development Community (SADC), ZaZiBoNA in 2013. Regulatory agencies participating in this initiative cooperate in the assessment of applications for registration of medicines. Methods A cross-sectional exploratory study design with qualitative techniques was used to investigate the status of the regulation of nanomedicines in Southern African countries in particular those participating in the ZaZiBoNA initiative. Results The study found that in general, NMRAs are aware of the existence of nanomedicines and they apply legislation applicable to other medical products. The NMRAs however neither have specific definition for nanomedicines and technical guidance documents, nor technical committees specific for consideration of nanomedicines. Collaboration with external experts or organisations in the regulation of nanomedicines was also found to be lacking. Discussion Capacity building and collaboration in the area of regulation of nanomedicines is strongly encouraged.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ongoing Efforts to Improve Antimicrobial Utilization in Hospitals among African Countries and Implications for the Future. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11121824. [PMID: 36551481 PMCID: PMC9774141 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11121824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
There are serious concerns with rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) across countries increasing morbidity, mortality and costs. These concerns have resulted in a plethora of initiatives globally and nationally including national action plans (NAPs) to reduce AMR. Africa is no exception, especially with the highest rates of AMR globally. Key activities in NAPs include gaining a greater understanding of current antimicrobial utilization patterns through point prevalence surveys (PPS) and subsequently instigating antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). Consequently, there is a need to comprehensively document current utilization patterns among hospitals across Africa coupled with ASP studies. In total, 33 PPS studies ranging from single up to 18 hospitals were documented from a narrative review with typically over 50% of in-patients prescribed antimicrobials, up to 97.6% in Nigeria. The penicillins, ceftriaxone and metronidazole, were the most prescribed antibiotics. Appreciable extended prescribing of antibiotics up to 6 days or more post-operatively was seen across Africa to prevent surgical site infections. At least 19 ASPs have been instigated across Africa in recent years to improve future prescribing utilizing a range of prescribing indicators. The various findings resulted in a range of suggested activities that key stakeholders, including governments and healthcare professionals, should undertake in the short, medium and long term to improve future antimicrobial prescribing and reduce AMR across Africa.
Collapse
|
7
|
Owusu-Asante M, Darko DM, Walker S, Salek S. Assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the West Africa medicines regulatory harmonization initiative by the member countries. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1069345. [PMID: 36506579 PMCID: PMC9732020 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1069345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The West Africa Health Organization launched the West Africa Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Project (WA-MRH) in 2017 with the overarching objective to improve the availability of high-quality, safe and effective medicines and vaccines by the 15 countries in the Economic Community of West African States region. Although this project has made significant progress towards the realisation of its goals, challenges still remain. The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the WA-MRH, examine what challenges are being encountered and identify strategies that would strengthen the process for realising the initiative's goals. Methods: The Process Effectiveness and Efficiency Rating (PEER) questionnaire was used to collect data from assessors representing the seven active NMRAs in the joint assessment procedure that identified the benefits, challenges and recommendations for improving the performance of the WA-MRH project. Results: The benefits of the joint assessment procedure include time savings to manufacturers resulting from submitting one dossier and the same response package to multiple countries resulting in access to the multiple African markets within the same timeframe. Additionally, some of the NMRAs have been able to strengthen their technical capacity as a result of this initiative. Key challenges to the project include the lack of a robust information technology system that would enable dossier tracking and constraints in human resources needed to support dossier submissions and the assessment process. Conclusion: This study identified the strengths of the WA-MRH initiative as well as strategies for improvement and achievement of its objectives. The centralised submission of a dossier and its tracking is key to the regulatory assessment process. This research has demonstrated that amongst other considerations, a robust information technology system, coupled with the necessary human resource capacity would greatly enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the WA-MRH initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Owusu-Asante
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom,Food and Drugs Authority, Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom,Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom,Institute of Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Sam Salek,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sithole T, Mahlangu G, Walker S, Salek S. Pharmaceutical Industry Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the ZaZiBoNa Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative: The Way Forward. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:898725. [PMID: 35547215 PMCID: PMC9082673 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.898725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The common technical document (CTD) format harmonised the requirements for the registration of medicines, which had traditionally differed from country to country, making it possible for countries to collaborate and conduct joint reviews of applications. One such collaborative medicines registration initiative is the Southern African Development Community ZaZiBoNa, established in 2013. A recent study was carried out with the nine active member regulatory authorities of the ZaZiBoNa to determine their views on its operational effectiveness and efficiency. Having obtained the authorities' views, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the current operating model of the ZaZiBoNa initiative including the challenges it faces as well as identifying opportunities for improvement from the applicants' perspective. Methods Applicants who had submitted registration/marketing authorisation applications for assessment under the ZaZiBoNa initiative during 2017-2021 were recruited into the study. Data was collected in 2021 using the Process, Effectiveness and Efficiency rating questionnaire (PEER-IND) developed by the authors. The questionnaire was completed by a representative responsible for ZaZiBoNa submissions in each company. Results The pharmaceutical industry was of the view that the ZaZiBoNa initiative has achieved shorter timelines for approval of medicines, resulting in increased availability of quality-assured medicines for patients in the SADC region. Harmonisation of registration requirements and joint reviews have reduced the workload for both the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory authorities. Some of the challenges identified were the lack of a centralised submission and tracking system, and the lack of information for applicants on the process for submission of ZaZiBoNa dossiers/applications in the individual countries, including contact details of the focal person. The establishment of a regional unit hosted in one of the member countries to centrally receive and track ZaZiBoNa dossiers/applications was identified as the best strategy for moving forward in the interim with the long-term goal being the establishment of a regional medicines authority. Conclusion There was consensus between the pharmaceutical industry and the regulatory authorities as to the way forward to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the ZaZiBoNa initiative. Implementation of the recommendations identified in this study will lead to enhanced regulatory performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariro Sithole
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Gugu Mahlangu
- Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Stuart Walker
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Salek
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
- Institute for Medicines Development, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|