1
|
Flanagan EP, Geschwind MD, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Blackburn KM, Turaga S, Binks S, Zitser J, Gelfand JM, Day GS, Dunham SR, Rodenbeck SJ, Clardy SL, Solomon AJ, Pittock SJ, McKeon A, Dubey D, Zekeridou A, Toledano M, Turner LE, Vernino S, Irani SR. Autoimmune Encephalitis Misdiagnosis in Adults. JAMA Neurol 2023; 80:30-39. [PMID: 36441519 PMCID: PMC9706400 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Importance Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis can lead to harm. Objective To determine the diseases misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis and potential reasons for misdiagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective multicenter study took place from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at autoimmune encephalitis subspecialty outpatient clinics including Mayo Clinic (n = 44), University of Oxford (n = 18), University of Texas Southwestern (n = 18), University of California, San Francisco (n = 17), University of Washington in St Louis (n = 6), and University of Utah (n = 4). Inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥18 years) with a prior autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis at a participating center or other medical facility and a subsequent alternative diagnosis at a participating center. A total of 393 patients were referred with an autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis, and of those, 286 patients with true autoimmune encephalitis were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures Data were collected on clinical features, investigations, fulfillment of autoimmune encephalitis criteria, alternative diagnoses, potential contributors to misdiagnosis, and immunotherapy adverse reactions. Results A total of 107 patients were misdiagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, and 77 (72%) did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. The median (IQR) age was 48 (35.5-60.5) years and 65 (61%) were female. Correct diagnoses included functional neurologic disorder (27 [25%]), neurodegenerative disease (22 [20.5%]), primary psychiatric disease (19 [18%]), cognitive deficits from comorbidities (11 [10%]), cerebral neoplasm (10 [9.5%]), and other (18 [17%]). Onset was acute/subacute in 56 (52%) or insidious (>3 months) in 51 (48%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was suggestive of encephalitis in 19 of 104 patients (18%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis occurred in 16 of 84 patients (19%). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were elevated in 24 of 62 patients (39%). Positive neural autoantibodies were more frequent in serum than CSF (48 of 105 [46%] vs 7 of 91 [8%]) and included 1 or more of GAD65 (n = 14), voltage-gated potassium channel complex (LGI1 and CASPR2 negative) (n = 10), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor by cell-based assay only (n = 10; 6 negative in CSF), and other (n = 18). Adverse reactions from immunotherapies occurred in 17 of 84 patients (20%). Potential contributors to misdiagnosis included overinterpretation of positive serum antibodies (53 [50%]), misinterpretation of functional/psychiatric, or nonspecific cognitive dysfunction as encephalopathy (41 [38%]). Conclusions and Relevance When evaluating for autoimmune encephalitis, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered and misdiagnosis occurs in many settings including at specialized centers. In this study, red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses included an insidious onset, positive nonspecific serum antibody, and failure to fulfill autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic criteria. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis leads to morbidity from unnecessary immunotherapies and delayed treatment of the correct diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin P. Flanagan
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael D. Geschwind
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco
| | | | - Kyle M. Blackburn
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Sanchit Turaga
- Autoimmune Neurology Group, West Wing, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Binks
- Autoimmune Neurology Group, West Wing, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Zitser
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv Sourazky Medical Center, Affiliate of Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jeffrey M. Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco
| | - Gregory S. Day
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | - Sean J. Pittock
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrew McKeon
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Divyanshu Dubey
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anastasia Zekeridou
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michel Toledano
- Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lindsey E. Turner
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Steven Vernino
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Sarosh R. Irani
- Autoimmune Neurology Group, West Wing, Level 3, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu W, Hu Z, Zhou X, Chen L, Wang M, Zhu Y, Qi Y. Establishment and evaluation of a prediction model for acute gastrointestinal injury in patients with prolonged disorder of consciousness. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:440. [PMID: 36284270 PMCID: PMC9594903 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02536-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To establish a prediction model for acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) in patients with prolonged disorder of consciousness (pDOC) and to evaluate and apply the prediction model. Methods The clinical data of 165 patients with pDOC admitted to the hyperbaric oxygen department from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were divided into an AGI group (n = 91) and an N-AGI group (n = 74) according to whether AGI occurred. A prediction model was built by fitting multiple independent influencing factors through logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of the model, the Hosmer–Lemeshow (H–L) test was used to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the model, and the ROC curve and calibration curve were drawn to evaluate the predictive performance. A nomogram was plotted to visualize the prediction model. Results According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis results, the prediction model was finally constructed with the CRS-R score, DAO, PCT, ALB, and I-FABP, and a nomogram was generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.931, the sensitivity was 83.5%, and the specificity was 93.2%. The data were divided into 5 groups for the H–L test (χ2 = 2.54, P = 0.468 > 0.05) and into 10 groups for the H–L test (χ2 = 9.98, P = 0.267 > 0.05). A calibration curve was drawn based on the test results, indicating that the prediction model has a good goodness-of-fit and good prediction stability. Conclusion The prediction model for AGI in pDOC patients constructed in this study can be used in clinical practice and is helpful to predict the occurrence of AGI in pDOC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenpei Fu
- Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China
| | - Zhihang Hu
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Second People' S Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China
| | - Xiaomei Zhou
- Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China
| | - Mei Wang
- Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China
| | - Yingying Zhu
- Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China
| | - Yinliang Qi
- Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parodi B, Kerlero de Rosbo N. The Gut-Brain Axis in Multiple Sclerosis. Is Its Dysfunction a Pathological Trigger or a Consequence of the Disease? Front Immunol 2021; 12:718220. [PMID: 34621267 PMCID: PMC8490747 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.718220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A large and expending body of evidence indicates that the gut-brain axis likely plays a crucial role in neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). As a whole, the gut-brain axis can be considered as a bi-directional multi-crosstalk pathway that governs the interaction between the gut microbiota and the organism. Perturbation in the commensal microbial population, referred to as dysbiosis, is frequently associated with an increased intestinal permeability, or "leaky gut", which allows the entrance of exogeneous molecules, in particular bacterial products and metabolites, that can disrupt tissue homeostasis and induce inflammation, promoting both local and systemic immune responses. An altered gut microbiota could therefore have significant repercussions not only on immune responses in the gut but also in distal effector immune sites such as the CNS. Indeed, the dysregulation of this bi-directional communication as a consequence of dysbiosis has been implicated as playing a possible role in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases. In multiple sclerosis (MS), the gut-brain axis is increasingly being considered as playing a crucial role in its pathogenesis, with a major focus on specific gut microbiota alterations associated with the disease. In both MS and its purported murine model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), gastrointestinal symptoms and/or an altered gut microbiota have been reported together with increased intestinal permeability. In both EAE and MS, specific components of the microbiota have been shown to modulate both effector and regulatory T-cell responses and therefore disease progression, and EAE experiments with germ-free and specific pathogen-free mice transferred with microbiota associated or not with disease have clearly demonstrated the possible role of the microbiota in disease pathogenesis and/or progression. Here, we review the evidence that can point to two possible consequences of the gut-brain axis dysfunction in MS and EAE: 1. A pro-inflammatory intestinal environment and "leaky" gut induced by dysbiosis could lead to an altered communication with the CNS through the cholinergic afferent fibers, thereby contributing to CNS inflammation and disease pathogenesis; and 2. Neuroinflammation affecting efferent cholinergic transmission could result in intestinal inflammation as disease progresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetta Parodi
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology and Maternal-Fetal Medicine (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nicole Kerlero de Rosbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology and Maternal-Fetal Medicine (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,TomaLab, Institute of Nanotechnology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Autoimmune neurogenic dysphagia refers to manifestation of dysphagia due to autoimmune diseases affecting muscle, neuromuscular junction, nerves, roots, brainstem, or cortex. Dysphagia is either part of the evolving clinical symptomatology of an underlying neurological autoimmunity or occurs as a sole manifestation, acutely or insidiously. This opinion article reviews the autoimmune neurological causes of dysphagia, highlights clinical clues and laboratory testing that facilitate early diagnosis, especially when dysphagia is the presenting symptom, and outlines the most effective immunotherapeutic approaches. Dysphagia is common in inflammatory myopathies, most prominently in inclusion body myositis, and is frequent in myasthenia gravis, occurring early in bulbar-onset disease or during the course of progressive, generalized disease. Acute-onset dysphagia is often seen in Guillain–Barre syndrome variants and slowly progressive dysphagia in paraneoplastic neuropathies highlighted by the presence of specific autoantibodies. The most common causes of CNS autoimmune dysphagia are demyelinating and inflammatory lesions in the brainstem, occurring in patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Less common, but often overlooked, is dysphagia in stiff-person syndrome especially in conjunction with cerebellar ataxia and high anti-GAD autoantibodies, and in gastrointestinal dysmotility syndromes associated with autoantibodies against the ganglionic acetyl-choline receptor. In the setting of many neurological autoimmunities, acute-onset or progressive dysphagia is a potentially treatable condition, requiring increased awareness for prompt diagnosis and early immunotherapy initiation.
Collapse
|