Acute Kidney Injury and Intestinal Dysbiosis

Investigating gut microbiota-blood and urine metabolite correlations in early sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: insights from targeted KEGG analyses

Background

The interplay between gut microbiota and metabolites in the early stages of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is not yet clearly understood. This study explores the characteristics and interactions of gut microbiota, and blood and urinary metabolites in patients with SA-AKI.

Methods

Utilizing a prospective observational approach, we conducted comparative analyses of gut microbiota and metabolites via metabolomics and metagenomics in individuals diagnosed with SA-AKI compared to those without AKI (NCT06197828). Pearson correlations were used to identify associations between microbiota, metabolites, and clinical indicators. The Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database was employed to detect antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), while Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways informed on metabolic processes and microbial resistance patterns.

Results

Our study included analysis of four patients with SA-AKI and five without AKI. Significant disparities in bacterial composition were observed, illustrated by diversity indices (Shannon index: 2.0 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6, P = 0.230; Simpson index: 0.8 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2, P = 0.494) between the SA-AKI group and the non-AKI group. N6, N6, N6-Trimethyl-L-lysine was detected in both blood and urine metabolites, and also showed significant correlations with specific gut microbiota (Campylobacter hominis and Bacteroides caccae, R > 0, P < 0.05). Both blood and urine metabolites were enriched in the lysine degradation pathway. We also identified the citrate cycle (TCA cycle) as a KEGG pathway enriched in sets of differentially expressed ARGs in the gut microbiota, which exhibits an association with lysine degradation.

Conclusions

Significant differences in gut microbiota and metabolites were observed between the SA-AKI and non-AKI groups, uncovering potential biomarkers and metabolic changes linked to SA-AKI. The lysine degradation pathway may serve as a crucial link connecting gut microbiota and metabolites.

The causal association of specific gut microbiota on the risk of membranous nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study

PURPOSE

Gut microbiota transplantation has been reported to improve the renal function of membranous nephropathy (MN). However, whether there is a causal effect of gut microbiota on MN remained unclear.

METHODS

We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the main approach to evaluate the causal relationship between gut microbiota and MN. Additional methods including MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and MR-weighted mode were also conducted. Cochrane's Q test, MR-Egger regression, and MR-PRESSO were employed to detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 196 gut microbiota were examined. After IVW and sensitivity analysis, eight gut bacteria taxa were observed causal effects on the risk of MN. Specifically, Genus. Oscillibacter was a protective factor (OR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.328-0.979; P = 0.042), while Class. Melainabacteria (OR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.004-2.277; P = 0.048), Genus. Butyricicoccus (OR: 2.16; 95% CI 1.005-4.621; P = 0.048), Genus. Catenibacterium (OR: 1.49; 95% CI 1.043-2.134; P = 0.028), Genus.Ruminiclostridium5 (OR: 1.74; 95% CI 1.053-2.862; P = 0.030), Genus. Ruminococcaceae UCG-003 (OR: 1.73; 95% CI 1.110-2.692; P = 0.015), Order. Bacillales (OR: 1.52; 95% CI 1.135-2.025; P = 0.0048) and Order. Gastranaerophilales (OR: 1.45; 95% CI 1.010-2.085; P = 0.044) were risk factors. Heterogeneity was not significant for most single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and no statistical difference in pleiotropy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study first indicated the causal association between specific gut microbiota and MN, which would be of great significance to guide clinical prevention and treatment in MN.

Blood transfusion reactions and risk of acute kidney injury and major adverse kidney events

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion reactions may have a negative impact on organ function. It is unknown whether this association holds true for acute kidney injury (AKI). Therefore, we conducted a cohort study to assess the association between transfusion reactions and the incidence of AKI and major adverse kidney events.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients who received transfusion of blood products during hospitalization at the Hospital Civil of Guadalajara. We analyzed them according to the development of transfusion reactions, and the aim was to assess the association between transfusion reactions and AKI during long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2021, 81,635 patients received a blood product transfusion, and 516 were included in our study. The most common transfusion was red blood cell packaging (50.4%), fresh frozen plasma (28.7%) and platelets (20.9%); of the 516 patients, 129 (25%) had transfusion reactions. Patients who had transfusion reactions were older and had more comorbidities. The most common type of transfusion reaction was allergic reaction (70.5%), followed by febrile nonhemolytic reaction (11.6%) and anaphylactoid reaction (8.5%). Most cases were considered mild. Acute kidney injury was more prevalent among those who had transfusion reactions (14.7%) than among those who did not (7.8%), p =  < 0.01; those with AKI had a higher frequency of diabetes, vasopressors, and insulin use. Transfusion reactions were independently associated with the development of AKI (RR 2.1, p =  < 0.02). Major adverse kidney events were more common in those with transfusion reactions. The mortality rate was similar between subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective cohort of patients who received blood product transfusions, 25% experienced transfusion reactions, and this event was associated with a twofold increase in the probability of developing AKI and some of the major adverse kidney events during long follow-up.

Probiotics in septic acute kidney injury, a double blind, randomized control trial

INTRODUCTION

During acute kidney injury (AKI) due to sepsis, the intestinal microbiota changes to dysbiosis, which affects the kidney function recovery (KFR) and amplifies the injury. Therefore, the administration of probiotics could improve dysbiosis and thereby increase the probability of KFR.

METHODS

In this double-blind clinical trial, patients with AKI associated with sepsis were randomized (1:1) to receive probiotics or placebo for 7 consecutive days, with the objectives of evaluate the effect on KFR, mortality, kidney replacement therapy (KRT), urea, urine volume, serum electrolytes and adverse events at day 7.

RESULTS

From February 2019 to March 2022, a total of 92 patients were randomized, 48 to the Probiotic and 44 to Placebo group. When comparing with placebo, those in the Probiotics did not observe a higher KFR (HR 0.93, 0.52-1.68, p = 0.81), nor was there a benefit in mortality at 6 months (95% CI 0.32-1.04, p = 0.06). With probiotics, urea values decreased significantly, an event not observed with placebo (from 154 to 80 mg/dl, p = 0.04 and from 130 to 109 mg/dl, p = 0.09, respectively). Urinary volume, need for KRT, electrolyte abnormalities, and adverse events were similar between groups. (ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03877081) (registered 03/15/2019).

CONCLUSION

In AKI related to sepsis, probiotics for 7 consecutive days did not increase the probability of KFR, nor did other variables related to clinical improvement, although they were safe.