μVEMP: A Portable Interface to Record Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) With a Smart Phone or Tablet

Using macular velocity measurements to relate parameters of bone conduction to vestibular compound action potential responses

To examine mechanisms responsible for vestibular afferent sensitivity to transient bone conducted vibration, we performed simultaneous measurements of stimulus-evoked vestibular compound action potentials (vCAPs), utricular macula velocity, and vestibular microphonics (VMs) in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Results provide new insights into the kinematic variables of transient motion responsible for triggering mammalian vCAPs, revealing synchronized vestibular afferent responses are not universally sensitive to linear jerk as previously thought. For short duration stimuli (< 1 ms), the vCAP increases magnitude in close proportion to macular velocity and temporal bone (linear) acceleration, rather than other kinematic elements. For longer duration stimuli, the vCAP magnitude switches from temporal bone acceleration sensitive to linear jerk sensitive while maintaining macular velocity sensitivity. Frequency tuning curves evoked by tone-burst stimuli show vCAPs increase in proportion to onset macular velocity, while VMs increase in proportion to macular displacement across the entire frequency bandwidth tested between 0.1 and 2 kHz. The subset of vestibular afferent neurons responsible for synchronized firing and vCAPs have been shown previously to make calyceal synaptic contacts with type I hair cells in the striolar region of the epithelium and have irregularly spaced inter-spike intervals at rest. Present results provide new insight into mechanical and neural mechanisms underlying synchronized action potentials in these sensitive afferents, with clinical relevance for understanding the activation and tuning of neurons responsible for driving rapid compensatory reflex responses.

A mathematical model for mechanical activation and compound action potential generation by the utricle in response to sound and vibration

Introduction

Calyx bearing vestibular afferent neurons innervating type I hair cells in the striolar region of the utricle are exquisitely sensitive to auditory-frequency air conducted sound (ACS) and bone conducted vibration (BCV). Here, we present experimental data and a mathematical model of utricular mechanics and vestibular compound action potential generation (vCAP) in response to clinically relevant levels of ACS and BCV. Vibration of the otoconial layer relative to the sensory epithelium was simulated using a Newtonian two-degree-of-freedom spring-mass-damper system, action potential timing was simulated using an empirical model, and vCAPs were simulated by convolving responses of the population of sensitive neurons with an empirical extracellular voltage kernel. The model was validated by comparison to macular vibration and vCAPs recorded in the guinea pig, in vivo.

Results

Transient stimuli evoked short-latency vCAPs that scaled in magnitude and timing with hair bundle mechanical shear rate for both ACS and BCV. For pulse BCV stimuli with durations &lt;0.8 ms, the vCAP magnitude increased in proportion to temporal bone acceleration, but for pulse durations &gt;0.9 ms the magnitude increased in proportion to temporal bone jerk. Once validated using ACS and BCV data, the model was applied to predict blast-induced hair bundle shear, with results predicting acute mechanical damage to bundles immediately upon exposure.

Discussion

Results demonstrate the switch from linear acceleration to linear jerk as the adequate stimulus arises entirely from mechanical factors controlling the dynamics of sensory hair bundle deflection. The model describes the switch in terms of the mechanical natural frequencies of vibration, which vary between species based on morphology and mechanical factors.

Vestibular function testing in the 21st century: video head impulse test, vestibular evoked myogenic potential, video nystagmography; which tests will provide answers?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To most neurologists, assessing the patient with vertigo is an unpleasant and worrisome task. A structured history and focused examination can be complemented by carefully selected laboratory tests, to reach an early and accurate diagnosis. We provide evidence-based recommendations for vestibular test selection.

RECENT FINDINGS

The video head impulse test (vHIT), cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) and home-video nystagmography are four modern, noninvasive methods of assessing vestibular function, which are equally applicable in the hospital and office-practice. Collectively, they enable assessment of all five vestibular end-organs. The prevalence and patterns of test abnormalities are distinct for each vestibular disorder. We summarize typical abnormalities encountered in four common vestibular syndromes.

SUMMARY

In the context of acute vestibular syndrome, an abnormal vHIT with low gain and large amplitude refixation saccades and an asymmetric oVEMP separates innocuous vestibular neuritis from stroke. In episodic spontaneous vertigo, high-velocity ictal nystagmus and asymmetric cVEMP help separate Ménière's disease from vestibular migraine. In chronic imbalance, all three tests help detect unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss as the root cause. Recurrent positional vertigo requires no laboratory test and can be diagnosed and treated at the bedside, guided by video nystagmography.

Rare Disorders of the Vestibular Labyrinth: of Zebras, Chameleons and Wolves in Sheep's Clothing

The differential diagnosis of vertigo syndromes is a challenging issue, as many - and in particular - rare disorders of the vestibular labyrinth can hide behind the very common symptoms of "vertigo" and "dizziness". The following article presents an overview of those rare disorders of the balance organ that are of special interest for the otorhinolaryngologist dealing with vertigo disorders. For a better orientation, these disorders are categorized as acute (AVS), episodic (EVS) and chronic vestibular syndromes (CVS) according to their clinical presentation. The main focus lies on EVS sorted by their duration and the presence/absence of triggering factors (seconds, no triggers: vestibular paroxysmia, Tumarkin attacks; seconds, sound and pressure induced: "third window" syndromes; seconds to minutes, positional: rare variants and differential diagnoses of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; hours to days, spontaneous: intralabyrinthine schwannomas, endolymphatic sac tumors, autoimmune disorders of the inner ear). Furthermore, rare causes of AVS (inferior vestibular neuritis, otolith organ specific dysfunction, vascular labyrinthine disorders, acute bilateral vestibulopathy) and CVS (chronic bilateral vestibulopathy) are covered. In each case, special emphasis is laid on the decisive diagnostic test for the identification of the rare disease and "red flags" for potentially dangerous disorders (e. g. labyrinthine infarction/hemorrhage). Thus, this chapter may serve as a clinical companion for the otorhinolaryngologist aiding in the efficient diagnosis and treatment of rare disorders of the vestibular labyrinth.

Static and dynamic otolith reflex function in people with Parkinson's disease

PURPOSE

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction. This study reports the transient and sustained functions of the otoliths and their reflex pathways in PD compared to healthy controls (HC) and determines if otolith function relates to previous fall history.

METHODS

Forty participants with PD and 40 HC had their otolith function assessed. Transient saccular and utricular-mediated reflexes were assessed by cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs, respectively) elicited by air-conducted stimulus (clicks) and bone-conducted vibration (light tendon hammer taps). Static otolith function was assessed by the Curator Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test.

RESULTS

Compared to HC, the PD group had significantly more absent cVEMP responses to both clicks (47.5% vs. 30%, respectively, p = 0.03) and taps (21.8% vs. 5%, respectively, p = 0.002). Only the PD group had bilaterally absent tap cVEMPs, this was related to previous falls history (p < 0. 001). In both groups, click oVEMPs were predominantly absent, and tap oVEMPs were predominantly present. The PD group had smaller tap oVEMP amplitudes (p = 0.03) and recorded more abnormal SVV responses (p = 0.01) and greater error on SVV compared to HC, p < 0.001. SVV had no relationship with VEMP responses (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

PD impacts on cVEMP reflex pathways but not tap oVEMP reflex pathways. Bone-conducted otolith stimuli (taps) are more robust than air-conducted sound stimuli (clicks) for both o and cVEMPs. A lack of association between SVV and VEMP responses suggest that static and dynamic otolith functions are differentially affected in PD.

Evidence-based diagnostic use of VEMPs : From neurophysiological principles to clinical application

BACKGROUND

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are increasingly being used for testing otolith organ function.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the anatomical, biomechanical and neurophysiological principles underlying the evidence-based clinical application of ocular and cervical VEMPs (oVEMPs and cVEMPs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature search in PubMed until April 2019.

RESULTS

Sound and vibration at a frequency of 500 Hz represent selective vestibular stimuli for the otolith organs. The predominant specificity of oVEMPs for contralateral utricular function and of cVEMPs for ipsilateral saccular function is defined by the different central projections of utricular and saccular afferents. VEMPs are particularly useful in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence and otolith organ specific vestibular dysfunction and as an alternative diagnostic approach in situations when video oculography is not possible or useful.

CONCLUSION

The use of VEMPs is a simple, safe, reliable and selective test of dynamic function of otolith organs.

Optimization of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing Using an Impulse Hammer in Adults, Adolescents, and Children

OBJECTIVE

To characterize cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP) responses using an impulse hammer (IH) in adults and pediatrics at standardized force levels and evaluate: the relationship of force level on VEMP amplitude, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction on cVEMP amplitude, required number of tap stimuli, and subject comfort. Using these data, optimal testing parameters were selected.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-eight healthy adults, adolescents, and children with no hearing or vestibular deficits.

INTERVENTIONS

All subjects received c- and oVEMP testing using IH and 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. Adults received hard, medium, and soft force levels. Adolescents and children received medium and soft force levels. A comfort questionnaire was administered pre- and post-testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

IH VEMP response parameters (response rates, latency, cVEMP pre-stimulus SCM Electromyography [EMG], and peak-to-peak amplitude) were assessed per force level. Subjective reporting for patient comfort was also assessed.

RESULTS

VEMP response rates ranged from 92 to 100%. Force had a linear relationship with VEMP amplitude. SCM contraction had a linear relationship with raw cVEMP amplitude; however, dissipated with amplitude normalization. Force level did not impact the number of taps needed. A minimum peak force of 15 to 20 N, accounting for SCM contraction, and using a lower EMG monitoring limit for cVEMP is recommended to elicit reliable responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, IH VEMP is appropriate and comfortable to use in adults and pediatrics and can be useful when an air conduction stimulus is contraindicated or not preferred.

[Evidence-based diagnostic use of VEMPs : From neurophysiological principles to clinical application. German version]

BACKGROUND

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are increasingly being used for testing otolith organ function.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the anatomical, biomechanical and neurophysiological principles of an evidence-based clinical application of ocular and cervical VEMPs (oVEMPs and cVEMPs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature search in PubMed until April 2019.

RESULTS

Sound and vibration at a frequency of 500 Hz represent selective vestibular stimuli for the otolith organs. The predominant specificity of oVEMPs for contralateral utricular function and of cVEMPs for ipsilateral saccular function is defined by the different neuronal projections of the utricle and the saccule. VEMPs are particularly useful in the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence and otolith organ-specific vestibular dysfunction and as an alternative diagnostic approach in situations when video oculography is not possible or useful.

CONCLUSION

The use of VEMPs is a simple, safe, reliable and selective test of dynamic function of otolith organs.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in practice: Methods, pitfalls and clinical applications

•

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are used to test the otolith organs in patients with vertigo and imbalance.

•

This review discusses the optimal procedures for recording VEMPs and the pitfalls commonly encountered by clinicians.

•

Better understanding of VEMP methodology should lead to improved quality of recordings.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are a useful and increasingly popular component of the neuro-otology test battery. These otolith-dependent reflexes are produced by stimulating the ears with air-conducted sound or skull vibration and recorded from surface electrodes placed over the neck (cervical VEMPs) and eye muscles (ocular VEMPs). VEMP abnormalities have been reported in various diseases of the ear and vestibular system, and VEMPs have a clear role in the diagnosis of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. However there is significant variability in the methods used to stimulate the otoliths and record the reflexes. This review discusses VEMP methodology and provides a detailed theoretical background for the techniques that are typically used. The review also outlines the common pitfalls in VEMP recording and the clinical applications of VEMPs.