Real-time polymerase chain reaction methods for strain specific identification and enumeration of strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei 8700:2

Real-time PCR methods for identification and stability monitoring of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum UABl-14 during shelf life

Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum UABl-14™ is an important probiotic strain that was found to support digestive health. Here we present the development and validation of real-time PCR methods for strain-specific identification and enumeration of this important strain. The identification method was evaluated for specificity using 22 target samples and 30 non-target samples. All target samples successfully amplified, while no amplification was observed from any non-target samples including other B. longum strains. The identification method was evaluated for sensitivity using three DNA dilution series and the limit of detection was 2 pg. of DNA. Coupled with a viability dye, the method was further validated for quantitative use to enumerate viable cells of UABl-14. The viability dye treatment (PMAxx) was optimized, and a final concentration of 50 μM was found as an effective concentration to inactivate DNA in dead cells from reacting in PCR. The reaction efficiency, linear dynamic range, repeatability, and reproducibility were also evaluated. The reaction efficiency was determined to be 97.2, 95.2, and 95.0% with R2 values of 99%, in three replicates. The linear dynamic range was 1.3 × 102 to 1.3 × 105 genomes. The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for repeatability ranged from 0.03 to 2.80, and for reproducibility ranged from 0.04 to 2.18. The ability of the validated enumeration method to monitor cell counts during shelf life was evaluated by determining the viable counts and total counts of strain UABl-14 in 18 multi-strain finished products. The viable counts were lower than label claims in seven products tested post-expiration and were higher than label claims in products tested pre-expiration, with a slight decrease in viable counts below label claim in three samples that were tested 2-3 months pre-expiration. Interestingly, the total counts of strain UABl-14 were consistently higher than label claims in all 18 products. Thus, the method enables strain-specific stability monitoring in finished products during shelf life, which can be difficult or impossible to achieve using the standard plate count method. The validated methods allow for simultaneous and cost-effective identification and enumeration of strain UABl-14 and represent an advancement in the quality control and quality assurance of probiotics.

Assessing probiotic viability in mixed species yogurt using a novel propidium monoazide (PMAxx)-quantitative PCR method

Viability is a prerequisite for any therapeutic benefits associated with the ingestion of probiotic bacteria. Current culture-based techniques are inadequate for the enumeration of probiotics in mixed-species food products. This study utilized a quantitative PCR (qPCR) method coupled with propidium monoazide (PMAxx), and novel species-specific tuf gene primers to selectively enumerate Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium spp., and yogurt starter cultures in mixed-species probiotic yogurt. The method was optimized for PMAxx concentration and specificity and evaluated for efficiency and applicability. PMAxx-qPCR showed high specificity to the target organisms in mixed-species yogurt, quantifying only viable cells. The linear dynamic ranges were established over five to seven orders of magnitude. The assay was reliable with an efficiency of 91-99%, R2 values > 0.99, and a good correlation to the plate count method (r = 0.882). The results of this study demonstrate the high selectivity, improved lead time, and reliability of PMAxx-qPCR over the culture-dependent method, making it a valuable tool for inline viability verification during processing and improving probiotic quality assurance for processors and consumers.

Bifidobacterium species viability in dairy-based probiotic foods: challenges and innovative approaches for accurate viability determination and monitoring of probiotic functionality

Bifidobacterium species are essential members of a healthy human gut microbiota. Their presence in the gut is associated with numerous health outcomes such as protection against gastrointestinal tract infections, inflammation, and metabolic diseases. Regular intake of Bifidobacterium in foods is a sustainable way of maintaining the health benefits associated with its use as a probiotic. Owing to their global acceptance, fermented dairy products (particularly yogurt) are considered the ideal probiotic carrier foods. As envisioned in the definition of probiotics as "live organisms," the therapeutic functionalities of Bifidobacterium spp. depend on maintaining their viability in the foods up to the point of consumption. However, sustaining Bifidobacterium spp. viability during the manufacture and shelf-life of fermented dairy products remains challenging. Hence, this paper discusses the significance of viability as a prerequisite for Bifidobacterium spp. probiotic functionality. The paper focuses on the stress factors that influence Bifidobacterium spp. viability during the manufacture and shelf life of yogurt as an archetypical fermented dairy product that is widely accepted as a delivery vehicle for probiotics. It further expounds the Bifidobacterium spp. physiological and genetic stress response mechanisms as well as the methods for viability retention in yogurt, such as microencapsulation, use of oxygen scavenging lactic acid bacterial strains, and stress-protective agents. The report also explores the topic of viability determination as a critical factor in probiotic quality assurance, wherein, the limitations of culture-based enumeration methods, the challenges of species and strain resolution in the presence of lactic acid bacterial starter and probiotic species are discussed. Finally, new developments and potential applications of next-generation viability determination methods such as flow cytometry, propidium monoazide-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PMA-qPCR), next-generation sequencing, and single-cell Raman spectroscopy (SCRS) methods are examined.

Probiotic and postbiotic analytical methods: a perspective of available enumeration techniques

Probiotics are the largest non-herbal/traditional dietary supplements category worldwide. To be effective, a probiotic strain must be delivered viable at an adequate dose proven to deliver a health benefit. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the various technologies available for probiotic enumeration, including a general description of each technology, their advantages and limitations, and their potential for the future of the probiotics industry. The current "gold standard" for analytical quantification of probiotics in the probiotic industry is the Plate Count method (PC). PC measures the bacterial cell's ability to proliferate into detectable colonies, thus PC relies on cultivability as a measure of viability. Although viability has widely been measured by cultivability, there has been agreement that the definition of viability is not limited to cultivability. For example, bacterial cells may exist in a state known as viable but not culturable (VBNC) where the cells lose cultivability but can maintain some of the characteristics of viable cells as well as probiotic properties. This led to questioning the association between viability and cultivability and the accuracy of PC in enumerating all the viable cells in probiotic products. PC has always been an estimate of the number of viable cells and not a true cell count. Additionally, newer probiotic categories such as Next Generation Probiotics (NGPs) are difficult to culture in routine laboratories as NGPs are often strict anaerobes with extreme sensitivity to atmospheric oxygen. Thus, accurate quantification using culture-based techniques will be complicated. Another emerging category of biotics is postbiotics, which are inanimate microorganisms, also often referred to as tyndallized or heat-killed bacteria. Obviously, culture dependent methods are not suitable for these products, and alternative methods are needed for their quantification. Different methodologies provide a more complete picture of a heterogeneous bacterial population versus PC focusing exclusively on the eventual multiplication of the cells. Alternative culture-independent techniques including real-time PCR, digital PCR and flow cytometry are discussed. These methods can measure viability beyond cultivability (i.e., by measuring cellular enzymatic activity, membrane integrity or membrane potential), and depending on how they are designed they can achieve strain-specific enumeration.

The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication

Introduction

The global probiotic market is growing rapidly, and strict quality control measures are required to ensure probiotic product efficacy and safety. Quality assurance of probiotic products involve confirming the presence of specific probiotic strains, determining the viable cell counts, and confirming the absence of contaminant strains. Third-party evaluation of probiotic quality and label accuracy is recommended for probiotic manufacturers. Following this recommendation, multiple batches of a top selling multi-strain probiotic product were evaluated for label accuracy.

Methods

A total of 55 samples (five multi-strain finished products and 50 single-strain raw ingredients) containing a total of 100 probiotic strains were evaluated using a combination of molecular methods including targeted PCR, non-targeted amplicon-based High Throughput Sequencing (HTS), and non-targeted Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing (SMS).

Results

Targeted testing using species-specific or strain-specific PCR methods confirmed the identity of all strains/species. While 40 strains were identified to strain level, 60 strains were identified to species level only due to lack of strain-specific identification methods. In amplicon based HTS, two variable regions of 16S rRNA gene were targeted. Based on V5-V8 region data, ~99% of total reads per sample corresponded to target species, and no undeclared species were detected. Based on V3-V4 region data, ~95%-97% of total reads per sample corresponded to target species, while ~2%-3% of reads matched undeclared species (Proteus species), however, attempts to culture Proteus confirmed that all batches were free from viable Proteus species. Reads from SMS assembled to the genomes of all 10 target strains in all five batches of the finished product.

Discussion

While targeted methods enable quick and accurate identification of target taxa in probiotic products, non-targeted methods enable the identification of all species in a product including undeclared species, with the caveats of complexity, high cost, and long time to result.