Positioning Diverse Type IV Structures and Functions Within Class 1 CRISPR-Cas Systems

Structure, function and evolution of the bacterial DinG-like proteins

The damage-inducible G (DinG)-like proteins represent a widespread superfamily 2 (SF2) of DNA helicases, exhibiting remarkable diversity in domain architecture, substrate specificity, regulatory mechanisms, biological functions, interaction partners, and taxonomic distribution. Many characterized DinG-like proteins play critical roles in bacterial stress responses and immunity, including the SOS response, DNA repair, and phage interference. This review aims to provide a summary of bacterial DinG-like proteins, categorizing them into subgroups such as DinG, YoaA, CasDinG, CasDinG-HNH, ExoDinG, pExoDinG, EndoDinG, RadC-like DinG, sDinG, and others. This classification provides an analysis of sequence-structure-function relationships within this superfamily. Further sequence clustering revealed inter-cluster relationships and subgroup heterogeneity, suggesting potential functional divergence. Integrating sequence analysis, domain architecture, structural data, and genomic context enabled functional predictions for these DinG-like protein subgroups, shedding light on their evolutionary and biological significance.

Rapid and sensitive protein complex alignment with Foldseek-Multimer

Advances in computational structure prediction will vastly augment the hundreds of thousands of currently available protein complex structures. Translating these into discoveries requires aligning them, which is computationally prohibitive. Foldseek-Multimer computes complex alignments from compatible chain-to-chain alignments, identified by efficiently clustering their superposition vectors. Foldseek-Multimer is 3-4 orders of magnitudes faster than the gold standard, while producing comparable alignments; this allows it to compare billions of complex pairs in 11 h. Foldseek-Multimer is open-source software available at GitHub via https://github.com/steineggerlab/foldseek/ , https://search.foldseek.com/search/ and the BFMD database.

Determining the biochemical function of type IV CRISPR ribonucleoprotein complexes and accessory proteins

Type IV CRISPR systems are phylogenetically diverse and poorly understood. However, recently, major strides have been made toward understanding type IV-A systems. In type IV-A systems, a multi-subunit ribonucleoprotein complex, called the Csf complex, uses a CRISPR-derived guide to bind double-stranded DNA, forming an R-loop to which a helicase called CRISPR-associated DinG (CasDinG) is recruited. It is proposed that the ATP-dependent helicase activity of CasDinG then unwinds duplex DNA near the targeting site, impairing RNA transcription, and gene expression. Here we describe methods used to investigate the type IV-A system from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 83 including a plasmid clearance assay, expression and purification of type IV ribonucleoprotein complexes and proteins, nucleic acid binding assays, and CasDinG helicase assays. These methods provide a foundation for future work aimed at understanding these enigmatic systems.

CRISPR in mobile genetic elements: counter-defense, inter-element competition and RNA-guided transposition

CRISPR are adaptive immunity systems that protect bacteria and archaea from viruses and other mobile genetic elements (MGE) via an RNA-guided interference mechanism. However, in the course of the host-parasite co-evolution, CRISPR systems have been recruited by MGE themselves for counter-defense or other functions. Some bacteriophages encode fully functional CRISPR systems that target host defense systems, and many others recruited individual components of CRISPR systems, such as single repeat units that inhibit host CRISPR systems and CRISPR mini-arrays that target related viruses contributing to inter-virus competition. Many plasmids carry type IV or subtype V-M CRISPR systems that appear to be involved in inter-plasmid competition. Numerous Tn7-like and Mu-like transposons encode CRISPR-associated transposases (CASTs) in which interference-defective CRISPR systems of type I or type V mediate RNA-guided, site-specific transposition. The recruitment of CRISPR systems and their components by MGE is a manifestation of extensive gene shuttling between host immune systems and MGE, a major trend in the coevolution of MGE with their hosts.

Structural variation of types IV-A1- and IV-A3-mediated CRISPR interference

CRISPR-Cas mediated DNA-interference typically relies on sequence-specific binding and nucleolytic degradation of foreign genetic material. Type IV-A CRISPR-Cas systems diverge from this general mechanism, using a nuclease-independent interference pathway to suppress gene expression for gene regulation and plasmid competition. To understand how the type IV-A system associated effector complex achieves this interference, we determine cryo-EM structures of two evolutionarily distinct type IV-A complexes (types IV-A1 and IV-A3) bound to cognate DNA-targets in the presence and absence of the type IV-A signature DinG effector helicase. The structures reveal how the effector complexes recognize the protospacer adjacent motif and target-strand DNA to form an R-loop structure. Additionally, we reveal differences between types IV-A1 and IV-A3 in DNA interactions and structural motifs that allow for in trans recruitment of DinG. Our study provides a detailed view of type IV-A mediated DNA-interference and presents a structural foundation for engineering type IV-A-based genome editing tools.

Methanotrophic Methanoperedens archaea host diverse and interacting extrachromosomal elements

Methane emissions are mitigated by anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea, including Methanoperedens. Some Methanoperedens host huge extrachromosomal genetic elements (ECEs) called Borgs that may modulate their activity, yet the broader diversity of Methanoperedens ECEs is understudied. Here we report small enigmatic linear ECEs, circular viruses and unclassified ECEs that are predicted to replicate within Methanoperedens. Linear ECEs have inverted terminal repeats, tandem repeats and coding patterns that are strongly reminiscent of Borgs, but they are only 52-145 kb in length. As they share proteins with Borgs and Methanoperedens, we refer to them as mini-Borgs. Mini-Borgs are genetically diverse and can be assigned to at least five family-level groups. We identify eight families of Methanoperedens viruses, some of which encode multi-haem cytochromes, and circular ECEs encoding transposon-associated TnpB genes with proximal population-heterogeneous CRISPR arrays. These ECEs exchange genetic information with each other and with Methanoperedens, probably impacting their archaeal host activity and evolution.

An overview and potential of CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing

Genome editing involves altering of the DNA in organisms including bacteria, plants, and animals using molecular scissors that helps in treatment and diagnosis of various diseases. Genome editing technology is exponentially growing and have been developed for enabling precise genomic alterations and the addition, removal, and correction of genes. These modifications begin with the creation of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) that is generated by nucleases and can be joined through homology-directed repair (HDR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). NHEJ is quick but increases mutation chances due to deletions and insertions of nucleotides at the break site, while HDR uses homologous templates for precise repair and targeted DNA specific to the gene or sequence. Other methods such as zinc-finger protein is a transcription factor that binds with DNA and binds specific to that sequence, which uniquely recognise 3-base pairs of DNA. TALENs consists of two domains: TALE domain, a transcription activator and FokI that is a restriction endonuclease that cuts the DNA at specific sites. CRISPR-Cas systems are clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats present in various bacterial species. These sequences activate RNA-guided DNA cleavage, aiding in the development of an adaptive immune defence against foreign DNA. CRISPR-Cas9 is widely used for genome editing, regulation, diagnostic and many.

Type IV-A3 CRISPR-Cas systems drive inter-plasmid conflicts by acquiring spacers in trans

Plasmid-encoded type IV-A CRISPR-Cas systems lack an acquisition module, feature a DinG helicase instead of a nuclease, and form ribonucleoprotein complexes of unknown biological functions. Type IV-A3 systems are carried by conjugative plasmids that often harbor antibiotic-resistance genes and their CRISPR array contents suggest a role in mediating inter-plasmid conflicts, but this function remains unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that a plasmid-encoded type IV-A3 system co-opts the type I-E adaptation machinery from its host, Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), to update its CRISPR array. Furthermore, we reveal that robust interference of conjugative plasmids and phages is elicited through CRISPR RNA-dependent transcriptional repression. By silencing plasmid core functions, type IV-A3 impacts the horizontal transfer and stability of targeted plasmids, supporting its role in plasmid competition. Our findings shed light on the mechanisms and ecological function of type IV-A3 systems and demonstrate their practical efficacy for countering antibiotic resistance in clinically relevant strains.

The N-terminal domain of Type IV-A1 CRISPR-associated DinG is vulnerable to proteolysis

CasDinG is an ATP-dependent 5'-3' DNA helicase essential for bacterial Type IV-A1 CRISPR associated immunity. CasDinG contains an essential N-terminal domain predicted to bind DNA. To better understand the role of the N-terminal domain, we attempted to co-crystallize CasDinG with DNA substrates. We successfully crystallized CasDinG in a tightly packed, crystal conformation with previously unobserved unit cell dimensions. However, the structure lacked electron density for a bound DNA substrate and the CasDinG N-terminal domain. Additionally, the tight crystal packing disallowed space for the N-terminal domain, indicating that the N-terminal domain was proteolyzed before crystallization. Follow up experiments revealed that the N-terminal domain of CasDinG is proteolyzed after a few days at room temperature, but is protected from proteolysis at 4°C. These data provide a distinct x-ray crystal structure of CasDinG and indicate the essential N-terminal domain of CasDinG is prone to proteolysis.

Unity among the diverse RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas interference mechanisms

CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated) systems are adaptive immune systems that protect bacteria and archaea from invading mobile genetic elements (MGEs). The Cas protein-CRISPR RNA (crRNA) complex uses complementarity of the crRNA "guide" region to specifically recognize the invader genome. CRISPR effectors that perform targeted destruction of the foreign genome have emerged independently as multi-subunit protein complexes (Class 1 systems) and as single multi-domain proteins (Class 2). These different CRISPR-Cas systems can cleave RNA, DNA, and protein in an RNA-guided manner to eliminate the invader, and in some cases, they initiate programmed cell death/dormancy. The versatile mechanisms of the different CRISPR-Cas systems to target and destroy nucleic acids have been adapted to develop various programmable-RNA-guided tools and have revolutionized the development of fast, accurate, and accessible genomic applications. In this review, we present the structure and interference mechanisms of different CRISPR-Cas systems and an analysis of their unified features. The three types of Class 1 systems (I, III, and IV) have a conserved right-handed helical filamentous structure that provides a backbone for sequence-specific targeting while using unique proteins with distinct mechanisms to destroy the invader. Similarly, all three Class 2 types (II, V, and VI) have a bilobed architecture that binds the RNA-DNA/RNA hybrid and uses different nuclease domains to cleave invading MGEs. Additionally, we highlight the mechanistic similarities of CRISPR-Cas enzymes with other RNA-cleaving enzymes and briefly present the evolutionary routes of the different CRISPR-Cas systems.

CRISPR-based gene editing technology and its application in microbial engineering

Gene editing technology involves the modification of a specific target gene to obtain a new function or phenotype. Recent advances in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas-mediated technologies have provided an efficient tool for genetic engineering of cells and organisms. Here, we review the three emerging gene editing tools (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas) and briefly introduce the principle, classification, and mechanisms of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Strategies for gene editing based on endogenous and exogenous CRISPR-Cas systems, as well as the novel base editor (BE), prime editor (PE), and CRISPR-associated transposase (CAST) technologies, are described in detail. In addition, we summarize recent developments in the application of CRISPR-based gene editing tools for industrial microorganism and probiotics modifications. Finally, the potential challenges and future perspectives of CRISPR-based gene editing tools are discussed.

CasDinG is a 5'-3' dsDNA and RNA/DNA helicase with three accessory domains essential for type IV CRISPR immunity

CRISPR-associated DinG protein (CasDinG) is essential to type IV-A CRISPR function. Here, we demonstrate that CasDinG from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 83 is an ATP-dependent 5'-3' DNA translocase that unwinds double-stranded (ds)DNA and RNA/DNA hybrids. The crystal structure of CasDinG reveals a superfamily 2 helicase core of two RecA-like domains with three accessory domains (N-terminal, arch, and vestigial FeS). To examine the in vivo function of these domains, we identified the preferred PAM sequence for the type IV-A system (5'-GNAWN-3' on the 5'-side of the target) with a plasmid library and performed plasmid clearance assays with domain deletion mutants. Plasmid clearance assays demonstrated that all three domains are essential for type IV-A immunity. Protein expression and biochemical assays suggested the vFeS domain is needed for protein stability and the arch for helicase activity. However, deletion of the N-terminal domain did not impair ATPase, ssDNA binding, or helicase activities, indicating a role distinct from canonical helicase activities that structure prediction tools suggest involves interaction with dsDNA. This work demonstrates CasDinG helicase activity is essential for type IV-A CRISPR immunity as well as the yet undetermined activity of the CasDinG N-terminal domain.

Type IV-A CRISPR-Csf complex: Assembly, dsDNA targeting, and CasDinG recruitment

Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems, which are primarily found on plasmids and exhibit a strong plasmid-targeting preference, are the only one of the six known CRISPR-Cas types for which the mechanistic details of their function remain unknown. Here, we provide high-resolution functional snapshots of type IV-A Csf complexes before and after target dsDNA binding, either in the absence or presence of CasDinG, revealing the mechanisms underlying Csf^crRNA complex assembly, "DWN" PAM-dependent dsDNA targeting, R-loop formation, and CasDinG recruitment. Furthermore, we establish that CasDinG, a signature DinG family helicase, harbors ssDNA-stimulated ATPase activity and ATP-dependent 5'-3' DNA helicase activity. In addition, we show that CasDinG unwinds the non-target strand (NTS) and target strand (TS) of target dsDNA from the Csf^crRNA complex. These molecular details advance our mechanistic understanding of type IV-A CRISPR-Csf function and should enable Csf complexes to be harnessed as genome-engineering tools for biotechnological applications.

Insights into the Mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a popular genome-editing tool with immense therapeutic potential. It is a simple two-component system (Cas9 protein and RNA) that recognizes the DNA sequence on the basis of RNA:DNA complementarity, and the Cas9 protein catalyzes the double-stranded break in the DNA. In the past decade, near-atomic resolution structures at various stages of the CRISPR/Cas9 DNA editing pathway have been reported along with numerous experimental and computational studies. Such studies have boosted knowledge of the genome-editing mechanism. Despite such advancements, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 in therapeutics is still limited, primarily due to off-target effects. Several studies aim at engineering high-fidelity Cas9 to minimize the off-target effects. Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations have been an excellent complement to the experimental studies for investigating the mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9 editing in terms of structure, thermodynamics, and kinetics. MD-based studies have uncovered several important molecular aspects of Cas9, such as nucleotide binding, catalytic mechanism, and off-target effects. In this Review, the contribution of MD simulation to understand the CRISPR/Cas9 mechanism has been discussed, preceded by an overview of the history, mechanism, and structural aspects of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. These studies are important for the rational design of highly specific Cas9 and will also be extremely promising for achieving more accurate genome editing in the future.

Molecular Details of DNA Integration by CRISPR-Associated Proteins During Adaptation in Bacteria and Archaea

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins constitute an adaptive immune system in bacteria and archaea, where immunological memory is retained in the CRISPR locus as short pieces of the intruding nucleic acid, termed spacers. The adaptation to new infections occurs through the integration of a new spacer into the CRISPR array. For immune protection, spacers are transcribed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNA) that are used to guide the effector nuclease of the system in sequence-dependent target cleavage. Spacers originate as a prespacer from either DNA or RNA depending on the CRISPR-Cas system being observed, and the nearly universal Cas proteins, Cas1 and Cas2, insert the prespacer into the CRISPR locus during adaptation in all systems that contain them. The mechanism of site-specific prespacer integration varies across CRISPR classes and types, and distinct differences can even be found within the same subtype. In this review, the current knowledge on the mechanisms of prespacer integration in type II-A CRISPR-Cas systems will be described. Comparisons of the currently characterized type II-A systems show that distinct mechanisms exist within different members of this subtype and are correlated to sequence-specific interactions of Cas proteins and the DNA elements present in the CRISPR array. These observations indicate that nature has fine-tuned the mechanistic details while performing the basic step of DNA integration by Cas proteins, which offers unique advantages to develop Cas1-Cas2-based biotechnology.

Characterization of the self-targeting Type IV CRISPR interference system in Pseudomonas oleovorans

Bacterial Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems are thought to rely on multi-subunit ribonucleoprotein complexes to interfere with mobile genetic elements, but the substrate requirements and potential DNA nuclease activities for many systems within this type are uncharacterized. Here we show that the native Pseudomonas oleovorans Type IV-A CRISPR-Cas system targets DNA in a PAM-dependent manner and elicits interference without showing DNA nuclease activity. We found that the first crRNA of P. oleovorans contains a perfect match in the host gene coding for the Type IV pilus biogenesis protein PilN. Deletion of the native Type IV CRISPR array resulted in upregulation of pilN operon transcription in the absence of genome cleavage, indicating that Type IV-A CRISPR-Cas systems can function in host gene regulation. These systems resemble CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) methodology but represent a natural CRISPRi-like system that is found in many Pseudomonas and Klebsiella species and allows for gene silencing using engineered crRNAs.

A naturally DNase-free CRISPR-Cas12c enzyme silences gene expression

Used widely for genome editing, CRISPR-Cas enzymes provide RNA-guided immunity to microbes by targeting foreign nucleic acids for cleavage. We show here that the native activity of CRISPR-Cas12c protects bacteria from phage infection by binding to DNA targets without cleaving them, revealing that antiviral interference can be accomplished without chemical attack on the invader or general metabolic disruption in the host. Biochemical experiments demonstrate that Cas12c is a site-specific ribonuclease capable of generating mature CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) from precursor transcripts. Furthermore, we find that crRNA maturation is essential for Cas12c-mediated DNA targeting. These crRNAs direct double-stranded DNA binding by Cas12c using a mechanism that precludes DNA cutting. Nevertheless, Cas12c represses transcription and can defend bacteria against lytic bacteriophage infection when targeting an essential phage gene. Together, these results show that Cas12c employs targeted DNA binding to provide antiviral immunity in bacteria, providing a native DNase-free pathway for transient antiviral immunity.

Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas technology for accelerated crop improvement

Precise genome engineering approaches could be perceived as a second paradigm for targeted trait improvement in crop plants, with the potential to overcome the constraints imposed by conventional CRISPR/Cas technology. The likelihood of reduced agricultural production due to highly turbulent climatic conditions increases as the global population expands. The second paradigm of stress-resilient crops with enhanced tolerance and increased productivity against various stresses is paramount to support global production and consumption equilibrium. Although traditional breeding approaches have substantially increased crop production and yield, effective strategies are anticipated to restore crop productivity even further in meeting the world's increasing food demands. CRISPR/Cas, which originated in prokaryotes, has surfaced as a coveted genome editing tool in recent decades, reshaping plant molecular biology in unprecedented ways and paving the way for engineering stress-tolerant crops. CRISPR/Cas is distinguished by its efficiency, high target specificity, and modularity, enables precise genetic modification of crop plants, allowing for the creation of allelic variations in the germplasm and the development of novel and more productive agricultural practices. Additionally, a slew of advanced biotechnologies premised on the CRISPR/Cas methodologies have augmented fundamental research and plant synthetic biology toolkits. Here, we describe gene editing tools, including CRISPR/Cas and its imitative tools, such as base and prime editing, multiplex genome editing, chromosome engineering followed by their implications in crop genetic improvement. Further, we comprehensively discuss the latest developments of CRISPR/Cas technology including CRISPR-mediated gene drive, tissue-specific genome editing, dCas9 mediated epigenetic modification and programmed self-elimination of transgenes in plants. Finally, we highlight the applicability and scope of advanced CRISPR-based techniques in crop genetic improvement.

Evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility of CRISPR systems

The principal biological function of bacterial and archaeal CRISPR systems is RNA-guided adaptive immunity against viruses and other mobile genetic elements (MGEs). These systems show remarkable evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility at multiple levels, including both the defense mechanisms that lead to direct, specific elimination of the target DNA or RNA and those that cause programmed cell death (PCD) or induction of dormancy. This flexibility is also evident in the recruitment of CRISPR systems for nondefense functions. Defective CRISPR systems or individual CRISPR components have been recruited by transposons for RNA-guided transposition, by plasmids for interplasmid competition, and by viruses for antidefense and interviral conflicts. Additionally, multiple highly derived CRISPR variants of yet unknown functions have been discovered. A major route of innovation in CRISPR evolution is the repurposing of diverged repeat variants encoded outside CRISPR arrays for various structural and regulatory functions. The evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility of CRISPR systems are striking manifestations of the ubiquitous interplay between defense and “normal” cellular functions.

The CRISPR systems show remarkable functional versatility beyond their principal function as an adaptive immune mechanism. This Essay discusses how derived CRISPR systems have been recruited by transposons on multiple occasions and mediate RNA-guided transposition; derived CRISPR RNAs are frequently recruited for regulatory functions.

Metagenomic discovery of CRISPR-associated transposons

CRISPR-associated Tn7 transposons (CASTs) co-opt cas genes for RNA-guided transposition. CASTs are exceedingly rare in genomic databases; recent surveys have reported Tn7-like transposons that co-opt Type I-F, I-B, and V-K CRISPR effectors. Here, we expand the diversity of reported CAST systems via a bioinformatic search of metagenomic databases. We discover architectures for all known CASTs, including arrangements of the Cascade effectors, target homing modalities, and minimal V-K systems. We also describe families of CASTs that have co-opted the Type I-C and Type IV CRISPR-Cas systems. Our search for non-Tn7 CASTs identifies putative candidates that include a nuclease dead Cas12. These systems shed light on how CRISPR systems have coevolved with transposases and expand the programmable gene-editing toolkit.

Evolution of Type IV CRISPR-Cas Systems: Insights from CRISPR Loci in Integrative Conjugative Elements of Acidithiobacillia

Type IV CRISPR-Cas are a distinct variety of highly derived CRISPR-Cas systems that appear to have evolved from type III systems through the loss of the target-cleaving nuclease and partial deterioration of the large subunit of the effector complex. All known type IV CRISPR-Cas systems are encoded on plasmids, integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), or prophages, and are thought to contribute to competition between these elements, although the mechanistic details of their function remain unknown. There is a clear parallel between the compositions and likely origin of type IV and type I systems recruited by Tn7-like transposons and mediating RNA-guided transposition. We investigated the diversity and evolutionary relationships of type IV systems, with a focus on those in Acidithiobacillia, where this variety of CRISPR is particularly abundant and always found on ICEs. Our analysis revealed remarkable evolutionary plasticity of type IV CRISPR-Cas systems, with adaptation and ancillary genes originating from different ancestral CRISPR-Cas varieties, and extensive gene shuffling within the type IV loci. The adaptation module and the CRISPR array apparently were lost in the type IV ancestor but were subsequently recaptured by type IV systems on several independent occasions. We demonstrate a high level of heterogeneity among the repeats with type IV CRISPR arrays, which far exceed the heterogeneity of any other known CRISPR repeats and suggest a unique adaptation mechanism. The spacers in the type IV arrays, for which protospacers could be identified, match plasmid genes, in particular those encoding the conjugation apparatus components. Both the biochemical mechanism of type IV CRISPR-Cas function and their role in the competition among mobile genetic elements remain to be investigated.