1
|
Kutsche J, Taylor JJ, Erkkinen MG, Akkad H, Khosravani S, Drew W, Abraham A, Ott DVM, Wall J, Cohen AL, Horn A, Neumann WJ, Kletenik I, Fox MD. Mapping Neuroimaging Findings of Creativity and Brain Disease Onto a Common Brain Circuit. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e2459297. [PMID: 39946133 PMCID: PMC11826368 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 12/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance Creativity is important for problem solving, adaptation to a changing environment, and innovation. Neuroimaging studies seeking to map creativity have yielded conflicting results, and studies of patients with brain disease have reported both decreases and paradoxical increases in creativity, leaving the neural basis of creativity unclear. Objective To investigate the brain circuit underlying creativity and assess its association with brain injury and neurodegenerative disease. Design, Setting, and Participants This study examined neuroimaging coordinates from a meta-analysis of 36 studies published between 2004 and 2019 associated with increased activity during creative tasks in healthy participants. A validated method termed coordinate network mapping and a database of resting-state functional connectivity from 1000 healthy individuals were used to test whether these coordinates mapped to a common brain circuit. Specificity was assessed through comparison to random coordinates and coordinates from working memory tasks in healthy participants. Reproducibility was assessed using an independent dataset of coordinates from additional studies of creativity in healthy participants. Finally, alignment with effects of focal brain damage on creativity was tested using data from patients with brain lesions and coordinates of brain atrophy from 7 different neurodegenerative disorders. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were creativity or no creativity and alignment with a creativity circuit or no alignment. Results Creativity tasks activated heterogenous locations, with coordinates scattered across many different brain regions (415 coordinates derived from 857 healthy participants; pooled mean [SD] age, 24.1 [6.91] years; 461 [54%] female). However, these activation coordinates were part of a common brain circuit, defined by negative connectivity to the right frontal pole. This result was consistent across creative domains, reproducible in an independent dataset (383 coordinates derived from 691 participants) and specific to creativity when compared with random gray matter coordinates (n = 415) or coordinates activated by working memory tasks (3072 coordinates derived from 2900 healthy participants). Damage to this creativity circuit by lesions (n = 56 patients) or neurodegenerative disease (2262 coordinates derived from 4804 patients) aligned with both decreases and increases in creativity observed in these disorders. Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this study suggest that brain regions activated by creativity tasks map to a brain circuit defined by negative functional connectivity to the right frontal pole. Damage to this circuit aligned with changes in creativity observed in individuals with certain brain diseases, including paradoxical creativity increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Kutsche
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph J. Taylor
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael G. Erkkinen
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Haya Akkad
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sanaz Khosravani
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William Drew
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna Abraham
- Department of Educational Psychology, Mary Frances Early College of Education, University of Georgia, Athens
| | - Derek V. M. Ott
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Juliana Wall
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander Li Cohen
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isaiah Kletenik
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael D. Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chea M, Pichon B, Migeot H, Bayen E. Art, as a hyphen between health professionals and individuals in rehabilitation after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2022; 65:101658. [PMID: 35272064 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maryane Chea
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, APHP, Paris, France; GRC 24, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Pichon
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, APHP, Paris, France; GRC 24, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Migeot
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, APHP, Paris, France; GRC 24, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Eléonore Bayen
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, APHP, Paris, France; GRC 24, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale - Inserm U1146, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Global Brain Health Institute, Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Puranik N, Arukha AP, Yadav SK, Yadav D, Jin JO. Exploring the Role of Stem Cell Therapy in Treating Neurodegenerative Diseases: Challenges and Current Perspectives. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2022; 17:113-125. [PMID: 35135462 DOI: 10.2174/1574888x16666210810103838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
:
Several human neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease,
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and brain
stroke, are caused by the injury to neurons or glial cells. The recent years have witnessed the successful
generation of neurons and glia cells driving efforts to develop stem-cell-based therapies for
patients to combat a broad spectrum of human neurological diseases. The inadequacy of suitable
cell types for cell replacement therapy in patients suffering from neurological disorders has hampered
the development of this promising therapeutic approach. Attempts are thus being made to reconstruct
viable neurons and glial cells from different stem cells, such as embryonic stem cells,
mesenchymal stem cells, and neural stem cells. Dedicated research to cultivate stem cell-based
brain transplantation therapies has been carried out. We aim at compiling the breakthroughs in the
field of stem cell-based therapy for the treatment of neurodegenerative maladies, emphasizing the
shortcomings faced, victories achieved, and the future prospects of the therapy in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Puranik
- Department of Biological Science, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641046, India
| | - Ananta Prasad Arukha
- Comparative Diagnostic
and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville- 32608, U.S.A
| | - Shiv Kumar Yadav
- Department of Botany, Government Lal Bahadur Shastri PG college, Sironj, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Dhananjay Yadav
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea
| | - Jun O. Jin
- Department
of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea
- Research Institute of Cell Culture, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lahiri D, Cappa SF. Left hemispheric stroke in a professional artist: A prospective case study. Cortex 2021; 138:203-211. [PMID: 33711771 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Several papers have investigated the effect of stroke on creativity. While initial evidence favored right hemispheric dominance in artwork creation, subsequent well-founded research has established the left hemispheric participation in creativity, supporting the idea of bi-hemispheric role in artistic production. We here describe the case of a renowned artist who suffered a left hemispheric ischemic stroke involving the occipito-temporal region and subsequently manifested several difficulties in producing visual artworks. We documented his recovery phases in a prospective way during the initial months following stroke and observed that, although his constructional abilities recovered to a significant extent over 3 months, spontaneous creation was persistently impaired. The right hemispheric role in visual art is linked mainly to visuo-spatial skills and global attention, while left hemispheric participation is thought to be related to focal attention and visual imagery. Our case study lends support to the idea that art is a bi-hemispheric function with important complementary contributions from both the right and left hemisphere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durjoy Lahiri
- Neurology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India; Neurology, Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - Stefano F Cappa
- University School for Advanced Studies (IUSS), Pavia, Italy; IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|