Linking Brain Age Gap to Mental and Physical Health in the Berlin Aging Study II

Brain health in diverse settings: How age, demographics and cognition shape brain function

Diversity in brain health is influenced by individual differences in demographics and cognition. However, most studies on brain health and diseases have typically controlled for these factors rather than explored their potential to predict brain signals. Here, we assessed the role of individual differences in demographics (age, sex, and education; n = 1298) and cognition (n = 725) as predictors of different metrics usually used in case-control studies. These included power spectrum and aperiodic (1/f slope, knee, offset) metrics, as well as complexity (fractal dimension estimation, permutation entropy, Wiener entropy, spectral structure variability) and connectivity (graph-theoretic mutual information, conditional mutual information, organizational information) from the source space resting-state EEG activity in a diverse sample from the global south and north populations. Brain-phenotype models were computed using EEG metrics reflecting local activity (power spectrum and aperiodic components) and brain dynamics and interactions (complexity and graph-theoretic measures). Electrophysiological brain dynamics were modulated by individual differences despite the varied methods of data acquisition and assessments across multiple centers, indicating that results were unlikely to be accounted for by methodological discrepancies. Variations in brain signals were mainly influenced by age and cognition, while education and sex exhibited less importance. Power spectrum activity and graph-theoretic measures were the most sensitive in capturing individual differences. Older age, poorer cognition, and being male were associated with reduced alpha power, whereas older age and less education were associated with reduced network integration and segregation. Findings suggest that basic individual differences impact core metrics of brain function that are used in standard case-control studies. Considering individual variability and diversity in global settings would contribute to a more tailored understanding of brain function.

Age Prediction Using Resting-State Functional MRI

The increasing lifespan and large individual differences in cognitive capability highlight the importance of comprehending the aging process of the brain. Contrary to visible signs of bodily ageing, like greying of hair and loss of muscle mass, the internal changes that occur within our brains remain less apparent until they impair function. Brain age, distinct from chronological age, reflects our brain's health status and may deviate from our actual chronological age. Notably, brain age has been associated with mortality and depression. The brain is plastic and can compensate even for severe structural damage by rewiring. Functional characterization offers insights that structural cannot provide. Contrary to the multitude of studies relying on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we utilize resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI). We also address the issue of inclusion of subjects with abnormal brain ageing through outlier removal. In this study, we employ the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) to identify the 39 most predictive correlations derived from the rsfMRI data. The data is from a cohort of 176 healthy right-handed volunteers, aged 18-78 years (95/81 male/female, mean age 48, SD 17) collected at the Mind Research Imaging Center at the National Cheng Kung University. We establish a normal reference model by excluding 68 outliers, which achieves a leave-one-out mean absolute error of 2.48 years. By asking which additional features that are needed to predict the chronological age of the outliers with a smaller error, we identify correlations predictive of abnormal aging. These are associated with the Default Mode Network (DMN). Our normal reference model has the lowest prediction error among published models evaluated on adult subjects of almost all ages and is thus a candidate for screening for abnormal brain aging that has not yet manifested in cognitive decline. This study advances our ability to predict brain aging and provides insights into potential biomarkers for assessing brain age, suggesting that the role of DMN in brain aging should be studied further.

Toward MR protocol-agnostic, unbiased brain age predicted from clinical-grade MRIs

The difference between the estimated brain age and the chronological age ('brain-PAD') could become a clinical biomarker. However, most brain age models were developed for research-grade high-resolution T1-weighted MRIs, limiting their applicability to clinical-grade MRIs from various protocols. We adopted a dual-transfer learning strategy to develop a model agnostic to modality, resolution, or slice orientation. We retrained a convolutional neural network (CNN) using 6281 clinical MRIs from 1559 patients, among 7 modalities and 8 scanner models. The CNN was trained to estimate brain age from synthetic research-grade magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo MRIs (MPRAGEs) generated by a 'super-resolution' method. The model failed with T2-weighted Gradient-Echo MRIs. The mean absolute error (MAE) was 5.86-8.59 years across the other modalities, still higher than for research-grade MRIs, but comparable between actual and synthetic MPRAGEs for some modalities. We modeled the "regression bias" in brain age, for its correction is crucial for providing unbiased summary statistics of brain age or for personalized brain age-based biomarkers. The bias model was generalizable as its correction eliminated any correlation between brain-PAD and chronological age in new samples. Brain-PAD was reliable across modalities. We demonstrate the feasibility of brain age predictions from arbitrary clinical-grade MRIs, thereby contributing to personalized medicine.

Explaining Variation in Individual Aging, Its Sources, and Consequences: A Comprehensive Conceptual Model of Human Aging

We define aging as a characteristic deterioration in one (or more) observable attributes of an organism that typically occurs during later life. With this narrow functional definition, we gain the freedom to separate aging from other processes of age-related change (e.g., maturation, growth, illness, terminal decline). We introduce a structural model that distinguishes between (1) the phenomenon of aging, (2) the subjective experience of aging, (3) sources of aging, and (4) consequences of aging. A core focus of the model is on the role of buffering mechanisms of biological repair and personal adaptation that regulate the relations between sources of aging, aging proper, and its consequences. The quality and level of functioning of these buffering mechanisms also varies across the life span, which directly affects the sources of aging, resulting in either resilience against or accelerated aging, and thus can be considered to be a major source of the variation in aging processes among different individuals. External factors comprising attributes of the physical environment and sociocultural characteristics are considered as contexts in which aging occurs. These contextual factors are assumed to feed into the various components of the model. Our model provides an interdisciplinary account of human aging, its sources and consequences, and also its subjective experience, by integrating biological, psychological, lifestyle, and sociocultural factors, and by specifying their interrelations and interactions. The model provides a comprehensive understanding of individual human aging, its underlying processes, and modulating factors. It allows for the derivation of empirically testable hypotheses, and it helps practitioners to identify elements that lend themselves to targeted intervention efforts aimed at increasing the resilience of individuals against aging and buffering its negative consequences.

Toward MR protocol-agnostic, bias-corrected brain age predicted from clinical-grade MRIs

The predicted brain age minus the chronological age ('brain-PAD') could become a clinical biomarker. However, most brain age methods were developed to use research-grade high-resolution T1-weighted MRIs, limiting their applicability to clinical-grade MRIs from multiple protocols. To overcome this, we adopted a double transfer learning approach to develop a brain age model agnostic to modality, resolution, or slice orientation. Using 6,224 clinical MRIs among 7 modalities, scanned from 1,540 patients using 8 scanners among 15 + facilities of the University of Florida's Health System, we retrained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict brain age from synthetic research-grade magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo MRIs (MPRAGEs) generated by a deep learning-trained 'super-resolution' method. We also modeled the "regression dilution bias", a typical overestimation of younger ages and underestimation of older ages, which correction is paramount for personalized brain age-based biomarkers. This bias was independent of modality or scanner and generalizable to new samples, allowing us to add a bias-correction layer to the CNN. The mean absolute error in test samples was 4.67-6.47 years across modalities, with similar accuracy between original MPRAGEs and their synthetic counterparts. Brain-PAD was also reliable across modalities. We demonstrate the feasibility of clinical-grade brain age predictions, contributing to personalized medicine.

A systematic review of multimodal brain age studies: Uncovering a divergence between model accuracy and utility

Brain aging is a complex, multifaceted process that can be challenging to model in ways that are accurate and clinically useful. One of the most common approaches has been to apply machine learning to neuroimaging data with the goal of predicting age in a data-driven manner. Building on initial brain age studies that were derived solely from T1-weighted scans (i.e., unimodal), recent studies have incorporated features across multiple imaging modalities (i.e., "multimodal"). In this systematic review, we show that unimodal and multimodal models have distinct advantages. Multimodal models are the most accurate and sensitive to differences in chronic brain disorders. In contrast, unimodal models from functional magnetic resonance imaging were most sensitive to differences across a broad array of phenotypes. Altogether, multimodal imaging has provided us valuable insight for improving the accuracy of brain age models, but there is still much untapped potential with regard to achieving widespread clinical utility.