Integrated Array Tomography for 3D Correlative Light and Electron Microscopy

ARRAY TOMOGRAPHY: 15 YEARS OF SYNAPTIC ANALYSIS

Synapses are minuscule, intricate structures crucial for the correct communication between neurons. In the 125 years since the term synapse was first coined, we have advanced a long way when it comes to our understanding of how they work and what they do. Most of the fundamental discoveries have been invariably linked to advances in technology. However, due to their size, delicate structural integrity and their sheer number, our knowledge of synaptic biology has remained somewhat elusive and their role in neurodegenerative diseases still remains largely unknown. Here, we briefly discuss some of the imaging technologies used to study synapses and focus on the utility of the high-resolution imaging technique array tomography (AT). We introduce the AT technique and highlight some of the ways it is utilised with a particular focus on its power for analysing synaptic composition and pathology in human post-mortem tissue. We also discuss some of the benefits and drawbacks of techniques for imaging synapses and highlight some recent advances in the study of form and function by combining physiology and high-resolution synaptic imaging.

Volume electron microscopy

Life exists in three dimensions, but until the turn of the century most electron microscopy methods provided only 2D image data. Recently, electron microscopy techniques capable of delving deep into the structure of cells and tissues have emerged, collectively called volume electron microscopy (vEM). Developments in vEM have been dubbed a quiet revolution as the field evolved from established transmission and scanning electron microscopy techniques, so early publications largely focused on the bioscience applications rather than the underlying technological breakthroughs. However, with an explosion in the uptake of vEM across the biosciences and fast-paced advances in volume, resolution, throughput and ease of use, it is timely to introduce the field to new audiences. In this Primer, we introduce the different vEM imaging modalities, the specialized sample processing and image analysis pipelines that accompany each modality and the types of information revealed in the data. We showcase key applications in the biosciences where vEM has helped make breakthrough discoveries and consider limitations and future directions. We aim to show new users how vEM can support discovery science in their own research fields and inspire broader uptake of the technology, finally allowing its full adoption into mainstream biological imaging.

One for All, All for One: A Close Look at In-Resin Fluorescence Protocols for CLEM

Sample preparation is the novel bottleneck for high throughput correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM). Protocols suitable for both imaging methods must therefore balance the requirements of each technique. For fluorescence light microscopy, a structure of interest can be targeted using: 1) staining, which is often structure or tissue specific rather than protein specific, 2) dye-coupled proteins or antibodies, or 3) genetically encoded fluorescent proteins. Each of these three methods has its own advantages. For ultrastructural investigation by electron microscopy (EM) resin embedding remains a significant sample preparation approach, as it stabilizes the sample such that it withstands the vacuum conditions of the EM, and enables long-term storage. Traditionally, samples are treated with heavy metal salts prior to resin embedding, in order to increase imaging contrast for EM. This is particularly important for volume EM (vEM) techniques. Yet, commonly used contrasting agents (e.g., osmium tetroxide, uranyl acetate) tend to impair fluorescence. The discovery that fluorescence can be preserved in resin-embedded specimens after mild heavy metal staining was a game changer for CLEM. These so-called in-resin fluorescence protocols present a significant leap forward for CLEM approaches towards high precision localization of a fluorescent signal in (volume) EM data. Integrated microscopy approaches, combining LM and EM detection into a single instrument certainly require such an “all in one” sample preparation. Preserving, or adding, dedicated fluorescence prior to resin embedding requires a compromise, which often comes at the expense of EM imaging contrast and membrane visibility. Especially vEM can be strongly hampered by a lack of heavy metal contrasting. This review critically reflects upon the fundamental aspects of resin embedding with regard to 1) specimen fixation and the physics and chemistry underlying the preservation of protein structure with respect to fluorescence and antigenicity, 2) optimization of EM contrast for transmission or scanning EM, and 3) the choice of embedding resin. On this basis, various existing workflows employing in-resin fluorescence are described, highlighting their common features, discussing advantages and disadvantages of the respective approach, and finally concluding with promising future developments for in-resin CLEM.

Parallel gold enhancement of quantum dots 565/655 for double-labelling correlative light and electron microscopy on human autopsied samples

Cadmium selenide quantum dots (QDs) are fluorescent and electron-dense nanoparticles. When used as reporter of immunolabeling, this dual visibility is essential for direct comparison of its fluorescent signals on light microscopy (LM) and their ultrastructrual counterparts on electron microscopy (EM) as correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM). To facilitate EM recognition, QDs on EM grid were gold enhanced, which increased their size and electron density. On histological sections as well, gold-enhanced QDs, used as a reporter of immunolabeling, were easily recognized on EM. Because target structures are visible on bright field microscopy, gold enhancement facilitated trimming the target structures into final EM sections. Furthermore, gold enhancement of rod-shaped QD655 on EM grid was accentuated on their tips while spherical QD565 was gold-enhanced as sphere in contrast. This EM distinction was evident on histological sections where QD565 (green fluorescence) and QD655 (red fluorescence) were used as a reporter pair for double immunolabeling. Double-labeled immuno-fluorescent images, initially captured before EM processing, are now compared with their respective immuno EM counterparts. Specific labeling of each epitope was corroborated by mutual comparison between LM and EM. Although fluoronanogold may be a candidate reporter partner with QDs for gold-enhanced, double-labeling CLEM, its limited penetration into fixed tissue hampers universal use for thick histological sections. Gold-enhancement of QD immunolabeling, now expanded to double-labeling CLEM for human brain samples, will pave the way to translate molecular events into ultrastructural morphopathogenesis in situ.