Do We Belittle Essential Tremor by Calling It a Syndrome Rather Than a Disease? Yes

[Essential tremor: are we just splitting hairs? Non-motor symptoms and essential tremor-plus]

INTRODUCTION

The existence of non-motor symptoms in essential tremor (ET) and the appearance of a new condition, ET-plus, are two controversial issues.

AIMS

To offer a review of the current status of these two topics.

DEVELOPMENT

We performed an analysis of the studies conducted on non-motor symptoms in ET and of the articles for and against the use of the term ET-plus.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-motor symptoms have gained increased recognition as a feature accompanying ET. Several studies have documented its presence compared to matched controls. It is not clear, however, whether these non-motor symptoms would be part of the spectrum of ET symptoms (a primary phenomenon) or whether they would be symptoms that appear as a consequence of the physical or psychological disability produced by the clinical signs and symptoms of ET itself (a secondary phenomenon). For the time being, their evaluation and treatment are not included within the standard assessment of patients with ET. In view of the heterogeneous phenotype, the term ET-plus aims to improve phenotypic homogeneity for genetic or therapeutic studies. Yet, there is no pathological basis, and epidemiological, genetic and therapeutic research studies have numerous drawbacks. In the absence of clear objective biomarkers, distinguishing between ET and ET-plus by clinical distinction alone is very complex. We should be cautious about using new terms that are not yet backed by sound scientific evidence.

Essential tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic and progressive neurologic disease. Its central and defining clinical feature is a 4-12Hz kinetic tremor, that is, tremor that occurs during voluntary movements such as drinking from a cup or writing. Patients may also exhibit a range of other tremors-postural, rest, intention, additional motor features (e.g., mild gait ataxia, mild dystonia), as well as nonmotor features. The disease itself seems to be a risk factor for other degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Both genetic and toxic environmental factors have been explored as etiologic factors. In addition to a growing appreciation of the presence of clinical, etiologic, and pathologic heterogeneity, there is some support for the notion that ET itself may not be a single disease, but may be a family of diseases whose central defining feature is kinetic tremor of the arms, and which might more accurately be referred to as "the essential tremors." Recent research has increasingly placed the seat of the disease in the cerebellum and cerebellar system and identified a host of neurodegenerative changes within the cerebellum, indicating that this progressive disorder is likely degenerative.

Brain Donation Decisions as Disease Specific Behaviors: An Elucidation of the Donation Process in the Context of Essential Tremor

Brain donation is a challenging process, comprising four sequential stages: (1) the brain donation decision, (2) pre-mortem arrangements and follow up, (3) specimen collection and (4) tissue processing. It is important to understand the factors that are pertinent to each stage. Currently, there is extensive information on factors that involve donor’s personal and cultural backgrounds and how these could affect the process. However, little is known about disease-specific factors that influence the process. The Essential Tremor Centralized Brain Repository was established in 2003, and after nearly 20 years of collecting essential tremor (ET) brain tissue, we are well-positioned to discuss the brain donation process from a disease-specific standpoint. In the current manuscript, we discuss ET disease-specific factors that influence the first two stages of the brain donation process. We center our discussion around three points: (1) factors that influence the patient’s decision to donate, (2) the involvement of next of kin in the donation, and (3) the rationale for enrolling patients prospectively and evaluating them longitudinally before the anatomical gift takes place. This discussion shares our understanding of the background from which our repository operates and may be of value for other brain banks that study similar neurodegenerative diseases.

A standardized accelerometry method for characterizing tremor: Application and validation in an ageing population with postural and action tremor

Background

Ordinal scales based on qualitative observation are the mainstay in the clinical assessment of tremor, but are limited by inter-rater reliability, measurement precision, range, and ceiling effects. Quantitative tremor evaluation is well-developed in research, but clinical application has lagged, in part due to cumbersome mathematical application and lack of established standards.

Objectives

To develop a novel method for evaluating tremor that integrates a standardized clinical exam, wrist-watch accelerometers, and a software framework for data analysis that does not require advanced mathematical or computing skills. The utility of the method was tested in a sequential cohort of patients with predominant postural and action tremor presenting to a specialized surgical clinic with the presumptive diagnosis of Essential Tremor (ET).

Methods

Wristwatch accelerometry was integrated with a standardized clinical exam. A MATLAB application was developed for automated data analysis and graphical representation of tremor. Measures from the power spectrum of acceleration of tremor in different upper limb postures were derived in 25 consecutive patients. The linear results from accelerometry were correlated with the commonly used non-linear Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST).

Results

The acceleration power spectrum was reliably produced in all consecutive patients. Tremor frequency was stable in different postures and across patients. Both total and peak power of acceleration during postural conditions correlated well with the CRST. The standardized clinical examination with integrated accelerometry measures was therefore effective at characterizing tremor in a population with predominant postural and action tremor. The protocol is also illustrated on repeated measures in an ET patient who underwent Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound thalamotomy.

Conclusion

Quantitative assessment of tremor as a continuous variable using wristwatch accelerometry is readily applicable as a clinical tool when integrated with a standardized clinical exam and a user-friendly software framework for analysis. The method is validated for patients with predominant postural and action tremor, and can be adopted for characterizing tremor of different etiologies with dissemination in a wide variety of clinical and research contexts in ageing populations.

Does essential tremor increase the risk of dementia? No

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common neurological cause of tremor affecting adult humans affecting about 6% of those over age 65 years. In the United States, dementia has a prevalence of 15% in those age 68 and older. Overlap of the two conditions is therefore not surprising. Several studies report mild subclinical cognitive dysfunction in non-demented people with ET, likely related to overactivity of fronto-cerebellar circuitry involved in tremor pathophysiology. Frontal/executive dysfunction is often though not exclusively noted, and some studies have even shown areas of cognitive strengths. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is impairment which a person is aware of but does not interfere significantly with daily activities. While MCI has been considered to presage dementia this is not necessarily the case, as some persons with MCI revert to normal cognition in follow-up. Dementia is a clinical syndrome with cognitive impairment interfering with daily activities. Population-based and clinic-based studies have shown mixed results regarding rates of MCI in ET. A handful of studies have looked at development of dementia in ET with differing results. Brain pathology studies in ET and dementia or investigating Alzheimer-type pathology have thus far been unrevealing. There is evidence by some investigators supporting a greater risk of dementia for those having older onset tremor, while those having ET at a younger age faring at least as well as controls regarding risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. At present the evidence is inconclusive that ET as a group are at a greater risk of developing dementia.

Is essential tremor a family of diseases or a syndrome? A family of diseases

It is now well-established that essential tremor (ET) can manifest with different clinical presentations and progressions (i.e., upper limb tremor, head tremor, voice tremor, lower limb tremor, task- or position-specific tremor, or a combination of those). Common traits and overlaps are identifiable across these different subtypes of ET, including a slow rate of progression, a response to alcohol and a positive family history. At the same time, each of these manifestations are associated with specific demographic, clinical and treatment-response characteristics suggesting a family of diseases rather than a spectrum of a syndrome. Here we summarize the most important clinical, demographic, neuropathological and imagingfeatures of ET and of its subtypes to support ET as a family of identifiable conditions. This classification has relevance for counseling of patients with regard to disease progression and treatment response, as well as for the design of therapeutic clinical trials.

Is essential tremor a family of diseases or a syndrome? A syndrome

In a consensus statement, a task force of the "International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society" (IPMDS) has recently proposed a two axes classification for tremor: axis I (clinical manifestations) and axis II (etiology). In the axis, I, the clinical features of tremor in a given patient are specified in terms of medical history, tremor characteristics, associated signs, and laboratory tests for some tremors leading to the discovery of axis 2 etiologies. Based on axis I sign and symptoms a specific clinical syndrome is diagnosed which have been categorized as isolated tremor syndrome (a syndrome consisting only of tremor) and combined tremor syndrome (consisting of tremor and other systemic or neurological signs). The IPMDS task force defined essential tremor as an isolated tremor syndrome of bilateral upper limb action tremor of at least 3years duration with or without a tremor in other locations (e.g., head, voice or lower limbs) in absence of other neurological signs, such as dystonia, ataxia, or parkinsonism. Patients with neurological signs of uncertain significance (such as impaired tandem gait, questionable dystonic posturing, or memory impairment) are classified as essential tremor plus. In this paper, the author will make the argument that essential tremor is a syndrome with multiple causes.

Is essential tremor a disorder of GABA dysfunction? No

Although essential tremor is common, its underlying pathophysiology remains uncertain, and several hypotheses seek to explain the tremor mechanism. The GABA hypothesis states that disinhibition of deep cerebellar neurons due to reduced GABAergic input from Purkinje cells results in increased pacemaker activity, leading to rhythmic output to the thalamo-cortical circuit and resulting in tremor. However, some neuroimaging, spectroscopy, and pathology studies have not shown a clear or consistent GABA deficiency in essential tremor, and animal models have indicated that large reductions of Purkinje cell inhibition may improve tremor. Instead, tremor is increasingly attributable to dysfunction in oscillating networks, where altered (but not necessarily reduced) inhibitory signaling can result in tremor. Hypersynchrony of Purkinje cell activity may account for excessive oscillatory cerebellar output, with potential contributions along multiple sites of the olivocerebellar loop. Although older animal tremor models, such as harmaline tremor, have explored contributions from the inferior olivary body, increasing evidence has pointed to the role of aberrant climbing fiber synaptic organization in oscillatory cerebellar activity and tremor generation. New animal models such as hotfoot17j mice, which exhibit abnormal climbing fiber organization due to mutations in Grid2, have recapitulated many features of ET. Similar abnormal climbing fiber architecture and excessive cerebellar oscillations as measured by EEG have been found in humans with essential tremor. Further understanding of hypersynchrony and excessive oscillatory activity in ET phenotypes may lead to more targeted and effective treatment options.

The MDS consensus tremor classification: The best way to classify patients with tremor at present

In 2018, the new Consensus Statement on the Classification of Tremors, by the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson Movement Disorder Society, was published. So far, the article has been cited more than 400 times in peer-reviewed international journals and commonly debated in conferences and meetings due to an enthusiastic welcome from the community. Compared to the previous Consensus Statement (1998), the main novelties are: 1) the classification of tremor according to clinical manifestation (Axis 1) and etiology (Axis 2), and therefore the use of a syndromic approach; 2) the definition of essential tremor as a syndrome; 3) the recognition of the new category essential tremor plus, that derives from the uncertain significance of the soft neurological signs often associated with essential tremor. In this paper, we summarise and explain the most important aspects of the new classification of tremors, highlighting the main novelties, their relevance, and application in clinical practice. Moreover, we discuss its possible weakness and reflect on the critical comments made so far. We believe that this new tremor classification is comprehensive, rigorous, and consistent and, considering our current knowledge of tremor syndromes, it is the best we can do at present. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Essential Tremor: Five New Things

Purpose of the review:

To highlight five new things in the research and clinical aspects of essential tremor (ET).

Recent findings:

The introduction of a new definition of ET and a new category “ET plus” were the major themes of the recent consensus statement. This new change demands a change in the approach to the clinical diagnosis of ET and related diseases. From the pathogenesis standpoint, the cerebellar neurodegenerative model seems to have numerous evidence in its favor compared to the olivary model which has largely fallen out of favor. From the standpoint of therapeutics, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy has enriched the therapeutic armamentarium.

Summary:

There has been considerable progress in the field of ET. We discuss five new things in this article which include- (i) new definition (ii) ET plus (iii) approach to the diagnosis of ET, (iv) cerebellar degeneration, and (v) MRgFUS thalamotomy.

Features of "ET plus" correlate with age and tremor duration: "ET plus" may be a disease stage rather than a subtype of essential tremor

BACKGROUND

Essential tremor (ET) is characterized by considerable clinical heterogeneity. In 2018, the term "ET plus" was introduced to mark a potential stratification point for dividing ET into subtypes - ET vs ET plus (i.e., ET cases with neurological features other than action tremor). However, as ET progresses, patients often develop increasingly severe tremor, spread of tremor, tremor under different activation conditions, and other features. Given this situation, ET plus may represent a disease stage rather than a disease classification or subtype. In theory, if the defining characteristics of a disease subtype fluctuate with age or disease duration, it raises the distinct possibility the "subtype" is a disease stage.

METHODS

A cohort of 241 prospectively enrolled ET cases underwent a detailed motor and cognitive assessment in which the features of ET plus including cerebellar signs (intention tremor, tandem gait difficulty), rest tremor, dystonia, and cognitive performance were evaluated. We determined whether these features of ET plus correlated with action tremor duration and age.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that numerous ET plus features were significantly correlated with both age and action tremor duration (numerous p values < 0.05). The same relationships were observed in a series of sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

We observed that the component parts of ET plus are highly age- and stage-dependent. These features are yearly-changing features conditional on a demographic and disease stage variable. These data support the notion that ET plus may represent a disease stage rather than a distinct disease subtype or disease classification.

Tremor Syndromes: An Updated Review

Tremor is the most commonly encountered movement disorder in clinical practice. A wide range of pathologies may manifest with tremor either as a presenting or predominant symptom. Considering the marked etiological and phenomenological heterogeneity, it would be desirable to develop a classification of tremors that reflects their underlying pathophysiology. The tremor task force of the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorders Society has worked toward this goal and proposed a new classification system. This system has remained a prime topic of scientific communications on tremor in recent times. The new classification is based on two axes: 1. based on the clinical features, history, and tremor characteristics and 2. based on the etiology of tremor. In this article, we discuss the key aspects of the new classification, review various tremor syndromes, highlight some of the controversies in the field of tremor, and share the potential future perspectives.

Phenotypic Features of Isolated Essential Tremor, Essential Tremor Plus, and Essential Tremor-Parkinson's Disease in a Movement Disorders Clinic

Background:

Patients with essential tremor were initially considered to have isolated tremor, but additional motor and non-motor features have been increasingly recognized. The term “essential tremor plus” was adopted by the Task Force on Tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society to describe essential tremor patients with additional neurologic signs.

Objectives:

To characterize essential tremor patients and their phenotypes in a movement disorders clinic population in the context of the new tremor classification.

Methods:

Demographic, clinical, historical, treatment, and diagnostic data were retrospectively collected on 300 patients diagnosed by movement disorder experts with essential tremor. Patients were classified as having essential tremor, essential tremor plus, or essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease combination, and features between these groups were compared.

Results:

Of the 300 patients, 20.7% were classified as isolated essential tremor, 53.3% as essential tremor plus, and 26.0% as essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease. There was no significant difference in the duration of tremor symptoms. Essential tremor plus patients were more likely to have dystonia, tandem gait abnormalities, head tremor and greater tremor severity. Essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease patients were more likely to have RBD symptoms. There was no significant difference in cognitive impairment between essential tremor plus and essential tremor-Parkinson’s disease patients.

Conclusions:

Additional motor and non-motor features, including parkinsonism, are common in patients with essential tremor. Further studies are needed to clarify essential tremor phenotypes and to provide insights into possible subtypes.

Highlights:

300 patients with essential tremor from a movement disorders clinic were re-classified based on the Movement Disorder Society Consensus Statement on the Classification of Tremors. Additional motor and non-motor features, including parkinsonism, were common, and only 20.7% of patients remained classified as isolated essential tremor.

Essential tremor: Is the word "essential" really essential?

Essential tremor (ET) is among the common movement disorders. A surge in research in recent years has considerably improved our understanding of disease etiology and pathogenesis, and its associated clinical phenomenology and natural history. With this progress have emerged a multitude of new questions and conundrums and newly proposed terminologies. Amidst these various related discussions, it is worth revisiting the essence of the nomenclature, "essential tremor", to assess how well it continues to fit the growing understanding of this entity. Here we revisit the historical underpinnings of the nomenclature, its accuracy, pitfalls of eliminating the word, and advantages of removing the word. There are two primary historical bases for using the word "essential": (i) idiopathic or unclear etiology, (ii) a unitary (single-featured) trait perceived as a constitutional feature. Numerous studies indicate that ET is neither truly idiopathic nor is fully isolated, making the use of "essential" technically incorrect. There are pitfalls and advantages of eliminating the term "essential" and both are succinctly described in this article. Yet in the absence of any flawless alternatives at present, we conclude that it is preferable for now to persist with "essential" tremor, thereby respecting the historical continuity of this one-and-a-half-century old nomenclature.