Pipeline Embolization Device for Salvage Treatment of a Willis Covered Stent Prolapse Into the Aneurysmal Sac

Comparison of a covered stent and pipeline embolization device in intracranial aneurysm: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The Willis covered stent (WCS) and pipeline embolization device (PED) have partly overlapping therapeutic indications. However, the differences of effect between these two treatments remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical outcome, angiographic outcome, and complications following treatment with a WCS versus PED.

METHODS

Patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by a WCS or PED between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. The primary outcomes were complications, clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2), and angiographic outcome (incomplete aneurysm occlusion). Propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 94 aneurysms treated by WCS and 698 aneurysms by PED were included. Compared with the PED group, patients in the WCS group are younger, a greater number have a poor condition at admission, a larger proportion of ruptured, non-saccular, and anterior circulation aneurysms, a smaller aneurysm neck width, and less coiling assistance is required. A total of 42 (44.7%) branches were covered by WCS. After adjustment for age, sex, aneurysm type, rupture status, neck size, aneurysm location, and coiling, 50 WCS and PED pairs were examined for internal carotid artery aneurysms. No significant differences were observed in clinical (10.4% vs 2.1%, P=0.206) and angiographic outcomes (12.8% vs 18.2%, P=0.713). However, 27 branches covered by WCS, including 22 ophthalmic arteries and five posterior communicating arteries. Patients in the WCS group had a higher intraoperative complication rate than those in the PED group (28% vs 6%, P=0.008), especially in the occlusion rate of covered branches (51.9% vs 11.1%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes of WCS or PED demonstrate the therapeutic potential of WCS as a viable alternative for aneurysms. However, the complication of occlusion of covered branches might not be negligible.

Comaneci stent-angioplasty for the optimization of inadequately deployed flow diverter stents

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In endovascular procedures, inadequate deployment of a flow diverter stent is a highly concerning technical complication that can lead to acute parent vessel occlusion and ischaemic events. This study aimed to assess the off-label use of the Comaneci device in managing technical difficulties associated with flow diversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted an analysis of all flow diverter procedures documented in our prospectively collected database. Our objective was to identify patients with inadequately deployed implants who underwent Comaneci stent-angioplasty. Both Comaneci 17 and Comaneci 21 devices were utilized to address and remediate technical complications related to stent deployment. We reviewed anatomical features, technical details, intraprocedural complications, as well as clinical and angiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-one Comaneci devices were employed to remediate 31 inadequately deployed flow diverter stents. Successful resolution of technical complications associated with flow diverter placement was achieved in all attempted cases. No clinically significant complications were attributed to the technique, and no mortality was observed during the study.

CONCLUSION

Technical issues arising from flow diverter stent deployment are formidable complications. Familiarity with appropriate corrective manoeuvres is essential to achieve successful outcomes. The Comaneci device can be safely and effectively incorporated into the range of techniques used to rectify inadequately deployed stents.