Development and Implementation of the AIDA International Registry for Patients With VEXAS Syndrome

Acquired autoinflammatory disorders: a dermatologist's perspective

Autoinflammatory disorders are characterized by a dysregulated and disproportionately heightened response by the innate immune system to PAMPs and DAMPs (pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns, respectively), with a crucial role played by neutrophils and macrophages in disease pathogenesis. Autoinflammatory disorders closely resemble connective tissue diseases (CTDs); however, tests for antinuclear antibodies, typically considered a marker of CTDs, are negative in autoinflammatory disorders. Many autoinflammatory disorders are monogenic and arise from inherited genetic mutations, resulting in autoinflammation. This is especially true for disorders presenting in childhood or early adulthood. However, with the relatively recent identification of VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome, the recognized genetic spectrum of these disorders has expanded, especially in the adult population, emphasizing that these mutations could either be inherited or acquired later in life. Additionally, many of the acquired autoinflammatory disorders, for example, adult-onset Still disease and Schnitzler syndrome, have a multifactorial pathogenesis and are typically polygenic. Many novel disorders are being described in this category, and the majority of them have prominent cutaneous manifestations - either at onset or during the course of disease - that are particularly important from a diagnostic point of view. In this review, we discuss the cutaneous findings of a few acquired autoinflammatory disorders, with a specific focus on adult-onset Still disease, VEXAS syndrome, Schnitzler syndrome, Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome

Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a late-onset autoinflammatory disorder caused by somatic mutations in the ubiquitin-attaching protein 1 (UBA1) gene. It primarily affects men aged over 50. We report a middle-aged man presenting with bilateral orbital inflammation, sixth nerve palsy, relapsing polychondritis, sensorineural hearing loss, possible vestibulopathy and a papulovesicular rash. He had macrocytic anaemia and elevated inflammatory markers, but normal autoimmune and infective screens. Imaging identified features of orbital pseudotumour. Genetic testing confirmed a UBA1 p.Met41Thr mutation, confirming VEXAS syndrome. We gave intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisolone and subsequently tocilizumab. This case highlights the multisystem presentation and rare neurological manifestations of VEXAS syndrome and emphasises the importance of genetic testing in its diagnosis. Current treatment options include corticosteroids, interleukin-6 inhibitors and Janus kinase inhibitors, with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation offering curative potential.

Efficacy and safety of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in VEXAS syndrome: real-world data from the international AIDA network

Background

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory condition resulting in severe, often treatment-refractory inflammation. Currently, there are no established treatment guidelines for VEXAS syndrome.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) in a cohort of VEXAS patients.

Methods

Data from VEXAS patients were obtained from the International AIDA Network VEXAS registry.

Results

Data from 36 VEXAS patients were evaluated, with 28 (77.8%) treated with cDMARDs as monotherapy - and concomitant glucocorticoids (GC) - and 8 (22.2%) receiving a combination of different cDMARDs plus GC. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and failure to cDMARDs monotherapy were reported in 4/22 (18.2%), 11/22 (50%), and 7/22 (31.8%) courses, respectively. All patients were treated with GCs at the start of cDMARD monotherapy, and no GC discontinuation was observed later. No significant differences were observed in the GC dosage from the start of cDMARDs to the 3-month (p = 0.43), 6-month (p = 0.31), and 12-month (p = 0.21) visits. Conversely, the GC sparing resulted to be statistically significant when using methotrexate (p = 0.02). As for cDMARDs combinations, no cases achieved CR, while PR was observed in 5/9 (55.6%). Seventeen adverse events were reported, seven of which led to discontinuation.

Conclusion

Many VEXAS patients report a partial benefit from cDMARDs, while a smaller yet not negligible number of patients exhibit a CR; cDMARDs remain a viable option for this disorder, especially when the initial GC dosage is low and the need for a steroid-sparing effect is not immediately urgent.

Efficacy and safety profile of biotechnological agents and Janus kinase inhibitors in VEXAS syndrome: data from the international AIDA Network VEXAS registry

BACKGROUND

VEXAS syndrome, a recently identified systemic autoinflammatory disorder, poses new diagnostic and management challenges. Based on experience with other autoinflammatory diseases, anti-interleukin (IL)-1, anti-IL-6, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biotechnological agents, and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have been widely employed in VEXAS patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the global effectiveness and safety of biotechnological agents and JAKis using data from the real-world context.

METHODS

Clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic data from VEXAS patients were obtained from the international AIDA Network VEXAS registry.

RESULTS

In total, 69 VEXAS patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 12 patients (13 treatment courses) received IL-1 inhibitors, 12 patients (13 treatment courses) were administered anti-IL-6 agents, 8 patients (9 treatment courses) were treated with anti-TNF agents, and 16 patients (17 treatment courses) were treated with JAKis. A complete response was observed in 3 patients (23%) treated with anti-IL-1 agents, 2 patients (15%) receiving IL-6 inhibitors, 1 patient (11%) receiving TNF inhibitors, and 4 patients (23.5%) treated with JAKis. The mean prednisone (or equivalent) dosage significantly decreased during anti-IL-1 treatment (p = 0.01), while glucocorticoids changed during anti-IL-6, anti-TNF, and JAKi treatment in a non-significant fashion. A total of 21 patients experienced adverse events, 3 of which led to death (gut perforation, Legionnaires' disease, and infectious pneumonia) while on JAKis; treatment withdrawal was required for 8 out of 21 patients.

CONCLUSION

IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors, along with JAKis, represent promising therapeutic options for VEXAS patients, albeit careful monitoring is mandatory to control disease activity and ensure safety.

Development and implementation of the international AIDA network spondylarthritis registry

During the last decade, spondyloarthritis (SpA) has increasingly been considered a disease at the crossroads between autoimmunity and autoinflammation. Some patients may even present with autoinflammatory-related manifestations, including fever, hidradenitis suppurativa, other neutrophilic dermatoses, and an unusually high increase in inflammatory markers. Therefore, a subgroup of SpA patients may be identified, and specific details about this cluster need to be investigated. In this regard, the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) Network has developed a registry primarily aimed at better understanding the autoinflammatory aspects of SpA. The development of this Registry favors the systematic assessment of SpA through the lens of autoinflammation, giving a voice to patients with atypical presentations, and favoring a personalized treatment approach. By supporting research and facilitating the transfer of new evidence to clinical practice, this specific registry has the potential to significantly advance the field of rheumatology and enhance the lives of patients suffering from this complex and multifaceted disease.

Case report: VEXAS as an example of autoinflammatory syndrome in pulmonology clinical practice

Lung involvement is not widely recognized as a complication of auto-inflammatory diseases. We present a broad approach to diagnose a severe form of autoinflammatory syndrome in an adult male patient. A 63-year-old Caucasian male presented with recurrent episodes of high fever, interstitial lung infiltration, and pleural effusion. Laboratory tests performed during the flares revealed lymphopenia and increased levels of C-reactive protein and ferritin. Broad diagnostic research on infections, connective tissue diseases, and malignancies yielded negative results. The patient's symptoms promptly resolved upon the administration of glucocorticoids; however, they reappeared when the prednisone dose was reduced. All attempts to administer immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive medications were ineffective. During follow-up, autoinflammatory syndrome was suspected; however, no pathological variants of monogenic autoinflammatory diseases were identified by genome-exome sequencing. The patient did not respond to interleukin 1 blockade with anakinra. He died due to multi-organ failure, and his condition remained unresolved until the first reported description of vacuole, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic syndrome (VEXAS). We describe the diagnostic traps and reasoning process involved in establishing that the patient's symptoms were autoinflammatory in nature based on clinical symptoms, in addition to the proof of concept gained from genetic reevaluation and identification of pathogenic variants in the UBA1 gene. The aim of this review is to increase the awareness of VEXAS among pulmonologists. Genetic screening for UBA1 should be considered in patients with recurrent pneumonitis of unknown origin with elevated inflammatory markers and signs of cytopenia, especially if they require chronic steroids to control the disease. Respiratory manifestations are part of VEXAS; these may be dominant in the course of the disease and severe at presentation.

Knowledge and Current Practices in Monogenic Uveitis: An International Survey by IUSG and AIDA Network

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts.

METHODS

This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the Autoinflammatory Diseases Alliance (AIDA) Network and International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG). We included respondents answering ≥ 50% of the survey.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven participants rated their knowledge of mU as proficient (3.9%), adequate (15.6%), sufficient (16.9%), or poor (63.6%). When asked about the first mU gene they thought of, 60.4% mentioned NOD2, 3.9% mentioned NLRP3 or MEFV, and 49.4% provided incorrect or no answers. Success rates in clinical scenarios varied from 15.6% to 55.8% and were higher for ophthalmologists working in multidisciplinary teams (p < 0.01). Genetic testing was ordered for suspected mU by 41.6% of physicians. The availability of molecular techniques did not significantly differ based on geography (p > 0.05). The public healthcare system ensured a higher percentage of tests prescribed were obtained by patients compared to private insurances (p < 0.00). In terms of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors were the most familiar to uveitis experts. The difficulties with off-label therapy procedures were the primary barrier to DMARDs prescription for patients with mU and correlated inversely with the obtained/prescribed drug ratio for interleukin-1 (p < 0.01) and interleukin-6 (p < 0.01) inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey identifies proficiency areas, gaps, and opportunities for targeted improvements in patients care. The comprehensive outputs may inform evidence-based guidelines, empowering clinicians with standardized approaches, and drive an AIDA Network-IUSG unified effort to advance scientific knowledge and clinical practice.

VEXAS-Syndrome, a newly described autoinflammatory systemic disease with dermatologic manifestations

VEXAS syndrome is a recently identified autoinflammatory systemic disease caused by an acquired somatic mutation of the X-linked UBA1 gene, the key enzyme of the first step of ubiquitylation. The acronym VEXAS stands for the characteristics Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory and somatic. The disease occurs in advanced adulthood preferentially in men and is characterized by hematological, rheumatological and dermatological symptoms. The latter include neutrophil-rich lesions reminiscent of Sweet's syndrome, erythema nodosum- and panniculitis-like skin manifestations and recurrent polychondritis of the nose and auricles. The presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid precursors in the bone marrow is characteristic. In up to half of the cases, VEXAS syndrome is associated with myelodysplastic syndrome. Dermatologists should be familiar with the clinical picture, as skin symptoms are often the first indicator of the disease. Molecular diagnostics are essential for confirming the diagnosis and risk stratification of affected patients. In this minireview we provide an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy of VEXAS syndrome and illustrate its clinical picture with two own cases.

VEXAS-Syndrom, eine neu beschriebene autoinflammatorische Systemerkrankung mit dermatologischen Manifestationen

Das VEXAS‐Syndrom ist eine kürzlich erstbeschriebene autoinflammatorische Systemerkrankung, die auf einer erworbenen, somatischen Mutation des X‐chromosomal lokalisierten UBA1‐Gens, dem Schlüsselenzym des ersten Schritts der Ubiquitinierung, beruht. Das Akronym VEXAS steht für die Charakteristika Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, autoinflammatory und somatic. Die Erkrankung tritt im fortgeschrittenen Erwachsenenalter vorzugsweise bei Männern auf und ist insbesondere durch hämatologische, rheumatologische und dermatologische Symptome gekennzeichnet. Letztere umfassen unter anderem neutrophilenreiche, an das Sweet‐Syndrom erinnernde Läsionen, Erythema nodosum‐ und Pannikulitis‐artige Hauterscheinungen sowie rezidivierende Polychondritiden an Nase und Ohrmuscheln. Das Vorliegen zytoplasmatischer Vakuolen in myeloiden und erythroiden Vorläuferzellen des Knochenmarks ist charakteristisch. In bis zur Hälfte der Fälle ist das VEXAS‐Syndrom mit einem myelodysplastischen Syndrom vergesellschaftet. Dermatologen sollten das Krankheitsbild kennen, da Hauterscheinungen oft der erste Indikator für die Erkrankung sind. Eine molekulare Diagnostik ist essenziell für die Diagnosesicherung und die Risikostratifizierung betroffener Patienten. In dieser Arbeit geben wir einen Überblick über die Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie des VEXAS‐Syndroms und illustrieren das klinische Spektrum anhand zweier eigener Fälle.

How to treat VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies for the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome.

METHODS

A protocolized systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Three databases were searched for reports on treatment strategies for VEXAS. Data from the included publications was extracted and a narrative synthesis was performed. Treatment response was recorded as complete (CR), partial (PR) or none (NR) depending on changes in clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters. Patient characteristics, safety data and previous treatments were analysed.

RESULTS

We identified 36 publications with a total of 116 patients; 113 (98.3%) were male. The identified reports included azacytidine (CR 9/36, 25%; PR 14/36, 38.9%), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) (CR 11/33, 33%; PR 9/33, 27.3%), tocilizumab (CR 3/15, 20%; PR 6/15, 40%), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (CR 6/7, 85.7%; one patient died), anakinra (CR 4/5, 80%; NR 1/5, 20%), canakinumab (CR 1/2, 50%; PR 1/2, 50%) and glucocorticoid monotherapy (CR 1/6, 16.7%; PR 4/6, 66.7%). Individual reports were available for TNF inhibitors, rituximab and MTX. Data on adverse events were available for 67 patients (67/116, 57.8%) and included: pneumonia (12/67, 17.9%), other infections (9/67, 13.4%), venous thromboembolisms (6/67, 8.9%), cytopenias (4/67, 5.9%), and acute (4/67, 5.9%) and chronic graft-vs-host-disease (2/67, 2.9%).

CONCLUSION

Current data on VEXAS treatment are limited and inhomogeneous. Treatment decisions should be individualized. For the devolvement of treatment algorithms clinical trials are needed. Adverse events remain a challenge, especially an elevated risk for venous thromboembolism associated to JAKi treatment should be carefully considered.

VEXAS syndrome: a newly discovered systemic rheumatic disorder

VEXAS syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory disease associated with hematologic symptoms. The disease affects primarily males, and leads to death of a significant proportion of the patients. VEXAS syndrome is caused by a somatic mutation of the UBA1 gene in hematopoietic progenitor cells. The clinical picture of the syndrome consists of a number of organ manifestations including those akin to rheumatic diseases, arthritis, myalgia, vasculitis and chondritis.

VEXAS: where do we stand 2 years later?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Two years after the recognition of VEXAS (for Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome, we propose an extensive review of the current understanding of VEXAS pathophysiology and therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among the nearly 150 articles published about VEXAS, some have provided determinant insights into VEXAS pathophysiology and treatment. Clinical data from retrospective series support the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib as the most efficient strategy to control inflammation, and interesting results were also described with azacytidine. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative option, but should be proposed to carefully selected patients.

SUMMARY

Although waiting for more robust evidence from prospective clinical trials, therapeutic options emerge from retrospective studies. We propose a set of criteria that should be systematically reported to harmonize the evaluation of therapeutic outcomes. This will allow the collection of high-quality data and facilitate their subsequent meta-analysis with the overall aim of improving the management of VEXAS patients.

VEXAS syndrome: a new paradigm for adult-onset monogenic autoinflammatory diseases

VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is a recently described pathological entity. It is an acquired monogenic autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic mutations of the UBA1 gene in blood cells precursors; the gene encodes one of the two E1 enzyme isoforms that initiates ubiquitylation in cell's cytoplasm. VEXAS syndrome leads to systemic inflammation, with all organs and tissues potentially involved. The clinical picture may be extremely heterogenous, mimicking different other systemic rheumatologic entities coexisting with haematological disorders, especially myelodysplastic syndrome. This new disease represents a very intriguing clinical condition in several respects: it accounts for the paradigm of adult-onset monogenic autoinflammatory diseases determined by a genetic mosaicism resulting in the development of a challenging multiorgan inflammatory condition. Moreover, VEXAS syndrome is perhaps not an exceptionally rare condition and represents an example of a systemic genetic autoinflammatory disease drawing its origin in bone marrow disorders. VEXAS syndrome should be strongly considered in each adult patient with an unexplained systemic inflammatory condition, especially when recurrent fevers, neutrophilic dermatosis, relapsing polychondritis, ocular inflammation and other systemic inflammatory symptoms accompanying myelodysplastic syndrome or other haematological disorders. The syndrome deserves a multidisciplinary approach to reach the diagnosis and ensure the best management of a potentially very challenging condition. To quickly describe the clinical course, long-term outcomes, and the optimal management of this new syndrome it is essential to join forces internationally. To this end, the international AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registry dedicated to VEXAS syndrome has been developed and is already active.

A case of VEXAS syndrome (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) with decreased oxidative stress levels after oral prednisone and tocilizumab treatment

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome has recently been described as an autoinflammatory disease associated with severe adult-onset inflammatory manifestations. The various clinical manifestations include recurrent high-grade fever, neutrophilic dermatoses, cutaneous vasculitis, chondritis of the ear and nose, pulmonary infiltrates, cytopenia, uveitis, gastrointestinal pain or inflammation, aortitis, hepatosplenomegaly, and hematological disorders. VEXAS syndrome is caused by somatic mutations of the ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 (UBA1) gene in myeloid-lineage cells. It is characterized by vacuolated myeloid and erythroid progenitor cells seen by bone marrow biopsy. We report the case of a 64-year-old Japanese man with VEXAS syndrome. At age 63, he was referred to us with a recurrent erythema on the hands associated with a general fever of 38-40°C that had persisted for 4 or 5 days and had recurred about once a month for a year. The skin rash appeared 2 or 3 days after the onset of each fever episode. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest revealed bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL), and the mediastinal lymph nodes were swollen. Sarcoidosis was suspected but was ruled out by several tests. Laboratory examinations showed elevated inflammatory markers. Bone marrow examination showed the vacuolization of myeloid precursor cells. A skin biopsy revealed dense dermal, predominantly perivascular, infiltrates. These consisted of mature neutrophils admixed with myeloperoxidase-positive CD163-positive myeloid cells, lymphoid cells and eosinophils. Sequencing analysis identified the somatic UBA1 variant c.122T > C, which results in p.Met41Thr. Treatment with oral prednisone (15 mg/day) and monthly intravenous tocilizumab injections (400 mg) completely resolved the symptoms. Neutrophils are a major source of reactive oxygen species, and the present case demonstrated numerous neutrophilic infiltrates. We hypothesize that the patient might have had elevated derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs). d-ROM quantification is a simple method for detecting hydroperoxide levels, and clinical trials have proven it useful for evaluating oxidative stress. In this study, we measured serum d-ROM before and after oral prednisone and tocilizumab treatment. The levels decreased significantly during treatment.