Distinct Target-Specific Mechanisms Homeostatically Stabilize Transmission at Pre- and Post-synaptic Compartments

Excess glutamate release triggers subunit-specific homeostatic receptor scaling

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (GluRs) are targets for modulation in Hebbian and homeostatic synaptic plasticity and are remodeled by development, experience, and disease. We have probed the impact of synaptic glutamate levels on the two postsynaptic GluR subtypes at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction, GluRA and GluRB. We first demonstrate that GluRA and GluRB compete to establish postsynaptic receptive fields, and that proper GluR abundance and composition can be orchestrated in the absence of any synaptic glutamate release. However, excess glutamate adaptively tunes postsynaptic GluR abundance, echoing GluR scaling observed in mammalian systems. Furthermore, when GluRA vs. GluRB competition is eliminated, GluRB becomes insensitive to glutamate modulation. In contrast, GluRA is now homeostatically regulated by excess glutamate to maintain stable miniature activity, where Ca2+ permeability through GluRA receptors is required. Thus, excess glutamate, GluR competition, and Ca2+ signaling collaborate to selectively target GluR subtypes for homeostatic regulation at postsynaptic compartments.

A glutamate receptor C-tail recruits CaMKII to suppress retrograde homeostatic signaling

Presynaptic homeostatic plasticity (PHP) adaptively enhances neurotransmitter release following diminished postsynaptic glutamate receptor (GluR) functionality to maintain synaptic strength. While much is known about PHP expression mechanisms, postsynaptic induction remains enigmatic. For over 20 years, diminished postsynaptic Ca2+ influx was hypothesized to reduce CaMKII activity and enable retrograde PHP signaling at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Here, we have interrogated inductive signaling and find that active CaMKII colocalizes with and requires the GluRIIA receptor subunit. Next, we generated Ca2+-impermeable GluRs to reveal that both CaMKII activity and PHP induction are Ca2+-insensitive. Rather, a GluRIIA C-tail domain is necessary and sufficient to recruit active CaMKII. Finally, chimeric receptors demonstrate that the GluRIIA tail constitutively occludes retrograde homeostatic signaling by stabilizing active CaMKII. Thus, the physical loss of the GluRIIA tail is sensed, rather than reduced Ca2+, to enable retrograde PHP signaling, highlighting a unique, Ca2+-independent control mechanism for CaMKII in gating homeostatic plasticity.

Botulinum neurotoxin accurately separates tonic vs. phasic transmission and reveals heterosynaptic plasticity rules in Drosophila

In developing and mature nervous systems, diverse neuronal subtypes innervate common targets to establish, maintain, and modify neural circuit function. A major challenge towards understanding the structural and functional architecture of neural circuits is to separate these inputs and determine their intrinsic and heterosynaptic relationships. The Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction is a powerful model system to study these questions, where two glutamatergic motor neurons, the strong phasic-like Is and weak tonic-like Ib, co-innervate individual muscle targets to coordinate locomotor behavior. However, complete neurotransmission from each input has never been electrophysiologically separated. We have employed a botulinum neurotoxin, BoNT-C, that eliminates both spontaneous and evoked neurotransmission without perturbing synaptic growth or structure, enabling the first approach that accurately isolates input-specific neurotransmission. Selective expression of BoNT-C in Is or Ib motor neurons disambiguates the functional properties of each input. Importantly, the blended values of Is+Ib neurotransmission can be fully recapitulated by isolated physiology from each input. Finally, selective silencing by BoNT-C does not induce heterosynaptic structural or functional plasticity at the convergent input. Thus, BoNT-C establishes the first approach to accurately separate neurotransmission between tonic vs. phasic neurons and defines heterosynaptic plasticity rules in a powerful model glutamatergic circuit.

Synaptic homeostats: latent plasticity revealed at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction

Homeostatic signaling systems are fundamental forms of biological regulation that maintain stable functionality in a changing environment. In the nervous system, synapses are crucial substrates for homeostatic modulation, serving to establish, maintain, and modify the balance of excitation and inhibition. Synapses must be sufficiently flexible to enable the plasticity required for learning and memory but also endowed with the stability to last a lifetime. In response to the processes of development, growth, remodeling, aging, and disease that challenge synapses, latent forms of adaptive plasticity become activated to maintain synaptic stability. In recent years, new insights into the homeostatic control of synaptic function have been achieved using the powerful Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ). This review will focus on work over the past 10 years that has illuminated the cellular and molecular mechanisms of five homeostats that operate at the fly NMJ. These homeostats adapt to loss of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor functionality, glutamate imbalance, axonal injury, as well as aberrant synaptic growth and target innervation. These diverse homeostats work independently yet can be simultaneously expressed to balance neurotransmission. Growing evidence from this model glutamatergic synapse suggests these ancient homeostatic signaling systems emerged early in evolution and are fundamental forms of plasticity that also function to stabilize mammalian cholinergic NMJs and glutamatergic central synapses.

Structural and Functional Synaptic Plasticity Induced by Convergent Synapse Loss in the Drosophila Neuromuscular Circuit

Throughout the nervous system, the convergence of two or more presynaptic inputs on a target cell is commonly observed. The question we ask here is to what extent converging inputs influence each other's structural and functional synaptic plasticity. In complex circuits, isolating individual inputs is difficult because postsynaptic cells can receive thousands of inputs. An ideal model to address this question is the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) where each postsynaptic muscle cell receives inputs from two glutamatergic types of motor neurons (MNs), known as 1b and 1s MNs. Notably, each muscle is unique and receives input from a different combination of 1b and 1s MNs; we surveyed multiple muscles for this reason. Here, we identified a cell-specific promoter that allows ablation of 1s MNs postinnervation and measured structural and functional responses of convergent 1b NMJs using microscopy and electrophysiology. For all muscles examined in both sexes, ablation of 1s MNs resulted in NMJ expansion and increased spontaneous neurotransmitter release at corresponding 1b NMJs. This demonstrates that 1b NMJs can compensate for the loss of convergent 1s MNs. However, only a subset of 1b NMJs showed compensatory evoked neurotransmission, suggesting target-specific plasticity. Silencing 1s MNs led to similar plasticity at 1b NMJs, suggesting that evoked neurotransmission from 1s MNs contributes to 1b synaptic plasticity. Finally, we genetically blocked 1s innervation in male larvae and robust 1b synaptic plasticity was eliminated, raising the possibility that 1s NMJ formation is required to set up a reference for subsequent synaptic perturbations.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In complex neural circuits, multiple convergent inputs contribute to the activity of the target cell, but whether synaptic plasticity exists among these inputs has not been thoroughly explored. In this study, we examined synaptic plasticity in the structurally and functionally tractable Drosophila larval neuromuscular system. In this convergent circuit, each muscle is innervated by a unique pair of motor neurons. Removal of one neuron after innervation causes the adjacent neuron to increase neuromuscular junction outgrowth and functional output. However, this is not a general feature as each motor neuron differentially compensates. Further, robust compensation requires initial coinnervation by both neurons. Understanding how neurons respond to perturbations in adjacent neurons will provide insight into nervous system plasticity in both healthy and disease states.

Disruption of Cholinergic Circuits as an Area for Targeted Drug Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: In Vivo Assessment of Short-Term Plasticity in Rat Brain

The search for new therapeutics for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is still in progress. Aberrant pathways of synaptic transmission in basal forebrain cholinergic neural circuits are thought to be associated with the progression of AD. However, the effect of amyloid-beta (Aβ) on short-term plasticity (STP) of cholinergic circuits in the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) is largely unknown. STP assessment in rat brain cholinergic circuitry may indicate a new target for AD cholinergic therapeutics. Thus, we aimed to study in vivo electrophysiological patterns of synaptic activity in NBM-hippocampus and NBM-basolateral amygdala circuits associated with AD-like neurodegeneration. The extracellular single-unit recordings of responses from the hippocampal and basolateral amygdala neurons to high-frequency stimulation (HFS) of the NBM were performed after intracerebroventricular injection of Aβ 25–35. We found that after Aβ 25–35 exposure the number of hippocampal neurons exhibiting inhibitory responses to HFS of NBM is decreased. The reverse tendency was seen in the basolateral amygdala inhibitory neural populations, whereas the number of amygdala neurons with excitatory responses decreased. The low intensity of inhibitory and excitatory responses during HFS and post-stimulus period is probably due to the anomalous basal synaptic transmission and excitability of hippocampal and amygdala neurons. These functional changes were accompanied by structural alteration of hippocampal, amygdala, and NBM neurons. We have thus demonstrated that Aβ 25–35 induces STP disruption in NBM-hippocampus and NBM-basolateral amygdala circuits as manifested by unbalanced excitatory/inhibitory responses and their frequency. The results of this study may contribute to a better understanding of synaptic integrity. We believe that advancing our understanding of in vivo mechanisms of synaptic plasticity disruption in specific neural circuits could lead to effective drug searches for AD treatment.